Hello!
I have 2 servers (with external IP each of them) and 1 domain:
domain.tld -> A: 100.200.30.1 (Server1-Ubuntu) running a Web Server
mail.domain.tld -> A: 100.200.30.2 (Server2-Ubuntu) running postfix/dovecot
MX: 10
All the setup seems to work fine. but when
j...@bordengrammar.kent.sch.uk a écrit :
> Hi List,
>
> I have Postfix 2.3.3 with amavis-new, spamassassin and clamav and am
> trying to block a group of users from sending to two internal maillists
> called staff and pupils.
>
> I have two files, restricted_maillists which is in the format:
>
>
Alberto Lepe a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I have 2 servers (with external IP each of them) and 1 domain:
>
>domain.tld -> A: 100.200.30.1 (Server1-Ubuntu) running a Web Server
> mail.domain.tld -> A: 100.200.30.2 (Server2-Ubuntu) running postfix/dovecot
> MX: 10
>
> Al
Hello.
First of all, sorry for my poor english.
How can I cofigure my postfix to receive all messages for postmaster and
not apply smtpd_*_restrictions for it? Currently I see in my log:
Mar 12 09:18:17 zero postfix/smtpd[31761]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[94.121.227.110]: 450 4.7.1
* Rocco Scappatura :
> Hello,
>
> I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses Postfix
> as MTA.
>
> On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to transmit
> messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the
> messages. In particular, it loo
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Rocco Scappatura :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses Postfix
> > as MTA.
> >
> > On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to transmit
> > messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit
* Victor Duchovni :
> No, it is a fine Postfix port. There is no reason to avoid it.
Indeed!
> The dynamic tables make it easy to add additional table types without
> re-installing Postfix or building a Postfix that supports all possible
> table types. This Postfix is at least as good as that on
* KLaM Postmaster :
> From the replies that I have received so far, I get the impression that
> while no one has anything bad to say about the Ubuntu implementation of
> Postfix, nobody is very enthusiastic.
Well, it works OK and doesn't generate any problems. For me.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.
Noel,
> > I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses
> Postfix
> > as MTA.
> >
> > On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to
> transmit
> > messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the
> > messages. In particular, it looks up DNS f
2009/3/12 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> The dynamic tables make it easy to add additional table types without
>> re-installing Postfix or building a Postfix that supports all possible
>> table types. This Postfix is at least as good as that on other Linux
>> systems.
>
> Actually, it's better. On some dist
* Barney Desmond :
> Bingo, RHEL5 comes with Postfix 2.3.3 and doesn't have support for
> mysql/pgsql tables - which are kinda popular, y'know.
E in RHEL5 stands for "except *sql", not "enterprise"
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de
Postfix - Einrich
Dear postfix users,
I have a mail-server with postfix 2.5 configured and working without
problems.
I only have an error witn one domain: [cdpoolmusic.com] . When I send
messages to that domain, I received this log notice:
postfix/error[21456]: 656B03A404D: to=<[us...@cdpoolmusic.com>, relay=none,
mhbe...@gmail.com:
> Dear postfix users,
>
> I have a mail-server with postfix 2.5 configured and working without
> problems.
> I only have an error witn one domain: [cdpoolmusic.com] . When I send
> messages to that domain, I received this log notice:
>
> postfix/error[21456]: 656B03A404D: to=<[
Hi,
Run 70+ Virtual Domains in POSTFIX
Postfix logs to /var/log/mail.log
Would like to see graphs & stats separately for each domain.
I have been attempting to use Awstats with included maillogconvert.pl
script.
Since I use amavisd-new I first process the mail.log with prepflog.pl
The Awstats,
Hello,
We have a postfix servers' backend for our domain (debian etch servers,
postfix 2.3.8). We have several domains and its users are in a ldap
database. So we have defined several ldap maps in postfix to check
relocated users, mail aliases and virtual users.
With this configur
Angel L. Mateo:
> Hello,
>
> We have a postfix servers' backend for our domain (debian etch servers,
> postfix 2.3.8). We have several domains and its users are in a ldap
> database. So we have defined several ldap maps in postfix to check
> relocated users, mail aliases and virtual users.
>
El jue, 12-03-2009 a las 09:00 -0400, Wietse Venema escribió:
> Postfix virtual alias table lookups are documented in virtual(5).
> http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html.
>
> See also ldap_table(5) for details specific to LDAP lookups.
> http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html
>
I know
Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> El jue, 12-03-2009 a las 09:00 -0400, Wietse Venema escribió:
>
>
>> Postfix virtual alias table lookups are documented in virtual(5).
>> http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html.
>>
>> See also ldap_table(5) for details specific to LDAP lookups.
>> http://www.postfix.org/ld
Hello
we have a in house mail system based on postfix.
