In message <b1132232-5b45-4a7b-8fb8-f240cea1f...@kreme.com> "@lbutlr" writes: > > On Apr 10, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Curtis Villamizar = > <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> wrote: > > postscreen_dnsbl_sites =3D > > list.dnswl.org*-5 > > # followed by some blacklist sites > > It was my understanding that eh the order of test said not matter > because all the dnsbls listed would be checked, a final score > computed, and then that compound number passed along to postscreen.
Nobody ever said there was an order dependence. btw- I don't think list.dnswl.org is a viable workaround for the post 220 problem. This just affects the dnsbl score which would already be zero. The post 220 checks would still be run before putting the gmail server IP into the temporary whitelist. Manual maintenance of postscreen_access is the only thing that would work. Curtis
