On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:37:15PM -0600, James Cammarata wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +0000, Toby Riddell <toby.ridd...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an > > article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To > > abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when > > both verifying and fixing configuration. > > I'm not really surprised by this, puppet is written in Ruby (an interpreted > language) vs CFengine which is written in C.
Has anyone tried puppet with Ruby 1.9? It's supposed to be a lot faster than 1.8. Haven't tested it myself, though. Cheers, -- Eric Gerlach, Network Administrator Federation of Students University of Waterloo p: (519) 888-4567 x36329 e: egerl...@feds.uwaterloo.ca -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
