Zitat von Stan Hoeppner :
Noel Jones put forth on 12/6/2010 11:10 AM:
If you decide that greylisting is right for you, postgrey is a popular
choice -- it's flexible and reliable.
...
See google for benefits and risks of using greylisting if you're not
familiar with it.
Interestingly, just
Zitat von Stan Hoeppner :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de put forth on 12/7/2010 2:18 AM:
Zitat von Stan Hoeppner :
Noel Jones put forth on 12/6/2010 11:10 AM:
If you decide that greylisting is right for you, postgrey is a popular
choice -- it's flexible and reliable.
...
See google for benefits and
Zitat von Wolfgang Zeikat :
Hi,
apparently, aol.com is currently not resolved via DNS (at least in Germany).
How can I have postfix queue mails to AOL and retry delivery in that
case instead of bouncing the mails?
As band-aid:
soft_bounce=yes
Regards
Andreas
smime.p7s
Description: S/
Zitat von ev...@meulie.net:
Hi all,
Since yesterday I am suddenly seeing quite a few lines like:
Dec 21 10:32:24 yips postfix/sendmail[3086]: fatal: www-data(33): No
recipient addresses found in message header
in my log. Is there any way I can determine which page/cron/something is
causing th
Zitat von ev...@meulie.net:
Zitat von ev...@meulie.net:
Hi all,
Since yesterday I am suddenly seeing quite a few lines like:
Dec 21 10:32:24 yips postfix/sendmail[3086]: fatal: www-data(33): No
recipient addresses found in message header
in my log. Is there any way I can determine which pag
Zitat von David Brophy :
Hi,
I'd like to set Postfix up as a high performance MTA for sending high
volumes of mail.
Our website (dontstayin.com) sends about 100,000 mails per day (message
notifications etc.)
We also send about 1-2 million bulk mails per day, in the form of
newsletters and e-f
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Robert Schetterer :
>> [snip]
yes it changed again, so there should be no problem anymore
Frankly I didn't see a problem before. Less idiots on the internet,
where's the problem?
Na,na...
Sowas kurz vor Weihnachten
Gruß & fröhliches Fest
Andreas
smime
Hello
we are trying to improve the DSN support of our environment and have
set "lmtp_assume_final=yes" at our final mailstore using Cyrus and
LMTP over socket.
The resulting DSN still set
Final-Recipient: rfc822; x...@kwsoft.de
Original-Recipient: rfc822;x...@kwsoft.de
Action: expanded
Stat
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Hello
we are trying to improve the DSN support of our environment and have
set "lmtp_assume_final=yes" at our final mailstore using Cyrus and
LMTP over socket.
The resulting DSN still set
Final-Recipient: rfc822; x...@kwsoft.de
Original-Recipient
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 09:35:59AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
3 - Propagate ENVID, NOTIFY, RET, and ORCPT to one result from
alias expansion only, and send no DSN. Postfix does this with
one-to-one virtual aliases that translate one address into
itself.
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Victor Duchovni :
I am curious why the OP is eager to so faithfully support DSN. In my
case I explicitly disable "DSN" in the ESMTP response at the incoming
perimeter gateway.
Yes, it causes nothing but grief.
We had some sender who would ask for DSN, but then
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
we are trying to improve the DSN support of our environment and have
set "lmtp_assume_final=yes" at our final mailstore using Cyrus and
LMTP over socket.
The resulting DSN still set
Final-Recipient: rfc822; x...@kwsoft.de
Original-Recipient: rfc82
To summarize:
DSN as of RFC 3461 is only recommended as internal status indicator
for message relayed out of the own scope. End-to-end status is neither
supported nor technical possible at the moment.
So with this DSN is useless for us, as we don't have a complex or
unreliable internal n
Zitat von jason hirsh :
OK Everyone was such a help that I am back.. I got a new server and
thought things were going great
The issue is Postgrey keeps bouncingh the same message i have tried
to debug using my mac.com, comcast.net hotmail.com
in all instances it kept boucing the mail until
Zitat von IT geek 31 :
On 6 January 2011 19:49, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 19:21:56 +
IT geek 31 articulated:
I think you've nailed it there Tom - I'm trying to teach better
etiquette. Ideally I'd like a plugin for his mail client (Outlook)
that automatically detects the recipient
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:39:23PM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
To summarize:
DSN as of RFC 3461 is only recommended as internal status indicator for
message relayed out of the own scope. End-to-end status is neither
supported nor technically possible at the
Zitat von Eero Volotinen :
Does this still works for windows 2008 ad? :
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/mailrelay/#d0e149
or is there better way to do it?
