Hello, Mr Hammer,
yes, it is true. As far as I know, PSPP does not provide the
significance test for the full model. You have to calculate it by yourself.
Kind regards,
Am 16.08.2024 um 10:47 schrieb Andreas Hammer:
Hello,
Do I see correctly that PSPP does not output the significance of the
Hello,
Do I see correctly that PSPP does not output the significance of the
overall model?
Systeminformation
╭┬──╮
│Version │GNU pspp 2.0.1-gff8d3d │
│Hostsystem │x86_64-w64-min
familiar with regex (regular expression) to parse the output
>> file and write out the ???hits??? to a separate csv file? Sorry, I cannot
>> help with the specific regex syntax, as I am not a Unix person.
>>
>> Best,
>> Markus
>>
>> Von:
> Im Auftrag von Oren Ish-Shalom
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2021 06:12
> An: pspp-users@gnu.org
> Betreff: Output ONLY sig. level in binary logistic regression
>
>
> Hi all,
> I???m running 200,000 binary logistic regressions
> (lo
with the specific regex syntax, as I am not a Unix person.
Best,
Markus
Von: Pspp-users Im
Auftrag von Oren Ish-Shalom
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2021 06:12
An: pspp-users@gnu.org
Betreff: Output ONLY sig. level in binary logistic regression
, I cannot help with the
specific regex syntax, as I am not a Unix person.
Best,
Markus
Von: Pspp-users Im Auftrag
von Oren Ish-Shalom
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2021 06:12
An: pspp-users@gnu.org
Betreff: Output ONLY sig. level in binary logistic regression
Hi all,
I’m running 200,000
gene A64
time F8.8
survived F1.
LOGISTIC REGRESSION survived WITH time.
EXECUTE.
When I run it I get three tables but only need the significance (0.436
here):
Variables in the Equation
+---+-+++--++--+
| | B |S.E
Dear Mr Mejias,
predicted probabilities given the regressors X from logistic regression
should be the same as the observed relative frequencies given X, because
in logistic regression E(Y | X) = P(Y = 1 | X) = 1/(1+exp(-x'ß))
(response function). The maximum likelihood estimator of E(
The /SAVE subcommand for LOGISTIC REGRESSION has not yet been implemented.
J'
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:39:55PM +, Ricardo Mejias wrote:
Unlike for linear OLS regression, PSPP logistic regression does not
produce a calculated dependent variable, which I need for my project. W
Unlike for linear OLS regression, PSPP logistic regression does not produce a
calculated dependent variable, which I need for my project. When I use the
coefficients of the logistic regression to do the calculation on the same data
in this way:
COMPUTE CalcDep = 1/(1 +
EXP(-(-5.844816350213
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 06:45:59PM +, Ricardo Mejias wrote:
When running a logistic regression, I found that, under certain situations
I get NaN symbols where most of the output numbers usually appear.
The situation occurs when the independent variable Party20210112Npa
When running a logistic regression, I found that, under certain situations I
get NaN symbols where most of the output numbers usually appear.
The situation occurs when the independent variable Party20210112Npa is used
with 13 other variables.
It does not occur when used by itself or with a
i,
>
> I calculated a logistic regression based on poll data that show a
> large percentage of missing data.
>
> The initially summary shows - the missing sub-command set on default -
>
> included in the analysis8,196
> missing cases7,253
> Total15,449
>
>
Hi,
I calculated a logistic regression based on poll data that show a large
percentage of missing data.
The initially summary shows - the missing sub-command set on default -
included in the analysis8,196
missing cases7,253
Total15,449
To see whether the large part of missings
for your kind help and john for taking time to look at
this.
regards,
som
> On Saturday, 9 January 2016 4:30 PM, Werner wrote:
> > dr soumalya ray yahoo.co.in> writes:
snip-
>
> Dear Som,
>
> please try to run the analysis by using the syntax and not from
dr soumalya ray yahoo.co.in> writes:
>
> hello friends,
>
> i'd like to point out a problem present in the "logistic regression"
function of PSPP.
>
> this is a problem stopping usage of PSPP for logistic regression analysis.
>
> short description:
hello friends,
i'd like to point out a problem present in the "logistic regression" function
of PSPP.
this is a problem stopping usage of PSPP for logistic regression analysis.
short description: while doing the logistic regression, pspp completely ignores
"measure&quo
Hi Friedrich, thanks for requesting.
Would be useful if i attach the .sav file?
I just have loaded a file tab separated, and I have defined variables. When
I want to analize the file, using Logistic Regression, the program crashes.
2014-10-01 15:29 GMT-03:00 Friedrich Beckmann :
> D
Dear Gustavo,
thank you for your bug report. In order to find and fix the problem we need
to reproduce the error condition. Could you explain in more detail with which
sequence of clicks in the gui and with which data you are able to crash pspp?
For us it would be even easier if you could produc
Can you try this with version 0.8.4
If this happens there too, please raise a bug report as you would any other.
J'
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:03:58AM -0300, Gustavo Tocci wrote:
Hi!
I have downloaded and installed PSPP (psppire.exe 0.8.2-gc473f9) for Win 8
64bits and I am trying
Hi!
I have downloaded and installed PSPP (psppire.exe 0.8.2-gc473f9) for Win 8
64bits and I am trying to use Logitic Regression but I could not get it. I
am using graphical interface.
There is any trick to use that feature?
I got that window everytime:
[image: Imágenes integradas 1]
And then, t
hi,
thanks for the information.but i am a ubuntu 12.04 user. and even after
searches, i was unable to find any version for linux with logistic regression.
thanks again for the information though.
Dr Soumalya Ray
skype:som3776|twitter:@docbkp
From: Harry
The 2012-11-27 build for MSWindows already includes the latest
Logistic Regression features.
Have fun
___
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
The LOGISTIC REGRESSION command has been recently added to PSPP.
Logistic regression enables one to find the coefficients of one or more
predictor variables explaining a dichotomous dependent variable, and to
investigate the significance of such explanatory relationships. Both
continuous and
Dear Renan Levine,
this is the result of the logistic regression syntax -
.1-8: error: LOGISTIC REGRESSION: LOGISTIC REGRESSION is not yet implemented.
apparently i do not have the latest PSPP installed. so trying to find the
latest build for ubuntu 12.04. presently using PSPP (0.7.9
Hi
> 2)if yes, what is the latest version of PSPP supporting this?and where to
> find any version newer than 0.79?
regards, pasting the copy of the previous mail--
As development is continues there are more builds from the 0.7.9
version. At least for the MSWindows build there are numerous sites
Dear Dr. Ray,
Information about the logistic regression syntax can be found here, in
the PSPP manual:
http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/latest/user-manual/pspp.html#LOGISTIC-REGRESSION
<http://pspp.benpfaff.org/%7Eblp/pspp-master/latest/user-manual/pspp.html#LOGISTIC-REGRESS
hi,
i am using PSPP 0.79. i thought this was the latest version of PSPP. but in a
previous mail of this mailing list, it is mentioned that logreg is now
supported in the latest version of PSPP.
the ref manual with the PSPP(0.79) is mentioning logistic regression under the
heading of not
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:11:12AM -0300, Victoria Perez wrote:
> Hi, i need help
>
> does pspp have implemented logistic regresion?
No. It's something we want to add, though.
-Jason
>
> thanks a lot
> -
> - M. Victoria Perez - Unidad Inform?
Hi, i need help
does pspp have implemented logistic regresion?
thanks a lot
-
- M. Victoria Perez - Unidad Informática -
- Fondo Nacional de Recursos -
Tel 901 40 91 int 178
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
30 matches
Mail list logo