I would guess they're using some sort of address-generating program. I got
two, one through pentax-discuss and one direct to my email account.
Norton's torpedoed them both!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:14:58 -0500, Chee Seang Ong wrote:
>Hi List,
>Is there a difference between connecting an off flash using F and FG
>hotshoes?
>Anyone has an extra set of F/FG hotshoes with cable wanna sell off?
>Thanks!
The F allows you to stack F connectors or place a flash on the top
(ho
Does anyone knows if there is a third party dummy shoe adaptor just
with the tripod mount? I don't need the cord connection of the
shoe adaptor F - I just use the 360FGZ wireless and I'm not willing
to pay the already inflated price of the F shoe adaptor.
Thanks.
Servus, Al
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> What I'm saying is leave the film in the lead bag and let
them run it
> through the machine. When they can't see through the lead,
they'll hand
> check it. Works every time for me. Four times at Heathrow
in the last
> two months.
Well done Paul. I wish we all had the s
I'm not from Uppsala myself, but I have a sister and several dedicated Pentaxian
friends there.
Petter
- Original Message -
From: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:39 am
Subject: Uppsala Sweden anyone ?
> Hello,
>
> Any Pentaxian in Uppsala ?
>
> cheers,
> c
Me too. The pertinent info is:
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO: [No To Addresses]
Subject: Your Amazon.com order (#103-5647566-7192624)
Attachment Name: preussen.gif.exe
No mention of Pentax for me.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 4
On June 11, 2003 08:03 am, Steve Desjardins wrote:
> Me too. The pertinent info is:
>
> FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> TO: [No To Addresses]
> Subject: Your Amazon.com order (#103-5647566-7192624)
>
> Attachment Name: preussen.gif.exe
> No mention of Pentax for me.
Without full headers it doe
I received one from amason in my canoemail account.Its gone:)
Dave
> What the hell's up with this. Caveman got one, I did, you did. Is this
> coming into everyone's mailbox? Someone's screwing with us!
>
> -frank
>
> tom wrote:
>
> > My anti-virus software just intercepted a virus purportin
I'm still up for it.
Evan
From: "jerome"
>
> Evan, Doug, Cory Cesar (?!) ,
>
> I'm guessing it's about that time. Last we "spoke", the concensus was that
we'd
> possibly meet on saturday in June, possibly at the botanical gardern. Are
we
> still on? I haven't shot in a while, and it'll give
I keep a fairly keen eye on prices, as do many others here.
Looking @ http://www.mpex.com, RB67 prices have been dropping.
Pentax is down a little from a year ago, but not much.
It's unique enough to hold its value. Good for the retailer
and the company -- it's a product that's not in a surplus/co
Welcome back Doug. Glad you returned okay. I would dearly love to make
the trip you have, and I will one week in the not too distant future. I
don't have any direct liason to events of those years during WWII, but
having read Robert Capa and seen the pics, I feel a need to go and see
for myself.
L
>To the original poster (also Paul), I would recommend that
>you don't use 7dayshop.com and instead use a UK supplier
>such as Mailshots or Mathers - 7dayshop.com is in Guernsey,
>Channel Islands, which is not part of the UK, and they have
>a reputation for very variable delivery times, although th
>> The first shot is the summit shot of myself Jerome and
>> Cesar on McRae Peak from last year's Camera Clinic Weekend
>> in August> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/
>
>
>That, my friend is what you call holding on for dear life. I was
>terrified and
>don't even know how I managed to smile. I t
>> This is risky. There is no legal right to hand checking of
>> film in the UK.
>
>What I'm saying is leave the film in the lead bag and let them run it
>through the machine. When they can't see through the lead, they'll hand
>check it. Works every time for me. Four times at Heathrow in the las
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: Uppsala Sweden anyone ?
> Hello,
>
> Any Pentaxian in Uppsala ?
>
Occasionally, yes. Visited Pentax Scandinavia there a couple of years ago...
Seriously: P
- Original Message -
From: Alin Flaider
Subject: Re[2]: F and FG off flash connection
>
>Does anyone knows if there is a third party dummy shoe adaptor just
>with the tripod mount? I don't need the cord connection of the
>shoe adaptor F - I just use the 360FGZ wireless and I'
> I'm still up for it.
Sounds like we're talking the 14th or the 21st (this or next saturday). I'm
game for a weekday also, but I think I remember at least one of you having a
job or something silly like that . If either saturday is good for you two
(Doug & Evan), then I suppose we'll let Cory
I've heard that in many cases, if they see a lead-lined bag, they
just turn up the power of the (new and more powerful) x-ray scanner
to see through it, which then subjects the film to more radiation
than it would have seen if it had gone through without a bag. Is this
true?
