Re: Installed packages to be REMOVED

2025-07-09 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. What will be the result of pkg check -dan when such a condition occurs? That might not be a problem, but the only way to know for sure is to ask the person who can make it happen :) Regards.

Re: How to use programs related to libxml2 before all of their updates are complete

2025-07-07 Thread Tatsuki Makino
I have progressed to the point where I just have to rebuild chromium. During the building of Chromium, a tool linked with libxml2 was created, and in order to use it, a libmap for that was also needed. Make sure that the libmap is applied to WRKDIR directory. [/usr/ports/] libxml2.so.16 libxml2.

Re: strange issue with HAS_SYMBOL_VERSION

2025-07-03 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. If this is executed twice or more times with sleep and sync in between, will there be any change in the results? Additionally, check whether the relevant files exist in an appropriate state before checking. There is some strange behavior, isn't there? :) Regards.

Re: How to use programs related to libxml2 before all of their updates are complete

2025-06-30 Thread Tatsuki Makino
On 2025/06/30 21:35, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:59:02 +0300 Gleb Popov wrote: I think it'd be enough to # cp libxml2.so /usr/local/lib/compat/ instead of dancing with libmap.conf Yes. It is usually enough. This is the recommendation. cp -L /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 /usr/l

Re: php81-xml and libxml2 problems

2025-06-30 Thread Tatsuki Makino
On 2025/06/30 18:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon 30 Jun 02:10, Jack L. wrote: Yes, it seems the libxml2 upgrade has broken all my ports that depend on it since those ports didn't get a bumped portrevision portrevision has been bumped now. Best regards, Bapt Thank you very much. It is l

Re: php81-xml and libxml2 problems

2025-06-30 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Um. I don't know :), but it might just be a specific version issue with the pkg side, so it could possibly be fixed with something like poudriere bulk -C textproc/php81-xml. Regards. On 2025/06/30 16:24, void wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 04:01:03PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote:

Re: php81-xml and libxml2 problems

2025-06-30 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. This time, it seems that the portrevision bump for the consumer port due to the version upgrade of libxml2 has not been carried out, so poudriere-3.4.2 may not have rebuilt the new package. pkg check notifies that many ports have missing libraries :) Regards.

Re: net/kea: [2.6.3_1]: Unable to open database: invalid path specified - only /var/db as folder allowed

2025-06-22 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 2025/06/23 1:40, A FreeBSD User wrote: > Is there a clean way - apart from changing rc.d-script - to provide environment variables at > boottime? How about defining a variable named kea_env in /etc/rc.conf? Regards.

Re: USE_QT= . . . webengine . . . and libQt5WebEngine.so.5 vs. libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5 dependency failures in builds

2025-05-30 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 5/30/25 16:50, Robert Clausecker wrote: Am Wed, May 28, 2025 at 09:21:06PM -0700 schrieb Mark Millard: Looking . . . # file /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5WebEngineCore* /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5WebEngineCore.prl:ASCII text, with very long lines (770) /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5WebE

Re: USE_QT= . . . webengine . . . and libQt5WebEngine.so.5 vs. libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5 dependency failures in builds

2025-05-28 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 5/29/25 05:29, Mark Millard wrote: First, for reference, showing libQt5WebEngine.so.5 provided when I tried installing an official one (14.2-RELEASE context): . . . Yet my build experiments get a missing libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5 dependency (note the "Core" vs. not): [00:06:41] [01]

Re: math/suitesparse-cholmod version of cholmod should be 5.3.3 for SuiteSparse v7.10.3

2025-05-19 Thread Tatsuki Makino
On 5/20/25 01:51, Thierry Thomas wrote: I sent an email directly to the committer who made this change, but it seems it did not pass the SPF check, so I will post a similar message here :) Could you please send me (privately) the error message of this mail? It might just be an issue with th

Re: Proper way to change /etc/devfs.conf when installing a port

2025-04-17 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I haven't used it at all, so it's all just speculation After looking at devd.cc for about 5 seconds, it doesn't seem like the conf for devd is being reloaded within the event_loop. It seems that if a new conf for devd is installed, devd must be restarted. I still do not know if that

Re: py-setuptools not finding py-wheel

2025-04-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
This is probably it. devel/py-anyio It is interesting to see the BUILD_DEPENDS of it. make -C /usr/ports/devel/py-anyio/ -V BUILD_DEPENDS The setuptools that it requires will end up installing wheel044, which will prevent the installation of the wheel(0.45) that it needs :) After installing t

Re: py-setuptools not finding py-wheel

2025-04-13 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Even if that's swapped out for devel/py-wheel044 , something else might require devel/py-wheel, so it's not possible to install/update everything at once with something like portmaster :) Regards.

