-DHAS_PRCE -I/usr/include/prce2
-DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/include/mysql" AUXLIBS="-lssl -lcrypto -lmysqlclient
-lz -lm -R/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -lsasl2"
For me it's not that important to have a working 3.6.4 or 3.7.2 version
of postfix
but it would be great
3.7.2 version
of postfix
but it would be great to get one of them to work properly.
Does anybody encounter similar problems (either the first one or the
second)?
Best Regards,
Martin
--
___
[born at 328 ppm atmospherical CO2]
7;s no warning
left
(and possibly there will be no problem when doing the next update :))
Best Regards, thanks for all your helpful answers,
Martin
Am 03.10.2022 14:44 schrieb Martin Hahn:
> P.S.: I went back to the snapshot before trying to install postfix
> from source, did an
&g
there has been a kind of new configuration between old postfix
version and the 3.6.4 one.
Do you have a listing of the directory /usr/libexec/postfix of a clean
install?
Am 03.10.2022 18:51 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Martin:
>
>> Hi there, I went back to the snapshot before trying to insta
Today my mail server uses MySQL as a backend to keep all users/pw's
which is fine as far as that goes.
However, has anyone tried using Windows Azure Active Directory as a
authentication backend - any hints/pointers etc to this.
Might be lacking googlefu again - if so appoligies.
/Martin S
lk to LDAP/Active Directory in the past, but never Postfix.
Will have to find documentation on the process.
Thanks,
Martin S
Any suggestion please?
On 19 Jan 2017, 09:16 +, Martin Brampton ,
wrote:
> This is somewhat related to:
>
> On 19/01/2017 08:53, Petr Bena wrote: Re: How to effectively block
> communication to all domains except whitelisted?
>
> Since the start of this year, the amount
XXX.XXX.XXX.XX...
Connected to mail.example.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.example.com ESMTP Postfix
helo martin
250 mail.example.com
mail from: mar...@example.com
250 2.1.0 Ok
rcpt to: mar...@gmail.com
554 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Access denied
quit
221 2.0.0 Bye
I&#x
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 07:54 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Martin Spinassi:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I'm trying to install a postfix with some restrictions, including a
> > sender restriction, but I'm just missing
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:10 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Spinassi
> wrote:
> > main.cf:
> >
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions=
> >check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access
> >reject
> >
>
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 14:02 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
[ snip ]
> >
> > Hey! That did the trick!
> >
> > Thanks for the help. Can you explain me why is it a problem if it si an
> > external MTA?
> >
> >
> > Martín
> >
>
> Because any sender not equal to example.com will be reject.
>
> You
Hi list!
I've been using postfix since a few weeks. I always used qmail before
for mail servers, and I'm really impressed by postfix but there is
something that I really miss...
I use to use "qmHandle -m'MAIL_ID'" to see some mails that looks strange
or not normal, but can't figure out if there i
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 15:16 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> Martin Spinassi wrote:
> > Hi list!
> >
> > I've been using postfix since a few weeks. I always used qmail before
> > for mail servers, and I'm really impressed by postfix but there is
> > something
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 09:06 -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Martin Spinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Reinaldo, I'll check korreio. I need to see if it's possible to do it
> > remotely, I don't want to install X on a product
elcome.
I hope that usage of the name "Postfix" in the project name is
acceptable. If not, please let me know and I'll be glad to come up with
something else.
Thanks for your time,
-martin
--
Martin Schmitt / Schmitt Systemberatung / www.scsy.de
--> http://www.
for clarification) would be gratefully
> accepted.
I had written my own SASL implementation several years ago. Now I am in
the process of moving to Dovecot myself. It doesn't get any simpler than
Postfix+Dovecot.
-martin
--
Martin Schmitt - Schmitt Systemberatung - http://www.scsy.de
DE
resses and to the spamtraps around the same
> time. Is there a way or, what is the correct way of delaying some addresses?
You might use greylisting and exclude your spamtrap addresses from it.
-martin
--
Martin Schmitt / Schmitt Systemberatung / www.scsy.de
--> http://www.pug.org/in
the time.
Check the value of error_notice_recipient and check your
postmas...@myorigin alias.
-martin
--
Martin Schmitt / Schmitt Systemberatung / www.scsy.de
--> http://www.pug.org/index.php/Benutzer:Martin <--
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
This software insists on including a "Sender" header that I wish to filter out
with Postfix, but only for this certain client (or the envelope s
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:28:03 +0100, Terry Carmen wrote:
> Martin Strand wrote:
>> Is it possible to make a header_checks rule apply only to a certain client?
