On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:33:12PM -0300, Rolando Guaracio wrote:
> The problem is that this message is bounced with the following
> line: said: 501 Syntax error: Empty email address. (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command)).
The string "Empty email address" does not appear in the Postfix source code.
On 28 Oct 2015, at 20:11, Marco Stoecker wrote:
On 10/29/2015 01:07 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:26:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
Thx Bill and Viktor!
as I discussed this topic in parallel in the mailman mailinglist, we
came there today also to the conclusion, tha
On 10/28/2015 11:04 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 15:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>>
>>> From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
>>>
>>> If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists
>>>
Hey,
I am using postfix with spamassassin and a relayhost directive.
The way I am using spamassassin is by the content_filter option.
When I am applying delivery confirmation on a message I am receiving a
confirmation but from spamassassin
I want to get delivery confirmations from my upstream
On 10/29/2015 01:07 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:26:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
>
>> Thx Bill and Viktor!
>> as I discussed this topic in parallel in the mailman mailinglist, we
>> came there today also to the conclusion, that fetchmail is the root
>> cause, due to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:26:20AM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
> Thx Bill and Viktor!
> as I discussed this topic in parallel in the mailman mailinglist, we
> came there today also to the conclusion, that fetchmail is the root
> cause, due to missing envelope information/maildrop capabilities.
>
On 10/28/2015 11:04 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 15:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>>
>>> From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
>>>
>>> If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists
>>>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:11:16PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
>Hi Victor,
>
>The point is the mail was never delivered, this is known.
We don't know that the mail ever really arrived. Cleanup logs the
message-id before the rest of the message arrives. Perhaps the
message was neve
On 28 Oct 2015, at 15:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists
will
receive multiple copies.
Not on properly configured
Hi Victor,
The point is the mail was never delivered, this is known.
Kind of a coincidence that the mail was not delivered and also
that the logs show it is missing.
Homer
Homer Wilson Smith Clean Air, Clea
Hi,
I have the following situation.
When my internal postfix MTA send a NDN it send it with null from
(from<>). Next, this message is send to the external postfix MTA to send
it to the Internet. The problem is that this message is bounced with the
following line: said: 501 Syntax error: Empty
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:51:43PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> From that point onward there are 5 distinct messages.
>
> If those are 5 different mailing lists, subscribers to multiple lists will
> receive multiple copies.
Not on properly configured systems. We're not talking about
subscribers wh
On 28 Oct 2015, at 4:04, Marco Stoecker wrote:
As I understand now, the mail from the sender (machine Klamotte) is
delivered to the smtp server from web.de which than is delivered to
1und1 (mx.kundenserver).
Yes. The second "hop" (between web.de and mx.kundenserver.de) occurs 5
times, once f
On Oct 28, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/28/2015 6:41 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
I really hope there is a solution.
I have been using postfix and dspam. However, /var became full.
After looking into the problem, I found that /var/dspam/data was
where all the disk space was being use
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:06:26PM +0100, ma...@stoecker-family.de wrote:
> I do not understand your question.
> I configured mailman as a mailing list server using postfix (relayhost) and
> fetchmail as its interfaces to the internet as described for mailman.
Not all the question you're being
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:17:35AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
> Is there a way to have Postfix take a specific action based on the
> *response* of the SMTP server to which it is connected? What I'm hoping to
> accomplish is re-queueing messages to a new queue whenever I see an SMTP
> response indic
Is there a way to have Postfix take a specific action based on the
*response* of the SMTP server to which it is connected? What I'm hoping to
accomplish is re-queueing messages to a new queue whenever I see an SMTP
response indicating that a message has been "grey-listed". For complex
reasons, it's
On 29/09/15 21:47, coolhandluke wrote:
On 2015-09-29 05:13, Robert Sharp wrote:
I have been trying to use a third-party backup provider to cover
occasional outages (SiXwishlist). I set up an MX record as instructed
but I get no emails sent on when my server recovers. I asked them to
check what
Hi,
I have had a few problems recently with my router/server locking up and
I was thinking about reducing the load on it by moving as much as
possible to another machine and making the server more reliable. I know
I could just DNAT port 25 to another machine, but that creates two
points of fa
I do not understand your question.
I configured mailman as a mailing list server using postfix (relayhost) and
fetchmail as its interfaces to the internet as described for mailman.
BR
Marco
- Reply message -
From: "Robert Wolfe"
To: "Marco Stoecker"
Cc:
Subject: email duplicates
Dat
Why so many hops?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 28, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Marco Stoecker wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 10/27/2015 06:10 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
>>> On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:40, Marco Stoecker wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I do need some assistance, as this is very new for me.
>>> Thx in advance.
>>> So this
On 10/28/2015 6:41 AM, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really hope there is a solution.
>
> I have been using postfix and dspam. However, /var became full.
> After looking into the problem, I found that /var/dspam/data was
> where all the disk space was being used. After deleting
> /var/dspam/data /va
Hi,
I really hope there is a solution.
I have been using postfix and dspam. However, /var became full. After
looking into the problem, I found that /var/dspam/data was where all
the disk space was being used. After deleting /var/dspam/data /var
was almost empty. Well, I then created /var/d
On 10/28/2015 01:09 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:40:35PM +0100, Marco Stoecker wrote:
message1:
Delivered-To: vorstand@localhost
Received: from wakis02.local (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by wakis02.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DC6269A;
Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:40:43 +0200 (
On 10/27/2015 06:10 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 27 Oct 2015, at 12:40, Marco Stoecker wrote:
[...]
I do need some assistance, as this is very new for me.
Thx in advance.
So this is the "Received" header of 5 out of 5 messages. I can't see
where the duplication happend :-(
Maybe this abridgme
25 matches
Mail list logo
