Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:17AM +0100, Hector Martin wrote: > Perhaps with an SRS milter, or similar content filter, assuming these > take extreme caution to avoid loops (never rewrite "<>" to a non empty > return path) and provide appropriate means for bounces to come back to > the original sender in most cases. > > Nothing built-in, because supporting the return path requires non-trivial > state. > [...
Well, I clearly underestimated the effort required to make this work sanely. How about something simpler, like just rewriting the envelope sender to postmaster (i.e. me)? This is a small system, and bounces from the final destination servers should be rare. This way I'd get any such bounces and would be able to (manually) deal with them appropriately. -- Hector Martin (hec...@marcansoft.com) Public Key: http://www.marcansoft.com/marcan.asc