>>
>> I've got an annoying piece of software which sends messages through Postfix.
>> This software insist
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:22:42 +0100, Noel Jones wrote:
>> No, it's only the "Sender" *header* that's causing problems, not the actual
>> envelope sender.
>> I added an IGNORE line to filter out all Sender headers, but I would prefer
>> to only apply that filter to this specific client.
>> After r
We have an embedded device which is speaking malformed SMTP. We have filed a
bug with the vendor but we would like to see if we can work around it in the
meantime. Is there a way to ignore this or change it to a warning rather
than a failure?
220 smtp.example.com ESMTP Postfix...
HELO embedded.exa
they are supposed to with:
554 554 5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected:
Access denied (state 14).
My question is - Can I also send a reason about why the email was
rejected. Something like 'User does not exist'?
--
Best regards
Martin Schiøtz
Perfect - now postfix rejects with this reason:
550 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
User unknown in relay recipient table (state 14).
Thanks :-)
Martin
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Martin Schiøtz :
>> Hi
>>
>> I have made a spamf
I found the script here:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~malth/gaptuning/postfix/getadsmtp.pl
and it works perfectly.
- Martin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Benedict White
wrote:
>
>
>
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owne
your server forwards this message to yourcusto...@hotmail.com
3. hotmail rejects the message because your server is not allowed send messages
from someu...@hotmail.com
I believe the solution to this would be SRS, but haven't found any such
solution for Postfix yet :(
http://www.openspf.org/S
On Mon, 18 May 2009 03:48:54 +0200, Carlos Williams
wrote:
> I find it confusing to know / understand what
> configurations Postfix auto assumes and what is required to be
> specified in my main.cf.
>
> Can someone please shed some light on this for me?
Use postconf -d to see the default value:
rewrite the envelope sender such that it appears to
come from the left hand side of the alias map file, so a mail from
b...@gmail.com to f...@example.com would turn into a mail from
f...@example.com to foo...@gmail.com. Is there a way of doing this in
Postfix?
--
Hector Martin (hec
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote:
> Perhaps with an SRS milter, or similar content filter, assuming these
> take extreme caution to avoid loops (never rewrite "<>" to a non empty
> return path) and provide appropria
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:00:21 +0100, J.D. Bronson
wrote:
I have noticed (at times) that sometimes email gets greylisted
when the user doesn't exist in my system. The mail ultimately get's
rejected, but I cant figure out why it's greylisting when it's invalid
to begin with? Greylisting, to me..s
$quoted_author = "Stan Hoeppner" ;
>
> >> DJ Lucas put forth on 2/15/2010 1:22 AM:
> >>
> >>> http://www.experts-exchange.com/Security/Software_Firewalls/Enterprise_Firewalls/Cisco_PIX_Firewall/Q_24438893.html
>
> I can't get to it without entering a CC and starting a 30 day trial. The
> "bot
Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> Does anyone can recommend any good alternative to Mailman as a Mailing
> Lists Manager that plugs well with Postfix?
I heard some praise for http://www.sympa.org/
But I never used it myself.
--
Martin
Hi
I noted that postfix is writing headers with "unknown" instead of the IPv6
reverse DNS that I know exists.
e.g.
Received: from merboo.mamista.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1055::1])
by tigger.mamista.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581F21100B4
for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:18:00 +1
$quoted_author = "Bernhard Schmidt" ;
> >
> > $ dig -x 2001:470:1f0b:1055::1 +short
> > merboo.mamista.net.
>
> $ dig -t merboo.mamista.net +short
> 2001:470:1f0a:1055::2
>
> 1f0a != 1f0b
[facepalms]
thanks!
Marty
; in
main.cf.
Regards,
Martin Adolfsson
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:20:56 +0200, Wietse Venema
wrote:
Eduardo Júnior:
But my box Postfix provides mail services to many domains and I created
a only SSL certificate with the name server as Common Name.
And I get many warnings because the Common Name in the certificate
doesn't match
Hi,
is there a possibiliy to reject bounced emails from other smtp servers
and forwared to a postfix server.
I have control of Bserver and the following use case:
1. A sends an email from Aserver to B on Bserver.
2. B is an alias on Bserver, so the email is forwarded to Cserver.
3. Cserver do
also checks whether the client is an MX for
its domain or in the same /24 subnet as the MX.