We would like to optionnaly integrate AUTH for SMTP
I wonder if it would be possible to
have SMTP/postfix listen on port 25 and say port 26
with the following setttings
* port 25 does not require AUTH
* port 26 requires AUTH
( we
fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> Hello
>
>
> we have a in house mail system based on postfix.
> We would like to optionnaly integrate AUTH for SMTP
>
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to
>
> have SMTP/postfix listen on port 25 and say port 26
>
> with the following setttings
>
> * port 25 do
you are probably better just using port 587 (submission) for auth as
it's a common thing to expect.
for example, master.cf comes pre-setup for enabling smtp auth on the
submission port.
Cheers,
Harry
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 13:30 +, fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> Hello
>
>
> we have a in h
Hello,
i try to create a small policy server as a bash script. The script is
alsmost done and is working.
the only problem i have is the correct reply to postfix.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html shows:
The policy server replies with any action that is allowed in a Postfix SMTPD
in master.cf file by default only the normal smtp service is enabled.
You can enable submission on port 587
Sometimes people enable smtps service (port 465), for some compatibility
with some older clients (outlook express etc) although most new clients
you can define the port.
my config looks
Andre H?bner:
> Hello,
>
> i try to create a small policy server as a bash script. The script is
> alsmost done and is working.
> the only problem i have is the correct reply to postfix.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html shows:
> The policy server replies with any action that i
Hi Again,
Sorry to be a pain but I'm stuck again. If I try to send to the maillists
from any account, I get blocked instead of only the pupils so it seems
that the restricted user list is being ignored when applying the rules.
I've tried all sorts of combinations of restrictions but it's either on
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:21:25PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Curtis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Victor Duchovni
transport:
bo...@example.com error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient address
address.invalid error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient add
Ok, sorry, another list-newbie :)
The problem (User unknown in virtual alias table)only happens with one rcpt
domain [cdpoolmusic.com]:
Log at /var/log/maillog :
Mar 12 15:32:30 host01 postfix/smtpd[23592]: connect from unknown[127.0.0.1]
Mar 12 15:32:30 host01 postfix/smtpd[23592]: 616CE3A40CD:
I've been using Postfix for 9 years, and I really like it. There is
still one thing I can't seem to be able to do:
I' using the following config options:
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:virtual_mailbox_domains.sql
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:virtual_mailbox_maps.sql
virtual_a
Which smtpd services in master.cf have receive_override_options
and what are the receive_override_options settings there?
Wietse
All,
If I am a secondary server hosting part of a domain.
I must route all bounce messages back to the primary service
for delivery.
Does Postfix have this capability?
George
_
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels r
KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
> look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
> I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
> think about things like "dynamicmaps" and other oddities of the Ubuntu
Marc Jauvin:
> I've been using Postfix for 9 years, and I really like it. There is
> still one thing I can't seem to be able to do:
>
> I' using the following config options:
>
> virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:virtual_mailbox_domains.sql
> virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:virtual_
Hi Wietse, I understand this.
Here is a more complete description of my problems:
We're offering mail services for our clients, we also provide dns
services for them. So in practice, most of our customers will have
their MX record point to our mail servers by default while we provide
the m
On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:56, Marc Jauvin wrote:
So how can we configure postfix so that it will "realize" that the
mail should be routed to the NEW MX host?
1) don't top post.
2) Remove the domain from your maps.
Amavisd filters smtp mail over 10025 port on localhost:
Settings for receive_override_options are equal to
no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks
/etc/postfix/master.cf :
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
#smtp inet n - n - -
Marc Jauvin wrote:
Now, at some point if the customer decides to point their MX records to
an external mail server (whether it handles the final delivery of the
email is of no concern to us at this point), but our mail server is not
aware of the change (and still has mapping in the internal "vi
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:16:22PM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> El jue, 12-03-2009 a las 09:00 -0400, Wietse Venema escribi??:
>
> > Postfix virtual alias table lookups are documented in virtual(5).
> > http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html.
> >
> > See also ldap_table(5) for details specific
mhbe...@gmail.com:
> Mar 12 15:32:30 host01 postfix/error[23595]: 616CE3A40CD:
> to=, relay=none, delay=0.23, delays=0.03/0.12/0/0.07,
> dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (User unknown in virtual alias table)
cdpoolmusic.com matches virtual_alias_domains
Should it match virtual_alias_domains? Why?
u...@
Marc Jauvin:
> "virtual" maps. So at this point, if we send this customer an email at
> his domain, the email will be delivered "internally" instead of being
> sent to his NEW external MX host.
>
> So how can we configure postfix so that it will "realize" that the
> mail should be routed to
How do I go about setting up something where the "to" field shows the
address of the list but is still delivered to each individual user? I'm
also wondering how I preserve the original message id and reply-to-id
(or whatever that header was called).
Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I mean:
postfix has no idea if he's supposed to be MX host or not, because
it's treating the virtual mapping rules as "authoritative", as far as
I know.
