3:36:50 PM PST, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
>Dnia 22.01.2025 o godz. 14:22:05 Curtis Vaughan via Postfix-users pisze:
>>
>> mv opendkim opendkim-real
>>
>> I'm moving /usr/sbin/opendkim to /usr/bin/opendkim-real ? Nope, there is no
>> such pr
to note the following error:
opendkim-testkey -vvv
opendkim-testkey: using default configfile /etc/opendkim.conf
opendkim-testkey: invalid data set type
So maybe I need to recreate all the keys or something?
On 1/22/25 13:31, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Curtis Vaughan via Postfix-users
Curtis Vaughan via Postfix-users:
I realize there have been a lot of posts about this issue, but in my
attempts so far, nothing has resolved this issue for me.
The postfix server in question is running on Ubuntu LTS 24.04 and has
been in operation for over a decade. But today while looking in
I realize there have been a lot of posts about this issue, but in my
attempts so far, nothing has resolved this issue for me.
The postfix server in question is running on Ubuntu LTS 24.04 and has
been in operation for over a decade. But today while looking in the logs
about a different issue I
in those log entries.
Just saying looks like my expectations were off...
On 6/29/24 11:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29.06.24 10:28, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
I meant to mention I do not see any connections/traffic on port 10026
in the mail logs.
see
I meant to mention I do not see any connections/traffic on port 10026 in
the mail logs.
-Curt
On 6/29/24 10:21, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
On 6/29/24 04:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29.06.24 01:41, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
No I am not
On 6/29/24 09:38, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-06-28 at 23:45:33 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:45:33 -0500)
Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
OK I tired this. What "mydestination" is set to does not matter
whether it's localhost or 127.
On 6/29/24 08:40, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users:
Everything except this that is:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain, www.$mydomain
Should this be set to:
mydestination = $myhostname, 127.0.0.1.$mydomain, $mydomain, www
On 6/29/24 04:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29.06.24 01:41, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
No I am not confusing inbound and outbound
not you, someone other perhaps :-)
and for this I'm only concerned about inbound and actually only on
ports 10024-26
-o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8
-o smtpd_use_tls=no
-o smtp_use_tls=no
spamtnsp unix - n n - - local
-o alias_maps=lmdb:/etc/aliaases
On 6/29/24 01:26, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 18:09, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
I don'
ual_alias_domains = lmdb:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_alias_maps = lmdb:/etc/postfix/virtual
On 6/28/24 23:27, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 15:16, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Peter, my misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today
in my testing. I expl
set to use 127.0.01 explicitly.
If anyone can explain the detailed why I am curious to know.
Thanks,
-Curt
On 6/28/24 22:16, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Peter, my misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today in
my testing. I explicitly used 127.0.0.1 and not localhost
Yeah I thought of including the config but that OP was long due to all
the logging so I didn't want to make it longer. I did say in my OP I
would provide anything if requested.
-Curt
On 6/28/24 21:11, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 05:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
tfix-users wrote:
On 29/06/24 03:17, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Well Peter all the "mynetworks =" that I have defined explicitly
state 127.0.0.1 not localhost and all the logging shows 127.0.0.1 not
localhost. So that is why I say I am using 127.0.0.1. So I cannot
follow
tool to drill the hole in the cable. When the DESTA came out and you
could use Thinwire (coax) that was a revolution!. Yes I'm old. LOL
https://gunkies.org/wiki/DEC_Ethernet_Transceivers
On 6/28/24 12:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Always in a good mood. It's a waste not
ch off that backbone.
TCP/IP was in it's infancy too at the time. That was over 30 years
before ipv6 was around so localhost was 127.0.0.1 and now to me, oh
yeah, ::1 is too now.
-Curt
On 6/28/24 12:09, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users:
What I
Thank you, Alexander, Matus, Jaroslaw, Peter, and Bill, just the kind of
ideas I was looking for.