I also use it to include DNSBLs; because it uses a scoring system and a
single false positive attribute or BL listing will not cause a reject.
--
Martin
. The header will not be rewritten as wanted.
Any hints?
Thanks,
Martin
:40:14 hermes postfix/master[14705]: warning:
/usr/lib/postfix/cleanup: bad command startup -- throttling
How do I set an empty value for undisclosed_recipients_header ?
I did it by specifying
undisclosed_recipients_header =
in main.cf.
Thanks,
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
hi,
we need to set up postfix as an incoming relay which forwards
messages via transport to a protected exchange 2007 server.
to do this without getting backscatter, we need to check the
recipients for validity on exchange server side in AD/LDAP.
this howto from 2003 describes pretty well, what
On 02/12/2010, at 06:25, DTNX/NGMX Postmaster wrote:
On 01/12/2010, at 23:18, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Martin Kellermann put forth on 12/1/2010 9:19 AM:
so, is it still (seven years later) "The right thing™ to do" ?
will it work proper with exchange 2007/2010 ?
since the usage
Am 02.12.2010 13:11, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
but i see a strange "double-bounce" in mail.log which i don't understand:
double-bounce is account used for validation of user account.
thank you for explaining this... so everything seems to be fine so far...
is this user name configurable?
Hi good people
It's a special case I know but I would like in postfix to restrict
incoming emails from outside world by the senders from domain?
(not by senders mailserver ip - we already do spf to insure that)
Cheers Martin
Hi Ralf
Thank you - I will take a look at that:-)
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Martin Schiøtz :
>> Hi good people
>>
>> It's a special case I know but I would like in postfix to restrict
>> incoming emails from outside world by t
Am 02.12.2010 23:08, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Martin Kellermann put forth on 12/2/2010 6:08 AM:
and there's a 5 sec. delay ... seems way too long to me for just
checking the recipient...!?
That delay should be no longer than what a typical delivery to the
Exchange server would be. Sin
Am 05.12.2010 20:40, schrieb DTNX/NGMX Postmaster:
On 02/12/2010, at 23:08, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Martin Kellermann put forth on 12/2/2010 6:08 AM:
and there's a 5 sec. delay ... seems way too long to me for just
checking the recipient...!?
That delay should be no longer than what a ty
t when it hits the email
server, or before sending the email. That would be awesome!
Do you have any links or tips? Don0t have a clue how to do this.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Martin
Am 25.12.2010 19:55, schrieb ASAI:
Greetings,
In the logs I have been seeing many attempts made to send messages to
gmail which seem like there's spam being sent from my server. In the
logs I see this:
Dec 24 00:05:11 triata amavis[29729]: (29729-06) Passed CLEAN,
->
, Message-ID:
<2010
ems should you ever want to add a second server,
a central log host, or any log analysis tool.
--
Martin
I'm hoping someone knows the key to this.
I use a backup MX service to accompany my Postfix mail server. Right now
the Backup MX service has more than 1,200 messages waiting to be
delivered. As near as I can tell (from the Postfix logs) all of them are
addressed to addresses that either never
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:23:29 +0200, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
wrote:
> But I wonder if any of you knows about a beggning manual for dummy sysadmins
> to let them to work with already postfix installation.
I think the architecture overview gives a pretty good idea of how it all works:
http://www.
x27;any-other-local-part')
and domain = '%d'
Martin
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:37:53 +0200, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, we have postfix+mysql with virtual domains. Until now for each
> virtual domain we have c
ted actually experimenting yet, so I
don't know if this is a silly idea, or what. (Hence the email to this
list.)
So, any advice would be wonderful. Pointers to useful docs would be
superb. If there are any good search terms I might use while googling
for this kind of thing, that would als
and send
messages to its stdin; e.g. "mail.* |/usr/local/bin/mailmonitor"
If your installed syslogd does not support one of these options then you
might consider to replace it with rsyslog or syslog-ng.
--
Martin
, I'd really appreciate any clues as to whether:
1) this is likely to be because I have mis-configured the milter interface
on the Postfix side (I hasten to admit I haven't yet explored any of the
params beyond smtpd_milters);
OR
2) this is more likely to be a problem w
smtpd, in order to clarify this; and
also take look at the source for smtp-vilter.