Re: Should we recommend daemon(8) for rc scripts?

2025-03-19 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I will mention something completely unrelated... :) To achieve the same behavior as daemon of FreeBSD 10.x, the current daemon requires argument -m 0. However, it is not written that 0 can be used for option -m. (I stated the same thing in bug 236117.) pcscd (port of devel/pcsc-lite) lea

extension mhash of php82

2025-03-11 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. PHP 8.2 has an extension called mhash. It is enabled by --with-mhash. It seems that this has not been ported yet. If this is ported, the build will fail in environments where xxhash(devel/xxhash) is installed. The cause is the usual one due to the order of the include directories specif

Re: security/nss fails to build

2025-02-18 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. It's unrelated, but since I was just touching on something similar, I'll write a little something. In the case of clang, we can display which directory is targeted with a command like the following. clang -E -x c -Wp,-v /dev/null /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChai

Re: www/apache24: request for review

2025-02-07 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I think that being hard-coded refers more to this part. https: //svn.apache.org /viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/os/unix/unixd.h?revision=1797368&view=markup#l68 The current patch concerns whether to create users and groups with predefined UIDs and GIDs, so it seems reasonable to prov

Re: Strange version inconsistency in Samba t* utils (e.g. talloc)

2025-02-01 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. The following two lines exist in INDEX-*. tdb-1.4.9,1|/usr/ports/databases/tdb|/usr/local|Trivial Database|/usr/ports/dat... tdb-1.4.10,1|/usr/ports/databases/tdb1410|/usr/local|Trivial Database|/usr/port... I haven't checked which one takes precedence, but I guess it's bad that packa

Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase

2025-01-26 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. My environment is that :), but I have llvm19 installed, so I will write about what I did a little research. In llvm19, a file that seems to have 32-bit libc++ linked. The command looks like this. find /usr/local/ -exec sh -c 'readelf -d -- ${1} 2> /dev/null | grep -e libc++\\.so\\.1' a

Re: pkg-2.0.x compression format and poudriere running on FreeBSD-13.x

2025-01-25 Thread Tatsuki Makino
define DEFAULT_COMPRESSION TXZ + define DEFAULT_COMPRESSION TZS } cc-check-tools ar ranlib strip On 2025/01/26 0:18, Piotr Smyrak wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 11:49:40 +0100 Piotr Smyrak wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 15:08:24 +0900 Tatsuki Makino wrote: PKG_COMPRESS_FORMAT of FreeBSD-14

pkg-2.0.x compression format and poudriere running on FreeBSD-13.x

2025-01-24 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. PKG_COMPRESS_FORMAT of FreeBSD-14 is tzst, so it doesn't seem to cause any problems. On FreeBSD-12.4-STABLE, poudriere cannot succeed pkg-repo because archive_write_add_filter_zstd returns ARCHIVE_WARN. So which result does FreeBSD 13.x get? If you see a log like below, then there is a

Re: CFT: repository for kernel modules

2024-12-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
I digress from the original. On 2024/12/15 7:01, Kevin Oberman wrote: Thanks, but -I has the same issue as -V. -P went away and I killed it after 2 minutes. Recent pkg-version takes an unusually long time. My 12.4-STABLE needs about 5 minutes and 30 seconds for it. My 14.2-STABLE also start

Re: CFT: repository for kernel modules

2024-12-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I'm going to omit a lot of things, but about this part. On 2024/12/15 2:51, Kevin Oberman wrote: # pkg version -vL= drm-61-kmod-6.1.92.1500026_3 < needs updating (index has 6.1.92.1500029_3) gpu-firmware-intel-kmod-alderlake-20230625.1500026 < needs updating (index has 20230625

Re: CFT: repository for kernel modules

2024-12-13 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. This may be due to the fact that the ability to build+install some ports at the same time as buildkernel+installkernel is still incomplete. Any fixes for the next report of Bugzilla are expected to improve flavor support and parallelization performance. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla

Re: Build proceeds on arm64 despite BROKEN_aarch64 being in the port

2024-12-11 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Poudriere's log says e17ba537c, so it seems that porttree is still pre-0ca0be4ae. e17ba537c is also just yuri's commit. Regards. On 2024/12/12 6:26, Ronald Klop wrote: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?h=2024Q4&id=0ca0be4ae9db2a693ceae90519cc722d93090b8e Van: Yuri Datum: 11 dece

Re: /etc/localtime symlink in poudriere jails

2024-12-11 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 2024/12/11 17:28, Nuno Teixeira wrote: I'm trying to find why there is no /etc/localtime in poudriere jails and I need to create manually a symlink for some R-cran tests inside interactive jail. Any hints on how to automatize this task? Hook is considered to be the most suitable for

Re: PATCH_WRKSRC with groups?

