On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:40 -0700, tom lee wrote:
> hello,
>
> I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
> clear about two issues.
>
> I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B is a relay
> server forwarding the email to machine C (target machine).
>
> I
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned
and I don't have virtual_alias_domains :)
Actually, isn't virtual_mailbox_d
Hi ,
I've controlled the mails delivery rate( F.E hotmail ,1mail /10s) in
postfix, when this mail is delivered the first time, this rate is okay, but
there is another problem shows, if some mails are back into queue for
reject reason from one ISP(hotmail), it looks like the re-sending rate is
no
Tony Liu:
> Hi ,
>
> I've controlled the mails delivery rate( F.E hotmail ,1mail /10s) in
> postfix, when this mail is delivered the first time, this rate is okay, but
> there is another problem shows, if some mails are back into queue for
> reject reason from one ISP(hotmail), it looks like the
LuKreme:
> On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
> > you must understand the difference between
> > virtual_mailbox_domains
> > and
> > virtual_alias_domains
>
> I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned
> and I don't have virtual_alias_domains :)
By default,
On Mar 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned
and I don't have virtual_alias_domains :
Is this sane or is it going to cause problems?
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
...
# Valid local users only exist in these locations
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
$virtual_alias_maps
...
# What are the domains that we handle mail for?
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/etc/postf
Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user level?
That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything from
example.net goes to gateway 2?
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Beh
Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
> Is this sane or is it going to cause problems?
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> ...
> # Valid local users only exist in these locations
> local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
> $virtual_alias_maps
> ...
> # What are the domains that we handle mail for?
> vir
On 3/9/2009 6:12 PM, mouss wrote:
>> It will never fail that the user will decide right after clicking the
>> send button that they want to recall it, no matter how long they wait
>> prior to sending...
> and they will also decide to recall it after it was "released" ;-p
Of course... but all joki
I'm running the commands from a SSH shell logged in as root. What do you mean
by setuid wrapper?
GlenB
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Victor Duchovni wrote:
From: Victor Duchovni
Subject: Re: v2.5.5 showq and postcat date/time stamp discrepancy
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Tuesday, March 10
On 10 Mar 2009, at 13:24, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Do not include virtual_alias_maps in local_recipient_maps.
virtual_alias_maps are checked globally for all Address Classes.
For more on Address Classes, see
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
That makes sense. I'm not
Glen B:
> ?
> ? I'm running the commands from a SSH shell logged in as root. What do you
> mean by setuid wrapper?
> ?
Type the following commands, and report the output:
$ date
$ mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
$ date
This may very well be a Debian bug where they run daemons chrooted
but don't provi
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:43 -0400, Zachary Fortna
wrote:
> Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user
level?
> That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything
from
> example.net goes to gateway 2?
>
Have a look at:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:43 -0400, Zachary Fortna
wrote:
> Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user
level?
> That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything
from
> example.net goes to gateway 2?
I may have goofed, I'm not sure what I suggested i
I keep seeing and having questions on valid parameters and valid values
for them. The Postfix.org site and manual have great listings and this
list has provided excellent info on them.
Still I stay a bit confused as I started with an older version (could
have been in the 1.x series) and got m
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:01 AM, ram wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:40 -0700, tom lee wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
>> clear about two issues.
>>
>> I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B is a relay
>> server forwa
Zachary Fortna wrote:
Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user level?
That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything from
example.net goes to gateway 2?
Yes, please see
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
Roderick A. Anderson:
> I keep seeing and having questions on valid parameters and valid values
> for them. The Postfix.org site and manual have great listings and this
> list has provided excellent info on them.
>
> Still I stay a bit confused as I started with an older version (could
> have
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:27:21PM +0800, Tony Liu wrote:
> I've controlled the mails delivery rate( F.E hotmail ,1mail /10s) in
> postfix, when this mail is delivered the first time, this rate is okay, but
> there is another problem shows, if some mails are back into queue for
> reject reason f
Is it possible to implement multiple HOLD queues for different types of
content that requires inspection (spam, file attachments, etc?)
Thanks!
Terry
Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below. I
referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to once
verify it for me.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_re
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:52:07AM -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
> Is it possible to implement multiple HOLD queues for different types of
> content that requires inspection (spam, file attachments, etc?)
Yes, use FILTER rather than HOLD, and deliver the mail to separate
Postfix quarantine instance
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
I keep seeing and having questions on valid parameters and valid values
for them. The Postfix.org site and manual have great listings and this
list has provided excellent info on them.
Still I stay a bit confused as I started with an older version (
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = ...
> smtpd_data_restrictions = ...
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ...
> header_checks = ...
