On 2024-12-12 23:46, max.hesserchen via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> I am the only user of my setup on my debian 12 server. I am convinced
> that minimalism is the best security.
Not in the sense you're using it. It's about minimalism in exposure
surface, not in configuration burden and you seem to b
Hi,
I write the mail with a quasi throw-away mail, because I don't want to reveal
my configuration to everyone.
I am the only user of my setup on my debian 12 server. I am convinced that
minimalism is the best security. I mention this because it hopefully explains
some of the decisions I have m
>
> Hi Jonathan, thank you.
> It helped me to eliminate some fake senders and spams, but I see your
> point.
> Yes, I'm not using postscreen as I have rspamd.
> Is there any further suggestion you might have?
>
I had a look at https://ssl-config.mozilla.org when setting up TLS things,
but I think
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 6:14 PM Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
wrote:
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
>
> remove this in main.cf
>
> add it to port 465 587 in master.cf
>
> i will refrain for commenting on CHROOT, most users don't make it work
Thank you Benny, I already had smtpd_sasl_auth_enab
Mark via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-10-24 14:00:
https://www.pastebin.cz/en/p/fqcoW8Q
Anything unneeded, excessive, exaggerated, abusive or wrong there,
please?
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
remove this in main.cf
add it to port 465 587 in master.cf
i will refrain for commenting on CHROO
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 13:02, Mark via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Hello Postfix fellows,
>
> Could you please give me your feedback on my postfix (with dovecot
> LMTP and virtual users in MySQL db) setup?
>
> Here's my main.cf and master.cf contents;
>
> https://www.pasteb
Hello Postfix fellows,
Could you please give me your feedback on my postfix (with dovecot
LMTP and virtual users in MySQL db) setup?
Here's my main.cf and master.cf contents;
https://www.pastebin.cz/en/p/fqcoW8Q
Anything unneeded, excessive, exaggerated, abusive or wrong there, please?
Many th
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:53 Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On Aug 26, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> >
> > I am fooling around with various configuration settings for my postfix
> installation and would like to be able to clean out all existing mail and
> the existing configuration.
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> I am fooling around with various configuration settings for my postfix
> installation and would like to be able to clean out all existing mail and the
> existing configuration.
This is poorly defined. What do you mean by "clean out all ex
I am fooling around with various configuration settings for my postfix
installation and would like to be able to clean out all existing mail and
the existing configuration.
Is there any single command to do that? Or do I have to manually delete
stuff.
I want the system to (1) start with empty qu
: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 9:40 AM
To: postfix users
Subject: Re: Sanity check - of my postfix setup.
I had similar issues and my Maildir was misnamed. I solved it by making a link
from the existing name to the correct name.
On 05/09/2017 07:36 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 5/9/2017 6:59 AM, John wr
I had similar issues and my Maildir was misnamed. I solved it by making
a link from the existing name to the correct name.
On 05/09/2017 07:36 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 5/9/2017 6:59 AM, John wrote:
As Andreas pointed out it might help is I outlined the problem.
I am losing mail, it just disa
On 5/9/2017 6:59 AM, John wrote:
> As Andreas pointed out it might help is I outlined the problem.
>
> I am losing mail, it just disappears. Postfix seems to deliver it,
> hands it off the dovecot LMTP and then shows "removed"
>
> Dovecot shows ... : saved to INBOX.
Both postfix and dovecot are
em with my mail system. I think the
problem is with Dovecot, or Thunderbird.
However, just to make sure i am not missing something really stupid
could I get a check on my postfix setup.
TIA
John A
I am trying to debug a problem with my mail system. I think the problem
is with Dovecot, or Thunderbird.
However, just to make sure i am not missing something really stupid
could I get a check on my postfix setup.
TIA
John A
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
I’m working thru some issues on my new server setup.
I wanted to set up some virtual user mailboxes so I don’t have to create actual
accounts but add them to the mySQL (MariaDB) database.
I am having an issue with the following :
postfix/trivial-rewrite[8120]: warning: do not list domain
stealt
Hi,
On 2015-08-27 10:27, z...@oper.hu wrote:
2015-08-27 10:04 időpontban Koko Wijatmoko ezt írta:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:53:19 +0200
z...@oper.hu wrote:
Dear All, I would like to realize a postfix setup where: - I have
1 public IP address - at least 2 domains - one postfix instace
After
On 2015-08-27 Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
> PTR can only map to 1 IP, one PTR for one IP is enough even using
> multiple domain with postfix.
