Hello,
currently we manually use text files for mapping/routing:
# postconf -n |grep -e transport -e alias
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
allow_mail_to_commands = alias,forward,include
local_transport = lmtp:un
Hello,
i am running 3.4.14 smoothly. However, after adding a virtual ip and
some mailrouting (migration from an old sendmail host) i have the
problem, that if i add "reject_unverified_recipient":
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
reject_unknown_recipient_domain reject_unverified_re
Hello List,
i am running Postfix 3.4.14 and try to set up mailrouting to multiple
smtp hosts.
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/mailertable
example.com smtp:[mx1.foobar.com],smtp:[mx2.foobar.com]
However i get:
fatal: garbage after "]" in server description:
[mx1.foobar.com],
On 2015-01-19 13:32, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
[sendmail -f]
This solved the issue.
As you can see it was under your nose all the time but you were
too busy insulting us:
Postfix has hundreds of parameters and dozens of comand-line options.
Figuring which of these was i
On 2015-01-19 01:36, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Perhaps we could pass ${sender} to our custom script
and then use sendmail's -f argument to change the Return-Path header ?
The -f argument IS THE RETURN-PATH ADDRESS.
SENDMAIL(1)
On 2015-01-19 00:53, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
> By default, Postfix REMOVES Return-Path headers from email messages.
> The default setting is:
>
> message_drop_headers = bcc, content-length, resent-bcc, return-path
That is the default setting.
We tried to use the
On 2015-01-18 23:51, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
and the header is still there.
By default, Postfix REMOVES Return-Path headers from email messages.
The default setting is:
message_drop_headers = bcc, content-length, resent-bcc, return-path
You claim that you remove
On 2015-01-18 23:35, Christian Rößner wrote:
Am 18.01.2015 um 23:27 schrieb m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: m...@ruggedinbox.com
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by ruggedinbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7693331405C7
for ; Sun, 18 Ja
On 2015-01-18 22:01, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Ok the new rule is:
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=debian-spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
-G
${sender} -- ${recipient}
You can't put -G between -f and sender. I assumed that you would be
On 2015-01-18 22:17, KSB wrote:
On 19.01.2015. 0:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
did a postfix restart (of course) and sent a test email:
There is no such thing as "postfix restart". In other words,
Postfix keeps using the old configuration.
Wietse
Probab
On 2015-01-18 21:17, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
>> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
>>user=debian-spamd
>>argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} --
>> ${recipient}
>
> This is better, without "R" flags and with -- before the recipients.
>
> The
On 2015-01-18 20:48, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
>> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
>> flags=R user=debian-spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail
>> -oi -f
>> ${sender} ${recipient}
>
> This is not final delivery, don't use "R" here. And don't forget "--"
> bef
On 2015-01-18 19:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 07:41:15PM +, m...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
Hi ok we double checked and this is the source of an email sent from
m...@ruggedinbox.com to m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: m...@ruggedinbox.com
[...]
so it lo
On 2015-01-18 18:43, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
m...@ruggedinbox.com:
Hi!
At the end of the /etc/postfix/master.cf file (Debian Wheezy)
we have a nice custom PHP script which checks and limits outgoing
emails:
outCustomFilter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=F user=vmail:vmail argv=/etc/postfix/ou
Hi!
At the end of the /etc/postfix/master.cf file (Debian Wheezy)
we have a nice custom PHP script which checks and limits outgoing
emails:
outCustomFilter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=F user=vmail:vmail argv=/etc/postfix/outCustomFilter.php
${recipient}
This script does its checks and if eve
Hi all, when hardening dovecot against the POODLE vulnerability,
we followed the advise to disable SSL2 and SSL3
but this is giving problems with some email clients (claws-mail).
ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3
results in the following error:
dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in
:
> On 20/08/2014 10:56, ml ml wrote:
>> By default my postfix accepted those mails until it found out that the
>> recipent does not exists. Then postfix tries to send back that "550
>> User Unknown" error mail.
>
> I doubt that Postfix by default accepts mail fo
Hi Wietse,
may i kindly ask why the original sender address cant be passed for
the address_verify_sender feature? Is there a specific reason?
Thanks a lot,
Mario
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ml ml:
>> Hello Robert,
>>
>> thanks for your reply.
Hello list,
from time to time i get hit by mass mail with fake sender addresses.
By default my postfix accepted those mails until it found out that the
recipent does not exists. Then postfix tries to send back that "550
User Unknown" error mail.
However, the sender is fake. Therefore the mails g
net:
> >
> >
> > Am 15.08.2014 um 08:22 schrieb ml ml:
> >> why does postfix use a empty from=<> envelope when it tried to verify
> the recioient?
