Hey guys,
David Lutterkort wrote:
> If you have Augeas 0.4.1 on both the puppet client and master (count was
> only added in 0.4.1) this should work. Bryan, any ideas what could be
> wrong ?
Just a follow-up and warning: if you try this on an older version of
augeas (0.3.5 in my case), it tends
Luke Kanies wrote:
> Definitely a bug; can you file it with the stack trace?
>
Bug #2050.
I'm willing to work with anyone to help debug this as it has crippled my
development of a new grid that I have to roll out very soon.
Thanks.
--
Trevor Hemsley
Infrastructure Engineer
Definitely a bug; can you file it with the stack trace?
On Mar 4, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>
> More on this problem, I found the --trace option and enabled it and
> get
> this out of a puppetd run with the setup I listed earlier.
>
> [r...@myhost manifests]# puppetd --test --noo
On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> My puppet scripts have gotten complicated, and I'd like to visualize
> what's going on. I've seen
> http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#how-do-i-use-puppet-s-graphing-support
> , but I find that the
Hello!
My puppet scripts have gotten complicated, and I'd like to visualize
what's going on. I've seen
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#how-do-i-use-puppet-s-graphing-support
, but I find that the graph is pretty unwieldy, and graphviz renders
it illegibly. Has
Luke Kanies wrote:
> I have the same confusion, but the initial publication of Chef was
> made with many claims that it was just easier for them to start again
> than to try to understand Puppet's code base or to try to participate
> as developers. Of course, this is a development truism:
On Mar 4, 2009, at 5:45 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:59 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>>
>>> We're grown ups. If someone is bugging us out-of-band, we can tell
>>> them to go away, block their email, or decide to accompany them to
>>> their fabulous World of Wonder and E
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:59 -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:
> >
> > We're grown ups. If someone is bugging us out-of-band, we can tell
> > them to go away, block their email, or decide to accompany them to
> > their fabulous World of Wonder and Excitement.
>
> I expect this will be the general consens
More on this problem, I found the --trace option and enabled it and get
this out of a puppetd run with the setup I listed earlier.
[r...@myhost manifests]# puppetd --test --noop --tags users --trace
info: Loading fact drbd
info: Retrieving facts
info: Loading fact drbd
warning: Found multiple def
On Mar 4, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Ben Beuchler wrote:
>
>> What do others think? Should it be acceptable to privately contact
>> members of our community, encouraging them to leave?
>
> It may be rude, but as long as they're not being threatening or
> interfering with the communication flow, it seems
I do not think rights of free speech matter in this context. What matters is
the type of community you want to foster and develop. I think open source
communities should strive for openness and transparency. I will not use or
ever recommend SugarCRM because of the posts over the vTiger fork of mine
Sorry, I meant 0.24.8. We'll be putting it into rc1 Friday, hopefully.
On Mar 4, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Jewels wrote:
>
> Hmmm - been running 24.7 for sometime now. Still there.
>
>>
>> This should be fixed in 0.24.x; search for that string in the ticket
>> db and you'll see the ticket and its dupes
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> It may be rude, but as long as they're not being threatening or
> interfering with the communication flow, it seems it would be silly to
> ban them. To do so would seem to be saying that either:
>
> 1) the community members are too stupid to make their o
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The underlying assumption of membership in any community is that your
> participation is at worst neutral, and if possible positive.
> Communities, online or off, generally do what they can to protect
> themselves from detrimental
> What do others think? Should it be acceptable to privately contact
> members of our community, encouraging them to leave?
It may be rude, but as long as they're not being threatening or
interfering with the communication flow, it seems it would be silly to
ban them. To do so would seem to be
Hi again,
just wanted to correct something:
If I uninstall a port, the most current one is installed. But if for
instance joe-3.5 is already installed, puppet doesn't upgrade to 3.7
(which is the current at the moment).
On Mar 4, 10:44 pm, "kuh...@gmx.net" wrote:
> Hi, I'm using FreeBSD and pu
Hi, I'm using FreeBSD and puppet-0.24.7
I want to update several ports. This, for instance, works fine:
class package_joe3{
$packagelist_joe3 = ["joe-3.*"]
package{
$packagelist_joe3:
ensure => latest,
provider => ports
}
}
problem is, that we're changing to portsnap and with portsna
Hmmm - been running 24.7 for sometime now. Still there.
>
> This should be fixed in 0.24.x; search for that string in the ticket
> db and you'll see the ticket and its dupes.
>
> --
> Measure with a micrometer. Mark with chalk. Cut with an axe.
>
Hi all,
The underlying assumption of membership in any community is that your
participation is at worst neutral, and if possible positive.
Communities, online or off, generally do what they can to protect
themselves from detrimental influences, which is where policies,
politeness, modera
On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:44 AM, mattimust...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 4, 3:56 am, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>
>> Not to nit-pick, but it's more that I just couldn't write in the
>> language. I did try pretty hard, and have since successfully written
>> a bit in it (in Jython, actually), but I just
On Mar 3, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Jewels wrote:
>
> I have spent the last week researching and trying to figure out this
> problem. I know there are a lot of issues with "other end went away"
> but I can find any relation to how I am seeing it. Only coming from
> clients with HP-UX. No other system (Li
On Mar 3, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Larry Ludwig wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 3, 2009, at 12:09 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Larry Ludwig wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>>>
[puppetd]
ldapserver=ldap.myorg.company.com
ldapb
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:50 AM, engle wrote:
>
> Nigel, that did the trick. I changed my provider to appdmg and the dmg
> from Firefox installed properly.
