On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:53:51AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 16-Sep-2009, at 05:28, Laurence Moughan wrote:
>> postmap -q "boarding" regexp:/etc/postfix/headerchecks
>>
>> This comes back with nothing - i thought it might coma back with a
>> match ?
>
>> /^From:(.*)boarding_...@domain\.com/ REJE
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:13:19PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:14:35PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >
> > > # main.cf
> > > recipient_canonical_maps = cdb:/usr/local/etc/postfix/canonical
> > >
> > > # /usr/local/e
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:14:35PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> > # main.cf
> > recipient_canonical_maps = cdb:/usr/local/etc/postfix/canonical
> >
> > # /usr/local/etc/postfix/canonical
> > @exmaple.org @example.org
>
> I strongly discourage
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:14:35PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> # main.cf
> recipient_canonical_maps = cdb:/usr/local/etc/postfix/canonical
>
> # /usr/local/etc/postfix/canonical
> @exmaple.org @example.org
I strongly discourage "recipient_canonical_maps". Use canonical_maps
instead. Unlike
>If you do not want to process local mail via SpamAssassin then don't
>send locally submitted mail to SpamAssassin.
Precisely, and the question was how to recognize locally submitted mail vs
other mail given that we had to process on delivery via procmail, and, each
user can have different Spam
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Steve Fatula wrote:
> It is likely you are not aware of the problem I am speaking of then as
> Spamassassin does NOT recognize locally sent mail the way it "should",
> it uses a test called NO_RELAYS for locally sent postfix mail. I don't
> want to process the local mail at al
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> On 16-Sep-2009, at 14:32, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> >@yaho.com @yahoo.com
>
> I can just put that in my normal virtue? That's very cool.
Yes.
> All seems to work, huzzah!
Indeed, but note that virtual alias mapping affects only the envelope
recipient address
>I use postfix and spamassassin, and I have no problem. I don't rewrite
>headers. I don't whitelist senders. ... etc.
It is likely you are not aware of the problem I am speaking of then as
Spamassassin does NOT recognize locally sent mail the way it "should", it uses
a test called NO_RELAYS for
Steve Fatula a écrit :
>>> Is this a true statement. If a message is sent to postfix via smtp, in the
>>> message headers will ALWAYS be at least one header of the form:
>>>
>>> Received: from...
>>>
>>> I believe this to be the case, which means the only messages without that
>>> are the locally
Steve Fatula a écrit :
>> Why? What problem are you trying to solve.
>> if you inist, force it to go to smtpd by using a content_filter in the
>> pickup service in master.cf.
>
>
> The problem to be solved is that various filters we use, spamassassin, dcc,
> etc., use the receive from header in
On 16-Sep-2009, at 14:32, Noel Jones wrote:
@yaho.com @yahoo.com
I can just put that in my normal virtue? That's very cool.
I figured I would need to create a separate virtual file that is
called under smtpd_recipient_restrictions or something.
All seems to work, huzzah!
--
Can I tell y
On 9/16/2009 3:10 PM, LuKreme wrote:
you can add a virtual_alias_maps entry to rewrite it. This works for
any domain.
u...@yaho.com u...@yahoo.com
But in that case I'd have to specify every possible user?
What I need to do is be able to, for example, rewrite (.*)@yaho\.com to
$...@yahoo.com
On 16-Sep-2009, at 12:41, Evan Platt wrote:
Not a 'postfix' answer, but what mail client does he use? Is it one
(or two or 3) e-mail addresses?
No, it's a large number of email addresses and a constantly changing
list.
On 16-Sep-2009, at 13:01, Noel Jones wrote:
you can add a virtual_alia
>> Is this a true statement. If a message is sent to postfix via smtp, in the
>> message headers will ALWAYS be at least one header of the form:
>>
>> Received: from...
>>
>> I believe this to be the case, which means the only messages without that
>> are the locally sent emails. Wouldn't that be
On 9/16/2009 10:53 AM, Steve Fatula wrote:
Is this a true statement. If a message is sent to postfix via smtp, in the
message headers will ALWAYS be at least one header of the form:
Received: from...
I believe this to be the case, which means the only messages without that are
the locally sen
On 9/16/2009 1:34 PM, LuKreme wrote:
I have a user who is constantly mistyping a specific domain that he
sends mail to on a regular basis. This has been going on for a couple of
years, and every time he complains to be about messages not being
delivered, or 'being eaten' or something. He is convi
Not a 'postfix' answer, but what mail client does
he use? Is it one (or two or 3) e-mail addresses?
Maybe make a addres book entry for the mistyped
address to go to the real address?
At 11:34 AM 9/16/2009, you wrote:
I have a user who is constantly mistyping a specific domain that he
sends m
I have a user who is constantly mistyping a specific domain that he
sends mail to on a regular basis. This has been going on for a couple
of years, and every time he complains to be about messages not being
delivered, or 'being eaten' or something. He is convinced, every time,
that my serve
> I recall some months ago seeing a large discussion on someone taking
> their time and dedication on creating a pre-packaged RPM of 2.6.X. I
> was wondering if anyone has the latest RPM that I can download for my
> new RHEL 5 server. I am looking to use 2.6.5 from a packaged RPM
> however Redhat
Carlos Williams schrieb:
> I recall some months ago seeing a large discussion on someone taking
> their time and dedication on creating a pre-packaged RPM of 2.6.X. I
> was wondering if anyone has the latest RPM that I can download for my
> new RHEL 5 server. I am looking to use 2.6.5 from a packa
Is this a true statement. If a message is sent to postfix via smtp, in the
message headers will ALWAYS be at least one header of the form:
Received: from...
