On 2010-10-12 7:23 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> People, I just don't get it, what is the point of comments such as:
>
>>> What did I forget?
>> In my opinion ? A brain.
> and
>>> What did I forget?
>> * rm -rf / (Read mail, really fast)
>> * A name
>> * http://www.postfix.org/DEB
On 2010-10-12 4:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> I just wanted to know if it is possible to add a recipient to a
>> message which is queued?
>
> What could possibly be the reason for this ?
Jeroen, please chill out...
He provided an example of a reputable MTA that provides a way to do
something t
On 2010/10/13 03:18 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-12 4:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
There is nothing wrong with him asking, and it is not really any of your
business why he wants to do it, although explaining why might reveal
that there is an alternative way to accomplish his goal...
T
Tom Kinghorn:
> On 2010/10/13 03:18 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 2010-10-12 4:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> >
> > There is nothing wrong with him asking, and it is not really any of your
> > business why he wants to do it, although explaining why might reveal
> > that there is an alternative
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:27 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> On 2010/10/13 03:18 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 2010-10-12 4:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>
> The reason I would like to do this was so that I could add my abuse
> email address as a recipient on any mail which is spam.
> That way, I co
Greetings,
I should know the answer to this but I don't. Very embarrassing.
The problem is my inside the firewall, backup mail server.
mxhost2 (ns6) in the dig output below.
# dig -t MX arlut.utexas.edu
; <<>> DiG
Jay G. Scott:
> relayhost = ns4.arlut.utexas.edu
> transport_maps = hash:/VOLUMES/postfix/etc/pftransport
> Mail leaving my site from ns6 should go straight
> to ns4, and not touch mxhost1. It isn't.
As documented, transport_maps overrides relayhost.
Wietse
Hi all
I just backed up my mails of /var/spool/imap/user/ from one box to another
cause im migrating the mail server, both server running suse 10.3, postfix,
everything is great so far, except mails on the new mailbox. the issue here
i not able to see each mails in theirs mailbox when i check vi
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:47:55PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay G. Scott:
> > relayhost = ns4.arlut.utexas.edu
> > transport_maps = hash:/VOLUMES/postfix/etc/pftransport
> > Mail leaving my site from ns6 should go straight
> > to ns4, and not touch mxhost1. It isn't.
>
> As documented, trans
Jay G. Scott:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:47:55PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Jay G. Scott:
> > > relayhost = ns4.arlut.utexas.edu
> > > transport_maps = hash:/VOLUMES/postfix/etc/pftransport
> > > Mail leaving my site from ns6 should go straight
> > > to ns4, and not touch mxhost1. It isn't.
On 10/13/2010 2:32 PM, Don B wrote:
> I have setup postfix/dovecot as per www.linuxmail.info with smtp
> authentication and this seems to be working well.
>
> The problem is with auto generated messages (like log reports etc) that
> I want to forward to an external address. These seem to be gettin
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 20:18, Oscar Mauricio Cruz Lazo
wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I just backed up my mails of /var/spool/imap/user/ from one box to another
> cause im migrating the mail server, both server running suse 10.3, postfix,
> everything is great so far, except mails on the new mailbox. the
[...]
> And there are lots of other ways to mess up Postfix.
>
> Wietse
>
lol
could you put that on facebook, I would love to endlessly click "like"
on that :)))
Le 13/10/2010 00:43, Costin Gusa a écrit :
see, mouss, that's the reason in my systems this email would have
never got a chance for "220 OK", even without any external spam filter
in place.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 22:42, The Doctor wrote:
Doctor Who saying in the 1970s.
What do I need to rev
Le 13/10/2010 20:32, Don B a écrit :
I have setup postfix/dovecot as per www.linuxmail.info with smtp
authentication and this seems to be working well.
The problem is with auto generated messages (like log reports etc) that
I want to forward to an external address. These seem to be getting
knoc
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 22:03, mouss wrote:
> Le 13/10/2010 00:43, Costin Gusa a écrit :
>>
>> see, mouss, that's the reason in my systems this email would have
>> never got a chance for "220 OK", even without any external spam filter
>> in place.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 22:42, The Doctor
>
Le 13/10/2010 21:11, Costin Gusa a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 22:03, mouss wrote:
Le 13/10/2010 00:43, Costin Gusa a écrit :
see, mouss, that's the reason in my systems this email would have
never got a chance for "220 OK", even without any external spam filter
in place.
On Tue, Oct 1
Let me take a step back. Let us say that my
main.cf looks like this:
# i don't do local delivery on this machine, so:
mydestination =
#
relayhost = outgo.arlut.utexas.edu
transport_map = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
and transport looks like this:
blarg.arlut.utexas.edu smtp:[blarg.arlut.utex
Jay G. Scott:
> Am I to understand that transport_map=value
> existing at all means relayhost=value is ignored?
No.
Please answer the questions that I asked in my other response.
