thank's mouss
>you can use virtual_alias_maps
>postfix-u...@postfix.org postfix-u...@postfix.org, f...@example.com
>
--
Nahliel
Hi
If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL password and
IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
Tahnks
Marc Chamberlin:
> On 6/5/2011 9:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Marc Chamberlin:
> >> Hello -
> >>
> >> I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help
> >> configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server.
> >> Don't get me wrong on this, Postfix is prob
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, gaby wrote:
> Hi
> If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL password and
> IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
>
>From smtp-client to smtpd, and from imap-client to imapd, if and only
if, clients enable TLS (STARTTLS) before authentication
Hi gaby,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:44:12 +0300, gaby wrote:
Hi
If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL
password
and IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
If you encrypt your connections with TLS Mallory isn't able to collect
your passwords. The TLS tunnel will hide the
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:44:12PM +0300, gaby wrote:
> If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL
> password and IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
There seems to be some confusion behind your question, so it's
hard to know where to start.
TLS encryption is implemented
Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
well worth what they charge.
Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing
On 6/6/2011 9:36 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Stan Hoeppner:
>>> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>>
My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
well worth what t
This thread is killed. Tresspassers will be removed.
Wietse
I have an old version of postfix running on a SuSE OS where forwarding works
fine, simply by using the virtual_maps option. Recently I installed a new
email server using CentOS 5.5, Postfix 2.3.3, mysql, postfixadmin, dovecot and
roundcube webmail. The new systems works except I cannot get the
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Marc Chamberlin:
On 6/5/2011 9:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marc Chamberlin:
>> Hello -
>>
>> I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help
>> configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server.
>> Don't get me wrong on this,
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Not sure if i really understand the OP but it looks like the only
> thing needed is a "sendmail" command handing over the mail to James
> which should be the SMTP service on that machine. So maybe something
> like mini_sendmail would be more appropriate for this use cas
Hi,
I can see in my logs that postfix is "waiting" for 10s between each email.
If I check the queues, there are empty qshape active / deferred / incoming
but if I do a
mailq | wc -l
I got a little more than 100 000 mails
(my hosting company had a problem with her domain this weekend and s
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:56:23AM -0400, Islam, Towhid wrote:
> I have an old version of postfix running on a SuSE OS where forwarding works
> fine, simply by using the virtual_maps option. Recently I installed a new
> email server using CentOS 5.5, Postfix 2.3.3, mysql, postfixadmin, dovecot
St?phane MERLE:
> Hi,
>
> I can see in my logs that postfix is "waiting" for 10s between each email.
What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
> mailq | wc -l
> I got a little more than 100 000 mails
mailq shows the content of the incoming, active and deferred queues.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:43:18PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> St?phane MERLE:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can see in my logs that postfix is "waiting" for 10s between each email.
>
> What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
>
> > mailq | wc -l
> > I got a little more than 100 00
Hi,
Le 06/06/2011 18:43, Wietse Venema a écrit :
St?phane MERLE:
Hi,
I can see in my logs that postfix is "waiting" for 10s between each email.
What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
this is a php script using the mail command ...
$retour=mail($to, $subject, $message
St?phane MERLE:
> Hi,
>
> Le 06/06/2011 18:43, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
> > St?phane MERLE:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I can see in my logs that postfix is "waiting" for 10s between each email.
> > What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
> this is a php script using the mail comman
Le 06/06/2011 19:14, Wietse Venema a écrit :
St?phane MERLE:
Hi,
Le 06/06/2011 18:43, Wietse Venema a ?crit :
St?phane MERLE:
Hi,
I can see in my logs that postfix is "waiting" for 10s between each email.
What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
this is a php scrip
I did not know that. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 12:37 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Forwarding via virtual_mailbox_maps or virtual_maps
Title: stephane
I am a little surprised by the fact that I would be using sendmail,
I though that php.cli would sent directly the mail in the maildrop
folder.
in my php.ini file (within the cli version of php5) I can see :
[mail function]
SMTP = localhost
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:45:17PM +0200, St?phane MERLE wrote:
> I am a little surprised by the fact that I would be using sendmail, I
> though that php.cli would sent directly the mail in the maildrop folder.
>
Don't confuse sendmail(1) (provided by Postfix) with Sendmail which
also provides a
Wietse:
> What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
Stephan:
> this is a php script using the mail command ...
> $retour=mail($to, $subject, $message, $headers, $option5);
Wietse:
> This uses /usr/sbin/sendmail. It places your messages into the
> /var/spool/postfix/maildrop
On 6/6/2011 8:35 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> Not sure if i really understand the OP but it looks like the only
>> thing needed is a "sendmail" command handing over the mail to James
>> which should be the SMTP service on that machine. So maybe something
>> like mini_sen
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:17:26AM -0700, Marc Chamberlin wrote:
> I do not need the full functionality of Postfix and Apache James running
> on the same machine, just James. But like I have said, I have other
> applications, such as Bugzilla, Bacula, and some Tomcat webapps running
> on the same
Hi All,
I have a setup where I use postfix to connect to my work smtpd
exchange server via TLS encryption
and normal login authentication. This smtpd server also requires that
the "From" address in the email header
is from the same user that authenticates, otherwise I get a:
"Client does not have
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:46:57PM -0400, Michael Way wrote:
> I have a setup where I use postfix to connect to my work smtpd
> exchange server via TLS encryption
> and normal login authentication. This smtpd server also requires that
> the "From" address in the email header
> is from the same use
Wietse:
> If all that is needed is to forward /usr/sbin/sendmail submissions
> to Apache James, then perhaps the original poster can confirm this,
> and we can provide a really simple configuration for the Apache
> James documentation.