2024-12-03 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 2024/12/01 19:59, Daniel Engberg wrote: On 2024-11-30T23:26:38.000+01:00, Ronald Klop wrote:  PATCH_WRKSRC+=  ${WRKSRC}/src/third_party/mozjs-60/extract:mozpatch  Without affecting where other patches are applied. This was a long time ago. After www/seamonkey was removed, there w

Re: port binary dumping core on recent head in poudriere

2024-11-25 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. (I don't subscribe to the current mailing list, so I don't send it there.) If changing the CPUTYPE changes the occurrence of the problem, is there -Wl,--as-needed involved? Not so long ago, Firefox used libraries loaded by other binaries, but that stopped working. As an example, recently

Re: security/gnutls: gnutls-3.8.8 requires llvm17 or higher to build

2024-11-21 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 2024/11/15 18:40, Dimitry Andric wrote: When you must use an old version, you could add this as a patch for groups.c. It could be conditionalized on COMPILER_VERSION < 17. Thank you for the patch. In my case, it was dealt with by rewriting make.conf. FETCH_DEPENDS+= llvm-config17:

Re: sysutils/bsdisks: 0.36 requires full C++20 header

2024-11-21 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 2024/11/11 13:32, Gleb Popov wrote: I'm surprised that someone is using a desktop-related package on such an old system. Why don't you upgrade? I'll answer about it, but it's a work in progress. I was going to start using it from 14.1-STABLE, but it doesn't finish when it gets to 14

security/gnutls: gnutls-3.8.8 requires llvm17 or higher to build

2024-11-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. It seems that it is mandatory to use llvm17 or higher to build gnutls 3.8.8. If not, the following error cannot be resolved. Changing -std=c11 is powerless. groups.c:93:2: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant group_x25519, ^~~~ If you are stil

Re: lang/rust/Makefile for 1.82.0 has wrong llvm:min= value [I got that incorrect]; more

2024-11-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Since option PORT_LLVM is not turned on in the official version, it seems that there is no problem with using of the bundle llvm. However, if we want to use llvm instead of a bundle on an architecture where the compiler causes problems, that version is no longer supported and we need to

sysutils/bsdisks: 0.36 requires full C++20 header

2024-11-10 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. bsdisks-0.36 is now something that can't be built for people like me who are still using environments with incomplete c20 headers. If you want to force it to build, apply a patch like the one attached below and build it :) Regards. diff --git a/sysutils/bsdisks/files/patch-block.cpp b

Re: Install file into /rescue

2024-10-22 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. It has nothing to do with ports, but I'm replying here because the status of my subscription can only reply here. On 2024/10/16 22:25, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: +1. And I cannot understand why ee is not in /rescue. On rescue, man pages are NOT promised to be read on another vty. Having modal

Re: Install file into /rescue

2024-10-17 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello again. On 2024/10/17 18:45, Zsolt Udvari wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:59:48PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: And USE_TMPFS="all" seems to be one of the workarounds. The `testport' fails with USE_TMPFS too. This seems to be restricted by markfs in /usr/local/

Re: Install file into /rescue

2024-10-17 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Does it mean that poudriere fails when testport or bulk -t? And USE_TMPFS="all" seems to be one of the workarounds. It's a guess because I'm not in a situation where I can test it right now :) Regards.