Technically you can have PTR records resolve to multiple names, just
like you can have A records resolving to multiple IP Addresses. It's
just best practice to re
2015-08-27 10:04 időpontban Koko Wijatmoko ezt írta:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:53:19 +0200
> z...@oper.hu wrote:
>
>> Dear All, I would like to realize a postfix setup where: - I have 1 public
>> IP address - at least 2 domains - one postfix instace After setting up (
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:53:19 +0200
z...@oper.hu wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to realize a postfix setup where:
>
> - I have 1 public IP address
>
> - at least 2 domains
>
> - one postfix instace
>
> After setting up (one) domain alias for the IP I e
Dear All,
I would like to realize a postfix setup where:
- I have 1 public IP address
- at least 2 domains
- one postfix instace
After setting up (one) domain alias for the IP I experienced problem
when sending mail. Since I have one IP I could set up only one PTR
record which causes
I'm trying to clarify the various ways in which I could set up
Postfix + Dovecot + SpamAssassin under CentOS-7,
and I'd welcome any comments on the following remarks.
As far as I can see there are 3 standard ways of setting this up:
1. Use amavisd
2. Use dovecot + pigeonhole/sieve
3. Use spa
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Marius Gologan
wrote:
> What you want is 100% doable and can work without drawbacks.
>
> You need to work on the VM to act as an incoming and outgoing gateway.
>
> You've been provided with a link from Wietse. That is the starting point.
Yes, that's what is on my
vide a .tar for Debian and Ubuntu <=13.04
that will do everything for you.
Marius.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of hiren panchasara
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 10:28 PM
To: Rick Zeman
Cc: Postfix users
Subject:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Rick Zeman wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:36 AM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>
>> This is how it should work, afaik:
>> Sending: Initiates from my home box and go out via VM.
>> Receiving: VM receives it and forwards to home box.
>>
>> (I've also tried sending th
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:36 AM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
> This is how it should work, afaik:
> Sending: Initiates from my home box and go out via VM.
> Receiving: VM receives it and forwards to home box.
>
> (I've also tried sending through my home machine on port 587 but the
> home comcast IP is
hiren panchasara:
> This link only shows VM side of configs. How about on the home machine
> postfix side?
For the machine that is FINAL DESTINATION:
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
> Also, if my domain is mail.exmaple.com, which machine's postfix should
> have that set? V
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> hiren panchasara:
>> To circumvent all that, I got a VM with a live IP where nothing is
>> being blocked now.
>>
>> What I want to do is, use this VM as just a jump host and still keep
>> entire setup at home.
>
>
> http://www.postfix.org/STAN
hiren panchasara:
> To circumvent all that, I got a VM with a live IP where nothing is
> being blocked now.
>
> What I want to do is, use this VM as just a jump host and still keep
> entire setup at home.
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#backup
"Configuring Postfix as p
Hi all,
Here is what I'm trying to achieve, please let me know if this is
possible/feasible.
I wanted to run my own mail sever so I setup everything on a FreeBSD
box at home. But soon I realized that my isp (comcast) is acting up.
Sending: I have to send via comcast's gateway using my comcast.ne
On 12/02/2012 04:17 PM, John Allen wrote:
I setup my original Postfix setup up some time ago using Jeff Posluns
excellent howto/tutorial.
My setup works and seems to work quite well, but I know that I have
not kept pace with the changes and improvements in Postfix.
Additionally, as a result of
I setup my original Postfix setup up some time ago using Jeff Posluns
excellent howto/tutorial.
My setup works and seems to work quite well, but I know that I have not
kept pace with the changes and improvements in Postfix. Additionally, as
a result of following this mail list, I believe that
Am 31.03.2011 15:48, schrieb Reinaldo de Carvalho:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>>
>> you should make a distribution-like package instead breaking
>> the package-managment, this is no solution
>>
>
> This isn't the real problem.
it is because a package is more th
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> you should make a distribution-like package instead breaking
> the package-managment, this is no solution
>
This isn't the real problem.
> on fedora it is 5 minutes work install a src.rpm, replace the tarball
> and after edit the SPEC-Fi
Am 31.03.2011 14:15, schrieb Voytek Eymont:
> I'm not clear here, this machine was given to me with Postfix 2.7.0
> 'pre-installed';
>
> so, subject to RELEASE_NOTES, do I copy old#/etc/postfix/* to
> new#/etc/postfix, then execute "postfix upgrade-configuration" ?
>
> or do I copy /etc/postfix/
Voytek Eymont:
> I'm not clear here, this machine was given to me with Postfix 2.7.0
> 'pre-installed';
Sorry, I don't keep an up-to-date list for how to upgrade packages
for BSD version X or Y or Z, Linux distro X or Y or Z, Solaris,
and so on.
