David Schweikert:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a look at the release notes for the Postfix 2.8 release
> candidate and noticed that "postscreen" isn't described as a completely
> new feature. It wasn't however included in a previous stable release.
Hmm. postscreen takes up about 1/3 of the release notes
Hi Wietse,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:00:10 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I just had a look at the release notes for the Postfix 2.8 release
> > candidate and noticed that "postscreen" isn't described as a completely
> > new feature. It wasn't however included in a previous stable release.
>
>
Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:12:54PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > alpha smoothing should do the trick, in this case we can start with
> > >
> > > t_0 = 0,
> > >
> > > and set
> > >
> > > t_{n+1} = 0.95*t_{n} + 0.05*delta
> >
> > There are many ways to arrive at a mo
David Schweikert:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:00:10 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > I just had a look at the release notes for the Postfix 2.8 release
> > > candidate and noticed that "postscreen" isn't described as a completely
> > > new feature. It wasn't however included in a
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:08:51 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I noticed now the last Feature paragraph. Yes, I find it not very
> > easy to understand for Postfix 2.7 users that didn't follow the
> > development of the feature.
>
> I can put a pointer to POSTSCREEN_README at the start of that s
I have a workign mx server (virtual) which I cloned to create a second
mx server. I changed the hostname and /etc/hosts and any reference I
could find to the old "mx4" name to "mx2". I also made sure reverse dns
and dns is OK. However, when I send mail, the recipient mail server
reports the bel
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:06:29AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > There are many ways to arrive at a moving average. Where do these
> > > magic numbers come from?
> >
> > The 0.05, 0.95 magic numbers give you an average over a few tens of sample
> > points, that is not overly sensitive to a s
Hi guys,
i finally made it in the intent of adding an autoresponder to my postfix
server, and it works, butit creates problems with dovecot!
This is what i've done:
master.cf:
vacationunix- n n - - pipe
flags=DRhuuser=vacation argv=/var/spool
i finally made it in the intent of adding an autoresponder to my postfix
server, and it works, butit creates problems with dovecot!
transport:
myu...@mydomain.com vacation
when i send a message to this account, i get the autoreply (this is ok) but
the receiving account doesn't receiv
Am 18.01.2011 17:37, schrieb roby65:
Hi guys,
i finally made it in the intent of adding an autoresponder to my postfix
server, and it works, butit creates problems with dovecot!
This is what i've done:
master.cf:
vacationunix- n n - - pipe
flags
Hi,
I had the same problem, but fixed it. Your problem is with your transport entry
and also (possibly) your alias table.
The postfixadmin vacation autoreponder works by first creating an entry in the
alias table using a domain name that you have setup in the config.inc.php file
for postfix.
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:06:29AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > > There are many ways to arrive at a moving average. Where do these
> > > > magic numbers come from?
> > >
> > > The 0.05, 0.95 magic numbers give you an average over a few tens of sample
> > > points, that
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:42:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > > > There are many ways to arrive at a moving average. Where do these
> > > > > magic numbers come from?
>
> You are describing basic math to someone with a master's degree in
> roughly 50% math and 50% physics :-) (My PhD was
On 2011-01-18 12:06 PM, Mark (Lunatechnologies) wrote:
> If you look at the alias table (or file depending on your setup) for any
> users that have activated VACATION, you should see something like this...
>
> u...@domain.com u...@domain.com, u...@autoreply.domain.com
Correction: the above
I must be doing something silly, but I can't see my mistake.
$ postconf postscreen_dnsbl_sites
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[2,3,4..8,10..11]
postfix/postscreen[26161]: fatal: bad DNSBL filter syntax: need "," or "]" at
"127.0.0.[2><"
Or to simplify the matter:
$ postconf
I just built and installed Postfix 2.8-RC2 using "make upgrade"
(upgraded from 2.3.3) and I'm getting the following warning in my
maillog:
postfix/smtpd[27208]: warning: unknown tls_disable_workarounds value
"CVE-2010-4180" in "CVE-2005-2969 CVE-2010-4180"
I'm able to make the error go away by ad
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:20:16PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> I just built and installed Postfix 2.8-RC2 using "make upgrade"
> (upgraded from 2.3.3) and I'm getting the following warning in my
> maillog:
>
> postfix/smtpd[27208]: warning: unknown tls_disable_workarounds value
> "CVE-2010-4180
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> $ postconf postscreen_dnsbl_sites
> postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[2,3,4..8,10..11]
>
> postfix/postscreen[26161]: fatal: bad DNSBL filter syntax: need "," or "]" at
> "127.0.0.[2><"
There is a parser issue her
Mark Martinec:
> I must be doing something silly, but I can't see my mistake.