Re: ports-mgmt/portlint vs absent USE_LDCONFIG

2024-10-08 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I feel like it would be a good to do the following... if ($makevar{USE_LDCONFIG} ne "") { if ($makevar{USE_LDCONFIG} eq "$makevar{PREFIX}/lib" && !$found_prefix_so) { &perror("WARN", ... objects into \${PREFIX}/lib."); } elsif (!$found_so) { &perror("WARN", ... objects."); }

Re: what to do about "FATAL: PLIST_FILES: files cannot contain %%FOO%% variables. Use make variables and logic instead"

2024-10-08 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 2024/10/09 0:16, Ronald Klop wrote: Ok, I took a look. Does it mean just replacing %%JAVAJARDIR%% with ${JAVAJARDIR}? It wants to use the make variable in the outer file, so it replaces it with a %%FOO%% placemark. Where a make variable can be used directly, use it directly. I thi

Re: ports-mgmt/pkg: condition for a devnullfd that can be closed

2024-09-25 Thread Tatsuki Makino
if we want to use % as a separator, like pkg query %n%%%v, we can't do it. But I still don't understand how to submit pull request :) Regards. On 2024/09/19 15:45, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Tatsuki Makino writes: While looking at libpkg/pkg_config.c, I noticed that the conditio

Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure

2024-09-24 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. On 2024/09/24 20:56, Matthias Fechner wrote: you are aware, that dhcpd is EOL since end of 2022: https://www.isc.org/dhcp/ and was replaced by kea? Not sure if it makes sense to put much effort into it. I was just trying to set it up there, so it interested me. net/kea is the port on

Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure

2024-09-24 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. # This is also a test for sending email :) As seen from the output of set -x, I think it has been trimmed too much. https: //cgit.freebsd.org /ports/tree/net/isc-dhcp44-server/files/isc-dhcpd.in#n505 Is there a workaround? dhcpd_flags="-q -4" or dhcpd_flags="-4 -q " Regards.

ports-mgmt/pkg: condition for a devnullfd that can be closed

2024-09-16 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. While looking at libpkg/pkg_config.c, I noticed that the condition of the conditional branch in function pkg_close_devnull may not be correct. It will not be able to close descriptor only when fd becomes 1. I don't think it will ever be assigned 1, but I'm a little concerned about it :) R

lang/rust-bootstrap: Add option that doesn't depend on freebsd-sysroot

2024-08-27 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. rust-1.79.0 is the last version we can build with 12.4-STABLE (and also 13.2?). Because the bootstrap compiler cannot be used due to the following output. ===> Building for rust-1.80.1 Building bootstrap running: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/rust/work/bootstrap/bin/cargo build --manifest-path

Re: FreeBSD Port: x11-toolkits/qt6-declarative: 6.7.2 built in the environment where qt6-svg is installed changes the build of qt6-5compat

2024-08-24 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Additional research on the changes that occur when qt6-svg is installed. Since the target Qt::Svg will exist, svgtoqml subdirectory will be added. https: //code.qt.io /cgit/qt/qtdeclarative.git/tree/tools/CMakeLists.txt#n70 Running the qt_internal_add_tool adds several modules to QT_KNOWN_MODULE

FreeBSD Port: x11-toolkits/qt6-declarative: 6.7.2 built in the environment where qt6-svg is installed changes the build of qt6-5compat

2024-08-24 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. It's a subject that doesn't make sense :), but it's as follows. When qt6-declarative-6.7.2 (x11-toolkits/qt6-declarative) is built (make configure) in an environment where qt6-svg-6.7.2 (graphics/qt6-svg) is installed, the following differences occur --- usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt6-decla

poudriere: create porttree of a partial clone of git

2024-08-17 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. As always, the inconsequential story provided by me :) poudriere does a shallow clone when git porttree is created by poudriere ports -c. In addition, a full clone of git porttree is created by adding -D. One more thing, -B specifies the branch, but for example, poudriere ports -c -p git

Re: UPDATING providing misinformation

2024-08-11 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Piotr Smyrak wrote on 2024/08/12 06:20: > It has been documented in MOVED file: > > devel/py-setuptools_scm|devel/py-setuptools-scm|2024-02-29|Package name > changed > > Still if one does not know or forgets about it's existence such a move > is quite opaque. I was also surprised by this

Re: After following the advise from UPDATING about pythoin-3.11, 'pkg add' now says: pkg: "Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" and attempts to install and then offers to remove py39- packages

2024-06-11 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Thank you very much. In this case, I think the problem with residual unnecessary packages can be solved by using poudriere pkgclean -j jail -a. However, using -a takes a significant amount of time. So, we can filter the origin of the port to only what we need and run it... Matthias Fechner wrote

Re: After following the advise from UPDATING about pythoin-3.11, 'pkg add' now says: pkg: "Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" and attempts to install and then offers to remove py39- packages