> >
> > * because it is the correct way of doing it
> > * because an ordianry address may get blocked
>
Hello List,
why does postfix use a empty from=<> envelope when it tried to verify the
recioient?:
Aug 14 17:59:35 mailout9 postfix/smtpd[26204]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
smtp.example.net[212.87.132.35]: 450 4.1.1 : Recipient address
rejected: unverified address: Address verification in progress
On 2014-06-29 13:07, martijn.list wrote:
> On 06/29/2014 02:02 PM, m...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
>
>> Hi nice people, easy question for this nice Sunday :D Are you aware of any
>> solution that would replicate (or even improve) the technology that was
>> developed by lavabit to encrypt their
Hi nice people, easy question for this nice Sunday :D
Are you aware of any solution that would replicate (or even improve) the
technology that was developed by lavabit to encrypt their users
mailboxes ?
There is an architecture description here:
http://highscalability.com/blog/2013/8/13/in-m
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:23 PM, "li...@rhsoft.net"
wrote:
why do you still post in HTML?
Am 20.03.2014 13:16, schrieb ML mail:
> Sorry my fault, it is working now! I have forgotten to add user
> authentication into my mail client for testing :(
and that is what i
On , ML mail wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:48 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> Sorry about that.
Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
>
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> config_d
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:48 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> Sorry about that. Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
>
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> config_directory = /etc/postfix
>
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:29 PM, "li...@rhsoft.net"
wrote:
Am 20.03.2014 12:24, schrieb ML mail:
> That's actually the guide I have followed but I thought there must be
> something missing because I alwayse get the
> following Access denied error message:
>
ected: Access denied; from= to=
proto=ESMTP helo=
What could I have done wrong here?
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:18 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
ML mail wrote:
> Authentication will be done using SASL with type dovecot over a
> d
guides or best practices for this purpose? I could not find
anything on postfix.org.
Regards,
ML
: ignoring
unrecognized request
Any idea what I did wrong here?
Regards
ML
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 12:34 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/13/2014 5:33 AM, ML mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the recipient_canonical_maps as PCRE map in order to
> convert some recipient e-mail
oing wrong?
Best regards
ML
Il 06/11/2013 09:46, Ian Evans ha scritto:
> About three days into my postfix/postgrey experience after migrating
> from qmail. Enjoying it.
>
> Of course, like a new dad, I'm sitting here watching the logs. For the
> last two hours I've been getting "postfix/smtpd: lost connection after
> RSET fro
Le 2013-01-26 17:45, King™ a écrit :
Dear ML,
I added to DNS record following your guide, but when I send email to
Hotmail, it still spam in Hotmail.
Have any idea ? help me
add the sender id and dkim milter
and declare the hostname in microsoft senderid form
-Original Message
hello guys
hello I'm fine and everything is going well on the whole better. I want
to evoke a thought higher of us. I followed the outstanding issues
lately on hotmail and problems of validation spf (the spf is: do the
simplest and shortest possible). I noticed the strange behavior in my
validati
Le 2013-01-24 09:14, KingT a écrit :
My email server send mail to Hotmail into junk, how to fix it ?
I search on google and found setup sender-id. Have any idea ?
Thanks all.
hey KingT
I send emails to hotmail without tag but it is necessary to declare
spf1 spf2 dkim my example and my hos
-211311-ml=smtp.fakessh...@ml.ovh.net
(host ks3.kimsufi.com[/var/run/dspam/dspam.sock] said: 421 4.3.0
Deferred: 451-4.7.0 DNS timeout
(in reply to end of DATA command))
fake...@localhost.ks3.kimsufi.com
3YQkdD5g2FzgwCn 5571 Tue Dec 18 17:06:56
bar-return-211312-ml=smtp.fakessh
is a guilty network for "a freedom"
Le 2012-08-08 20:07, Ben Rosengart a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:48:40PM +0800, Alvin Wong wrote:
With just a single binary I have 80% thought of it being a Trojan.
23 lines of non-obfuscated bash.
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&se
Le 2012-07-12 14:53, Wietse Venema a écrit :
OK, now update /etc/postfix/master.cf, add a -v option at the end
after the word ``cleanup'', then send some mail.
Do ``grep cleanup /var/log/maillog'' until you one have "good" and
one "bad" example.
Then do ``grep cleanup.x /var/log/maillog'' t
dear honorable doctor master of C Fu
dear honorable Doctor Wietse
i am beginners in C
but I have ideas of proto meta language that is based on rectangular
shapes and curvilinear orthonormal
to transmit the information I have to use a protocol and I think the
SMTP procole and easiest and simplest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hello honorable doctor master of C Fu hello doctor Wietse
i am continu my tentative to wrote a minimal mail server
that would work as open relay
my work is this
https://gitorious.org/openrelay/openrelay/trees/
work well on centos 6 and 5
to be more
Le mardi 12 juin 2012 à 19:28 +0200, ml a écrit :
> hello masters of postfix masters of c honorable and doctors
> and especially to master Wietse
>
> I am looking for a mini smtp server that takes a few lines or file.
