On 2021-07-12 at 22:07:23 UTC-0400 (Mon, 12 Jul 2021 22:07:23 -0400)
is rumored to have said:
Is there a way to disable milters based on recipient like how you can
use smtpd_milter_maps to disable based on client IP?
No.
There's no way to know any recipient until there's a RCPT command, by
Is there a way to disable milters based on recipient like how you can
use smtpd_milter_maps to disable based on client IP?
Doug Hardie:
> I have a postfix server that uses postscreen. However, occasionally
> a needed mail is blocked by one of the spam services. Is there a
> way to bypass postscreen for just one or more specific addresses
> for a short time?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_access_li
I have a postfix server that uses postscreen. However, occasionally a needed
mail is blocked by one of the spam services. Is there a way to bypass
postscreen for just one or more specific addresses for a short time?
-- Doug
For example the following transaction will not show any errors in SYSLOG:
In: AUTH LOGIN
Out: 503 5.5.1 Error: authentication not enabled
In: QUIT
Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye
You can use the existing notify_classes based mechamism and pipe
that into syslog.
notify_classes = protocol, ...
Kevin N.:
> > Kevin N.:
> >> For example the following transaction will not show any errors in SYSLOG:
> >>
> >> In: AUTH LOGIN
> >> Out: 503 5.5.1 Error: authentication not enabled
> >> In: QUIT
> >> Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye
> >
> > You can use the existing notify_classes based mechamism and pipe
> >
For example the following transaction will not show any errors in
SYSLOG:
In: AUTH LOGIN
Out: 503 5.5.1 Error: authentication not enabled
In: QUIT
Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye
You can use the existing notify_classes based mechamism and pipe
that into syslog.
notify_classes = protocol, ...
e
Kevin N.:
For example the following transaction will not show any errors in SYSLOG:
In: AUTH LOGIN
Out: 503 5.5.1 Error: authentication not enabled
In: QUIT
Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye
You can use the existing notify_classes based mechamism and pipe
that into syslog.
notify_classes = protocol,
> Forcing all senders to be "dan@mydomain" seems like the wrong
> solution, but I guess that's ok if it works for you and no one else uses the
> server.
> Sometimes when you hold a hammer everything looks like a nail.
Agreed, it is a bit draconian! But there won't be any users of my server
exc
> On 12 Jul 2021, at 3:22 pm, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> debug_peer_level (default: 2)
The smtp(8) manpage SYNOPSIS reads:
smtp [generic Postfix daemon options]
This is then seen again in:
SEE ALSO
...
master(5), generic daemon options
...
That manpage reads:
Manual:
debug_peer_level (default: 2)
The increment in verbose logging level when a nexthop destination,
remote client or server name or network address matches a pattern given
with the debug_peer_list parameter.
The default is 2, but what does 2 do?
What does 1 do?
Is there a 0?
How high do
> On 12 Jul 2021, at 1:23 pm, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> The manual says:
> "It is best not to use SQL to store the domains eligible for SQL lookups."
That would rather defeat the goal of avoiding SQL lookups for unsupported
domains. The list of values in:
domain = ...
should avoid us
Kevin N.:
> For example the following transaction will not show any errors in SYSLOG:
>
> In: AUTH LOGIN
> Out: 503 5.5.1 Error: authentication not enabled
> In: QUIT
> Out: 221 2.0.0 Bye
You can use the existing notify_classes based mechamism and pipe
that into syslog.
notify_classes = pr
On 7/12/2021 11:05 AM, Dan Morton wrote:
I am moving my phpBB website from a shared server to a VPS. phpBB sends
notifications to users that originate from d...@mydomain.net, my email
account; and that account can be one
of those user recipients. This is currently functioning on my shared
ser
If you add:
# Replace example.com with one or more appropriate domains:
domain = example.com
to the table definition, all the lookup keys will be user@domain, with
no
bare domain or parent domain keys.
The manual says:
"It is best not to use SQL to store the domains eligible
For the record:
On Jul 11, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Claus R. Wickinghoff wrote:
> I think this can be achieved with reject_unverified_recipient to query
> dovecot via lmtp but I've no practical experience with this. Probably you've
> to do some googling...
That turned out to be the Right Answer. I
It would be nice to have an option to enable logging to SYSLOG the SMTP
protocol errors that occur during a SMTP session, along with the SMTP
commands that caused them.
As far as I know, currently these errors can be logged to SYSLOG only by
one of the following methods:
1. By making the SMT
> On 12 Jul 2021, at 12:17 pm, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> If i change the query to return 'DUNNO' for false will it be valid returning
> "verify_spfpolicy,DUNNO" or "DUNNO,DUNNO"?
> Can it be fixed using result_format by adding on an insignificant check or
> would it still create an empty resul
> On 12 Jul 2021, at 12:43 pm, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> When postfix looks up an address it repeats the query for each section of an
> address.
>
>%s = u...@example.com
>%s = example.com
>%s = com
>
> Is there a way on a single check_recipient_access to tell postfix to only
> ch
> On 12 Jul 2021, at 11:53 am, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
>query = SELECT CONCAT(IF(spfVerify, 'verify_spfpolicy,', ''),
> IF(senderVerify, 'reject_unverified_sender,', '')) AS restrictions FROM
> settings WHERE email='%s' LIMIT 1
This is not a well thought out query. Avoid CONCAT, instead
When postfix looks up an address it repeats the query for each section
of an address.
%s = u...@example.com
%s = example.com
%s = com
Is there a way on a single check_recipient_access to tell postfix to
only check the full address, only do the query once?
%s = u...@example.co
On 07-12-2021 12:01 pm, Wietse Venema wrote:
Fix the underlying problem: the database must not return an empty
result. Don't waste cycles asking why Postfix handles an invalid
result in a specific way.
If i change the query to return 'DUNNO' for false will it be valid
returning "verify_spfpoli
I am moving my phpBB website from a shared server to a VPS. phpBB sends
notifications to users that originate from d...@mydomain.net, my email
account; and that account can be one
of those user recipients. This is currently functioning on my shared
server, and I am attempting to set it up on my V
Fix the underlying problem: the database must not return an empty
result. Don't waste cycles asking why Postfix handles an invalid
result in a specific way.
Wietse
I think this one is for Wietse or Viktor;
OVERVIEW
Trying to make a policy server run or not-run per recipient.
DETAILS
---
main.cf:
smtpd_restriction_classes = verify_spfpolicy
verify_spfpolicy = check_policy_service unix:private/spfpolicy
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
On 11.07.21 23:26, Ron Garret wrote:
This has me wondering: if a message is sent to multiple recipients and some
are valid and others are not, what is the Right Thing to do?
The right thing is to refuse all non-existing recipients, which postfix does
by default if it knows what addresses exist.
> netstat or lsof? Only the Postfix queue manager knows what deliveries
> are in progress, and it has never evolved a 'live status' API. None
> of the Postfix daemons has a status query API, it just isn't part of
> the architecture.
I created a way to watch the number of processes that exist for
27 matches
Mail list logo