Marc Chamberlin:
> So yes, I simply need /usr/sbin/sendmail to
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:45:17 +0200, Stéphane MERLE
wrote:
> > (I am using ubuntu 10.04LTS).
> I am a little surprised by the fact that I would be using sendmail
> #dpkg --get-selections | grep -i "sendmail"
> I got no package installed for sendmail ...
Postfix installs a pseudo-sendmail.
In Ub
Michael Way:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a setup where I use postfix to connect to my work smtpd
> exchange server via TLS encryption
> and normal login authentication. This smtpd server also requires that
> the "From" address in the email header
> is from the same user that authenticates, otherwise I ge
My work is a HUGE institution and there are just a few of us old
unix dudes around who use command line (and cron) for such things
so they will not allow any changes as you suggest.
Otherwise, I agree that it IS an ugly/wrong solution, but the only one at
my disposal... --mike
On Mon, Jun 6, 201
Sorry Wietse, my bad you are correct. It is the MAIL FROM:
I should have included the full line:
550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender (in
reply to MAIL FROM command))
I'm not sure of the difference honestly, or rather how I would filter this and
replace it.
--mike
O
Again thanks, Victor, for pointing out the change that I wasn't aware of. I
think I have found my problem, and you are correct that I do have an explicitly
defined virtual_alias_maps in main.cf. What I have is:
virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql:$config/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
To wh
Wietse:
> Why do you believe that it complains about the "From" address in
> the email header, instead of the SMTP "MAIL FROM" address?
Michael Way:
> Sorry Wietse, my bad you are correct. It is the MAIL FROM: I
> should have included the full line: 550 5.7.1 Client does not
> have permissions t
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:48:05PM -0400, Islam, Towhid wrote:
> Again thanks, Victor, for pointing out the change that I wasn't aware of. I
> think I have found my problem, and you are correct that I do have an
> explicitly defined virtual_alias_maps in main.cf. What I have is:
>
> vir
In the access(5) man page, it is either explicitly stated or else
easily inferred what XXX response value will be sent back to the
SMTP client for each of the possible values listed in the ACCEPT
ACTIONS and REJECT ACTIONS sections.
What XXX response values will be sent back to the SMTP client fo
Wietse Venema:
> Wietse:
> > Why do you believe that it complains about the "From" address in
> > the email header, instead of the SMTP "MAIL FROM" address?
>
> Michael Way:
> > Sorry Wietse, my bad you are correct. It is the MAIL FROM: I
> > should have included the full line: 550 5.7.1 Client
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:16:07PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> In the access(5) man page, it is either explicitly stated or else
> easily inferred what XXX response value will be sent back to the
> SMTP client for each of the possible values listed in the ACCEPT
> ACTIONS and REJECT ACT
Ronald F. Guilmette:
>
> In the access(5) man page, it is either explicitly stated or else
> easily inferred what XXX response value will be sent back to the
> SMTP client for each of the possible values listed in the ACCEPT
> ACTIONS and REJECT ACTIONS sections.
>
> What XXX response values will
Le 06/06/2011 19:59, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Wietse:
What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
Stephane:
this is a php script using the mail command ...
$retour=mail($to, $subject, $message, $headers, $option5);
Wietse:
This uses /usr/sbin/sendmail. It places your mess
If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists
in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well
remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my
smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will now be redundant?
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
Le 06/06/2011 22:40, Stéphane MERLE a écrit :
Le 06/06/2011 19:59, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Wietse:
What are the name and arguments of the program that is waiting?
Stephane:
this is a php script using the mail command ...
$retour=mail($to, $subject, $message, $headers, $option5);
Wietse:
Th
Le 06/06/2011 14:44, gaby a écrit :
> Hi
> If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL password and
> IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
>
No. the purpose of TLS is to encrypt traffic, including passwords.
that said, you need to configure your TLS/SSL servers to only acce
Unfortunately it seems that Wietse's suggestion was not sufficient for
the smtp server. I now get a different (but similar) error:
Jun 6 17:14:53 localhostname postfix/smtp[76133]: D7ED9A18A05:
to=,
relay=smtp.work.com[192.168.1.89]:587, delay=1.7, delays=0/0/1.4/0.35,
dsn=5.7.1,
status=bounced (h
In message <20110606203126.go8...@np305c2n2.ms.com>, you wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:16:07PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>>
>> In the access(5) man page, it is either explicitly stated or else
>> easily inferred what XXX response value will be sent back to the
>> SMTP client for e
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:30:59PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> > If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL
> > password and IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
>
> No. the purpose of TLS is to encrypt traffic, including passwords.
