Trust it is appropriate in this forum and useful to others to write that
postfix-tlspol-1.8.12 and tlsrpt-reporter-0.5.0 are now available in the
Ghettoforge repository as rpms for EL8 and 9.
https://mirror.ghettoforge.net/distributions/gf/el/9/gf/x86_64/
https://mirror.ghettoforge.net
Hi
I known this is First world problem. I have a questions about postfix
transport. I have two serwer:
1)smtp-n1 - default
2)smtp-n2
In smtp-nX i have this same query like:
postmap -q u...@domain1.ltd memcache:/etc/postfix/memcache_cache.cf
smtp-out
sql;
query =
SELECT IFNULL((SELECT
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:49:56AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Perhaps an example, like the above, that puts multiple pieces of the
> > puzzle together could make a useful addition to ADDRESS_REWRITING_README?
>
> I've been collecting 'advan
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 01:36:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > > Looks very interesting. But unfortunately there's no regexp support
> > > available.
> > > And the installations of pos
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 01:36:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Looks very interesting. But unfortunately there's no regexp support
> > available.
> > And the installations of postfix and OS are quite old. Old enough, so that i
> > seriously do
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4bgttz1dbdzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
|> Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|>>|Verified with
|>>|
|>>|postmap -q - 'pipemap:{regexp:rcpt-bcc.regexp,regexp:bcc-generic.reg\
|&g
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> > |Verified with
> > |
> > |postmap -q -
> > 'pipemap:{regexp:rcpt-bcc.regexp,regexp:bcc-generic.regexp\
> > |}'
> > |
> > |for quoted and unquoted loca
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> |Verified with
> |
> |postmap -q - 'pipemap:{regexp:rcpt-bcc.regexp,regexp:bcc-generic.regexp\
> |}'
> |
> |for quoted and unquoted localparts.
>
> And partially quoted? I have a bit of problems with ABN
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4bgqh45qyzzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|oftl--- via Postfix-users:
|> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 06:01:20PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-us\
|> ers wrote:
|>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 09:12:28PM +0200, oftl--- via Postfix-
oftl--- via Postfix-users:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 06:01:20PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 09:12:28PM +0200, oftl--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> >
> > > Have an already up and running postfix *also* relay everythin
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 06:01:20PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 09:12:28PM +0200, oftl--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > Have an already up and running postfix *also* relay everything to another
> > postfix.
>
> Yes, v
Eray Aslan via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> postfix-3.11-20250713 build fails with
> [...]
> multi_server.c: In function ?multi_server_drain?:
> event_server.c: In function ?event_server_drain?:
> multi_server.c:300:9: error: ?return? with no value, in function returning
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:28:17AM +0200, Eray Aslan via Postfix-users wrote:
> postfix-3.11-20250713 build fails with
> [...]
> multi_server.c: In function ‘multi_server_drain’:
> event_server.c: In function ‘event_server_drain’:
> multi_server.c:300:9: error: ‘return’ with no val
Hi,
postfix-3.11-20250713 build fails with
[...]
multi_server.c: In function ‘multi_server_drain’:
event_server.c: In function ‘event_server_drain’:
multi_server.c:300:9: error: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning
non-void [-Wreturn-mismatch]
300 | return
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 09:12:28PM +0200, oftl--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> Have an already up and running postfix *also* relay everything to another
> postfix.
Yes, via an envelope-recipient preserving PCRE recipient Bcc table, and
helper machinery to route and unmunge the add
To be more clear, by hardcoded addresses I meant local delivery. Postfix has
local accounts which exist on the machine as local users (eg. root@mailserver)
and virtual domains where there is no local user backed to it. Your question
didn’t state which type of transport you’re using so I
://www.google.com/search?q=relayhost+postfix
Such as:
https://www.lunanode.com/guides/postfix_smtp_secure
And:
https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/postfix-smtp-debian7/
Hope this helps,
Matthew
> On 14 Jul 2025, at 7:30 am, oftl--- via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> yes
Hi there,
yes i did come across always_bcc. Unfortunately that's not what i'm
looking for. I'd like to see how both postfixes behave when receiving
the (as far as possible) same messsage.
o/
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 08:21:11AM +0200, Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
wrote:
&g
Hallo,
did you check if the always_bcc directive meets that need? Put in a dedicated
recipient on the other postfix, it'll get a bcc of each message
inbound/outbound of the first postfix server.