2024-06-10 Thread Tatsuki Makino
If you want to read the important parts of this email first, scroll to the bottom and read from the bottom :) Tomoaki AOKI wrote on 2024/06/10 20:58: > I think poudriere would be better ignoring last 3 (at least 2) digits > of __FreeBSD_version for stable, releng and release branches, as > API/KP

Re: After following the advise from UPDATING about pythoin-3.11, 'pkg add' now says: pkg: "Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" and attempts to install and then offers to remove py39- packages

2024-06-10 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hmmm, I have never used poudriere to create all the packages. However, since I was using the STABLE version for my jail, I have lost all the packages I have built on several occasions. It seems to happen when the value returned by the uname -KU of the jail changes. It seems that poudriere-pkgcl

Re: After following the advise from UPDATING about pythoin-3.11, 'pkg add' now says: pkg: "Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" and attempts to install and then offers to remove py39- packages

2024-06-08 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I feel that there is a slight possibility that this upgrade may include the following issues. ( echo py39-foo ; echo py311-foo ) | sort However, I have only thought about the possibility and have not looked into it yet :) Regards.

Re: Service for jails?

2024-06-07 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Matthias Fechner wrote on 2024/06/07 15:20: > BBB_svcj_options=${BBB_svcj_options:-"net_basic"} > But I cannot find anything in the porters handbook about that new parameter. For these variables, it is better to search in /etc/rc.subr as well. In /usr/src, it seems to be in /usr/src/libexe

Re: Why does 'pkg install -A xx' reinstall pkg?

2024-06-03 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. If it's still reproducible in an environment, does setting the automatic flag on the pkg itself change the behavior? .. like this. pkg set --automatic 1 pkg Regards.

Re: [Maintainer] Help determining proper LICENSE for x11-wm/piewm?

2024-05-26 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. What I say may turn out to be bullshit :) In short, it doesn't matter what the license is, it's how it controls Can the FreeBSD installer include built packages? Can packages be included on FreeBSD installer disks sold on the FreeBSD Mall ( https://www.freebsdmall.com/ ) ? When the distfi

Re: I've started collecting tmpfs usage figures from a poudriere-devel bulk -a for later publishing some of the top ones (handy for TMPFS_BLACKLIST judgments)

2024-05-19 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello, especially those who add some kind of tweaks to poudriere :) In my case, I try to make it a hook script first, so it is not affected by errexit of shell. However, when modifying poudriere to incorporate the codes, some tmpfs are not mounted depending on USE_TMPFS value, so poudriere exits

Re: I've started collecting tmpfs usage figures from a poudriere-devel bulk -a for later publishing some of the top ones (handy for TMPFS_BLACKLIST judgments)

2024-05-08 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Mark Millard wrote on 2024/05/05 18:15: > [Part of my hack's notation does not generalize well across > various USE_TMPFS= alternatives.] > > "<" below is what is new, ">" is what was original, in > /usr/local/share/poudriere/common.sh : > > 5928,5934d5927 > < tmpfs_at_

Re: poudriere(-devel) cleanup when executed from in a chroot: "Error: (72603) rm:rm:1: /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/main-CA76-default: Device busy"

2024-05-05 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Mark Millard wrote on 2024/05/06 04:36: > I've been seeing the likes of: > > [main-CA76-default] [2024-05-05_01h48m07s] [committing] Queued: 269 Built: > 269 Failed: 0 Skipped: 0 Ignored: 0 Fetched: 0 Tobuild: 0Time: > 04:48:47 > [04:48:50] Logs: > /usr/local/poudriere/data/

Re: git ports-tree doesn't work, please check!

2024-05-02 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Brooks Davis wrote on 2024/05/03 04:08: > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:39:24PM +0200, Peter wrote: >> fetch: transfer timed out > Hmm, testing locally there's only a single commit to that path (moving > it from Move devel/py-dateutil) so git has to read the whole commit > history to discover

Re: I've started collecting tmpfs usage figures from a poudriere-devel bulk -a for later publishing some of the top ones (handy for TMPFS_BLACKLIST judgments)

2024-05-01 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Mark Millard wrote on 2024/04/29 10:48: > I've modified my local poudriere-devel to have Success and Failure lines also > report the tmpfs size at that point. Using, say, script to log the output to I am a bit curious because I am using tmpfs to reduce HDD IO from stage phase to package p

Re: pkg upgrade odity

2024-04-30 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 2024/05/01 05:21: > Le 30 avril 2024 13:18:41 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger > a écrit : >> In my case it complains about missing shared libs for exactly those ports >> which it wants to deinstall, but they are present in the system... >> ---snip--- >> # pkg check -da