Joe
>> This is
Peter wrote:
> If it doesn't sell for a fairytail amount then who'll buy it?
I don't think it is intended to sell. I don't think anyone are into DSLR to make money
in the short term. They release the *ist D to signalize that they are determined to
still be a contender in slr's that take 35mm
P30t. Cheap too. The cable release socket is similar to the old
mechanical one.
Mike Ignatiev wrote:
does anyone here know what manual focus pentax cameras can be triggered electronically. i know lx winder has electrical release socket.
anything less expensive?
best,
mishka
Caveman wrote:
> He stated that he can do it with 100% success with real scenes (not gray
> cards). Unfortunately he hasn't yet defined yet what he understands by
> "perfect exposure" of a real scene, so there's no sane way of arguing
> with him.
I've done it about ten times but you don't get
Mike wrote:
> >
> > roll to roll film variances are nonsystematic and cannot be dealt with, but i
> > doubt it's as bad as 1/3 stop. even then, one >can get a bulk roll and calibrate
> > for it.
Pro film is calibrated with 1/6 stop. Thats a words case scenario. It is usually far
better. Amat
Pål Jensen wrote:
I don't think it is intended to sell. I don't think anyone are into DSLR to make money in the short term.
ROFL. Then it must be a world-wide conspiracy to kill film. They will be
giving away digicams until they see Kodak and Fuji crumbling. Oh, wait a
minute, they are also giv
Anthony wrote:
> Perhaps YOU don't think a Pentax is worth $US1,600, that's your privelege.
I don't think Pentax need customers unwilling to pay for it.
Pål
>
> I've just received a virus in the attachment to the message sent from the
> (fake?) address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The virus is in preussen.gif.exe file from your Email address via PDML.
> This message came directly (not via PDML). I suspect somebody here in PDML
> got a virus on his PC...
Huh?
Hi, Nick! Are you located in Victoria?
As for Island Blue, I had some 11x14s and a 16x20 mounted and laminated
there. When I brought them in, the person at the counter had me sign a
release "In case of dust. We can't guarantee there's no dust." Hmm.
When I picked them up, the 16x20 had a lump
I'm right now downloading a new version of my anti virus program. I'll let you know if
I'm the guilty one.
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: Virus in PDML?
> >
> > I've just receive
Well done, Dave!
Pat White
Pål Jensen wrote:
Caveman wrote:
He stated that he can do it with 100% success with real scenes (not gray
cards). Unfortunately he hasn't yet defined yet what he understands by
"perfect exposure" of a real scene, so there's no sane way of arguing
with him.
I've done it about ten times but y
Don't know if the bulk Provia 100F that B&H is selling is pro grade,
however I'm amazed by the level of consistency I kept getting for
the last 3 years with this film, despite using different developing
kits. The greens, the reds, the grays always turn the same shades
when exposure is va
What legal agreement?
A disclaimer is not a legal agreement unless it is signed by the person who
it affects. To make that kind of thing clear, say you have an open abandoned
well in your front yard. So you put up a sign, "Not responsible for anyone
falling in the well". Do you think you would be
My puerile side often considered some extremely high lead content paint
(can't buy it any more can we?) marking out an interesting message on the inside
of your hardshell hand baggageanswers on a postcard please
Kind regards
Peter
Joe Wilensky wrote:
>
> I've heard that in many cases, if they see a lead-lined bag, they
> just turn up the power of the (new and more powerful) x-ray scanner
> to see through it, which then subjects the film to more radiation
> than it would have seen if it had gone through without a bag. Is this
The settlement took place in the UK, not the US. Your legal ignorance is now big
enough to span oceans.
BR
"T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would probably rule
__
McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network.
It's the BugBear. It uses the address books of infected computers to
harvest email addresses that's used both for sender and recipient.
Using addresses for sender different than the one of the infected
account is intended to increase the confusion and reduce the chances
to trace the infe
T Rittenhouse wrote:
What legal agreement?
A disclaimer is not a legal agreement unless it is signed by the person who
it affects. To make that kind of thing clear, say you have an open abandoned
well in your front yard. So you put up a sign, "Not responsible for anyone
falling in the well". Do yo
Hello to All,
Favourite Body is definitely the mighty MZ-S with the
battery holder/grip. One of the best modern cameras
ever made IMHO.