Am 13.07.2025 um 21:12 schrieb oftl--- via Postfix-users:
Hi!
This is what i'd
Hi!
This is what i'd like to do:
Have an already up and running postfix *also* relay everything to another
postfix.
The already running one should keep doing whatever it does and *additionally*
relay any and all mail to the other one.
Is that possibl
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
https://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.10.3.html]
This release fixes defects that were introduced in Postfix 3.10.
These were fixed first in the Postfix 3.11 unstable release.
The defects exist only with the default
Hi
Problem was not in systemd but in opendmarc-1.4.0 in debian11
I make own deb with opendmarc-1.4.2 and problem fixed
Probably bug in opendmarc-1.4.0 and special e-mail
After change version works fine
W dniu 9.07.2025 o 12:29, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users
natan via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-07-09 10:44:
Logs:
https://paste.debian.net/1384983/
disable systemd, the milter does not need it to work from postfix milter
ReportCommand /bin/true
bogus
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users
Hi
I found some problem with setup postfix + opendmarc. In my lab working
fine but in productions opendmarc killed ?
When I use older debian and remove systemd works fine.
In postfix i have standard:
#dkim+dmarc
#dmarc -> inet:127.0.0.1:54321
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:12301,i
Hi
Thanx sorry for stupid question and trivial mistake
W dniu 2.07.2025 o 17:00, Bill Cole via Postfix-users pisze:
On 2025-07-02 at 10:54:47 UTC-0400 (Wed, 2 Jul 2025 16:54:47 +0200)
natan via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
postmap -q u...@domain.ltd randmap:{int1,int2,int3,int4,int5
On 2025-07-02 at 10:54:47 UTC-0400 (Wed, 2 Jul 2025 16:54:47 +0200)
natan via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> postmap -q u...@domain.ltd randmap:{int1,int2,int3,int4,int5}
You need quotes to protect the {} from shell expansion:
$ postmap -q u...@domain.ltd 'randmap:{int1,i
fine:
query = select transport from virtual_transport where active='1' order
by rand() limit 1;
postmap -q u...@domain.ltd
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_default_rotate_map.cf
smtp149
postmap -q u...@domain.ltd
mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sender_default_rotate_map.cf
smtp12
postmap -q u...@
AD or maybe a MySQL server ( this is where I need help to decide)
The AD approach is IMHO more sensible.
> I am not sure how authentication is implemented for high traffic
> postfix servers.
Nothing special, SASL logins are very unlikely to be a bottleneck...
The most robust solution would
Dnia 2.07.2025 o godz. 14:25:52 Burn Zero via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> They do have fixed IP addresses. But I need to implement
> authentication so that they cannot just use any email address. For
> example: a device configured with an account must be able to send
> email
ust be able to send
email with that "from" address only (both "mail from" and "header
from").
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
d
> backend?
As they are not in Active Directory, I am planning to create those in
AD or maybe a MySQL server ( this is where I need help to decide)
I am not sure how authentication is implemented for high traffic
postfix servers. Just like when we use a SaaS solution like smtp2go,
they provide
Dnia 2.07.2025 o godz. 11:59:09 Burn Zero via Postfix-users pisze:
> > Typically, neither is a good choice for *authentication* (logins via a
> > password of some sort). Are you sure you're looking for
> > *authentication* rather that email address validation?
>
to create it if I am going for LDAP.
How do you expect to manage the login accounts of the users that are to
be authenticated? Users in ActiveDirectory, or some ad hoc password
backend?
--
Viktor.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@p
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:02:44PM +0530, Burn Zero via Postfix-users wrote:
> > With 400k/day, you can expect loads up to 100 requests/second.
> >
> > If this uses the Postfix ldap: or mysql: clients, then maybe using
> > memcache: with backup=ldap:/foo or ba
> With 400k/day, you can expect loads up to 100 requests/second.