>
> I'm assuming smtpd_* means the the first three are handled by smtpd but in
> what order?
Well, the
Linux Addict wrote:
> Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below.
> I referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to
> once verify it for me.
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> reject_unkn
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
> Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below. I
> referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to once
> verify it for me.
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
> Linux Addict wrote:
> > Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below.
> > I referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to
> > once verify it for me.
> >
> > smtpd_recipient_restriction
Roderick A. Anderson:
> In a main.cf I have:
>
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = ...
> smtpd_data_restrictions = ...
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ...
> header_checks = ...
>
> I'm assuming smtpd_* means the the first three are handled by smtpd but
> in what order? I'm leaning towards helo, recipi
Terry Carmen:
> Is it possible to implement multiple HOLD queues for different types of
> content that requires inspection (spam, file attachments, etc?)
Yes. This functionality can be added to Postfix, by plugging an
external information management system into the many standard
message interface
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
> > Linux Addict wrote:
> > > Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed
> below.
> > > I referred many documents to
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Well, the only opportunity to respond an SMTP command is in respnse to
*that* command, so originally these took place at the time of the
correspoding SMTP command.
connect:client re
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Glen B wrote:
> From: Glen B
> Subject: Re: v2.5.5 showq and postcat date/time stamp discrepancy
> To: "Wietse Venema"
> Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 1:16 PM
> >
> >--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Wietse Venema
> wrote:
> >
> >From: Wietse Venema
> >Subject: Re: v2.5.5 showq and
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:20:14AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>> You could try the documentation instead.
>> http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
>> http://www.postfix.org/postfix-manuals.html
>
> Oh I have but find myself getting lost as I follow links that lead to other
> l
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:20:15AM -0700, Glen B wrote:
> > box:/# mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
> > postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue
> > directly
> > DBBAD4A340AD? 827 Mon Mar? 9 10:29:27? root
> > box:/# date
> > Tue Mar 10 12:39:03 EDT 2009
> > box:/#
Perhaps the "pos
On 10-Mar-2009, at 03:27, Tony Liu wrote:
Hi ,
Hi. Please don't hijack another thread when posting a new message.
That is to say, when you reply to a message on the list and change the
subject that is NOT the same as creating a new message.
--
I do believe Marsellus Wallace, my husband,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> > Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below.
> I
> > referred many documents to compile the options. I wan
Wietse:
>Type the following commands, and report the output:
>
>$ date
>$ mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
>$ date
>
>This may very well be a Debian bug where they run daemons chrooted
>but don't provide the correct timezone file inside the jail.
Glen B:
> box:/# date
> Tue Mar 10 12:38:51 EDT 2009
> box
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:37:07PM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
> > > reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
> > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
> > > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
> > > permit
> >
> > Fairly sensible overall.
>
> Is it better to place rbl rejections under smtpd_client_re
On 10-Mar-2009, at 06:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains
assig
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:33:52PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> Could I simply change my virtual_alias_maps definition above to
> virtual_alias_domains? I don't think so. At least how this is setup, the
> mysql_virtual_alias.maps.cf returns the alias (forwarding alias) of
> accounts that have an ali
On 3/10/2009, Victor Duchovni (victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com) wrote:
> There are two decent books and I find that tabbed browsing makes it easy to
> not lose context. Certainly the links to postconf.5.html don't usually
> require too many levels of nesting, so first read the tutorial, open
> ba
Hello All,
I am running postfix (apple version) with MAC OSX10.4.11 client. I
found the following entries in the "Console/501/console.log". I am
concerned but do not know what it means. The var/log/mail.log does
not show any errors and seem to be sending/receiving mail without
problem.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:37:27PM +, Rupert Reid wrote:
> I am running postfix (apple version) with MAC OSX10.4.11 client. I found
> the following entries in the "Console/501/console.log". I am concerned but
> do not know what it means. The var/log/mail.log does not show any errors
> an
On 10-Mar-2009, at 09:59, Linux Addict wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
I have reject_invalid_hostname here as well (before permit_mynetworks)
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> This may very well be a Debian bug where they run daemons chrooted
> but don't provide the correct timezone file inside the jail.
Just for reference, the postfix 2.5.5-1.1 package in Debian -- if any
services i
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:28:00PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 10-Mar-2009, at 09:59, Linux Addict wrote:
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
>> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
>> reject_unknown_sender_domain,
>> reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
>
> I have reject_invalid_hostnam
On 10-Mar-2009, at 12:41, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:33:52PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
Could I simply change my virtual_alias_maps definition above to
virtual_alias_domains? I don't think so. At least how this is
setup, the
mysql_virtual_alias.maps.cf returns the alias (fo
On 10-Mar-2009, at 13:37, Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I am running postfix (apple version) with MAC OSX10.4.11 client. I
found the following entries in the "Console/501/console.log". I am
concerned but do not know what it means. The var/log/mail.log does
not show any errors and seem
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:46:29PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>> The recommended approach for those ready to move beyond 1.1 compatible
>> settings is:
>>
>>virtual_alias_domains = ... explicit list of domains or tables ...
