Wouldn't procmail do something like this?   I haven't used procmail for quite 
some time, but iirc it can handle passing to a filter program, then the filter 
can hand it to the lmtp (dovecot for instance).

Just a thought.  I now return to the lurkers lair.

--Curtis

On February 15, 2019 6:58:00 AM EST, Andrey Repin <anrdae...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>Greetings, Jan P. Kessler!
>
>>>> Does anyone have any suggestions for a tool for filtering out click
>>>> trackers from links in email bodies and rewriting the links without
>>>> the click tracking? 
>>> Anything that does this will also break DKIM, if the email has it
>>> (which many do). But perhaps you are confident that your users won't
>>> be bothered about this.
>
>> Isn't DKIM usually checked at MX (or at a downstream content filter)?
>> Then it would not necessarily bother users:
>
>It is checked where it is checked. This includes MUA for those capable
>of
>validating it.
>
>> Step-1: MX checks DKIM, acts on that information (reject or pass) and
>> optionally removes DKIM-header
>> Step-2: MX passes mail to click track remover, after that to user's
>mailbox
>
>> Or did I miss something?
>
>Other message signing techniques, as indicated above.
>
>
>-- 
>With best regards,
>Andrey Repin
>Friday, February 15, 2019 14:56:57
>
>Sorry for my terrible english...

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to