>
> If this uses the Postfix ldap: or mysql: clients, then maybe using
> memcache: with backup=ldap:/foo or backup=mysql:/bar can help.
>
Thank you, I will try using memcache.
____
ng LDAP data. I have to create it if I am going for LDAP.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Burn Zero via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement postfix authentication with LDAP (Active
> Directory) where the postfix server will act as relay. The expected traffic
> is huge (around 400K / day), so is it better to use LDAP as authentication
> mode than MyS
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 04:32:18PM +0530, Burn Zero via Postfix-users wrote:
> I am trying to implement postfix authentication with LDAP (Active
> Directory) where the postfix server will act as relay. The expected traffic
> is huge (around 400K / day), so is it better to us
Hi,
I am trying to implement postfix authentication with LDAP (Active
Directory) where the postfix server will act as relay. The expected traffic
is huge (around 400K / day), so is it better to use LDAP as authentication
mode than MySQL?
Thank you
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 11:50:55AM -0400, Jason Hirsh via Postfix-users wrote:
[ Just noticed this post from May 06... ]
> # TLS CONFIG
> smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes
> smtpd_tls_key_file = /usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/kasdivi.com/privkey.key
> smtpd_tls_cert_file =
>
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 10:55:10AM -0400, Paul Raines via Postfix-users wrote:
> I was thinking of a third way by removing proxy:unix:passwd.byname
> from local_recipient_maps and adding in a hash map with just the
> "enabled" user accounts. That would be take more effort thou
communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
_______
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
t;
> When I use the dig command to lookup the TLSA it can find them. But somehow
> with postfix not.
The local resolver must not have been configured to perform DNSSEC
validation.
> But I now removed localhost as local DNS resolver and use google or quad9
> instead.
That largely d
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:57:12PM -0400, Paul Raines via Postfix-users wrote:
> As a quick fix for (1) I have changed the access map to use
> olduser@primary.domain instead of just olduser@ but that only works for that
> primary.domain. We have several secondary domains and I would hav
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Paul Raines via Postfix-users:
> >
> > I moved from an old sendmail based mail server to a new Postfix one
> > recently. On the old system when a user account was closed I would put an
> > entry in a access map for sendmail like
&g
Paul Raines via Postfix-users:
>
> I moved from an old sendmail based mail server to a new Postfix one
> recently. On the old system when a user account was closed I would put an
> entry in a access map for sendmail like
>
> To:olduser@ERROR:"505 Disabled user accou
can find them. But somehow
with postfix not.
But I now removed localhost as local DNS resolver and use google or quad9
instead.
For testing I tried with "dane-only" policy with and without postfix-tlspol
and it works fine.
Luca.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Viktor Dukhov
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Luca vom Bruch via Postfix-users
wrote:
> to=, relay=none, delay=0.64,
> delays=0.1/0.02/0.51/0, dsn=4.7.5, status=deferred (no TLSA records found)
That's odd, when I query the DNS, I see DNSSEC-signed MX records for the
domain with signed
I moved from an old sendmail based mail server to a new Postfix one
recently. On the old system when a user account was closed I would put an
entry in a access map for sendmail like
To:olduser@ERROR:"505 Disabled user account"
and this would work fine to prevent any email de
Luca vom Bruch via Postfix-users:
> The log message when using postfix-tlspol
> Evaluated policy for "learndmarc.com": dane-only (from cache, 15m2s
> remaining)
postfix-tlspol says that TLSA records must be used. And I can
confirm that they exist. Command:
> And mail
Dear fellow postfixers!
I wanted to implement MTA-STS and for this I use postfix-tlspol
It works for the most part but I am wondering why I can no longer use the
test website
Learndmarc.com
That site gives you an email address to send mail to to test your
compliance
Dear Viktor,
Am 30.05.2025 um 15:34 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:31:59PM +0200, Christian H. Kuhn via Postfix-users
wrote:
What is the address class of the "$myorigin" domain? If "$myorigin"
is the same as "$mydomain&quo
BuzzSaw Code via Postfix-users:
> I've read the Postfix documentation trying to understand what the logs
> are telling me, but this may still be a dumb question, so apologies in
> advance.