>>virtual_alias_maps = ... tables ...
>>
>> if the number of virtual al
Ben Winslow:
> FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
> in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
> for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus user time zone). It could
explain the origina
On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:22, Victor Duchovni wrote:
None, but the trivial-rewrite service will be saddled with one less
MySQL lookup to determine the address class of a domain. Ideally you
also move virtual_mailbox_domains to its own parameter also, and
don't rely on implicit lookups of that in virt
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:57:04PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> OK OK, so I go from this:
>
> virtual_alias_maps =
> hash:$config_directory/virtual,
> pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
> mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
>
> to this:
>
> virtual_alias_maps =
> pcre:
On 10-Mar-2009, at 16:06, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:57:04PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
Yes, provided the latter contains only "domain anything" entries and
no
"address rewrite-address" entries.
virtual_alias
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:22:00PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>> Yes, provided of course the hash table only contained domains. Or could
>> just set:
>>
>>virtual_alias_domains = hash:$config_directory/virtual
>
> Ah... er... OK, now you lost me again. What in $DEITY's name would be the
> point o
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
>> you must understand the difference between
>> virtual_mailbox_domains
>> and
>> virtual_alias_domains
>
> I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned and
> I don't have virtual_alias_domains :)
>
then s
Charles Marcus a écrit :
> On 3/9/2009 6:12 PM, mouss wrote:
>>> I only said it was an interesting idea, and wondered if it could be
>>> automated... I'm still not sure it *should* be done... :)
>
>> it can be automated. the hard part is to define the criteria (when to
>> keep, when to "release")
tom lee a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:01 AM, ram wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:40 -0700, tom lee wrote:
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
>>> clear about two issues.
>>>
>>> I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B i
Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit :
> Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
>> Is this sane or is it going to cause problems?
>>
>> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>> ...
>> # Valid local users only exist in these locations
>> local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
>> $virtual_alias_maps
>> ...
>> # Wha
On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:57, LuKreme wrote:
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
Ugh!
Seems $config_directory/ is not liked by mysql:
whew, it's always s
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:47:22PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:57, LuKreme wrote:
>> virtual_alias_maps =
>>pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
>>mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
>> virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
>
>
> U
Hi,
Let see how to explain this...
The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my
rules is to reject a message and notify sender, in this step, postfix
uses <> as mail from, this is a normal behavior i think; but in my
scenario where i have one fake domain and using se
mme...@gmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> Let see how to explain this...
>
> The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my
> rules is to reject a message and notify sender.
Don't do that. By bouncing crap to the sender you are harassing
innocent people about mail that they did not sen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, mouss wrote:
>> All mails sending from machine A via relaying machine B will arrive in
>> machine C.
>> I think I need to set up something in machine B so that there will be no
>> mails
>> bounce back to machine A.
>
> if you want machine B to send no bounces, ch
I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine...
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
Is there an easy way to designate an explicit *invalid* email address so
that even though the catch-all is enabled for a domain, a specific email
address is considered invalid and is boun
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ben Winslow:
FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus user time zone). I
On Mar 10, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Curtis wrote:
I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine...
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
Is there an easy way to designate an explicit *invalid* email
address so that even though the catch-all is enabled for a domain, a
specif
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:23:30PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Curtis wrote:
>
>> I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine...
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
>>
>> Is there an easy way to designate an explicit *invalid* email ad
Glen B wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ben Winslow:
FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus user
With these settings
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
I get
mail postfix/smtpd[36156]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
lists.php.net[216.92.131.4]: 450 4.1.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:30:01PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> With these settings
>
> virtual_alias_maps =
>pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
>mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
> virtual_alias_domains = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
>
> I get
>
> mail postfix/smtpd[
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:30 PM, LuKreme wrote:
With these settings
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
I get
mail postfix/smtpd[36156]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
[...]
so with the above change to your main.cf, Postfix no longer accepts
mail from krem...@kreme.com.
s/from/for/
--
Sahil Tandon
hi, folks
this is a simple patch to make postfix 2.5.6 send queueid by xforward
command to next-hop, hope this can be ...
BTW: server side queueid parse does not done in this patch.
good luck.
saguto yin
cut--
diff -ruN postfix-2.5.6/src/global/mail_proto.h
74 matches
Mail list logo