In most cases it would be best to query Windows AD by LDAP without the
need for script magic and without syncronisation
Zitat von "Mike A. Leonetti" :
I set up postfix with:
smtp_tls_policy_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/tls_policy
And a list of domains with "may" as the policy for each of them. The
problem is postfix hates the certificate (because I don't have it listed
as a trusted issuer anywhere).
So I get this
Zitat von K bharathan :
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jan Johansson wrote:
>hi all
>is there any way to postfix could query the mail users directly from
Active Directory?
>what is required for this
>Thanks
Sure, plenty of ways, but do you _*really*_ want this?
The reason I mysel
Zitat von Dudi Goldenberg :
is there any way to postfix could query the mail users directly
from Active Directory?
Another reason not to use direct queries is that is for some reason
the AD is down, postfix will reject emails destined to it.
If use query the AD say once an hour into a ha
Zitat von Ansgar Wiechers :
On 2011-01-09 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Eero Volotinen :
Does this still works for windows 2008 ad? :
http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/mailrelay/#d0e149
or is there better way to do it?
In most cases it would be best to query Windows AD
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
smtpd_reject_footer = Contact postmaster at charite.de for assistance
caused a SIGNIFICANT increase in postmaster tickets :|
Uh, what *kind* of tickets???
So users do read.
Most of the times, but its really hard to follow their wooly thoughts...
Regards
Andre
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 1/13/2011 9:00 AM:
> postscreen should be ready for prime time on *BSD, Linux and Solaris
> systems (Solaris support was completed last week).
AIX?
AIX and HP-UX are not tested. Both use a BSD-derived TCP/UP stack,
and will
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 1/13/2011 9:00 AM:
>>
>> > postscreen should be ready for prime time on *BSD, Linux and Solaris
>> > systems (Solaris support was completed last week).
>>
>> AIX?
>
> AIX and
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
fslnx.hq.kwsoft.de[10.1.70.1]
Jan 17 12:05:44 hpux2 postfix/postscreen[16003]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Jan 17 12:05:45 hpux2 postfix/master[15998]: warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/postscreen pid 16003 exit status 1
Looks like the same probl
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> fslnx.hq.kwsoft.de[10.1.70.1]
>> Jan 17 12:05:44 hpux2 postfix/postscreen[16003]: fatal: watchdog timeout
>> Jan 17 12:05:45 hpux2 postfix/master[15998]: warning: process
>> /usr/libexec/postfix/
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
With both changes it looks ok now (first blacklisted, second whitelisted):
Jan 17 16:28:23 hpux2 postfix/master[28899]: daemon started -- version
2.8.0-RC1, configuration /etc/postfix
Jan 17 16:28:33 hpux2 postfix/postscreen[28903]: CONNECT from
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> With both changes it looks ok now (first blacklisted, second
whitelisted):
>>
>>
>> Jan 17 16:28:23 hpux2 postfix/master[28899]: daemon starte
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Wietse Venema:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>
> > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> >> With both changes it looks ok now (first blacklisted, second
whitelisted):
> >>
> >>
> >> Jan 17 16:28:23 hpux2 postfix/master[28899]: daemon started -- version
> >> 2.8.
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> This is what I expect to see (default_process_limit = 100):
>
> Jan 17 11:32:56 tail postfix/postscreen[17566]:
> postscreen_command_time_limit: stress=10 normal=300 lowat=70 hiwat=90
>
> hiwat=90 means enter stress mode with 90 or more connectio
Zitat von Buzai Andras :
Actually he is right.
"www" is just a sub-domain.
The common practice (although it is not mandatory) is to have "www"
setup as a CNAME for "domain.tld".
Personally I think it would be nice to have "postfix.org" and
"www.postfix.org" point to the same location.