Re: pkg upgrade odity

2024-04-29 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 2024/04/30 08:50: > Le 29 avril 2024 22:33:09 GMT+02:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> a > écrit : >> >> My notes from 2024-04-23: >> >> # pkg -r /tmp/be_mount.bN62 check -Ba >> Checking all packages: >> (0ad-0.0.26_23) /usr/local/bin/ActorEditor - require

Re: `pkg autoremove` uninstalls pkg itself

2024-04-22 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Yasuhiro Kimura wrote on 2024/04/22 15:38: > But the line hasn't changed since 2012. So it doesn't seems to be the > cause of the issue. It seems to be around here that pkg and pkg-devel make it impossible to delete without setting the force flag. https: //github.com /freebsd/pkg/blob/e482b6668b

Re: `pkg autoremove` uninstalls pkg itself

2024-04-21 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Good morning. I think the reason why the automatic flag in pkg is not up is because there is an .undef here. https: //cgit.freebsd.org /ports/tree/ports-mgmt/pkg/Makefile#n72 The package pkg is guessed to have been installed by a manual operation by the bootstrap pkg. (This has not been confirm

Re: size of long on all supported arches

2024-04-19 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Nuno Teixeira wrote on 2024/04/19 17:11: > (...) > > If anyone wants to test, I've included patch in commit: > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=89e4a1f2c1d1997b8414e2e648c7b4b7c829b63e I don't know how to write the language R, but it seems to me that it matches 1.0e-6 even when

Re: typo in mailwrapper manpage?

2024-04-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. bob prohaska wrote on 2024/04/15 08:02: > The typo I had in mind was in the line > FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE-p5October 29, 2014FreeBSD > ^ Does that mean this year is 2024? This manpage is just brought over from NetBSD (or OpenBSD), w

Re: In some places, WITH_${feature}_PORTS doesn't work

2024-04-12 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Mathieu Arnold wrote on 2024/04/12 15:53: > No, no, you should not do that, :) It is difficult to prioritize when there are two methods, WITH_*_PORTS and WITHOUT_*_PORTS. Perhaps we have experienced even something like "Order allow,deny Allow from ... Deny from ..." :) I wondered if a new variab

Re: In some places, WITH_${feature}_PORTS doesn't work

2024-04-11 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Gleb Popov wrote on 2024/04/12 02:57: > Should be fixed now by > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=665b0219e541019b849fd5a1efdf032081dcf610 Thank you very much. This would mean that there is more support for the use of _WITH_${feature} and _WITHOUT_${feature} in the future. It is expecte

Re: In some places, WITH_${feature}_PORTS doesn't work

2024-04-11 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Gleb Popov wrote on 2024/04/11 15:51: > Would like me to fix it or you'll do that yourself? Fixing this could conceivably break the functionality added in d697653cffd19ddaf3cdee2589a830c72ab39777, so it is better to fix it carefully or leave it alone. There is a workaround on my part. make -C /

In some places, WITH_${feature}_PORTS doesn't work

2024-04-10 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Since everyone does not need to debug all ports, I assume the definition is made like WITH_DEBUG_PORTS+=audio/libopenshot-audio . This has changed the variable defined from WITH_DEBUT to _WITH_DEBUG, so the part that switches when WITH_DEBUG is defined is malfunctioning. e.g. https: //cgi

Re: gmake-4.4.1 has a performance regression: at least the science/nwchem project now builds much slower

2024-04-08 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Tomoaki AOKI wrote on 2024/04/08 23:59: > Is it described somewhere in the Porter's Handbook? A fragment of the string path:dir[:target] is found when it is searched. But will the binaries in the stage be executed directly and will the necessary libraries be found...? Especially in a mini

Re: gmake-4.4.1 has a performance regression: at least the science/nwchem project now builds much slower

2024-03-29 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello Yuri-san. science/nwchem has a pre-build target, is there a problem with ${SETENV} used there? New reports from bugzilla seems to cite some problems with ports with such targets. Regards.