>
> $ postconf postscreen_dnsbl_sites
> postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[2,3,4..8,10..11]
>
> postfix/postscreen[26161]: fatal: bad DNSBL filter syntax: need "," or "]" at
> "127.0.0.[2><"
The proble
On 1/18/2011 2:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Martinec:
I must be doing something silly, but I can't see my mistake.
$ postconf postscreen_dnsbl_sites
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[2,3,4..8,10..11]
postfix/postscreen[26161]: fatal: bad DNSBL filter syntax: need "," or "]
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:36:12PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> > $ postconf postscreen_dnsbl_sites
> > postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[2,3,4..8,10..11]
> >
> > postfix/postscreen[26161]: fatal: bad DNSBL fi
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:36:12PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> >
> > > $ postconf postscreen_dnsbl_sites
> > > postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.[2,3,4..8,10..11]
> > >
> > > postfix/posts
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Something along the lines of:
>
> /*
> * Workaround. The "," was already in use as dnsbl list separator.
> */
> for (keep = 0, cp = var_psc_dnsbl_sites; *cp; cp++) {
> if (*cp == '[') {
> keep++
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Something along the lines of:
> >
> > /*
> > * Workaround. The "," was already in use as dnsbl list separator.
> > */
> > for (keep = 0, cp = var_psc_dnsbl_sites; *cp; cp++) {
> > if
* Wietse Venema :
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > Something along the lines of:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Workaround. The "," was already in use as dnsbl list separator.
> > > */
> > > for (keep = 0, cp = var_psc_dnsbl
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:08:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> But having "," inside an access control feature it is likely to
> break third-party tools that maintain Postfix configuration files.
>
> The alternative is to [modify] the address filter syntax, and to
> replace "," by a different s
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> * Wietse Venema :
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >
> > > > Something along the lines of:
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Workaround. The "," was already in use as dnsbl list separator.
> > > > */
>
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Wietse Venema :
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >
> > > > Something along the lines of:
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Workaround. The "," was already in use as dnsbl list separator.
> > > > */
> >
Wietse Venema:
> > * Wietse Venema :
> > > Victor Duchovni:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Something along the lines of:
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Workaround. The "," was already in use as dnsbl list separator.
> > > > >
Le 17/01/2011 22:29, Steve Linford a écrit :
> On 16 Jan 2011, at 23:49, Неворотин Вадим wrote:
>
>> It's a... nonsense! When somebody ask "tell me an address of website",
>> nobody and never start their answers with W...W...W
>
> I do. If you try to go to http://spamhaus.org you get a
* mouss :
> Le 17/01/2011 22:29, Steve Linford a écrit :
> > On 16 Jan 2011, at 23:49, Неворотин Вадим wrote:
> >
> >> It's a... nonsense! When somebody ask "tell me an address of
> >> website", nobody and never start their answers with W...W...W
> >
> > I do. If you try to go to http:/
I have an issue regarding SSL/TLS.
I have configured my certificates and STARTTLS works fine. Out of
curosity, I wanted to get SSL over tcp/465 working.
I uncommented the following line in master.cf:
smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
And netsat shows the serve
IT geek 31:
> I have an issue regarding SSL/TLS.
>
> I have configured my certificates and STARTTLS works fine. Out of
> curosity, I wanted to get SSL over tcp/465 working.
Port 465 uses a different protocol than port 25.
On port 25, the session starts in plaintext, and the client sends STARTTL
On 18 January 2011 22:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
> IT geek 31:
>> I have an issue regarding SSL/TLS.