My old postfix server is running 2.11 and I have not dealt much with
postfix really since then because like I said it just worked, did what I
needed it to do. Currently I'm working with 3.9 and I
ter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users:
I would like to get some insight as to the cause and correct
configuration to use. [...]
Maybe it is simply too early in the morning for me to get your point,
but what insight are you looking for, exactly?
You already found out that
I would like to get some insight as to the cause and correct
configuration to use. Building a new server that in part is my postfix
server and spent the last couple of days pulling my hair out trying to
get it to deliver mail.
I have an existing postfix server that has been working since 2014
om
(policy=temperror)
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC all pass at gmail.
Thanks,
Curtis
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
ave a long list of banned ip addresses in my system. I've also
changed the length of time addresses get banned for from hours to months.
--Curtis
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfi
a the ispconfig interface. I
agree that it's documentation is cryptic and not for the faint of
heart. They surely don't stick to the KISS method.
--
Curtis
https://curtis.maurand.com
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfi
;-)
I've been running rspamd for nearly a year and I've been very happy with
it. It's a huge improvement over amavis/spamassassin. It is very fast.
--Curtis
--
Curtis
https://curtis.maurand.com
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- pos
where do I find smtp-amavis connect timeout ?
Tweaking the timeouts won't help in this case, the real issue is Amavis
performance. Disable the content inspection features that make it slow,
or replace Amavis with something faster.
--
Viktor.
--
Curtis
https://curtis.maurand.com
Sadly MS is as fallible as the rest of us.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 2, 2022, at 4:56 AM, Linkcheck wrote:
>
> Thanks, Viktor. That's interesting. You'd think someone like MS could get it
> right. :(
>
) and
disable systemd-resolvd and dnsmasq. speeds things up dramatically.
Makes things much more reliable. I have much harsher opinions about
systemd, but that's not for this list.
--Curtis
--
Curtis
https://curtis.maurand.com
I might also suggest pdns-recursor. very fast.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 8, 2022, at 4:18 PM, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 8/7/22 09:50, Linkcheck wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2022 1:12 pm, Rob McGee wrote:
>>> dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
>>
>> ANY has to be after DIG, not at the end, b
using syslog-ng within the container.
> Em sáb., 6 de nov. de 2021 às 09:56, Curtis Maurand <
> cur...@maurand.com> escreveu:
> > On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 13:34 -0300, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> > > One last thing, is it possible to change the date format of the
> > > out
On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 13:34 -0300, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> One last thing, is it possible to change the date format of the
> output?
> Current format:
> Nov 05 13:20:06 smtp21 postfix/smtp[136]: 9D86C60BBE
>
> I'd like to use ISO format:
> 2021-10-29T19:37:52.017684-03:00 smtp21 postfix/smtp
>
>
would be a compelling choice of an an SMTP
server for students new to network protocols looking for verbose error
messages.
I did a search and found this about custom bounce messages.
https://www.howtoforge.com/configure-custom-postfix-bounce-messages
Cheers,
--Curtis
your a record and fqdn, your helo/ehlo hostname and the ptr record all need to
match.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 12:36 PM, Greg Sims wrote:
>
>
> We are receiving the following in our email logs:
>
> Mar 09 08:12:15 mail01.raystedman.org postfix/smtpd[13431]: warning: hostnam
I totally agree with this and I am going to work to scrub the prior terminology
from my system.
Thank you, Wietse
—Curtis
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 24, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> The following is from the postfix-3.6-20210221 release notes.
>
>Wiet
were
trying to send via google. SPF said nay, nay the policy says all incoming mail
from x.tld should come from spf.protection.outlook.com not the ip address that
google owns from which the message originated.