Actually
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> > This is what I expect to see (default_process_limit = 100):
>> >
>> > Jan 17 11:32:56 tail postfix/postscreen[17566]:
>> > postscreen_command_time_limit: stress=10 normal=300 lowat=70 hiwat=90
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:56:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Well this is the code:
>
> psc_lowat_check_queue_length = .7 * var_psc_pre_queue_limit;
> psc_hiwat_check_queue_length = .9 * var_psc_pre_queue_limit;
Is the compiler first conv
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Wietse Venema:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>
> > Victor Duchovni:
> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:56:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >> > Well this is the code:
> >> >
> >> > psc_lowat_check_queue_length = .7 * var_psc_pre_queue_limit;
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> If you have time, can you try:
>>
>> stuff = 0.7 * ((double) var_psc_pre_queue_limit);
>> stuff = 0.9 * ((double) var_psc_pre_queue_limit);
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> In case that does not help, declaring the hiwat and lowat variables
> as double
Zitat von lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
If you have time, can you try:
stuff = 0.7 * ((double) var_psc_pre_queue_limit);
stuff = 0.9 * ((double) var_psc_pre_queue_limit);
Thanks,
In case that does not help, declaring the hiwat and lowat variab
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
The Postfix 2.8 SMTP server will not be alone in enabling server-side
Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman key-agreement.
Hosted domains served by smtproutes.com (e.g. saybrook.edu)
have ECDHE ciphers enabled:
Trusted TLS connection established to
saybrook.edu.pri
Zitat von Bissio2000 :
Hi all,
we have some problem with our ip reputation on other provider. We are using
our postfix server as delivery server for some mailing lists (about
5000/8000 users); after a few days the destination providers (as hotmail, or
yahoo) block any message coming from our m
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Hello
we are on the way to IPv6 and some question arise about Postfix IPv6
behaviour in dual stack setup.
You mean dual-protocol. Unlike some versions of Linux, there exist
systems that have a single unified TCP/IP stack implementation (the
prot
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Wietse Venema:
> >> 2.) Do /ip6.arpa lookup occur on client connects from IPv4
> >> addresses or only when a client connects by IPv6 (name/reverse
lookups)?
> >
> > The Postfix SMTP server's FCRDNS lookups use the getnameinfo() and
> > getaddrinfo() system libra
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:51:36AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
That will create a separate queue from the outgoing mail which is using
the "smtp" transport,
There is one queue.
Physically, yes. Logically, and this is what matters more: no. Each
transport has a
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
Am 04.02.2011 11:20, schrieb J4K:
I agree. I have plenty of colleagues who run their own mail servers from
residential connections and they know how to set-up their machines.
Maybe, but if they are running a mailserver form dial-up ranges
mail seems not to be impor
Zitat von Matteo Cazzador :
Than'k a lot and excuse me if i'm not so clear:
my local dns server , that is postfix server to, is used to filter
navigation of client (by domain black list)
so my local dns is under pressure and often mail give me error
resolving dns while sending mail to exter
Zitat von "Ralf W." :
Hello all, Can somebody give me some feed back on putting a postfix
mail cluster
behind one off these new Fortimail appliances? We are getting
75 emails a
day and are currently using Cisco ironport devices. The biggest problem is
spam.
Postfix properly configure
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
hi
i have a little problem implementing alias-domains
the backend is dbmail with some additional tables and a inhouse
developed webui for dbmail/postfix/dovecot-proxy
i'm using "recipient_canonical_maps" as follows what works but
RCPT-Verify for "inva...@aliasdomain.t
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
Am 07.02.2011 11:51, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
hi
i have a little problem implementing alias-domains
the backend is dbmail with some additional tables and a inhouse
developed webui for dbmail/postfix/dovecot-proxy
i'm using "recipient
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
Am 07.02.2011 22:56, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
This is your source of recipient checking...
So it matters what you get from this by querying with "postmap -q
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-recipients.cf
exactly this is the reason why i need a working domain-alias
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
Hm, OK, i will start my IDE and develop something nice
local_recipient_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-recipients.cf
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_alias.cf
Can i use both as above because "mysql-recipients.cf" are from
the dbmail-alias-table an
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de :
virtual_alias_maps is used for domains listed in
virtual_alias_domains (= virtual alias domain class)
No, it's always applied!