>>
>> I have configured my certificates and STARTTLS works fine. Out of
>> curosity, I wanted to get SSL over tcp/465 working.
> Port 465 uses a different protocol than port 25.
>
> On port 25, the
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> Sorry, my mistake, when the OpenSSL team removes a work-around from
> SSL_OP_ALL, we should not remove its name from the list of names Postfix
> recognizes. It will do no harm.
>
> Please apply the following patch to 2.8.0-RC[12] or 2.9-20
IT geek 31:
> On 18 January 2011 22:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > IT geek 31:
> >> I have an issue regarding SSL/TLS.
> >>
> >> I have configured my certificates and STARTTLS works fine. ?Out of
> >> curosity, I wanted to get SSL over tcp/465 working.
>
> > Port 465 uses a different protocol than
Steve Jenkins:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> > Sorry, my mistake, when the OpenSSL team removes a work-around from
> > SSL_OP_ALL, we should not remove its name from the list of names Postfix
> > recognizes. It will do no harm.
> >
> > Please apply the following pa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> The patch applies without error here. Be sure not to corrupt the
> file content with some word-wrapping program, or some DOS editor
> that appends control-z.
>
> Wieste
Confirmed. I had initially copied and pasted it from my Gmail c
On 18 January 2011 22:34, Wietse Venema wrote:
> IT geek 31:
>> On 18 January 2011 22:22, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > IT geek 31:
>> >> I have an issue regarding SSL/TLS.
>> >>
>> >> I have configured my certificates and STARTTLS works fine. ?Out of
>> >> curosity, I wanted to get SSL over tcp/465
in thunderbird you have two options
"SSL/TLS"
"StARTTLS"
on port 465 you have to use "SSL/TLS"
the same for imaps/pop3s on dedicated ports
if port / enycryption is in the wrong combination it will not
work, happens most time if you changed the ports manually
while doing some tests, after that th
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 02:45:06PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> Confirmed. I had initially copied and pasted it from my Gmail client
> window to my Linux editor. Copying it from the message source instead
> did the trick.
>
> Will this patched version of tls_misc.c be in the final 2.8 release?
after a few discussion
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg58378.html
i still am getting
Jan 19 15:41:48 mail-server postfix/pipe[3724]: A502F19C8A57:
to=, relay=dovecot, delay=60040, delays=60002/36/0/2.1,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure)
postfix version: 2.5.9
Umarzuki Mochlis:
> after a few discussion
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg58378.html
>
> i still am getting
>
> Jan 19 15:41:48 mail-server postfix/pipe[3724]: A502F19C8A57:
> to=, relay=dovecot, delay=60040, delays=60002/36/0/2.1,
> dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporar
I have uploaded new tarballs to ftp.porcupine.org. Let's hope that
things stabilize this week. Below are the changes since RC2.
URL: ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
Wietse
20110118
Bugfix: the tls_disable_workarounds word list only inc
2011/1/19 Wietse Venema
>
> This means that the Dovecot mail delivery program terminates with
> exit status code 75 (EX_TEMPFAIL, as defined in /usr/include/sysexits.h).
>
> To find out WHY dovecot does this, you are on the wrong mailing
> list. This mailing list is about Postfix not Dovecot
>
>
The Postfix 2.8 SMTP server will not be alone in enabling server-side
Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman key-agreement.
Hosted domains served by smtproutes.com (e.g. saybrook.edu)
have ECDHE ciphers enabled:
Trusted TLS connection established to
saybrook.edu.pri-mx.smtproutes.com[174.36.154.1
Hello,
We are and ISP our mail environment is follows
Front End Mail server =: (postfix/mailscanner/clamav/spamasssin) where there
are no actual mailboxes, just role of this server is to filter the incoming
and outgoing email. After that all the incoming emails will sent to the its
act
* Ejaz :
> We are and ISP our mail environment is follows
>
> Front End Mail server =: (postfix/mailscanner/clamav/spamasssin) where there
> are no actual mailboxes, just role of this server is to filter the incoming
> and outgoing email. After that all the incoming emails will sent to the its
>
48 matches
Mail list logo