Sure.
> that said, you need to configure your
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:46:46PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm still not clear on any of this. You said "With actions
> that are equivalent to DUNNO...". This begs the question. Which ones are
> those?
The *obvious ones*. If an action is clearly a final OK that termi
In message <3qp73y409zzh...@spike.porcupine.org>, you wrote:
>Ronald F. Guilmette:
>>
>> In the access(5) man page, it is either explicitly stated or else
>> easily inferred what XXX response value will be sent back to the
>> SMTP client for each of the possible values listed in the ACCEPT
>> AC
Le 06/06/2011 23:53, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:30:59PM +0200, mouss wrote:
>
>>> If I use postfix with TLS (and courier-imap with TLS) the SASL
>>> password and IMAP password are visibe in plain text?
>>
>> No. the purpose of TLS is to encrypt traffic, including passwo
In message <20110606215604.gu8...@np305c2n2.ms.com>, Viktor wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:46:46PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I'm still not clear on any of this. You said "With actions
>> that are equivalent to DUNNO...". This begs the question. Which ones are
>>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:20:47PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> |ACCEPT ACTIONS
> | OK
> | all-numerical
> |
> |REJECT ACTIONS
> | 4NN text
> | 5NN text
> | REJECT optional text...
Yes, but with actions that are a list of restriction primitives, the
the result
On 06/06/2011 10:45 PM, Rich Wales wrote:
If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists
in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well
remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my
smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will n
St?phane MERLE:
> > Postfix installs its own sendmail command, to avoid breaking PHP
> > etc. This was a smarter move than having to re-educate people.
>
> yes, I must agree on that ! (that's just confusing because the
> /usr/sbin/sendmail is not a script but a binary ... so I though that was
>
On 6/6/2011 5:34 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 06/06/2011 10:45 PM, Rich Wales wrote:
If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists
and whitelists
in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I
might as well
remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses
fro
> On the interfaces and ports that postscreen(8) passes mail to, yes.
> Do note that the behaviour is different; you will be able to directly
> transplant your reject_rbl_client RBLs to postscreen, but postscreen
> has many more options available, such as checking for exact return
> values, and sco
Ronald F. Guilmette:
>
> In message <3qp73y409zzh...@spike.porcupine.org>, you wrote:
>
> >Ronald F. Guilmette:
> >>
> >> In the access(5) man page, it is either explicitly stated or else
> >> easily inferred what XXX response value will be sent back to the
> >> SMTP client for each of the possi
Rich Wales:
> If I enable postscreen and specify my choice of blocklists and whitelists
> in postscreen_dnsbl_sites, am I correct in assuming that I might as well
> remove any reject_rbl_client and permit_dnswl_client clauses from my
> smtpd_*_restrictions, since they will now be redundant?
Almost
Michael Way:
> it would be?:
> if !/[[:<:]]user1\.home@work\.com$/
> /./ user1\.home@work\.com Don't use \ in the replacement text!
> endif
Looks like you want to replace all senders in outbound email by your own
email address. In that case it is sufficient to do this:
/etc/postfix/ma
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Darek M:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>> > Check your SELINUX, APPARMOR, etc. "security" settings.
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?Wietse
>>
>> I'm running FreeBSD 8, and there isn't anything running by default
>> like SELin
Wietse Venema:
> Michael Way:
> > it would be?:
> > if !/[[:<:]]user1\.home@work\.com$/
> > /./ user1\.home@work\.com Don't use \ in the replacement text!
> > endif
>
> Looks like you want to replace all senders in outbound email by your own
> email address. In that case it is sufficient
> Note that postscreen caches the results of successful tests,
> so that it does not repeat every test for every connection.
> This is controlled by the postscreen_mumble_ttl parameters.
Some caching may also be done by my DNS server too, right? This would,
of course, be transparent to Postfix an
Rich Wales:
> > Note that postscreen caches the results of successful tests,
> > so that it does not repeat every test for every connection.
> > This is controlled by the postscreen_mumble_ttl parameters.
>
> Some caching may also be done by my DNS server too, right? This would,
> of course, be t
Sorry, if I sounded confusing, but yes, I meant a list of value for the
parameter virtual_alias_maps.
In my old SuSE based postfix (aka SLOX, SuSE OpenExchange) host, I found the
following parameter set thusly:
virtual_maps= ldap:ldapvuser,hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
The above parameter has two
In message <3qpbvm2dkczh...@spike.porcupine.org>,
Wietse Venema wrote:
>> If I have understood you correctly, you have said that for every kind/type
>> of ACTION specification listed in access(5) _other_ than REJECT & PREPEND
>> it is possible to combine that ACTION specification (and its assso
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:08:58PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> It sounds to me like you are saying that...
>
>:= |
>( [,])* []
No,
:= |
( [,])* []
:= REJECT [text] |
OK [text] |
4NN [text]
65 matches
Mail list logo