Re: gmake-4.4.1 has a performance regression: at least the science/nwchem project now builds much slower

2024-03-29 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Since gmake 4.4 is still x.x.1, it must still need a transition period from 4.3. So, Yuri-san prepared devel/gmake43. Currently this would conflict with devel/gmake. To use this, BUILD_DEPENDS must be gmake:devel/gmake, not gmake>=4.4.1:devel/gmake. Or it would require construction using DEFAULT_

Re: gmake-4.4.1 has a performance regression: at least the science/nwchem project now builds much slower

2024-03-29 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I don't think this is relevant at all, but gmake does seem to have a mechanism inside that stalls due to load average. It seems to be possible to set it with options -l and --load-average, but I don't think that matters, since if it is left at the default negative number, it doesn't seem

Re: how to see order of make targets steps in ports tree?

2024-03-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2024/03/15 07:24: > And this line should explain the order of patch and fix-shebang > _PATCH_REAL_SEQ  = ${:Uask-license} ${:Upatch-message} ${:Upatch-depends} > ${:Ufix-shebang} ${:Udo-patch} Regarding this, the use of :U out of the blue without a variable name doesn't

Re: how to see order of make targets steps in ports tree?

2024-03-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Various answers have already been given, however, here is a command that can produce interesting values on this. make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg -V _TARGETS_STAGES make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg -V _SANITY_SEQ -V _PKG_SEQ -V _FETCH_SEQ -V _EXTRACT_SEQ -V OMITTED_HEREAFTER:P The -d

devel/readline: New features for variable modifier is beginning to be used

2024-03-14 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. :On began to be used to expand the variable PATCHES in readline-8.2.10. This determined that porttree itself would not support versions with older make, such as 12.4-STABLE :) However, it seems that the indexer for INDEX-12 is still at work, creating a broken index. The following result i

Using --version-script with clang17

2024-03-07 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. This is related to Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere? There are some fixes for build failures when clang17 and version-script are combined in porttree as well. Nothing seemed to be wrong with clang15. It seems that since clang16, the warning to be strict has been

Re: [Solved?] Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-04 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Thank you for the various extractions. In the official poudriere this still seems to be yes. The version of it is 14.0-RELEASE-p5 amd64. In my environment this is yes. The version of it is still 12.4-STABLE amd64 :) Since dns/libidn2 has --enable-ld-version-script in CONFIGURE_ARGS, the problem

Re: [Solved?] Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-04 Thread Tatsuki Makino
I recently saw a similar problem and thought I had looked into something, but this was it. https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports/2024-February/005546.html David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/05 10:27: > albert(14.0-S)[14] pdf2ps pdf/bike.pdf >/tmp/bike.ps > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/lib

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread Tatsuki Makino
David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 09:11: > I am. however, also concerned about recently-installed packages that > appear to have references to obsolete libraries, such as libc.so.6. (I > had written earlier that I had not had libc.so.6 on my systems since 18 > February. That is technically true

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 03:33: > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libtasn1.so.6: version LIBTASN1_0_3 required by > /usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so.30 not defined I don't know what it. If you want to have them rebuilt only for those packages in poudriere, the command will be as follow

Re: py-setuptools-scm error

2024-03-01 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. It seems that py39-setuptools_scm-6.4.2 must not be installed to install py39-setuptools-scm-8.x. So we cannot use -o of portmaster or portupgrade. The only way seems to be to delete it beforehand with pkg delete -f. Then reinstall the ports that have lost their dependencies, and they will

Re: Subpackages: Update

2024-02-26 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2024/02/27 08:48: > Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2024/02/23 17:58: >> Might need pkg delete -f -g alsa-plugins-\* because it causes file conflicts? > In the case of pkg-1.20.9, It seems that alsa-plugins-* is not a glob pattern > that picks out the intended pa

Re: Subpackages: Update

2024-02-26 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2024/02/23 17:58: > Might need pkg delete -f -g alsa-plugins-\* because it causes file conflicts? In the case of pkg-1.20.9, It seems that alsa-plugins-* is not a glob pattern that picks out the intended package. Others like alsa-plugins-\?\* or alsa-plugins-\[^-\]\*

Re: Scary update: devel/fstrm-0.6.1 -> fstrm-0.6.1_1

2024-02-25 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Michael Butler wrote on 2024/02/26 01:41: > On 2/25/24 11:23, David Wolfskill wrote: >> ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libfstrm.so.0: version LIBFSTRM_0.2.0 required >> by /usr/local/lib/libdns-9.18.24.so not defined >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/named: ERROR: named-checkconf for >> /usr/local/etc/

Re: Subpackages: Update

2024-02-23 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. It seems that subpackaging of alsa-plugins (audio/alsa-plugins) has been reverted. What is the post-processing when such switching takes place? Might need pkg delete -f -g alsa-plugins-\* because it causes file conflicts? poudriere leaves a subpackage in the package repository. Will these