Upps, yes. This has confused me some time ago already...
Regards
Andreas
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME C
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:25:06AM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
local_recipient_maps is used for recipients with domain part listed in
mydestination (= local domain class)
virtual_alias_maps is used for domains listed in virtual_alias_domains (=
virtual alias d
Zitat von Matteo Cazzador :
Hello i've read something about grey list and i've a question about it:
Is it better to use postgrey or i can use directly postfix greylist
mechanism (http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist)
to realize greylist system? what the difference ?
As
Zitat von Erwan Loaëc :
Hello,
We have a postfix system which handle many alias and users with
virtual transport. The backend used is LDAP.
Now, I have to use mysql backend for some other specific domains.
How can I set this to make postfix looking to ldap for a "list of
domain" and look
Zitat von D G Teed :
I suspect there is a simple explanation to this I've overlooked.
We have a problem delivering to one address @eastlink.ca
The odd thing is that the bounce is from google mail, and this Canadian ISP
does not use google mail services.
I've tested that 'host -t mx eastlnk.ca
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Richard Smits :
Hello,
We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external
mailservers. I will explain.
If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
message, it just waits. I suppose this is some greeting delay for
anti spam.
It come
Zitat von Richard Smits :
On 02/23/2011 11:56 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Richard Smits :
Hello,
We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external
mailservers. I will explain.
If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
messag
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:58:22AM +0100, Christian Roessner wrote:
I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several
ways do use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So
I looked at the postfix.c code.
There is a no single
Zitat von Bernhard Rohrer :
This gave me an idea:
what do people think about an ESMTP extension that enforces TLS?
MTA1 --> MTA2 -> MTA3
TLS TLS
with the idea of having an X-header that basically says "do not
forward if no TLS available"
so MTA1 sends to MTA2 encrypted.
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
difference for the started services is that upstart need the program
to *not* daemonize or terminate itself b
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Wietse Venema:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>
> > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> >> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
> >> moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
> >> difference for the start
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> Wietse Venema:
>> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> > Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>> >
>> > > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> > >> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and
Redhat are
>> > >> moving to "upstart" for boo
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Christian Roessner:
This is, what I learned. So now my question: what do you have in mind
Wietse, if you say, you may provide something? Do not get me wrong
I have written a "postfix upstart" command as described below.
This can automatically respawn Postfix in sing
Zitat von kapetr :
So you mean, that this is not problem of bad postfix config ?
So I can nothing do to get it working ?
Maybe must every, who wants to send mails to Google, have contract
with Google ?
It seems to be too improbable to be possible.
Is this sure or is there another possibility ?
Zitat von Matthias Andree :
Am 28.02.2011 23:57, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
The main issue I see at the moment really is the inability to legally
link Postfix to MySQL, removing a valuable piece of Postfix functionality.
Not a loss. If MySQL and Postfix turn out to be incompatible
license
Zitat von kapetr :
Thanks all for replays.
Just few remarks:
1. RDNS - e.g. for den...@bestcheer.com, li...@dguhl.org, ...
that's what I had try to correct with
myhostname = 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz
yes - it is what I get with dig -x , so then
dig 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz == this address
Zitat von kapetr :
And the:
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=85.71.234.108+&.submit=Lookup
says -as you wrote:
IP Address 85.71.234.108 is listed in the CBL. It appears to be
infected with a spam sending trojan or proxy.
It was last detected at 2011-03-01 07:00 GMT (+/- 30 minutes),
approxi
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Steve Jenkins:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Denis Shulyaka wrote:
> Thanks! I will try to do this and will update you with the result.
When I read Denis' first post I thought "WHAT? Postfix on a WRT54G?
He's crazy!"
But now I'm rooting for you, Denis! I hope y
Zitat von R Johnson :
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 10:23 +0100, kj wrote:
--kj
What I suggest you do is set up some kind of forwarding for Postscatter
so it is sent to: wie...@porcupine.org. I wish everyone who suffers
Postscatter would do it. Then perhaps the ignorant retarded f&ckwit may
get the fh
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 05:21:13PM -0400, Rob Foehl wrote:
Possible substitutes include concierge or valet, or perhaps any of the less
specific guard, sentry, sentinel, ...