Cheers,
Curtis
-Curtis
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 10:31 AM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 2 Feb 2021, at 9:49, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
>> Perhaps Postfix does not support returning to clear text from a STARTTLS
>> session and doing futher protocol operations. I have not
for the blackhole lists, etc. take a look ar mxtoolbox.com
postfix should be passing sasl requests to dovecot’s imap process. I use a
tool called ispconfig which sets all of this up along with other tools such as
clamav, rspamd or amavisd along with per user policies.
my $0.02. I like its se
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 20, 2021, at 10:27 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> Dnia 20.01.2021 o godz. 15:48:29 Ganael Laplanche pisze:
>>> So just try to create some simple "proxy" to your LDAP server that does only
>>> one thing: if LDAP is available, just return the response from LDAP; if
>
s with snapshot capabilities. stop the ldap server,
restore the database from the snapshot, start the server. that can also be
automated and have it happen in seconds.
—Curtis
Sent from my iPhone
How about a general sieve rule in your dovecot server or a filter in your
delivery agent?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 1, 2020, at 5:11 PM, lists wrote:
>
> About 70% of my spam these days contains links to Google Forms. I've been
> googling for tips on how to reject such email but Google fi
October 15 2020 3:33 PM, "Patrick Ben Koetter" wrote:
> * Ian Evans :
>
>> The long story short is that due to dealing with family medical issues over
>> the past few years, my Combo web/postfix server is still on Ubuntu 14.04.
>>
>> In a couple of months I will have some time to upgrade. Instea
> On Aug 9, 2020, at 8:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> - Mail to managed lists with an owner-alias
>- Mail to pipes
>- Mail to :include:/some/file lists.
this can be put into the transports table and you can skip the /etc/aliases
altogether.
easier than that. use linux heartbeat on the two postfix service. the
failover happens within seconds. use the unison file system to keep the
spool folders and other necessary folders needed to pick up on the
failover machine and when the primary fails, whatever services that need
to be runni
really better to execute a command that sets both the
external address AND Postfix settings.
Wietse
Wietse's solution is better. what he said.
--Curtis
It's part of the config in main.cf You can specify "myhostname"
myhostname = host.domain.tld
Cheers, Curtis
On 6/30/20 4:55 PM, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
On 6/30/20 10:34 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Istvan Prosinger:
On 6/30/20 9:49 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Istvan Prosinger:
In message
"michae...@rocketmail.com" writes:
> THANKS to a all who answered!!!
>
> A lot of shared experience, learned a lot, cool. It's always very
> interesting how threads are meandering, somehow, adding new aspects to
> unasked but also relevant questions. Crowd as it's best :-) Summarize
t example.com if you can only get one IPv4 address.
Hope this helps.
Curtis
> - EOM for impatient readers :-) ---
>
> Hi patient readers :-)
>
> reason for my question:
>
> I'm running my own small postfix/dovecot etc. environment on a
> VPS. Running fine
you could set up the mail aliases in transport maps to pass them to mailman
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 14, 2020, at 10:43 AM, Peter Fraser wrote:
>
>
> Hi All
> I am trying to figure out how to get this working. I run Mailman through
> Postfix. The Mailman aliases are in alias_maps. I find
On 2/9/20 12:39 PM, Gerard E. Seibert wrote:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 07:56:53 -0500, Curtis Maurand stated:
it should be. use ldap. active directory is nothing but a glorified
ldap server and listens on port 389.
If it were ldap over ssl the port is 636 I believe.
I stand corrected.
it should be. use ldap. active directory is nothing but a glorified ldap
server and listens on port 389.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 9, 2020, at 7:04 AM, John Regan wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible for postfix to directly access the email addresses or userlist
> from an Exchange ser
Not competitors. Oligarchs. Colluders market fixers. Competition killers.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 4:44 AM, Wesley Peng wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> though this is a little OT, but I was curious since verizon has bought yahoo
> for long days, why ATT still host its customer email
ify-server-response-to-ehlo-helo?forum=exchangesvradmin
Cheers,
Curtis
On 7/1/19 1:24 AM, subscription1 wrote:
I'd appreciate you help with the following:
I'm looking after two server on 2 differents domains. During testing I
found the following issue.
On the sending server I get the fol
ponses. fail2ban is a resource hog
as it is.