Favourite Lens would have to be the 77mm 1.8 limited
with my FA 20mm f2.8 and FA 35mm f2 a close second and
third place.
Favorite Zoom / Non-Pentax lens:
Tokina
<< I've heard that in many cases, if they see a lead-lined bag, they
just turn up the power of the (new and more powerful) x-ray scanner
to see through it, which then subjects the film to more radiation
than it would have seen if it had gone through without a bag. Is this
true?
>>
Joe,
It doesn't matter what I think it's worth, (if it had a Canon or Nikon name
plate on
it they could probably sell a lessor Camera for a higher price), Pentax is
introducing
a product that will compete on price, not on installed base on some
perceived value but
on price it has to cheep since it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My puerile side often considered some extremely high lead content paint
(can't buy it any more can we?) marking out an interesting message on the inside
of your hardshell hand baggage
You may always scissor the letters from a film lead bag and glue them
there. But b
I think we disposed of the expense issue quite some time ago. We also
disposed of the
reason why backward compatibility is important as well, see any of Mark
Roberts excellent
posts in this and other *ist-D related threads.
To respond to your supposed point.
They better sell all of the *ist-D'
Two reasons, well three really, Countries claim Sovereign immunity, (one of the
bad precedents set forth by the United States Constitution was to give the
Government
of a Republic the same immunity claimed by a King, a right claimed by all
Republics now,
but I digress), and you're not allowed to
I've been told that Pentax have no plans of removing the aperture ring
from the more
expensive lenses. As usual, I might have been told bullshit...
Pål
If I recall correctly, photos I have seen of the FAJ 18-35 show both a
distance scale and aperture ring, unlike other FAJ lenses. So perhaps
t
Alin wrote:
> Don't know if the bulk Provia 100F that B&H is selling is pro grade,
> however I'm amazed by the level of consistency I kept getting for
> the last 3 years with this film, despite using different developing
> kits. The greens, the reds, the grays always turn the same shades
>
Peter wrote:
>Pentax is
> introducing
> a product that will compete on price, not on installed base on some
> perceived value but
> on price it has to cheep since it's not likely to be special.
Yep. And that probably explains why the can't afford an expensive lens mount and a
more expensive
> If you still don't see why this ain't a decent definition, then let me
> give you a cave example.
What you don't get that this is not about definition of expousre but getting the
exposure you want with precision and consistency.
It is about photography. I assign part of the scene to the tona
I think there is yet another thing Paul teaches us: One camera with one
(prime) lens can be enough to get impressive photos.
I admit I often forget that fact.
Regards, Bernd
---original
message--
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 17:54:25 -0400
From: fr
Peter wrote:
> You are mixing two contradictory arguments in your post:
>
> 1.) Pentax doesn't care how many of these bastard things they market so why
> make them
> compatible.
That was not what I said. Or meant to say. Making them comoatible don't make any
difference for sales exept making t
Pål Jensen wrote:
If you still don't see why this ain't a decent definition, then let me
give you a cave example.
What you don't get that this is not about definition of expousre but getting the exposure you want with precision and consistency.
It is about photography. I assign part of the scen
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:18:33 -0600
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: alexanderkrohe
Subject: Re: Pentax proudly presents a new lens mount,
the KAF3
> > BTW A system which *really* changed the mount
twice
> > was Mamiya (thei
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
> Yep. And that probably explains why the can't afford an expensive lens
> mount and a more expensive metering system.
I totally ignore all the threads about this, so I have no idea of someone
threw this out yet..but is it possible there's to be
Pål Jensen wrote:
There simply aren't that many K and M lenses in use.
On what data do you base your statement ?
cheers,
caveman
I think that the *ist is a good indication of the market they're after.
And this is a good hint for answering your question.
gfen wrote:
I totally ignore all the threads about this, so I have no idea of someone
threw this out yet..but is it possible there's to be four 35mm style
cameras in the li
The Super Program/Super A will do it.
I expect the Program Plus/Program A does it too.
The A3000 might, but I've never tried it.
Basically, you need an electric shutter release.
Do you want me to try it on an ME Super tonight?
Regards, Bob S.
> does anyone here know what manual focus pentax camer
the problem is that he is making these claims
on cameras using TTL metering (open aperture)
that assume the selected f-stop and shutter
speed combination is not only perfect, but
also that changing the speed and aperture settings
to what is theoretically the equivalent exposure
is also perfect even
No one make a DSLR for the old lenses because they made the old lenses
obsolete when
auto focus was introduced. (Except for Nikon and Pentax). There are more
K/M mount lenses
in use than you give credit for after all Pentax still supports them, sort of.
