Le 2012-03-10 05:46, The_Ace a écrit :
2012/3/10 ml <m...@smtp.fakessh.eu>
Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 09:28 +0530, The_Ace a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nikolaos Milas <nmi...@noa.gr>
wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 6:40 πμ, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> What is the best / reliable site to find newer
postfix
> rpm packages
> for centos 5 / rhel 5? by default it ships postfix
> 2.3.x and its a
> bit antique version.
>
>
>
> Hi Eero,
>
> These are considered fine:
> http://postfix.wl0.org/en/available-packages/ [2], yet
they
> diverge from standard (include VDA patch and possibly more
> non-standard options). But you can download the src.rpm
and
> build RPMs yourself disabling any undesired options (see
> directions: http://postfix.wl0.org/en/building-rpms/ [3]).
>
> Other SRPMs I know:
> http://www.kutukupret.com/downloads-page/ [4]
>
http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/postfix/RPMS/ils-5/SRPMS/ [5]
>
> Until now, I have not been able to find ready-made CentOS
> Postfix RPMs with standard-only options.
>
> You could also compile from source as described here:
>
http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/
[6]
>
> I currently use the latter methodology since a year or so
on a
> number of systems and it works fine.
>
> However, if someone can point to ready-made RPMs with
> standard-only options, I would be interested as well, as
> building from source does not scale well.
>
> Note that this has been discussed again in this list. See
for
> example:
>
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/postfix-users@postfix.org/2011-10/msg00094.html
[7]
>
> Best regards,
> Nick
>
>
> CentSLT repos http://centos.alt.ru/ [8] has Postfix 2.9.1
> http://centos.alt.ru/repository/centos/readme.txt [9]
>
> Regards,
> Mihira.
> --
> The mysteries of the Universe are revealed when you break stuff.
>
build the antique spec for postfix rpm it is easy in reading the doc
and other
centosalt its poor repo
do not use
maybe build own rpm -s
watch my doc for centos 5
http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/ [10]
--
Oh. Whats wrong with centalt repos ?
Mihira.
I would say that it is necessary to build the rpms for itself even
really know what you are doing I think
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742
http://urlshort.eu fakessh @
http://gplus.to/sshfake
http://gplus.to/sshswilting
http://gplus.to/john.swilting
https://lists.fakessh.eu/mailman/
This list is moderated by me, but all applications will be accepted
provided they receive a note of presentation
