Hello. Aryeh Friedman wrote on 2024/02/19 10:23: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:21 PM Mark Millard <mark...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> I fully agree that poudriere's systematic behavior >> rebuilds more than the likes of portmaster [but fails >> less often]. >> > The reason why no alternative has been produced yet is make it self is
We all love to talk about that area :) I am also sending something like this. https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports/2023-October/004837.html Anyway, poudriere rebuilds the package only to rewrite the version of dependent packages. And because the package is removed too soon, packages that do not need to be rebuilt are also included in the queue to be rebuilt. And I don't have the skills to be able to present the code that would fix the problem :) Well, if we make the mistake of operating poudriere and need to rebuild a lot of packages, we can just watch net*lix :) Regards.
