* Wietse Venema <postfix-users@postfix.org>:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:56:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > Something along the lines of:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Workaround. The "," was already in use as dnsbl list separator.
> > > */
> > > for (keep = 0, cp = var_psc_dnsbl_sites; *cp; cp++) {
> > > if (*cp == '[') {
> > > keep++;
> > > } else if (*cp == ']' && keep > 0) {
> > > keep--;
> > > } else if (*cp == ',' && keep <= 0) {
> > > *cp = ' ';
> > > }
> > > }
> > > dnsbl_site = argv_split(var_psc_dnsbl_sites, ", \t\r\n");
> >
> > Right, reasonably elegant, but with the split now on just " \t\r\n".
>
> But having "," inside an access control feature it is likely to
> break third-party tools that maintain Postfix configuration files.
>
> The alternative is to change the address filter syntax, and to
> replace "," by a different set separator such as ";".
2.9 is still release candidate. You could do that or does it break your rules?
p@rick
--
All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the
list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and
justified.
saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH):
<http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>
