--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Glen B <batch...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> From: Glen B <batch...@bellsouth.net>
> Subject: Re: v2.5.5 showq and postcat date/time stamp discrepancy
> To: "Wietse Venema" <wie...@porcupine.org>
> Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 1:16 PM
> >
> >--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Wietse Venema
> <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> >
> >From: Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org>
> >Subject: Re: v2.5.5 showq and postcat date/time stamp
> discrepancy
> >To: "Glen B" <batch...@bellsouth.net>
> >Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> >Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 10:36 AM
> >
> >Glen B:
> >> ?
> >> ? I'm running the commands from a SSH shell
> logged in as root. What do
> >you mean by setuid wrapper?
> >> ?
> >
> >Type the following commands, and report the output:
> >
> >$ date
> >$ mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
> >$ date
> >
> >This may very well be a Debian bug where they run
> daemons chrooted
> >but don't provide the correct timezone file inside
> the jail.
> 
> 
> Wietse,
> 
> box:/# date
> Tue Mar 10 12:38:51 EDT 2009
> box:/# mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
> postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue
> directly
> DBBAD4A340AD      827 Mon Mar  9 10:29:27  root
> box:/# date
> Tue Mar 10 12:39:03 EDT 2009
> box:/#
> 
> I think you are correct, but I've not had any luck
> getting postcat to report based on zoneinfo in the chroot or
> outside of a chroot. Mailq seems to work correctly
> regardless. 
> 
> I've copied zoneinfo files respective to the root path,
> /etc/localtime, and /etc/timezone into the chroot. I also
> tried disabling chroot for showq in master.cf,
> restarting/stopping postfix, and then submitting a new
> message offline. The same date/time issue still appears to
> happen.
> 
> I've seen that the code should be reporting the same
> date/time. Is there another service that I should remove the
> chroot from for testing this?
> 
>  The following services are currently not chrooted:
> 
>  smtpd, qmgr, proxymap, showq, local, virtual, maildrop,
> uucp
> 
> 
> GlenB

 Here's a copy of my response that didn't originally go to the list. 

Reply via email to