Since we have no means to know that the MX records were modified, then
we
Marc Jauvin wrote:
Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I mean:
postfix has no idea if he's supposed to be MX host or not, because it's
treating the virtual mapping rules as "authoritative", as far as I know.
Postfix doesn't care if it's the MX host or not, because
yo
That's what I was afraid of... when you're hosting multi-thousands of
domains, that's not an easy task... :(
Noel Jones wrote:
Marc Jauvin wrote:
Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I
mean: postfix has no idea if he's supposed to be MX host or not,
because it's
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> How do I go about setting up something where the "to" field shows the
> address of the list but is still delivered to each individual user?
> I'm also wondering how I preserve the original message id and
> reply-to-id (or whatever that header was called).
I highly recommend a
Marc Jauvin:
> "virtual" maps. So at this point, if we send this customer an email at
> his domain, the email will be delivered "internally" instead of being
> sent to his NEW external MX host.
>
> So how can we configure postfix so that it will "realize" that the
> mail should be routed to the NEW
I am a web programmer (dealing in Ruby/Merb). I've got most of it
worked out now, including VERP (which is redirected to my own email
until things get big). I'm manually putting the headers in each email,
but the Message-Id is getting set to something else even though I
included it already. I
On 12-Mar-2009, at 10:50, Marc Jauvin wrote:
Since we have no means to know that the MX records were modified,
then we can't "remove" those virtual mapping rules from our database.
$ dig mx example.com | grep -A1 "ANSWER SECTION" | grep MX
I suppose you could run that each day and flag domai
What would be the best way to add a "bounce+" to the beginning of every
"Return-Path" address for outgoing
e-mail? I've been digging for two days and have not found a workable solution.
Chris
Chris Dos:
> What would be the best way to add a "bounce+" to the beginning of
> every "Return-Path" address for outgoing e-mail? I've been digging
> for two days and have not found a workable solution.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#canonical
http://www.postfix.org/postconf
_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3931 (20090312) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3931 (20090312) _
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> It won't add bounce+ to the beginning of every email, but you can use
> VERP. It might prove more useful anyways as hosts don't always include
> the "to" email address when sending back bounced messages. The format
> is like this:
>
> mailinglistname+senderuser=senderdo...
Hi,
What i have to do for discard email when reverse name is google.com and from
is <> , Currently i''m receive 1.200 millions for email per seconds, a
bounce atack.
Thanks
Alexandre Carlim
Thanks,
We succeeded to solve this problem in this way, I create in main.cf
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_bounce_sender,
cat /etc/postfix/check_bounce_sender
<> check_no-bounce_domains
And:
smtpd_restriction_classes = bloqueio-revers
Chris Dos:
> Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > It won't add bounce+ to the beginning of every email, but you can use
> > VERP. It might prove more useful anyways as hosts don't always include
> > the "to" email address when sending back bounced messages. The format
> > is like this:
> >
> > mailinglistna
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> Sure thing. Right now I just have two lists at this domain:
> l...@domain.com and admin-l...@domain.com and so I have just this line
> in my
> regexp table:
>
> /^(admin\-)?lis...@domain\.com$/i boun...@domain.com
>
> It's a bit oversimplified, but it gets the job done.
Th
j...@bordengrammar.kent.sch.uk a écrit :
> Hi Again,
>
> Sorry to be a pain but I'm stuck again. If I try to send to the maillists
> from any account, I get blocked instead of only the pupils so it seems
> that the restricted user list is being ignored when applying the rules.
> I've tried all sor
Sergey a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> First of all, sorry for my poor english.
>
> How can I cofigure my postfix to receive all messages for postmaster and
> not apply smtpd_*_restrictions for it? Currently I see in my log:
>
> Mar 12 09:18:17 zero postfix/smtpd[31761]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unkn
George Forman a écrit :
> All,
>
> If I am a secondary server hosting part of a domain.
> I must route all bounce messages back to the primary service
> for delivery.
>
> Does Postfix have this capability?
>
this is unclear. which bounce messages? please clarify (explict
examples). also explain
2009/3/13 George Forman :
> If I am a secondary server hosting part of a domain.
> I must route all bounce messages back to the primary service
> for delivery.
>
> Does Postfix have this capability?
Setting the primary service as the relayhost should do this on the
secondary should do this for you
Jeremy Nicoll a écrit :
> I am a web programmer (dealing in Ruby/Merb). I've got most of it
> worked out now, including VERP (which is redirected to my own email
> until things get big). I'm manually putting the headers in each email,
> but the Message-Id is getting set to something else even tho
2009/3/13 Marc Jauvin :
> Since we have no means to know that the MX records were modified, then we
> can't "remove" those virtual mapping rules from our database.
As others have said, you need to make sure your postfix configuration
matches the reality of the situation. As I work at a webhosting
61 matches
Mail list logo