Cheers,
Curtis
--
Best Regards Curtis Maurand
mailto:cur...@maurand.com
If possible, I would like to avoid writing a list of all my user
mailbox @ all domain names neither in virtual, nor in relay_recipients
file.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Samuel
--
Best Regards Curtis Maurand
mailto:cur...@maurand.com
through several layers.
DNS has become very ugly as Google and Cloudflare attempt to monopolize it.
--
Best Regards
Curtis Maurand
mailto:cur...@maurand.com
Wouldn't procmail do something like this? I haven't used procmail for quite
some time, but iirc it can handle passing to a filter program, then the filter
can hand it to the lmtp (dovecot for instance).
Just a thought. I now return to the lurkers lair.
--Curtis
On February 15, 20
You could use Unison to keep the config folders in sync. Open source. runs on
just about everything.
February 8 2019 8:59 AM, "De Petter Mattheas"
wrote:
> Yeas we have F5 loadbalancer.
>
> But how do we shift the config ? as far as i know there is no central mgmt
> for postfix only config
>
On 1/9/2019 5:55 PM, Robert L Mathews wrote:
On 1/9/19 4:05 PM, Curtis wrote:
We recently switched our Postfix mail servers to Ubuntu Server 18, which
uses journald for logging. Since we have monitoring systems that parse
/var/log/maillog, we enabled rsyslog with imuxsock so we still can parse
s less CPU
intensive than journald/imjournal.
Ideas?
Thanks,
Curtis
to a new group for management from the author.
This happened within the last couple of weeks. I'm on that mailing list, too.
They're working on getting the changes into the package repos. Amavis just
received a new lease on life.
Back to the discussion at hand,
--Curtis
October 15 2018 11:19 AM, "Kris Deugau" wrote:
> Laura Smith wrote:
>
>> Honestly, you are most likely wasting your time on that point because all
>> that you are likely to
>> get back is a page of waffle saying "blah blah blah ... security reasons...
>> blah blah blah"
>>> I know this because
or viruses and spam.
amavisd-new is written perl. It's a resource hog. Add fuzzy OCR and clamav and
resource utilization starts going up. Lot's of regulare expressions in all
those rules and policies.
--Curtis
October 4 2018 11:46 AM, "Viktor Dukhovni" wrote:
> On Thu,
ms of stability?
Thanks,
Curtis
and postfix) used by that particular type of host. I have to
"cd install_certs; gmake REMOTE_HOST=fqdn install" to add TLS key,
cert, and CA cert files for some hosts.
I don't know if this helps since I can't at this time share the tools.
But the point is i
et radio in the digital stone ages. BSD dropped X.25 a
decade ago but Linux still has code (marked experimental and does not
seem to be supported). The ITU has pull in a lot of places so X.25 is
mandated for packet radio in a lot of places.
That said I'm no expert on this (or much of anything :)
Curtis
nd no IPv6!
Hello Bill. What's up?
Curtis
ps - sorry - I'd send direct to Bill ... but can't. Maybe the list is
getting through.
On 04/12/16 14:26, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/12/2016 11:38 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
On 04/12/16 06:25, Wietse Venema wrote:
Curtis Villamizar:
I recently had a problem with mail where an ESP was in three
blacklists
plus SPF failed and spamassassin tossed some mail. That ESP is
down to
one
getting reports from anyone else, that is a good thing.
I don't think there is any requirement to send empty reports or that
those reports would serve any purpose (except maybe create "I got your
report and here is your" loops).
Curtis
On 04/12/16 06:25, Wietse Venema wrote:
Curtis Villamizar:
I recently had a problem with mail where an ESP was in three blacklists
plus SPF failed and spamassassin tossed some mail. That ESP is down to
one blacklist now. A sender got to me out-of-band and I dug up the
maillog from a few days
xes
that.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Curtis
d and I dug up the
maillog from a few days earlier and informed them about how good their
ESP was serving them. btw- If I had been using postscreen back then, I
could not have found this in the logs based on sender email.