>
> Another mail server within our own organization sends periodic
> messages to
I've read the Postfix documentation trying to understand what the logs
are telling me, but this may still be a dumb question, so apologies in
advance.
Another mail server within our own organization sends periodic
messages to us, and in the logs for those emails I see this:
2025-05-30T
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:31:59PM +0200, Christian H. Kuhn via Postfix-users
wrote:
> reject: RCPT from list.sys4.de[45.90.5.195]: 450 4.1.1 :
> Recipient address rejected: unverified address: User unknown in virtual
> alias table; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
Address veri
Ingrid:
> 2025-05-29T19:47:36.922543+02:00 bywater postfix/smtpd[1862185]:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from list.sys4.de[45.90.5.195]: 450 4.1.1 post...@qno.de>: Recipient address rejected: unverified address: User
unknown in virtual alias table; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
root@bywate
Am 29.05.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> If you prefer to contradict the doctor, then I can't help you.
Never ever would i do such a thing. Just wanted to know what is going on.
After removing smtpd_recipient_restrictions, i saw a table lookup for
virtual
#x27;s empty. I cited from mail.info which contains log level info
and higher.
I added -v in master.cf, perhaps i'll get a closer hint.
Am 28.05.2025 um 21:57 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
- Next the Postfix SMTP daemon is supposed to find out if the domain
exists in DNS, bu
Christian H. Kuhn via Postfix-users:
> Dear Wietse,
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> Am 28.05.2025 um 21:57 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > (There should be warnings logged that saywhich table lookup failed.
> > Does your system perhaps log erro
Dear Wietse,
thank you for your answer.
Am 28.05.2025 um 21:57 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
(There should be warnings logged that saywhich table lookup failed.
Does your system perhaps log error and non-error messages to different
files? That is not a good idea - it complicates
Christian H. Kuhn via Postfix-users:
> from mailout1-87.xing.com[109.233.158.87]
> 2025-05-28T19:05:24.783884+02:00 bywater postfix/smtpd[1610483]:
> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mailout1-87.xing.com[109.233
> .158.87]: 451 4.3.0 : Temporary lookup failure;
> from= to= proto
> =E
Hi all,
i try to migrate my postfix installation to another server and to update
some things. There are more traps that i could imagine ...
My main domain, qno.de, is listed in virtual_alias_domains. My user qno
has several aliases. Especially, recipient_delimiter=- is set, so i
expect to
> On May 27, 2025, at 10:21 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:22:17PM -0400, Jason Hirsh wrote:
>>> From: Jason Hirsh
>>> Subject: Killed postfix
>>> Date: May 27, 2025 at 12:11:13 PM EDT
>>> To: po
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:22:17PM -0400, Jason Hirsh wrote:
> > From: Jason Hirsh
> > Subject: Killed postfix
> > Date: May 27, 2025 at 12:11:13 PM EDT
> > To: postfix-u...@postfix.org
[ Please format list posts as simple text, rather than HTML markup. ]
> > Sin
Ok I thought that was what BUT reloading got me this
warning: /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf, line 752: overriding earlier entry:
header_checks=regexp:$config_directory/header_checks
I removed the line and removed the “spaced” debugger command and postfix seems
to be happy. BUT I could
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 04:43:58PM -0400, Jason Hirsh wrote:
> I am getting this error
>
> ay 25 14:10:18 triggerfish postfix/cleanup[71521]: error: unsupported
> dictionary type: PATH=/bin
>
>
> I know nothing about “cleanup”. But since master.c
> <http://master
On 2025-05-14 at 21:29:59 UTC-0400 (Thu, 15 May 2025 11:29:59 +1000)
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 11:47:25AM -0400, Sean McBride via
Postfix-users wrote:
On 13 May 2025, at 13:02, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
The simplest setup
On 15/5/25 00:20, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
Dnia 14.05.2025 o godz. 20:37:40 Matthew J Black via Postfix-users pisze:
- as you are no doubt aware, I had an "interesting" situation where
my email were being turned into html by a service I am no-longer
using. Hopefully
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 11:47:25AM -0400, Sean McBride via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 13 May 2025, at 13:02, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > The simplest setup is to have the full chain in a single file
> > referred to by smtpd_tls_cert_file and NO smtpd_tls_chain_file.