--
Mail submitted with /usr/sbin/sendmail gets a Received: header
that looks like:
Received: by servername (Postfix, from userid number)
id queueid; date
which also does not match your quote.
Yes that's correct, I'm submitting the mail into smtpd over the network.
Many kind regards
MARTIN
==
So that's where I need to focus.
Many thanks for your earlier help.
MARTIN
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Crossley"
To: "Wietse Venema"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: milter (smtp-vilter) not seeing &
dom_source = dev:/dev/urandom
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
-
Best regards,
Martin
Can I do any outgoing spam checks with postfix or I'm forced to
install lots of Amavis, spamassassin, etc. software to do that job.
- Martin
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:50 +0200, Martin Schiøtz wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
the "internal" machines and so he's concerned about malware/botnets
> perhaps.
>
That is correct!
So far I restrict relay to only 'mynetworks' (IP-adresses own by us)
and authenticated users (TLS and ssl).
But I would like to do further spam filter restrictions for the
reasons Mark is pointing out?
- Martin
ems, you want rate
> limiting.
I just want to do some simple checks and rate limit seems like a good
idea and it can be performed by postfix.
- Martin
Yes, you can use certificate authentication instead of a password.
However, this has absolutely nothing to do with Postfix.
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:03:02 +0100, Alejandro Esteban Galvez
wrote:
Hi! I want known if exist any command of direct ssh connection. The means of
this, is a command wher
use
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_sasl_password_maps
--
Martin
I'd like to keep statistics on the number and total size of messages
received for each virtual domain each day. Similar idea to quotas,
except I want to keep the stats even for virtual aliases (forwarded to
external addresses), not just mailboxes. Ideally I'd like to insert a
record for each me
member any jails related problem.)
--
Martin
,
Martin
--
Martin Bley
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> yahoo,hotmail,gmx etc. With this you should try to get on their
>
> whitelists.
Hi Bastian,
* Bastian Blank am 28.07.11,
17:13:
> Please provide more information what you want to do.
sorry, please see my reply <20110729061552.GA3407@bvl-bsn004>
Thanks,
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:30:47 +0100, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre
wrote:
You could too take a look to Postfix Quota Reject.
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net. It's a postfix policy daemon
which allow mail to be rejected at smtp dialogue when mailbox are
overquota... can work from the own mai
On 11/16/11 18:17, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
> I was wondering what data backup systems people use?
I found that filesystem snapshots are the easiest solution.
Depending on disk space I keep several snapshots around and at night one
is used for an incremental backup with dump(8).
--
Martin
= smtpd
--
Am I overseeing the obvious? :-/ Please let me know if you need further infos
on this.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Martin
On 05/22/12 12:15, Barbara M. wrote:
> Any trick/config/workaround to force Postfix to consider /etc/hosts?
To use other data sources than DNS you need the smtp_host_lookup option
(http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_host_lookup).
--
Martin
On 05/07/2013 04:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> exactly the format like below from /var/log/maillog and yesterday?
With GNU date:
fgrep -e "`date -d yesterday +'%b %e'`" /var/log/mail.log | fgrep NOQUEUE
--
Martin
> What does "conn_use", "delays=a/b/c/d" and "dsn"means
http://www.postfix.org/CONNECTION_CACHE_README.html#safety
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_logging_resolution_limit
http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html
--
Martin
recommend best approach.
thanks,
Martin
set:
smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt
I expected that 99% of all servers supports TLS anyway (and I was
willing to risk the 1%). How surprised was I when my server refused
emails from Paypal, because Paypal does not (want to?) use TLS. I had to
revert back to "may".
Martin
smtpd_soft_error_limit=1
smtpd_hard_error_limit=3
Would that have unintended consequences?
And speaking of "relay access denied", what is the recommended way to
fight "relay access denied" attacks?
I would be happy if other people could share their experience
Thanks,
Martin
stfix would keep it until it can deliver it
to users mailbox, but instead it simply vanished.
Is this expected behavior?
Is there any way to solve this problem?
Can Postfix keep the message and deliver it once users home is mounted
again?
thanks,
Martin
> On 07/25/2014 01:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Martin Vegter:
>>
>> It happened to me that NFS was down (or simply unmounted),
>> $HOME/mail/Inbox did not exist, and new mail could not be delivered. I
>> would have expected that Postfix would keep it until it can
misconfiguration on my server is ruled out.
