forgot to mention you should use BOTH types
TXT and SPF

thelounge.net.          43200   IN      SPF     "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24 
ip4:89.207.144.27 -all"
thelounge.net.          43200   IN      TXT     "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24 
ip4:89.207.144.27 -all"
_________________________-

TXT RR Format

The standard TXT and SPF record format is defined as:

name  ttl  class   TXT     text
name  ttl  class   SPF     text

The SPF RR is functionally identical to a TXT record with SPF data. BIND 9.4+ 
supports the SPF RR type, however
previous versions, and most other DNS software (as of July 2007), do not yet 
support the SPF RR type. Thus, the
RFC's recommendation is to always provide a TXT based SPF RR and, if your DNS 
software supports the SPF RR type,
duplicate the information from the TXT version of the SPF RR in a native SPF 
RR. The reason for this procedure is
simply because while the master/slave DNS may support the SPF RR, querying name 
servers - such as name servers used
by receiving MTAs - may not. Some, but not all, of the examples below have been 
updated to reflect the use of both
record types to illustrate usage. In all cases the TXT and SPF RRs are shown 
with a comment line between containing
the word AND as a reminder of the current policy recommendation. It is safe to 
assume for the foreseeable future
that only using a TXT version of the SPF will always work.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to