Am 2012-09-27 23:38, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Victor discussed smtpd_relay_restrictions 6 years, see
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html.
The article also discussed a number of other ideas that have
potential
to increase the Postfix learning curve. I'll leave those f
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:15:09 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >
> > > Instead it looks like this:
> > > "Det her mailsystemet p?? v??rten mydomain."
> >
> > Bounce templates have supported non-ASCII from the start. I suspect
> > that something after Postfix is stripping them.
>
> I just conf
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:24:37 +
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> "postconf -b" just stuffs the raw bits down your terminal, so this
> just means that your terminal charset matches the encoding of Danish
> characters in the file. What is your "$LANG" environment variable
> set to? It may also be help
Am 28.09.2012 11:11, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
> I have tried to set the charset of bounce.cf to UTF-8 and then sent a
> few mails to the server to test it. When a bounce returns we'll know if
> UTF-8 did the trick. Thanks for the help so far and the additional
> information.
mail
the shell mai
When the remote site attempts to deliver it is caught in blocklist:
Sep 28 05:29:50 mx10 postfix/postscreen[15338]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from [210.44.128.104]:33372: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; client
[210.44.128.104] blocked using b.barracudacentral.org;
from=, to=,
proto=ESMTP, helo=
I alre
francis picabia:
> # cat postscreen_access
> 210.44.128.104PERMIT
Do "postfix reload" after changing this table.
Wietse
Michael Storz:
> If one of the permit-restrictions from smtpd_relay_restrictions fires
> which restriction will be evaluated next:
> - the first restriction of smtpd_recipient_restrictions or
> - the first restriction of smtpd_data_restrictions
With smtpd_client, helo, sender, recipient, and data
On Sep 27, 2012, at 10:07 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Jason Hirsh wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:49 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Jason Hirsh wrote:
>>>
I am trying to have email coming into postfix be del
On 9/27/2012 4:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor discussed smtpd_relay_restrictions 6 years, see
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html.
>
> The article also discussed a number of other ideas that have potential
> to increase the Postfix learning curve. I'll leave th
Noel Jones:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 9/27/2012 4:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Victor discussed smtpd_relay_restrictions 6 years, see
> > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html.
> >
> > The article also discussed a number of other ideas tha
Am 2012-09-28 14:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Michael Storz:
If one of the permit-restrictions from smtpd_relay_restrictions
fires
which restriction will be evaluated next:
- the first restriction of smtpd_recipient_restrictions or
- the first restriction of smtpd_data_restrictions
With smtpd_c
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> uce_restriction1
> ...
> uce_restrictionn
+-+-+
| In Postfix versions <= 2.9 | In Postfix versions >= 2.10 |
+-+---
Hi,
I am running CentOS 5.8 with postfix-2.9.1-1.pcre.sasl2.dovecot.rhel5 (a
build based on Simon J. Mudd's SRPM) using LTB openldap server
(openldap-ltb-2.4.31-1.el5) to host user accounts / aliases.
The setup has been working fine for many months.
Today, after a user sent (on 14:53:39) a m
Nikolaos Milas:
> Hi,
>
> I am running CentOS 5.8 with postfix-2.9.1-1.pcre.sasl2.dovecot.rhel5 (a
> build based on Simon J. Mudd's SRPM) using LTB openldap server
> (openldap-ltb-2.4.31-1.el5) to host user accounts / aliases.
>
> The setup has been working fine for many months.
>
> Today, aft
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:13:15 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 28.09.2012 11:11, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
> > I have tried to set the charset of bounce.cf to UTF-8 and then sent
> > a few mails to the server to test it. When a bounce returns we'll
> > know if UTF-8 did the trick. Thanks for the h
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:11:51AM +0200, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >
> > "postconf -b" just stuffs the raw bits down your terminal, so this
> > just means that your terminal charset matches the encoding of Danish
> > characters in the file. What is your "$LANG" environme
On 9/28/2012 8:37 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
> Am 2012-09-28 14:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>> Michael Storz:
> If smtpd_relay_restrictions behaves like all the other restriction
> classes,
> that means after the permit has fired, the first restriction of
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions is executed, th
On 9/28/2012 8:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Jones:
>> I think a better upgrade compatibility shim would be to set
>> smtpd_relay_restrictions empty, ie. perform relay checks in
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions as they are now; no behavior change.
>
> That would not help the transition at all.
On 28/9/2012 5:30 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote:
I suggest that you reduce the Postfix
default_process_limit until you can get a more powerful machine.
The default limit is 100. Try 25 to start with.
Thank you Wietse,
I did the change.
Any other limits that might be useful?
Like "smtpd_client_con
Nikolaos Milas:
> On 28/9/2012 5:30 ??, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > I suggest that you reduce the Postfix
> > default_process_limit until you can get a more powerful machine.
> > The default limit is 100. Try 25 to start with.
>
> Thank you Wietse,
>
> I did the change.
That will reduce the peak
Am 2012-09-28 18:39, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 9/28/2012 8:37 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
Am 2012-09-28 14:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Michael Storz:
If smtpd_relay_restrictions behaves like all the other restriction
classes,
that means after the permit has fired, the first restriction of
smtpd_recip
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:38:20PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor discussed smtpd_relay_restrictions 6 years, see
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html.
>
> The article also discussed a number of other ideas that have potential
> to increase the Postfix learning
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:41:22PM +0200, Michael Storz wrote:
> > -- Noel Jones
> >No, this is wrong. The new feature means you may *optionally*
> >separate relay decisions from smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
> >providing a little more safety and flexibility than currently
> >available. It is
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:58:44PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:38:20PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Victor discussed smtpd_relay_restrictions 6 years, see
> > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html
> >
> > The article also discussed a
/dev/rob0:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:41:22PM +0200, Michael Storz wrote:
> > > -- Noel Jones
> > >No, this is wrong. The new feature means you may *optionally*
> > >separate relay decisions from smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
> > >providing a little more safety and flexibility than currently
/dev/rob0:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:58:44PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:38:20PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > Victor discussed smtpd_relay_restrictions 6 years, see
> > > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html
> > >
> > > The
Viktor Dukhovni:
> # Empty? Use legacy behaviour controlled by smtpd_delay_reject
> #
> smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes =
>
> # Non-empty, do exactly what the user said:
> #
> smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes =
> smtpd_relay_restrictions,
>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:58:33AM -0300, francis picabia wrote:
> When the remote site attempts to deliver it is caught in blocklist:
>
> Sep 28 05:29:50 mx10 postfix/postscreen[15338]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from [210.44.128.104]:33372: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; client
> [210.44.128.104] b
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:18:16PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > # Empty? Use legacy behaviour controlled by smtpd_delay_reject
> > #
> > smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes =
> >
> > # Non-empty, do exactly what the user said:
> > #
> > smtpd_rcpt_restric
29 matches
Mail list logo