I believe this to be the case, which means the only messages without that are
the locally sent emails. Wouldn't that be true?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Brian Collins
wrote:
> Simon Mudd is the man who makes these RPMs. We mirror his site. You can get
> the RPMs here:
> ftp://mirror.newnanutilities.org/pub/postfix-rpm/official/2.6/
Thanks for that info and I greatly appreciate all the time and effort
Simon put
On 16-Sep-2009, at 05:28, Laurence Moughan wrote:
postmap -q "boarding" regexp:/etc/postfix/headerchecks
This comes back with nothing - i thought it might coma back with a
match ?
/^From:(.*)boarding_...@domain\.com/ REJECT junk
/^From:(*)boarding(*)\...@adomain\.com/ REJECT junk
/^From: *
I recall some months ago seeing a large discussion on someone taking
their time and dedication on creating a pre-packaged RPM of 2.6.X. I
was wondering if anyone has the latest RPM that I can download for my
new RHEL 5 server. I am looking to use 2.6.5 from a packaged RPM
however Redhat / CentOS o
fursink:
> I am still unclear on this...
>
> Despite creating a slow transport for yahoo and verifying that the
> unix socket 'slow' exists, it seems that it's not being used. Our
> connections to yahoo are still occurring at a rate faster than
> specified here in main.cf params and there is no 'p
I apologize if this topic seems basic or I'm missing something obvious
here, but after much googling and looking to Ralph's book for answers,
I am still unclear on this...
Despite creating a slow transport for yahoo and verifying that the
unix socket 'slow' exists, it seems that it's not being use
Laurence Moughan:
> Hi All,
>
> Would someone just please give me a headsup on the format for reg
> exp headerchecks files,
This is documented.
man 5 regexp_table
man 5 header_checks
man 7 regex
Wietse
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:03:48 -0400 (EDT)
Rob Foehl wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jose Carlos Madrid wrote:
>
> > you were right. I edited the file in Windows. I didn't realize. But
> > after save it with vi editor It still keeps giving me this error.
> > Notice it is not (line 1: missing '=' af
Appologies the second post - can someone please also explain the postmap test,
eg
postmap -q "boarding" regexp:/etc/postfix/headerchecks
This comes back with nothing - i thought it might coma back with a match ?
Laurence
>>> "Laurence Moughan" 16/09/09 12:00:15 >>>
Hi All,
Would someo
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:15 +0100, "Laurence Moughan"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Would someone just please give me a headsup on the format for reg exp
> headerchecks files,
>
> Im not sure how to format for searching for a string within an email
> address,
>
> eg
>
> to reject all mail with the
Hi All,
Would someone just please give me a headsup on the format for reg exp
headerchecks files,
Im not sure how to format for searching for a string within an email address,
eg
to reject all mail with the word "boarding" eg for the from address
boarding...@domain.com and newboarding_pc
* Arora, Sumit :
> I have done the basic configuration of postfix on my fedora10.
>
> Can anybody tell me where I can see the received emails.
Usually /var/mail/.
> Do I need to setup any database for storing emails?
No.
> I just want to be sure that I'm getting emails or not.
Check the log.
I have done the basic configuration of postfix on my fedora10.
Can anybody tell me where I can see the received emails.
Do I need to setup any database for storing emails?
I just want to be sure that I'm getting emails or not.
Thanks,
Sumit Arora
Arora, Sumit:
> Thanks p...@rick..
>
> I read "man 8 pipe"..
>
> And what I understand is, I need to change the configuration somewhere here
> in master.cf:
>
> #
> #
> # Other external delivery methods.
> #
> #ifmailunix
Thanks p...@rick..
I read "man 8 pipe"..
And what I understand is, I need to change the configuration somewhere here in
master.cf:
#
#
# Other external delivery methods.
#
#ifmailunix - n n - -
Peter Micunek wrote:
Hi all,
I need to dump lookup table transport.cdb. I tried it via postmap:
postmap -s cdb:transport
postmap: fatal: cdb table transport.cdb: sequence operation is not supported
Hmm. I thought I fixed this? I'll see.
Is there any way to do it?
Meanwhile, you can use
* Arora, Sumit :
> Thanks Erwan
>
> As I'm new to postfix I couldn't understand what u said, I googled it but
> didn't get any result useful to me.
Have you read "man 8 pipe" yet?
> Can u plz explain with some examples..
You can find some examples in /etc/postfix/master.cf. Look for commands t
Hi all,
I need to dump lookup table transport.cdb. I tried it via postmap:
postmap -s cdb:transport
postmap: fatal: cdb table transport.cdb: sequence operation is not supported
Is there any way to do it?
Thanks
Peter Micunek
---
Stavebna fakulta STU
On 2009-09-15 Paul Beard wrote:
> 554 5.1.0 : Sender address rejected: User unknown
> in virtual alias table
[...]
> virtual_alias_domains = example.org
> virtual_alias_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/example.cf
If mail sent to xx...@example.org should be delivered to local mailbox
Y, you n
Thanks Erwan
As I'm new to postfix I couldn't understand what u said, I googled it but
didn't get any result useful to me.
Can u plz explain with some examples..
Many Thanks,
Sumit Arora
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:10:01AM CEST, "Arora, Sumit"
said:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to execute my code when I receive email on my postfix smtp server.
>
> Can anybody tell me what I can do if I want to execute my java function when
> I receive email.
> Also I need my whole email content in my j
Hi All,
I need to execute my code when I receive email on my postfix smtp server.
Can anybody tell me what I can do if I want to execute my java function when I
receive email.
Also I need my whole email content in my java function.
It will be great if anyone can show me some examples.
Many Tha
42 matches
Mail list logo