I think "sentry" is short, and simple, and can even be thought of as a
contraction of "smtp
Zitat von 承磊 :
Hi list
I have been using postfix since a few weeks. The setup is currently: Redhat
As4.4 (Linux 2.6.9-42 SMP), Postfix 2.3.39, openldap-2.3.39, BerkeleyDB 4.5.
20 , courier-authlib-0.56.
Now, the ldap service crashes frequently once the ldap connection raises
about 300(the datab
Zitat von Richard Wurman :
I support a couple postfix servers that do a high volume of sending
mail (not "direct marketing" :) for billing, invoicing and account
update confirmations). On one machine, when the mailq is over 5000,
things seem to get "stuck" where I need to restart postfix. If I
d
Zitat von Robert Lopez :
Having built new email gateways, it is time to retire the old ones.
I have removed one email gateway running postfix from the MX records
for our college.
It still has a few hundred mail in the queues and some spam is still
coming in.
What is the best way to stop the
Zitat von Daniel L'Hommedieu :
On Aug 23, 2009, at 8:08, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
At Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:56:28 -0700,
Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
[1 ]
Could someone provide links to sites where IP addresses are
grouped by country? ASNs would work too but would prefer IP lists
that I co
Zitat von Boyd Lynn Gerber :
Hello,
I have a mental block and need an other set of eyes to maybe spot it.
I have replaced the gmail username with user below. So below is the
mail log and my postconf -n
Aug 23 11:25:55 suse104 postfix/smtpd[16378]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from localhost[::1
Zitat von AMP Admin :
Does anyone use iptables or something to defend against attacks? Like if x
amount of requests per x amount of time send away. If so I would love some
examples. Thanks!
We use the following :
$IPTABLES -N SMTP-BLOCK
$IPTABLES -A SMTP-BLOCK -m limit --limit 1/m --limit
Zitat von Seth Mattinen :
Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm running postfix 2.3 via rpm package. This is on a centos box. I
know that there are later versions out, and am wondering if there's a
feature add-ons page, not just a changelog, something very detailed version
to version, that goes in to
Zitat von Raimund Eimann :
Hi,
I'm running Cyrus imapd and postfix on a box. I would like postfix to
deliver incoming mail not to /var/spool/mail/, but rather to
/var/spool/imap//Inbox, where the latter is apparently not a
flat file, but rather a typical imap directory structure ("maildir"?)
C
Zitat von Mark Goodge :
Raimund Eimann wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Cyrus imapd and postfix on a box. I would like postfix to
deliver incoming mail not to /var/spool/mail/, but rather to
/var/spool/imap//Inbox, where the latter is apparently not a
flat file, but rather a typical imap directory struc
Zitat von ram :
We need to design a mail system where postfix transport maps file will
grow based on the inputs. . This may grow to a million lines
I need to know what will be the max entries in transport map that the
machine can handle ( 4 GB Ram , Quad Xeon) .. given that the system is
runnin
Zitat von ram :
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:46 +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von ram :
> We need to design a mail system where postfix transport maps file will
> grow based on the inputs. . This may grow to a million lines
>
> I need to know what will be the max entries in transport ma
Zitat von Rene Bartsch :
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:28:35PM +0100, Rene Bartsch wrote:
smtpd needs 24 MByte per client connection.
You may not be measuring correctly, are you sure you are not counting
shared executable pages or otherwise mapped read-only pages.
Output of "top":
PID USER
Zitat von Rene Bartsch :
Rene Bartsch:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND 7159 postfix 20 0
79960 24m 3332 S 0 12.4 0:00.14 smtpd 7897 postfix 20
0 79204 23m 2736 S
0 11.7 0:00.10 smtpd
Please report what portions of th
Zitat von Keith Palmer :
OK, thanks... but that doesn't answer my question.
Is it possible to configure Postfix for SMTP-AUTH *without* using
SASL/PAM?
I'd like to *not run SASL at all* rather than have it do the lookups.