> as it is possible to write an smtp client in c in a fe
hello masters of postfix masters of c honorable and doctors
and especially to master Wietse
I am looking for a mini smtp server that takes a few lines or file.
as it is possible to write an smtp client in c in a few hundred lines
https://github.com/fakessh/openprojectssl/blob/master/smtp_openss
Le jeudi 31 mai 2012 à 13:37 -0500, kazabe a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send
> messages to hotmail. The error is related to said: 550 SC-001
>
> Do you are experimenting the same issue today?
>
> Thanks and regards.
I do not encounter any proble
Le lundi 21 mai 2012 à 08:55 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.3.html]
>
> Postfix stable release 2.9.3, and legacy releases 2.8.11, 2.7.10,
> 2.6.16 are available. They contains workaro
I just ran saslauthd with -d. I can see the auth requests if u run
"/usr/sbin/testsaslauthd -u admin -p -s smtp -f
/var/run/saslauthd/mux" as postfix user. But i DO NOT see any auth
requests if I connect with my thunderbird client.
So i guess postfix somehow can`t or won't connect to my sasla
Hello List,
i cant get postfix with smtpd saslauthd working and its driving me crazy!
warning: SASL authentication problem: unknown password verifier
warning: unknown[192.168.10.30]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: no
mechanism available
Basically i followed the howto from http://wiki.debian.o
Le lundi 02 avril 2012 à 11:36 +0200, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> Den 2012-04-01 21:18, ml skrev:
>
> > I just made the changes I think the problem is solved
> > thank you for the fruitful comments
>
> nope !DSPAM sigs is still sent to me :)
>
> that means i can
Le dimanche 01 avril 2012 à 19:25 +0200, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> Den 2012-04-01 17:58, ml skrev:
>
> > I managed to fully operate the software and my question is zero.
>
> one left things to check is that why is dspam sign mails to recipient
> that is not local ? :=
Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 08:39 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> ml:
> > hello list
> > hello guru of the soft
> > hello all
> >
> > hello I seek again to set up dspam in my messaging solution but I am
> > having a problem mails locals are no longer distr
hello list
hello guru of the soft
hello all
hello I seek again to set up dspam in my messaging solution but I am
having a problem mails locals are no longer distributed
I know the option is in postfix is pickup
can you help me put to good value of this variable
sincerely
my current config is a
you will tell me I'm stupid but I find it on the mirrors
Le vendredi 30 mars 2012 à 17:38 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > * Wietse Venema :
> >
> > > Another option is to extend smtpd_reject_footer's feature set,
> > > so that
> > >
> > > smtpd_reject_footer = \c Text
Le 2012-03-10 05:46, The_Ace a écrit :
2012/3/10 ml
Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 09:28 +0530, The_Ace a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas
wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> What is the best / reliable site to f
Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 09:28 +0530, The_Ace a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> What is the best / reliable site to find newer postfix
> rpm packages
>
On 2/28/2012 09:27 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>Wildcard domain transports are probably a mistake, quite likely to come
back and bite you later.
>Anyway, your regexp is wrong.
>...
>So the user is unknown for a domain listed in $mydestination.
>http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
>http://www
Hello the list..
I'm asking your support for a problem we are facing using Postfix server
configuration.
We are trying to setup an internal CRM Solution, that has to manage mail
returns depending type of message.
We have actually 2 sorts of email types :
bounce.x--x...@mydomain.t
Le 2012-02-04 11:21, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
Zitat von ml :
hello postfix list
hello guru of "Fu"
I am having problems with my secondary mx some mails that are
blocked on
the secondary remain above with an error
4D5BDCA1C9 4344 Thu Feb 2 23:19:41 centos-boun...@centos
hello postfix list
hello guru of "Fu"
I am having problems with my secondary mx some mails that are blocked on
the secondary remain above with an error
4D5BDCA1C9 4344 Thu Feb 2 23:19:41 centos-boun...@centos.org
(Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=fakessh.eu
type=M
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit :
> 2012/2/1 ml :
> >
> > Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit :
> >> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> >> >
> >> > Am 01.02.2012 22:56, sch
Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit :
> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> >
> > Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
> > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema
> > > wrote:
> > >> [An
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
> Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> >> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html]
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 20:36 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
> Am 01.02.2012 20:32, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Postfix 2.8.8 is reissued. It contained a change that should not have
> > been included and that caused a compilation error.