You would have saved me time if you had mentioned e
On Thu, March 31, 2011 12:35 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> what the proper (easiest?) way to migrate current setup to the new
>> server ?
>
> 1) Study the RELEASE_NOTES file and look for any incompatible
> changes that may affect your configuration.
Wietse, thanks
this seems a slightly different
Voytek Eymont:
> I have a mail server on Centos with Postfix 2.4.5 mysql smtp-auth
> amavisd-new policyd postfixadmin 2.1 courier-imap,
> runs pretty well since install
>
> I need to transfer the mail server service to a new server running Ubuntu,
> it came with Postfix 2.7.0
>
> what the proper
I have a mail server on Centos with Postfix 2.4.5 mysql smtp-auth
amavisd-new policyd postfixadmin 2.1 courier-imap,
runs pretty well since install
I need to transfer the mail server service to a new server running Ubuntu,
it came with Postfix 2.7.0
what the proper (easiest?) way to migrate curre
On 12/10/2010 02:45 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 10/12/2010 03:43, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
On 12/09/2010 10:31 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 09/12/2010 14:54, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
This is a new install on Fedora 12 using the tools from:
http://wiki.amahi.org/index.php/Amahi_Mail_System
We have patched
Le 10/12/2010 03:43, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
On 12/09/2010 10:31 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 09/12/2010 14:54, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
This is a new install on Fedora 12 using the tools from:
http://wiki.amahi.org/index.php/Amahi_Mail_System
We have patched the Postfix source to add the Quota pa
On 12/09/2010 10:31 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 09/12/2010 14:54, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
This is a new install on Fedora 12 using the tools from:
http://wiki.amahi.org/index.php/Amahi_Mail_System
We have patched the Postfix source to add the Quota patch. It would be
REALLY nice if this was just a p
Le 09/12/2010 14:54, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
This is a new install on Fedora 12 using the tools from:
http://wiki.amahi.org/index.php/Amahi_Mail_System
We have patched the Postfix source to add the Quota patch. It would be
REALLY nice if this was just a part of Postfix
The VDA is patch is n
This is a new install on Fedora 12 using the tools from:
http://wiki.amahi.org/index.php/Amahi_Mail_System
We have patched the Postfix source to add the Quota patch. It would be
REALLY nice if this was just a part of Postfix that came disabled and
was 'easy' to enable so we could work from th
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:43:06AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Vikas Rawal wrote, at 07/06/2009 07:41 PM:
> > On my laptop, I use mutt with postfix for sending e-mails
>
> FWIW, recent development versions of mutt support SMTP:
>
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#smtp
>
> I haven't t
Vikas Rawal wrote, at 07/06/2009 07:41 PM:
> On my laptop, I use mutt with postfix for sending e-mails
FWIW, recent development versions of mutt support SMTP:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#smtp
I haven't tried it yet, but I plan to. Although I used mutt often, lack
of built-in SMTP
> I am appending my /etc/postfix/main.cf
>
> When asking for help on this mailing list, please never paste your main.cf
> .
> Instead, as directed in DEBUG_README, paste the output of 'postconf -n'.
>
My apologies. I posted to this list after a long time, and am not,
evidently, well versed with po
On Tue, July 7, 2009 01:41, Vikas Rawal wrote:
> #myorigin = /etc/mailname
set this to myorigin=gmail.com
fake when you use smtp auth client postfix
your local unix login must then be the part before @
problem solved :)
myhostname is irrelevant
> # appending .domain is the MUA's job.
> appe
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009, Vikas Rawal wrote:
> On my laptop, I use mutt with postfix for sending e-mails, and fetchmail for
> receiving them. Postfix is setup to relay mails through gmail. I am the only
> user on the computer and all mails originating from the computer are sent
> from my account.
>
>
On my laptop, I use mutt with postfix for sending e-mails, and fetchmail for
receiving them. Postfix is setup to relay mails through gmail. I am the only
user on the computer and all mails originating from the computer are sent
from my account.
A limitation of the present setup is that it sends e-
On 6-May-2009, at 01:29, Rik wrote:
I could not agree more. To the point this is the very *LAST* place I
go
for help.
This should be the last place you go for help. You read the docs, you
google, you research, try and find the answer, and THEN you post here.
I can't tell you how often I'
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:47:37PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> The way it works here is that any fool
> like me can answer a newbie's question, and if we get it wrong, we are
> corrected by the ones who really know.
Let's end the thread here. :-) Hopefully the OP is trying to make sense of
the do
On Wed May 6 2009 00:44:28 Jonathan McMahon wrote:
> I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
The former is not a problem; Postfix documentation has you covered.