Do I ned to change any settings in postfix, so that client IPs are
resolved into hostnames?
thanks,
Martin
> On 08/25/2014 11:28 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Do I ned to change any settings in postfix, so that client IPs are
>> resolved into hostnames?
>
> You need the correct DNS server in /etc/resolv.conf.
>
> You must not have "disable_dns_lookups=yes" in main.cf or master.cf.
>
> You must not have
> On 08/26/2014 12:11 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 26.08.2014 um 00:04 schrieb Martin Vegter:
>> I have turned off chroot for smtp and now it works.
>> But that is not an optimal solution. I would like to keep chrooted smtp.
>
> why?
>
> you need to have a good
it
with nosuid,dev,exec then the hostname resolving works (even when chrooted)
May I ask list members an opinion?
Now when chroot works, is it recommended to use it? Does it provide an
extra layer of security?
thanks,
Martin
> On 08/26/2014 03:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Martin Vegter:
>>> On 08/26/2014 12:56 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>>> Are there any reasons against using chrooted smtp ?
>>>
>>> Chroot jails require an expert administrator, able to trouble-shoot
>&
Hi all
We run Postfix on most servers and would like to have accurate monitoring of
the various processes that are running.
The monitoring has configuration for processes that "must" be running (and
will alert if they are not) and those "allowed" to be running (and will
alert if anything not pres
Hi all.
I'm looking to implement an auto-response mechanism which:
- only sends responses to senders who pass SPF checks
- responds from certain virtual aliases as well as certain virtual users
- doesn't respond to mailing lists
- finds the response message/subject through mysql
- supports per-rec
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:24:33 +0100, Robert Schetterer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Strand schrieb:
Hi all.
I'm looking to implement an auto-response mechanism which:
- only sends responses to senders who pass SPF checks
- responds from certain virtual aliases as well as cert
drop that
restriction and leave their domains alone?
Thanks,
Martin
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:58:25 +0100, Gerald V. Livingston II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Martin Strand wrote:
>> We're an email service provider hosting ~3000 domains. Customers can
>> delegate their domains to our nameservers and administer email
>> accoun
er/forms_index.html
Of course, they expect you to setup your servers properly with SPF/DKIM/etc but
you probably already know about that.
Martin
Hello guys,I've been strugling with this for more than a week now. The server
has 3 postfix instances. 1 for receiving everything (eth0:1), and the other 2
for outgoing emails from 2 different companies (eth0, eth0:2).# cat
/var/log/maillog | grep -i "timeout after "[ ... snip ...]Nov 20 14:
v 20 20:30:02 smtprelay
postfix/master[3355]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup
-- throttlingNov 20 20:30:10 smtprelay
postfix/smtpd[23964]: connect from unknown[10.13.0.9]
what else can I try?
Martin
_
D
certain domains
on incoming email. The "." hang remembers me the old pix bug.
Thanks for all the pointers. I'm open to any advice, I've tried everything I've
found so far.
Martin
What I meant Martin was that there was a space in
the "destination"
f the certificate printed in the logs. I'm
also not able to query the certificate from these servers using `openssl
s_client`.
Thanks,
mh
--
Martin Hicks P.Eng.| m...@bork.org
Bork Consulting Inc. | +1 (613) 266-2296
m ca-certificates.
The only configuration change I made in response to this discussion was
to disable smtpd_tls_ask_ccert - I'm not sure why this was ever enabled.
I'll update in a week or two when I see another e-mail from aircanada.
Thanks,
mh
--
Martin Hicks P.Eng.| m...@bork.org
Bork Consulting Inc. | +1 (613) 266-2296
Hi Viktor,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 14:07, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:39:44PM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> > The only configuration change I made in response to this discussion was
> > to disable smtpd_tls_ask_ccert - I'm not sure why this was eve
Hello,
I have many logs postfix/lmtp "deferred" like:
Jun 2 11:38:21 mail331 postfix/lmtp[17386]: A2E3212C86D:
to=, relay=none, delay=5930,
delays=2879/2862/189/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24: Connection timed out)
do you have a solution ?
Regards,
Paul
ps forward, I'll delete the account sometime in August.
Kind regards,
-martin
Am 19.07.2020 um 12:45 schrieb Martin Schmitt:
> Let me just say I'd like to give up ownership of twitter.com/postfix and
> pass it on into loving hands.
Hey all,
the credentials have been passed to Ralf Hildebrandt. Thanks Ralf! :-)
-martin
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