Re: Subpackages: Update

2024-02-21 Thread Tatsuki Makino
By the way, did anyone mention that setting CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS to no is a workaround for those who don't want to build qt5-webengine or www/qt5-webengine or qt5-webengine over and over again in poudriere? This configuration exists in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf . If we don't build the whole thi

Re: Installed audio/alsa-plugins and dependencies

2024-02-20 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I have yet to read the instructions by pizzamig@freebsd presented by arrowd@freebsd... :) ( https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports/2024-February/005321.html ) John Marino (FreeBSD) wrote on 2024/02/21 00:18: > The port builds fine. Yes, however, it seems that all subpackage opti

Re: Subpackages: Update

2024-02-20 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Luca Pizzamiglio wrote on 2024/02/21 05:26: > The aforementioned `make describe` issues affect the `pkg version` issue > you highlighted. Yes, perhaps there is a mistake in INDEX-*, and pkg version -P will not cause the problem (Unconfirmed as I am still in a INDEX-12 environment :) ). R

Re: Installed audio/alsa-plugins and dependencies

2024-02-19 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2024/02/18 04:58: > If subpackage is considered to be a FLAVOR that can be optionally changed > (but it seems not :) ), then something is still wrong around here. > https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/blob/4ca881e06c33f85870127a57f9457ae6c1b69d74/src/share/

Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken [port building configuration notes]

2024-02-18 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Aryeh Friedman wrote on 2024/02/19 10:23: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:21 PM Mark Millard wrote: >> >> I fully agree that poudriere's systematic behavior >> rebuilds more than the likes of portmaster [but fails >> less often]. >> > The reason why no alternative has been produced yet is make

Re: Bind918 slave reports Dumping master file...open: file not found

2024-02-17 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. It would be easier for later visitors to understand if the background of the "working" directory were also explained. Moin Rahman wrote on 2024/02/18 03:34: >> On Feb 17, 2024, at 7:26 PM, bob prohaska wrote: >> The options section of named.conf contains: >>directory "/usr/

Re: Installed audio/alsa-plugins and dependencies

2024-02-17 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. Robert R. Russell wrote on 2024/02/18 02:03: > Would that missing code cause audio/alsa-plugins to show a need for a > rebuild with new dependencies every time poudriere runs? If subpackage is considered to be a FLAVOR that can be optionally changed (but it seems not :) ), then something

Re: Should https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg-fallout/ (and related) get reports of broken status?

2024-02-13 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I don't know what that means, but poudriere will put the BROKEN port in the list of Ignored ports. If the reason is BROKEN, write "is marked as broken" in the nearby Search: text box and they will be filtered. The BROKEN ports will always try to build if TRYBROKEN is defined or if poudri

Re: Subpackages: Update

2024-02-09 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I am delayed in many things on my end, so I don't have time for this kind of thing :) But... I think the following conversions need to be modified to work correctly. PKGNAME -> port origin -> PKGNAME For example, alsa-plugins-pulseaudio -> audio/alsa-plugins -> alsa-plugins-... Current

Re: poudriere-3.4.1 repeatedly builds subpackaged port

2024-02-02 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Jan Beich wrote on 2024/02/03 13:03: > See https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/1113 Thank you. In the case of FLAVOR, the package name was also dynamically changed by a variable (e.g. ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}sphinx>=0:textproc/py-sphinx@${PY_FLAVOR}), but how does subpackage work...? R

poudriere-3.4.1 repeatedly builds subpackaged port

2024-02-02 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. I don't know what a subpackage is, but poudriere repeats the build that seems to be one of the causes. Since subpackage are going to be used, what else could be the cause? 1. I'm still using 12.4-STABLE :) 2. My poudriere has been fixed a bit :) 3. Dependencies are written in the style of

Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man

2024-01-26 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello everyone, especially those who prefer to rebuild rust over and over by poudriere :) Good news. The following commits would have rebuilt gcc12. https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=ea307f60573edaffb8152c7ab9ab668a4a8785c7 However, it is mandatory to rebuild gcc12 by the following commit

Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man

2024-01-21 Thread Tatsuki Makino
mailing list to make it one example. Regardless of the old gnu-configure, we may be affected by this for similar reasons. So, we need to check the list above :) Regards. From 793d298fc33fb0e017b3e371ec702a8f433e2da6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tatsuki Makino Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 12:00:00 +

  1   2   3   4   >