On 24/02/10 17:31, Eric Gerlach wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote: >> >> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +0000, Toby Riddell <toby.ridd...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an >>> article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To >>> abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when >>> both verifying and fixing configuration. >> >> I'm not really surprised by this, puppet is written in Ruby (an interpreted >> language) vs CFengine which is written in C. > > Has anyone tried puppet with Ruby 1.9? It's supposed to be a lot faster than > 1.8. Haven't tested it myself, though.
It's possible to run puppet on JRuby, which I expect might behave better than ruby 1.8 (especially because of the native threading of the JVM and its superior GC). -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
