On 28 Oct 2015, at 20:11, Marco Stoecker wrote:
On 10/29/2015 01:07 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:26:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
Thx Bill and Viktor!
as I discussed this topic in parallel in the mailman mailinglist, we
came there today also to the conclusion, tha
On 10/28/2015 11:04 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 15:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>>
>>> From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
>>>
>>> If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists
>>>
On 10/29/2015 01:07 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:26:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
>
>> Thx Bill and Viktor!
>> as I discussed this topic in parallel in the mailman mailinglist, we
>> came there today also to the conclusion, that fetchmail is the root
>> cause, due to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:26:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
> Thx Bill and Viktor!
> as I discussed this topic in parallel in the mailman mailinglist, we
> came there today also to the conclusion, that fetchmail is the root
> cause, due to missing envelope information/maildrop capabilities.
>
On 10/28/2015 11:04 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 15:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>>
>>> From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
>>>
>>> If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists
>>>
On 28 Oct 2015, at 15:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists
will
receive multiple copies.
Not on properly configured
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
>
> If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists will
> receive multiple copies.
Not on properly configured systems. We're not talking about
subscribers wh
On 28 Oct 2015, at 4:04, Marco Stoecker wrote:
As I understand now, the mail from the sender (machine Klamotte) is
delivered to the smtp server from web.de which than is delivered to
1und1 (mx.kundenserver).
Yes. The second "hop" (between web.de and mx.kundenserver.de) occurs 5
times, once f
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:06:26PM +0100, ma...@stoecker-family.de wrote:
> I do not understand your question.
> I configured mailman as a mailing list server using postfix (relayhost) and
> fetchmail as its interfaces to the internet as described for mailman.
Not all the question you're being
I do not understand your question.
I configured mailman as a mailing list server using postfix (relayhost) and
fetchmail as its interfaces to the internet as described for mailman.
BR
Marco
- Reply message -
From: "Robert Wolfe"
To: "Marco Stoecker"
Cc:
Subje
Why so many hops?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 28, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Marco Stoecker wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 10/27/2015 06:10 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
>>> On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:40, Marco Stoecker wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I do need some assistance, as this is very new for me.
>>> Thx in advance.
>>> So this
On 10/28/2015 01:09 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:40:35PM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
message1:
Delivered-To: vorstand@localhost
Received: from wakis02.local (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by wakis02.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DC6269A;
Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:40:43 +0200 (
On 10/27/2015 06:10 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:40, Marco Stoecker wrote:
[...]
I do need some assistance, as this is very new for me.
Thx in advance.
So this is the "Received" header of 5 out of 5 messages. I can't see
where the duplication happend :-(
Maybe this abridgme
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:40:35PM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
> message1:
> Delivered-To: vorstand@localhost
> Received: from wakis02.local (localhost [IPv6:::1])
> by wakis02.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DC6269A;
> Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:40:43 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from imap.1und1.de [212.
On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:40, Marco Stoecker wrote:
[...]
I do need some assistance, as this is very new for me.
Thx in advance.
So this is the "Received" header of 5 out of 5 messages. I can't see
where the duplication happend :-(
Maybe this abridgment will help, reducing each to the first & s
On 10/27/2015 05:06 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:45:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
Here is the log, where postfix got the original message (which was
sent
to 5 mailing lists) and handed over to mailman (which is done 5 times
with different postfix ID's).
No, the l
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:45:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
> Here is the log, where postfix got the original message (which was sent
> to 5 mailing lists) and handed over to mailman (which is done 5 times
> with different postfix ID's).
No, the logs show 5 incoming messages (from [::1]) each
On 10/23/2015 01:26 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marco Stoecker:
>>> You need to find the records where the same message is delivered
>>> more than once to the same recipient, then look for all the records
>>> with the same Postfix QUEUE ID. That will show if the duplication
>>> happened BEFORE Postf
Marco Stoecker:
> > You need to find the records where the same message is delivered
> > more than once to the same recipient, then look for all the records
> > with the same Postfix QUEUE ID. That will show if the duplication
> > happened BEFORE Postfix or INSIDE Postfix.S It may not matter for
>
On 10/21/2015 12:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marco Stoecker:
>>> All the evidence that you need is logged by Postfix and mailman:
>>> track down a duplicate delivery back to the source and look for
>>> delivery errors.
>>
>> Will do a double-check of all the logfiles again. Maybe I have overseen
Marco Stoecker:
> > All the evidence that you need is logged by Postfix and mailman:
> > track down a duplicate delivery back to the source and look for
> > delivery errors.
>
> Will do a double-check of all the logfiles again. Maybe I have overseen
> something. As I'm not the 'expert' in those t
On 10/20/2015 11:31 PM, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Marco Stoecker:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
Hi,
I do have a combination of postfix and mailman and use postfix as a
relayhost. I get all the mails for mailman via fetchmail. The whole
system is Debian 8 with its packages for postfix (2.11.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/20/2015 11:31 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> What do your postfix logs say for one of the duplicated
> deliveries?
I've attached the piece of the mail.info where the duplicate occurs
> When I have seen duplicate deliveries in the p
Hi Marco,
What do your postfix logs say for one of the duplicated deliveries?
When I have seen duplicate deliveries in the past, they were caused
by connection problems that prevented the final SMTP handshake from
being completed, which would acknowledge the receipt of the message.
Then postfix du
Marco Stoecker:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
>
> I do have a combination of postfix and mailman and use postfix as a
> relayhost. I get all the mails for mailman via fetchmail. The whole
> system is Debian 8 with its packages for postfix (2.11.3-1) and
> mailman (2.1.18-2).
>
> Now to th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I do have a combination of postfix and mailman and use postfix as a
relayhost. I get all the mails for mailman via fetchmail. The whole
system is Debian 8 with its packages for postfix (2.11.3-1) and
mailman (2.1.18-2).
Now to the problem: Sinc
26 matches
Mail list logo