Curtis
ps - works for google, though dmarc says "accept and report
blishing those records,
you just avoid having someone forge mail as you (including to you, but
there are plenty of simpler ways to protect against that). I was also
planning to reject based on opendmarc at some point in the
not-so-distant future.
Curtis
In message
"@lbutlr" writes:
>
> On Apr 10, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Curtis Villamizar =
> wrote:
> > postscreen_dnsbl_sites =3D
> > list.dnswl.org*-5
> > # followed by some blacklist sites
>
> It was my understanding that eh the order of te
better choice than inet with loopback IMO, reducing the chance
of leverage. Loopback is like a socket or fifo with ugo+rw perms.
Curtis
In message <570a341b.9000...@pajamian.dhs.org>
Peter writes:
>
> On 10/04/16 15:00, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> > This is a workaround that shouldn't be needed.
> >
> > Any idea what the cause of this is? So far no legit mail except gmail
> > gets c
In message <3qjz5d5s15zj...@spike.porcupine.org>
Wietse Venema writes:
>
> Curtis Villamizar:
> > Since I enabled postscreen (with soft_bounce=yes in master.cf) I was
> > getting logs of this form:
> >
> > Apr 9 01:08:12 mta1 postfix/postscreen[18326]:
&g
In message <5709c8c8.1050...@megan.vbhcs.org>
Noel Jones writes:
> On 4/9/2016 10:00 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> > Since I enabled postscreen (with soft_bounce=yes in master.cf) I was
> > getting logs of this form:
> >
> > Apr 9 01:08:12 mta1 postfix/postscr
In message <20160410024851.gu26...@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:31:48PM -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>
> > > 1) It looks to me that starttls really only protects the path to the
> > >first server. Classic cas
eject
postscreen_access:
# google mail servers
2607:f8b0:4002:c00::/60 permit
[... other google server blocks ...]
This is a workaround that shouldn't be needed.
Any idea what the cause of this is? So far no legit mail except gmail
gets caught here.
Curtis
of light is limited and geographic delays come into
play. I've been involved in testing and some simulation of this type
but on routers and various switchy-thingies rather than mailservers.
Curtis
> On 04/07/2016 06:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > See:
> > http://www.postfix.org/
,
using "zcat /var/log/maillog.0.bz2 | cat - /var/log/maillog | ...").
It gets rid of lots of PREGREET or HANGUP in under 1 sec. The
threshhold of 5 is quite low but I don't think it will catch any legit
mail servers. Still playing with this.
Note that the big space before reject i
Viktor.
Thanks for the links. I emailed one of the authors asking why so
little was said about DNSSEC and nothing at all about DANE.
Curtis
nd-to-end.
Of course to encrypt using pgp or s/mime both ends must support pgp or
s/mime which has been a problem. People within various communities of
interest use pgp or s/mime (for example, the security community) but
use is very sparse.
Curtis
> > Original Message
> > From: Vik
t;.
That doesn't solve base64 encoding.
Disclaimer: I haven't tried this.
Curtis
On 04/06/16 22:02, Laz C. Peterson wrote:
This is great information.
It's very odd ... Apple has been responsible for the foundation of quite a few
RFC's but in our experience has actually made it
ou could DKIM sign
your mail and add DKIM and SPF DNS records (maybe DMARC, though I
don't do that but might in the near future). DKIM and SPF pass can
only help, even if just a little, and DKIM+SPF+DMARC can make sure
that forgery doesn't penalize your domain.
Maybe someone that actual
nticated before the
check_sender_a_access and using smtpd_tls_auth_only if you want to use
auth only with TLS (good practice). If you manage to get rid of the
IP range based trust model, then add "reject" to the end of the
smtpd_sender_restrictions line for port 587.
Curtis
btw- Great location over there at Marlboro College.
ct_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
>... any other stuff...