On 14 May 2025, at 12:06, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
>> OTOH that setup doesn't seem so simple in that (AFAICT) neither certbot nor
>> acme.sh can generate such a combined file.
>
> Really?
>
> $ postconf smtpd_tls_eccert_file
> smtpd_tls_
On 2025-05-14 at 11:47:25 UTC-0400 (Wed, 14 May 2025 11:47:25 -0400)
Sean McBride via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 13 May 2025, at 13:02, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
The simplest setup is to have the full chain in a single file
referred to by smtpd_tls_cert_file and NO
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 05:47:25PM CEST, Sean McBride via Postfix-users
said:
> On 13 May 2025, at 13:02, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > The simplest setup is to have the full chain in a single file referred to
> > by smtpd_tls_cert_file and NO smtpd_tls_chain_fi
On 13 May 2025, at 13:02, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> The simplest setup is to have the full chain in a single file referred to by
> smtpd_tls_cert_file and NO smtpd_tls_chain_file.
OTOH that setup doesn't seem so simple in that (AFAICT) neither certbot nor
acme.sh can gene
Dnia 14.05.2025 o godz. 20:37:40 Matthew J Black via Postfix-users pisze:
> - as you are no doubt aware, I had an "interesting" situation where
> my email were being turned into html by a service I am no-longer
> using. Hopefully this email (which uses a different system/se
ic recreation of the relevant sni map file with the new/renewed LE Certificates.Thank you all - issue(s) resolved, thread (can be) closed.On 14/5/25 15:33, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 01:36:09AM +1000, Matthew J Black via Postfix-users wrote:>>> But what d
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 01:36:09AM +1000, Matthew J Black via Postfix-users
wrote:
> But what do you get with 'openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect
> mail.peregrineit.net:587' - cause I get :
The difference is that OpenSSL defaults to sending an SNI extension with
the server
On Tue, May 13 2025, 19:28:58 CEST Jaroslaw Rafa wrote via Postfix-users:
> Please, please, don't send HTML-only mail to the list. It's a part of
> longstanding mailing list etiquette that you don't do this. Some of us are
> reading the eamil in plain text.
There is som
Dnia 13.05.2025 o godz. 23:42:54 Matthew J Black via Postfix-users pisze:
> src="https://gfbjcce.r.bh.d.sendibt3.com/tr/op/BRjIpuSsyQ_w30QEpE8hT7WGsqTTSw7PbBYo5UxUvIOxN20GTDi-gVg1bX96dW3hiLDLftCm8Pigp2CkYTOrVRd8yWdmXZQDeohq0zk8PfSe8zRGbbmtIuZu8CgJLbNfpQ4Xb8scxKZpR8e0yjwxpH3zFb5Yvp
On 13.05.25 23:42, Matthew J Black via Postfix-users wrote:
This is really weird - Our Postfix server is presenting old/expired LE
TLS Certs, even though we've updated the certs AND restarted Postfix
(and Dovecot) (and even rebooted the server) multiple times.
I've done
On 2025-05-13 at 11:36:09 UTC-0400 (Wed, 14 May 2025 01:36:09 +1000)
Matthew J Black via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Cool - that's what I get
But what do you get with 'openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect
mail.peregrineit.net:587' - cause I get :
depth=0 CN=
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:07:04PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> any reverse proxy between you and server?
> no multiple postfix instances used?
Let's not encourage further pointless waste of time.
The OP needs to post:
$ postconf -nf
$ postconf -M
On Tue, May 13 2025 at 17:19:19 CEST Matthew J Black wrote via Postfix-users:
> so if there are suggesting (...) I'm more than happy to hear them and
> try them.
Please stop sending HTML-only.
--
Thanks
Tom
_______
Postfix-users m
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:56:34AM +1000, Matthew J Black via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > There's no magic, Postfix loads certificates and keys from the
> > configured locations.
