We have considered SPF some five years ago but after second thought
ditched it completely:
it helps nothing to not using it
- It dos not really help against spam because the spam-farms also can
set proper SPF
and it thats the problem one can block such domains in mta as sender
check, not a
Robert Schetterer skrev den 05-10-2012 17:01:
i use policyd-spf-perl
here i use sid-milter
only selective for some domains
why ?
doesnt help very much, spammers have most valid spf
the only valid domain is the one senders is sending with ?
and setup all "my domains" with spf non stri
Am 06.10.2012 22:37, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
> * Is there any advantage in using "v=spf1 ip4:1.2.3.4 -all" compared
> to "v=spf1 mx -all" or the other way around?
"v=spf1 mx -all" enforces a additional dns-request
while "v=spf1 ip4:1.2.3.4 -all" does not
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Titanus Eramius:
> And before you say it, I know SPF in itself is not enough to
> verify an email, but it should be (IMHO) enough to ensure the email is
> not spam or something similar.
OK. That's enough nonsense. I am stopping this thread on punishment
of removal. For questions about SPF, go to
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:17:49 +0200
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Reindl Harald :
>
> > Am 05.10.2012 16:04, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> >>
> >> Zitat von Titanus Eramius :
> >>
> >>> Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as
> >>> such.
> >>>
> >>> I was just wo
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:50:37 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> forgot to mention you should use BOTH types
> TXT and SPF
I did not even know that a SPF record type existed in DNS. At the
homepage of SPF and other places I have read, it is indicated that SPF
= TXT RR in DNS, but I may have read too l
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Alumno Etsii:
As far as I'm concerned, SPF is not an anti-spam tool, but an anti-forgery
tool.
I'm ending this discussion before the flames flare up.
Let's suffice with the following observation:
SPF helps a sender and receiver who know each other. Otherwise
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
Am 05.10.2012 16:04, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Titanus Eramius :
Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
if so, to what extend?
We have considered SPF
Am 05.10.2012 15:43, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
> Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
>
> I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
> if so, to what extend?
>
> My former provider of mail added a header with the SPF-info retrived
> from D
Alumno Etsii:
> As far as I'm concerned, SPF is not an anti-spam tool, but an anti-forgery
> tool.
I'm ending this discussion before the flames flare up.
Let's suffice with the following observation:
SPF helps a sender and receiver who know each other. Otherwise
it helps no-one.
The sa
Am 05.10.2012 16:04, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>
> Zitat von Titanus Eramius :
>
>> Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
>>
>> I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
>> if so, to what extend?
>
> We have considered SPF some five
2012/10/5
>
> Zitat von Titanus Eramius :
>
>
> Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
>>
>> I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
>> if so, to what extend?
>>
>
> We have considered SPF some five years ago but after second thought
>
Zitat von Titanus Eramius :
Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
if so, to what extend?
We have considered SPF some five years ago but after second thought
ditched it completely:
- It do
forgot to mention you should use BOTH types
TXT and SPF
thelounge.net. 43200 IN SPF "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24
ip4:89.207.144.27 -all"
thelounge.net. 43200 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24
ip4:89.207.144.27 -all"
_-
TXT RR Format
Am 05.10.2012 15:43, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
> Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
>
> I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
> if so, to what extend?
yes because it is no additional work since our admin-backend adding
them with a
Slightly off topic. I hope it's OK when the mail is marked as such.
I was just wondering if the users of this list use SPF in any way, and
if so, to what extend?
My former provider of mail added a header with the SPF-info retrived
from DNS, and I'm considering to do the same with "policyd-spf-per
16 matches
Mail list logo