> >
> > You can undo the unwanted change to the mail
Le 25.12.2011 06:35, fakessh @ a écrit :
Le dimanche 25 décembre 2011 06:06, fakessh @ a écrit :
Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 22:19, Andreas Berton a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
> > hello list
> > hello geek
> > hello guru
> > hello Fu
> Hi
> Problem usually occur when you ru
ng a kernel 3 .* I do not know if the
compilation of Simon J Mudd rpm is possible in such a case. do with
SJMudd and Wietse
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:40 PM, ml wrote:
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 15:33 +1300, Peter a écrit :
On 08/12/11 15:28, Kwasi Gyasi - Agyei wrote:
> Thanks, where
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 15:33 +1300, Peter a écrit :
> On 08/12/11 15:28, Kwasi Gyasi - Agyei wrote:
> > Thanks, where can I get src.rpm for v2.6.6, the highest version from
> > here http://postfix.wl0.org/en/available-packages/ is 2.5.
>
> ...picking a CentOS mirror at random:
> http://mirro
Le 18.11.2011 23:21, Wietse Venema a écrit :
peng...@sepserver.net:
I have in my /etc/aliases the text "postmaster: root". I sent an
email to
postmas...@mydomain.com. I checked the log files of the server but
do not
see any indication of any email being received. Would there be a log
of
All
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:28:02 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/10/2011 4:04 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like
X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up with informati
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:28:02 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/10/2011 4:04 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like
X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up with informati
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:04:10 +0200, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hi folks
I asked a question.
there are providers that remove information from headers like
X-Mailer
Received
when is there any good uses and customs
This is easy to set up with information like this
/^Received:/IGNORE
/^Use
On Fri, 27 May 2011 00:03:26 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/26/2011 11:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
can somebody please remove the idiots from LinkedIn from
mailing-lists?
s/from LinkedIn//
go back home new guy
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keys
Hello List,
is it possible to submit locally-generated mail via SMTP somehow?! If
yes, how?!
I am asking because i would like to use stream_by_receipient from
mimedefang and i ran into this problem here:
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2010-June/035844.html
(...)Convince W
Hello List,
there are such LDAP variables such as %s and %d to do ldap based
queries. I am looking for the varibale which is the ip adress. I want
to check my ldap for IP-Addresses that i allow relay for.
I did have a look at http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html, but was unlucky.
Cheers,
Mar
Hello List,
i would like to have a ldap based auto reply feature in a virtual
hosting environment. I had a look at gnarwl, but it was removed from
Debian lenny due to some security issues:
http://www.downloadpipe.com/forums/linux/Bug-457279-remove-gnarwl-lenny-ftopict57832.html
Is there any ot
Hello List,
we are planing to set up a new E-Mail (Cluster) system with postfix.
Our goal is that this is all ldap based and that our customers can
manage their own:
- E-Mail Addresses
- Passwords
- Black/White lists
- Spamasassin reports
- Autoreply/vacatation
- Filter rules
- etc..
Ldap is the
he chances that one of your customers is going to have a problem with
> the name (and possibly request that you change it, or give them their own).
Thank you, I appreciate the advice. It was excellent.
-ML
Stan,
> ML put forth on 11/23/2009 7:33 PM:
>
>> I am still confused.
[snip]
> Sending spam will get you blacklisted. Sending backscatter will get you
> blacklisted. Having mismatched A and PTR records will _NOT_ get you
> blacklisted. If might get you deferred by Yaho
Hi Wietse,
>> I have some confusion about multiple reverse PTR records per IP.
>
> You need only one.
>
> The name (from the address->name) lookup must resolve to the address.
I am still confused.
Like my example below, what happens if I want to setup a single mail server
that hosts mail for
Hi All,
I have some confusion about multiple reverse PTR records per IP.
Comcast has told me that they can only assign 2 reverse PTR records per IP.
So if I have mail.domainA.com and mail.domainB.com this is fine. If the reverse
lookup is done and it is not correct, it will retry and get the se
Le 3 nov. 08 à 20:24, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
you need both redirect (to other alias and to mailbox) in
virtual_alias_maps, reading your postconf i would suggest the
following lines :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTE
Le 3 nov. 08 à 12:02, Nicolas Letellier a écrit :
Hello.
I would like to have this possibility in postfix :
I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a mailbox (pop or imap), and it's TOO
an alias (to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
When a mail is sent for [EMAIL PROTECTED], the mail must arrive in
user mailbox
use a custom variable that you define in main.cf. something like this:
-o smtpd_sender_restrictions=${smtpd10028_sender_restrictions}
and define
smtpd10028_sender_restrictions =
in main.cf
it works fine, thanks !
Hi,
I wonder how to bypass a dspam filter for some sender only (aka a
filter whitelist), the issue is that i'm using a double filtering
system :
#main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination,
...
check_recipient_access hash:/usr/local/
I wonder how to know if a mail is catched by the default alias.
What i'm trying to achieve is to add a rule in my antispam when the
mail is sent to a unknown address
I have such lines in virtual_alias_maps :
@vitualdomain1.tld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@virtualdomain2.tld @virtualdomain1.tl
82 matches
Mail list logo