> >
> > https://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
>
> Yeah, I real
4/5/25 01:20, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:07:04PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
any reverse proxy between you and server?
no multiple postfix instances used?
Let's not encourage further pointless waste of time.
The OP needs to p
On 14/5/25 00:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:>> are you sure the proper smtpd_tls_cert_file and smtpd_tls_key_file are > configured in postfix configuration?>Triple-checked it :-)And as I said, I can't find the old certs on the box anywhere, so even if they
On 14/5/25 01:07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:>> >> On 14/5/25 00:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:>> >> >>> >> > are you sure the proper smtpd_tls_cert_file and >> smtpd_tls_key_file>> >> &
On 14/5/25 01:12, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:56:34AM +1000, Matthew J Black via Postfix-users wrote:>>>> There's no magic, Postfix loads certificates and keys from the>>> configured locations.>>>>>> https://w
>> On 14/5/25 00:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
>> >
>> > are you sure the proper smtpd_tls_cert_file and smtpd_tls_key_file
>> > are
>> > configured in postfix configuration?
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:17:29AM +10
On 14/5/25 00:48, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:17:29AM +1000, Matthew J Black via Postfix-users wrote:>>> [q2AY6ESDEdxdcaKPIjGrwB1r7irZNrS9NMjjOyd3RyDvDnZMS2-sTQhrV
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:17:29AM +1000, Matthew J Black via Postfix-users
wrote:
> [q2AY6ESDEdxdcaKPIjGrwB1r7irZNrS9NMjjOyd3RyDvDnZMS2-sTQhrVffoXSQ5YfoHS
>mIcYF9Dtgcyg6uqQNRONtN6fjtE7FhanYwbNm07AoA0WypPtbent8SCQHFw3oKlNw
Hi All,This is really weird - Our Postfix server is presenting old/expired LE TLS Certs, even though we've updated the certs AND restarted Postfix (and Dovecot) (and even rebooted the server) multiple times.I've done a thorough search of the box for the old certs and can find nothing.I
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 10:15 AM Tom Hendrikx via Postfix-users
wrote:
> In the past, I've used the test tools (milter-test-server,
> milter-test-client) from https://github.com/milter-manager/milter-manager
Very nice link, thank you!
--
Best re
On 2025-05-06 at 14:44:24 UTC-0400 (Tue, 6 May 2025 18:44:24 +)
Claus Assmann via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, May 06, 2025, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
Sadly, there has never been robust definitive docs for the Milter
API.
What is missing from the
On 06-05-2025 18:58, Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users wrote:
After my previous question about mail archiving, I tried to write a
milter that will save copies of emails in a way convenient for me.
And now my question is about how Postfix sends headers and message
body to milter. Everything that is
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> Claus Assmann via Postfix-users wrote in
> <20250506184424.ga35...@veps.esmtp.org>:
> |On Tue, May 06, 2025, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> |
> |> Sadly, there has never been robust definitive docs for the Milter API.
>
Claus Assmann via Postfix-users wrote in
<20250506184424.ga35...@veps.esmtp.org>:
|On Tue, May 06, 2025, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
|
|> Sadly, there has never been robust definitive docs for the Milter API.
|
|What is missing from the documentation in libmilter/docs/
|whic
On Tue, May 06, 2025, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> Sadly, there has never been robust definitive docs for the Milter API.
What is missing from the documentation in libmilter/docs/
which is part of the sendmail open source distribution?
--
Please don't Cc: me, use only the
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Jason Hirsh
> Subject: Re: [pfx] Postfix TLS Library Problem No such file
> Date: May 6, 2025 at 2:27:43 PM EDT
> To: postfix-u...@postfix.org
> Cc: Bill Cole
>
>
>> On May 6, 2025, at 12:43 PM, Bill Cole via Postfix-us
.
}
}
For each filter
process end of connection (xxfi_close)
}
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 2025-05-06 at 12:58:27 UTC-0400 (Tue, 6 May 2025 19:58:27 +0300)
Mike Teplynin via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
After my previous question about mail archiving, I tried to write a
milter that will save copies of emails in a way convenient for me.
And now my question is about how
1 - 100 of 14091 matches
Mail list logo