Wietse
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:41:26PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jay G. Scott:
> > Am I to understand that transport_map=value
> > existing at all means relayhost=value is ignored?
>
> No.
>
> Please answer the questions that I asked in my other response.
I will, but I think I need to do more ho
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 02:37:34PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
>
> Let me take a step back. Let us say that my
> main.cf looks like this:
>
> # i don't do local delivery on this machine, so:
> mydestination =
> #
> relayhost = outgo.arlut.utexas.edu
> transport_map = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
On 10/13/2010 03:18 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-12 4:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
I just wanted to know if it is possible to add a recipient to a
message which is queued?
What could possibly be the reason for this ?
Jeroen, please chill out...
Don't read into m
At many Universities there is a continual problem with accounts being phished
and used to send spam. We have a number of measures that catch stolen accounts
but they take a little bit of time to block outgoing email.
Ideally I'd like to hold email to either a new address or a new
address,sende
>At many Universities there is a continual problem with accounts being phished
>and used to send spam. We have a number of measures that catch stolen
>accounts but they take a little bit of time to block outgoing email.
>
>Ideally I'd like to hold email to either a new address or a new
>address
Hello,
Your solution worked, thank you! Now what I'm wondering is this: How can I add
specific IPs to be able to send off-site? Essentially, I'd like two access
lists for sending off-site: One for sender email addresses and one for host
IPs. If you belong in either one you can send offsite.
Is
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 14:37 -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> Let me take a step back. Let us say that my
> main.cf looks like this:
>
> # i don't do local delivery on this machine, so:
> mydestination =
> #
> relayhost = outgo.arlut.utexas.edu
> transport_map = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>
^
- Original Message -
> From: "Len Conrad"
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 6:06:26 PM
> Subject: Re: reverse greylist
> We solved our cracked passwords with sender rate limiting.
Yes, we do similar, except that we don't get cracked, but phished. We still
On 10/13/2010 05:53 PM, Dan Lannom wrote:
> At many Universities there is a continual problem with accounts being
> phished and used to send spam. We have a number of measures that
> catch stolen accounts but they take a little bit of time to block
> outgoing email.
>
> Ideally I'd like to hold e
I have found this link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amavis-u...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04286.html
in which almost the same problem as mine is described. However my setup is
different. This is what I have:
OS: Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) x32
Postfix: 2.5.1-2ubuntu1.2
Amavis: 2.5.3-1ubuntu3
ClamAV: 0.96.3
On 10/11/2010 10:26 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
Hello, I need some advice with a problem (I believe is an easy question
but I couldn't find an answer):
My server logs is "normally" reporting twice almost every time someone
is sending an email:
./mail.log.0:Oct 11 08:58:23 mail postfix/qmgr[5276]:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
>
> On 10/11/2010 10:26 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>
>> Hello, I need some advice with a problem (I believe is an easy question
>> but I couldn't find an answer):
>>
>> My server logs is "normally" reporting twice almost every time someone
>> is s
On 10/13/2010 09:43 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Matt Hayes mailto:domin...@slackadelic.com>> wrote:
On 10/11/2010 10:26 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
Hello, I need some advice with a problem (I believe is an easy
question
but I couldn't find
Yes Matt, I agree with you.
However, for some reason a customer is complaining that some people are
receiving several copies (in one case up to 15 copies) with exactly the same
content, when he/she sent just one mail.
I thought at the beginning it may be a problem with his mail client but
after c
On 10/13/2010 10:17 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
Yes Matt, I agree with you.
However, for some reason a customer is complaining that some people are
receiving several copies (in one case up to 15 copies) with exactly the
same content, when he/she sent just one mail.
I thought at the beginning it may
I've used postfix as an incoming anti-spam gateway for several years. Now, I'm experimenting with an additional
postfix'n + policydV2 as an outbound gateway for another mail server.
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, PO.ST.FIX.IP, MAIL.SER.VER.IP
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
smtpd_client_r
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
> On 10/13/2010 10:17 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>
>> Yes Matt, I agree with you.
>>
>> However, for some reason a customer is complaining that some people are
>> receiving several copies (in one case up to 15 copies) with exactly the
>> same conten
On 10/13/2010 10:08 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
I've used postfix as an incoming anti-spam gateway for several
years. Now, I'm experimenting with an additional postfix'n +
policydV2 as an outbound gateway for another mail server.
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, PO.ST.FIX.IP, MAIL.SER.VER.IP
smtp
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, captain_claw wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
>> On 10/13/2010 10:17 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>>
>>> Yes Matt, I agree with you.
>>>
>>> However, for some reason a customer is complaining that some people are
>>> receiving several
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, captain_claw wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/13/2010 10:17 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>>>
Yes Matt, I agree with you.
However, for some reason a
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, captain_claw wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, captain_claw wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Matt Hayes
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 10/13/2010 10:17 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote:
40 matches
Mail list logo