On http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_helo_restrictions
permit_sasl_authenticated is not listed.
Which makes some sense since the HELO occurs before AUTH. HELO checks
seem to be all IP and hostname related.
> -- Noel Jones
Am I missing som
be nice but a large number of client certs can be a
headache to keep track of and hard to get into user's client MUAs.
Filters limiting access to port 587 can then be applied a lot more
strickly than filters on port 25 could be.
Curtis
over time.
Yes there still is a lot of similarity, but recycled version ... No -
just a quick path to get closer to posix in the utilities with least
restrictive licensing.
Curtis
In message <612d47d4-9465-4031-9d48-e6a0c3a8a...@dukhovni.org>
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
>
> > On Mar 13, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Curtis Villamizar
> > wrote:
> >
> > The NS RR are typically delivered in a fixed order, the order in the
> > zone file, and wh
In message <3qnxhn426dzj...@spike.porcupine.org>
Wietse Venema writes:
>
> Curtis Villamizar:
> > Are you saying they only looked at the primary NS record? Maybe I
> > misread a prior post but I thought you meant primary MX record. The
> > former, if true, would be
lude files and
library files. So I don't give it good odds on being a drop in and
compile solution. Mail is very simple and fairly self contained and
probably hasn't changed significantly in decades so it might drop in.
I'd exhaust other options first.
Curtis
ue, and no one else seemed to notice =
> since the other DNS servers were working fine.
Are you saying they only looked at the primary NS record? Maybe I
misread a prior post but I thought you meant primary MX record. The
former, if true, would be even more broken.
Curtis
In message <56e0ccb4.6010...@spectralmud.org>
Richard James Salts writes:
>
> On 10/03/16 09:32, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> > In message <56dfcd11.5010...@spectralmud.org>
> > Richard James Salts writes:
> >
> >> On 09/03/16 06:44, Viktor Dukhovni wro
In message <56dfcd11.5010...@spectralmud.org>
Richard James Salts writes:
> On 09/03/16 06:44, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >> On Mar 8, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Curtis Villamizar
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> With HTTP the server cert is provided after HTTP ide
In message
Tom Browder writes:
> On Tuesday, March 8, 2016, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > I've been following this thread and also not clear on your
> > objectives. See inline.
> > As Viktor pointed out, look at the examples. Your home machin
e with a Postfix dummy.
>
> Best regards,
>
> -Tom
Fine so far but you haven't said what you expect the postfix MX to do
with received mail. You have a few choices.
Relay it per domain (easy - use transport_maps).
Deliver it locally? Easy but t...@domain1.example.com and
t...@domain2.example.com end up in the same mailbox (ie: tom, typically
delivered to /var/mail/tom).
Set up multiple IMAP server domains? See
http://www.cyrusimap.org/docs/cyrus-imapd/2.4.8/install-virtdomains.php
(for example).
Something else? If so what?
Either way take a look at http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
Hope this helps.
Curtis
ponse. Just pointing to an existance
proof that the mailman architecture is not fundamentally broken.
btw- I can't tell from headers whether they use sendmail.org sendmail
or postfix or something else, but amavisd-new is mentioned in the
headers. amsl.com runs most of the mailing lists.
Curtis
On 2/22/2016 3:03 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:57:23PM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
The problem was in the /etc/nsswitch.conf.
I changed the line
hosts: files dns
to
hosts:dns files
and that solved the trouble.
Is
On 2/20/2016 5:19 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
On 2/20/2016 1:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Nothing is chrooted. resolv.conf is world readable. Wietse's program
returns a valid address. It might not match the reverse, b
On 2/20/2016 1:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Nothing is chrooted. resolv.conf is world readable. Wietse's program
returns a valid address. It might not match the reverse, but it did return
an address.
# ./ge
On 2/20/2016 12:17 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:40:09AM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
i just sent myself a test message from the client's system. Here is what I
got. I immediately ran the lookups using dig. postfix can't seem to
resolve things properly
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