>
> I will have to look into what we are using to build these packages. I
> am somewhat new to Mac's and the concept of packages, hence, the
>
Nigel, that did the trick. I changed my provider to appdmg and the dmg
from Firefox installed properly.
I will have to look into what we are using to build these packages. I
am somewhat new to Mac's and the concept of packages, hence, the
source of my confusion.
What is the recommended process o
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:38 +1300, AJ Christensen wrote:
> What work is involved in getting a functional Augeas resource? I'm not
> sure we want to expose the level of functionality of Augeas entirely,
> but perhaps expose it through limited resources, that is unless we can
> lock it down a
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:34 AM, engle wrote:
> It seems that I am damn close. Is it a problem with the dmg file? At
> this point, I am using the dmg file off the Firefox web site.
ahah. That's your problem.
The dmg from the Firefox site contains an app, not a pkg, so it can't
be installed...
Here is my manifest file:
class mac-firefox {
$firefox_pkg = "firefox3.0.6.dmg"
package { $firefox_pkg:
provider => pkgdmg,
source => "http://nicola6.lane.edu/packages/
$firefox_pkg",
ensure => installed,
}
}
Here is the err
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:31 AM, engle wrote:
>
> Nigel, thanks for the quick response.
>
> Avoiding the 'define':
> I am not seeing a marker file being installed in /var/db. I have tried
> to install the package with the standard package install using
> puppet... no go. I get errors regarding the
Nigel, thanks for the quick response.
Avoiding the 'define':
I am not seeing a marker file being installed in /var/db. I have tried
to install the package with the standard package install using
puppet... no go. I get errors regarding the package path: ...Execution
of '/usr/sbin/installer -pkg ht
On Mar 3, 12:11 pm, Luke Kanies wrote:
> Yes I'm amenable to it being added but it's pretty low on the priority
> list for the general community, so you get both. :)
Works for me :) Thanks for being open minded about it, and keep up
the good work.
--~--~-~--~~~
Avi Miller wrote:
>
>
> David Lutterkort wrote:
>> Ouch .. you are right. There's a bug that makes '>' mean'>=' and '>='
>> mean '>'. I'll commit a fix.
>
> Well, on the plus side, it means I'm not actually going insane. :)
>
> Quick question: I'm trying to have multiple onlyif matches using
Avi Miller wrote:
>
>
> David Lutterkort wrote:
>> Ouch .. you are right. There's a bug that makes '>' mean'>=' and '>='
>> mean '>'. I'll commit a fix.
>
> Well, on the plus side, it means I'm not actually going insane. :)
>
> Quick question: I'm trying to have multiple onlyif matches using
David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:48 +1100, Avi Miller wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> David Lutterkort wrote:
>>> You definitely should read up on path expressions[1] for that, and maybe
>>> even have a look at the test cases for them[2], since they show some
>>> more esoteric uses.
>>
Hi all
I am using puppet 0.24.7 on Centos 5.2 and am attempting to set up users
in LDAP via puppet. I am getting an error msg that says
err: Got an uncaught exception of type NoMethodError: undefined method
`join' for :absent:Symbol
on the second run of puppetd. First time through I run
puppet
On Mar 4, 11:24 pm, AJ Christensen wrote:
> To clarify; if you're upset by my behavior - this was meant to be an
> off-list reply. I apologies if I've offended anyones sensibilities.
>
> Puppet tends to gather some of the smartest minds around architecture.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi all
At AJ's reque
To clarify; if you're upset by my behavior - this was meant to be an
off-list reply. I apologies if I've offended anyones sensibilities.
Puppet tends to gather some of the smartest minds around architecture.
Regards,
AJ
On 5/03/2009, at 12:18 AM, paul matthews wrote:
> I could be out of line
No.
Regards,
AJ
On 5/03/2009, at 12:18 AM, paul matthews wrote:
> I could be out of line in saying this but rather than developing an
> alternate to Puppet, would your efforts not be better served
> producing something that is complementary. The puppet equivalent of
> http://nagiosexchange
I could be out of line in saying this but rather than developing an
alternate to Puppet, would your efforts not be better served producing
something that is complementary. The puppet equivalent of
http://nagiosexchange.org, springs to mind. As I understand it there is a
need for a repository for mo
On Mar 4, 3:56 am, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> Not to nit-pick, but it's more that I just couldn't write in the
> language. I did try pretty hard, and have since successfully written
> a bit in it (in Jython, actually), but I just could never turn my
> ideas into code in Python. And no, it w
As you've already found out, this seems to be a problems with the
client creating a TCP-connection to the server.
- Check that there are anything listing on the server on port 8140
("netstat -tpln | egrep 8140")
- Try to connect to the server from the client with telnet ("telnet
vm-devserver-18
Hi David,
Not sure if you looked at it, but I'm one of the developers of Chef;
an alternate ruby-based configuration management / systems integration
framework.
What work is involved in getting a functional Augeas resource? I'm not
sure we want to expose the level of functionality of Augea
41 matches
Mail list logo