Where you will find (have been finding) difficulty is in the latter.
Postfix documentation does not (and IMO mostly s
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 06:52 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
> >> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
> >> time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
> >> that the new user ends up feeling insulted
On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
>> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
>> time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
>> that the new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the
>> poster's own fault for not respecting h
On May 6, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Rik wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that
the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well
Zitat von Rik :
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the poster's own
fault fo
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
> to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
> new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the poster's own
> fault for not respec
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Jonathan McMahon wrote:
>
> I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
>
> My general feedback:
>
> 1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search"
> documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I
> d
Jonathan McMahon wrote:
I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
My general feedback:
1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search" documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I did expect this given the number of possible sy
I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
My general feedback:
1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search"
documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I did
expect this given the number of possible system permutations.
2.
On May 5, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
I fully believe that the experts on this list have good intentions and
I appreciate the time they spend helping us. However, this scenario
has happened quite a few times.. A new user asks questions that are
vague or easily answered by the docs, e
On 5-May-2009, at 10:04, Jeff Bernier wrote:
There's really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a
buffoon Victor.
Is there someone willing to help? Please?
Consider two things. First, stop top-posting. Trim your quoted
material and reply after, preserving the conversatio
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Brett Dikeman wrote:
>
>> > I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I?set Postfix to
>> > accept
>> > email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
>> > acc
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Brett Dikeman wrote:
> > I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I?set Postfix to accept
> > email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
> > accomplish.
>
> http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=postfix+firewall
>
> > There
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to accept
> email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
> accomplish.
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=postfix+firewall
> There's really no need to be
Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to
> accept email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one
> thing I need to accomplish.
>
> There's really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a
> buffoon Victor.
> Is there some
* Jeff Bernier :
> I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to
> accept email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing
> I need to accomplish.
It's not really easy to answer that question:
"accept email for another MTA": why does the mail arrive on the
I had asked a fairly clear question... it was: Ho do I set Postfix to accept
email for, and relay email to another MTA? This is the one thing I need to
accomplish.
There's really no need to berate me and otherwise treat me like a buffoon
Victor.
Is there someone willing to help? Please?
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:32:36AM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I don't want to sound ungrateful for pointing me at the docs, but I
> was hoping for a little clarification on the process. I had looked at
> the docs, but was still unclear on how to go about it.
Specific questions are much easier t
I don't want to sound ungrateful for pointing me at the docs, but I was hoping
for a little clarification on the process. I had looked at the docs, but was
still unclear on how to go about it.
Jeff
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com 5/5/2009 11:00 AM >>>
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:51:58AM -0400
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:51:58AM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a newbie...
>
> I wish to use my Postfix system (v2.1.5) to accept mail for, and relay
> mail to another MTA. How do I go about doing this?
http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html
http://www
Hello,
I am a newbie...
I wish to use my Postfix system (v2.1.5) to accept mail for, and relay mail to
another MTA. How do I go about doing this?
Thank you for any help offered.
Jeff
"It does not require many words to speak the truth." - Chief Joseph, Great Nez
Perce Indian Chief
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set to my ISP, but I musta had something wrong,
because some people would
Also, have a look here:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set t
Send us the output of postconf -n from your smtp server. If your logs
didn't indicate the mail was rejected it could have been silently
discarded by spam filters or something of the like.
Adam McCarthy wrote:
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to
I would not point the MX record for your dynamic domain name (or any
other domain name) at your ISP's server. The mail will almost certainly
be rejected.
Adam McCarthy wrote:
So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I
know, but they also have MX records.), to just put i
Well as far as I know SMTP is not blocked. I wanted to go through my
ISP's server to begin with, because places such as GMail didn't like
me. Yet everyone seems to love my ISP's server.
I had relayhost set to my ISP, but I musta had something wrong,
because some people would get replies, while oth
So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I
know, but they also have MX records.), to just put in my address or
would I just throw in my ISP's SMTP server?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J.P. Trosclair
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-i
I think DynDNS.com (the folks who have no-ip.org right?) have an option
to setup a MX record for dynamic host names. You'll more than likely
want to enable this unless you have a reason not to.
Basic setup for accepting and sending mail with your ddns hostname:
mydomain = mymachine.no-ip.org
m
I have looked for a guide on the Internet on how to do this but I have
never found one.
I am wishing to run a request tracker (RT) and need postfix.
Now I already have the email coming in, sent to RT by fetch mail of a
gmail account.
Now how can I make it so that postfix sends replies and other
81 matches
Mail list logo