Postfix has no user management at its own. You have to use either
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Rene Bartsch:
r...@www:~# pmap 23976
pmap is a command that originates from Solaris, but that is also
available on Linux (except that the Linux version is very light
on documentation).
23976: smtpd -n :smtp -t inet -u -o stress
...
7f2936d45000 36K r-x-
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Matt Richards:
Hello,
I just want to check up on something ...
I run my own mail servers, using postfix and a few years ago I use to
get quite a lot of backscatter due to spam messages being sent out with
forged from addresses.
Today I still run my own mail server b
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:39:06PM -0200, maximatt wrote:
Postfix support dns srv registers... for ldap service?
If you need to define your LDAP servers in SRV records, you can
run a cron job that queries DNS, and rebuilds your "map.cf" files
based on an updated s
Zitat von Dan Schaefer :
One of my coworkers would like to send emails from her blackberry
using the work mail server and her work address. Whenever she
attempts to send a message, I get the following error messages in
the mail log:
Nov 4 13:28:35 pony postfix/smtpd[26853]: warning: 32.144
Zitat von Alex :
Hi
The trust in my own users led me to his post. The users are
ignorant (not all, but..). No one care about how send , what send,
where send , thei just wnat to send more and more .
I don't trust anyone and my server too.
I know that the outbound filtering is d
Zitat von Manoj Burande :
Hello There,
Can anybody please suggest me on the below error while adding new
aliases to the root user. I am just trying to forward all emails of
the root user to my own account but #newaliases command result with
the below error. I am a newbie on postfix please
Zitat von Gaby Vanhegan :
Is there a portable way to share postmapped file across machines?
I have one postfix server running OpenBSD and another running
CentOS, I want the CentOS server to provide secondary services for
for the BSD box. The OpenBSD box uses virtual delivery:
/etc/postfi
Hello
as far as i know Postfix does not alter a Message-ID beside when it
creates a missing one. Is there some way one could find out later in
the logfile if Postfix has created one? Is it sufficient if the
Message-ID looks like "@" or
is there some other thing to check?
Many Thanks
An
Zitat von "Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL" :
Hi All,
Because of a crashed exchange server we need to queue messages longer on
our smarthost then usual.
I want to increase the time messages are queued to at least 2 weeks...
Is changing the 'maximal_queue_lifetime' in main.cf sufficient
Zitat von "cont...@rusanu.com" :
Is there a way to configure postfix to use a relay only if direct
delivery is rejected? The case being a web application that has to
send notification to subscribers, but some servers reject the
connection (app IP originates from AWS EC2). I want those cases
Zitat von Braun Björn :
Hiho,
I'm using debian 4.0r6 / postfix / postgrey ...
This works really fine for 99+% of emailsenders
From time to time I get
Nov 11 09:01:54 grey2 postfix/smtpd[28926]: lost connection after
RSET from unknown[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
This has probably nothing to do with
Zitat von Braun Björn :
My logs (mail.log)
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: connect from
unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]: 450 4.7.1 : Recipient
address rejected: Greylisted, see
http://isg.ee.e
Zitat von Eero Volotinen :
Braun Björn wrote:
My logs (mail.log)
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: connect from
unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]: 450 4.7.1 : Recipient
address rejected: Greylisted
Hello
is it possible to force a matching "From" header in the mail if
reject_sender_login_mismatch is used so the "From" header is the same
as the checked MAIL FROM address? The goal is to prevent spoofing of
the "From" header for SASL authenticated clients.
Many Thanks
Andreas
smime.p
Zitat von LuKreme :
OK, in preparation for moving to new hardware I've copied all the
mail from the working machine to the new machine, installed postfix
and copied over my /usr/local/etc/postfix folder so that I have
identical configs on both machines.
Now, I haven't changed the MX recor
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Hello
is it possible to force a matching "From" header in the mail if
reject_sender_login_mismatch is used so the "From" header is the same
as the checked MAIL FROM address? The goal is to prevent spoofing of
the "From" header for SASL authenticat
Zitat von Jerry :
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:51:16 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema replied:
Wietse:
You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
Wietse, maybe it is something local to my machine; however that URL
yields this result here
Zitat von Javier Henderson :
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the failure
of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com
to u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP server dies or bec
101 - 200 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