At 07:52 PM 6/11/03 +0200, you wrote:
Pe
Outhouse express will open it for you at it's default installation settings,
unless Microsoft has changed things.
At 11:47 AM 6/11/03 -0700, you wrote:
No, you have to open the ".exe" program that came with the mail message,
in order to unleash the virus.
However, that's what they are counting on,
I apologize to the list for this post it should have been sent privately, or
not at all.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Rather
Wholly Mackerel! I didn't know that!
One more reason to NOT go with Outhouse Express... as tho' I need any more...
keith whaley
Peter Alling wrote:
>
> Outhouse express will open it for you at it's default installation settings,
> unless Microsoft has changed things.
>
> At 11:47 AM 6/11/03 -07
The problem is that he's claiming he gets a Something that he's not
defining what it is. I may claim that I can get the "trusty exposure"
anytime all day long 100% accurate. Can you argue with that without me
defining what a "trusty exposure" would be ? And of course, I may also
claim that it's
There's an ugly way around if Pentax does not change the firmware.
I've got a set of extension tubes from Pentax that does NOT couple
aperature. The smallest one is about 8 or 9mm of extension.
These older tubes are better built than the Pentax auto tubes.
Who the hell focuses at infinity anyways?
Exposure compensation detents are full stops.
Pentax lied about synch speed. It's 1/90th.
That's my story, and I'm sticking to it. Got two SuperPrograms.
-Lon
Alan Chan wrote:
15 - 1/2000 shutter speeds, synch is at 1/90 (although specified as
1/125)
???
Exposure compensation +/- 2 EV, cont
We don't joke about ~real~ viruses around these parts anymore!
ciao,
frank (from the SARS capital of the Western World)
ps: Toronto, with it's huge inferiority complex, has yearned to be a "world class"
city for decades - well, we're finally known around the world for ~something~!!
Lasse Ka
I'm a sympatico subscriber, too. I wondered the same thing about my 'puter. I
didn't open the attachment, though. Hope I'm ok!
cheers,
frank
T Rittenhouse wrote:
> Says something for Norton. Another poster said his McAfee didn't catch it,
> and my AVG didn't catch it. However, I never open an
Ahhh The K-1000 DOF trick.
Just don't drop the lens..
Arnold Stark wrote:
Well, with K- and M-lenses you can have all apertures with the *ist D in
manual mode, but you won't be able to have the camera meter in manual
mode with these lenses. Taking out the aperture lever would indeed bring
Apparently the Optio S uses a flash system similar to the MZ-S. In normal
flash mode there are 2 quick flashed and in red eye reduction there are
three. Has Pentax been able to get a flash sensor inside something this
small?
Bill
It's actually French: M'Asahi, or "my Asahi".
Okay, that's a bad one...
One of my favourite eBay mis-spellings (other than Cannon, Pantax, Pentex, etc)
is Yashika - especially, it seems, from Germany (I guess they like "k's" ).
cheers,
frank
Joe Wilensky wrote:
> I never thought to bookmark "
I wish I ~had~ some shots from Paris...
-frank
Mike Ignatiev wrote:
> I wish my shots from Paris were half as good.
>
> Mishka
>
> > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: OT:Twelve Hours in Paris
> >
> >
> > On a recent business trip to Paris I decided to stay
> > over one da
Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's the BugBear. It uses the address books of infected computers to
> harvest email addresses that's used both for sender and recipient.
It doesn't use just the address book. It also scans your web browser's
cache and looks for "mailto" links on the HT
We cannot afford to let Cotty into the states.
Folks might start thinking 1776 was a mistake.
-Lon
Cotty wrote:
Hi Troops...
[snip]
Gee, remember when it was okay on the list to enjoy using your Pentax gear?
I know it's not the popular view, but I like my Pentax stuff. I don't spend
my time
Hi everyone,
I'm curious, for those who use backgrounds, which do they prefer and why;
seamless paper or muslin?
I've been considering purchasing a background for myself for portrait and
full body work but now I have a suspicion that seamless paper may be more
convenient and, in the long run, mor
Okay, then, Alin,
Since so many have reported that the apparent originating address seems to be
"sympatico.ca", and both Caveman and me have Sympatico addresses (maybe others, I
can't remember), is it possible that one of us passed on the virus?
When I received the offending e-mail, the forwardin
Frank wrote...
> ps: Toronto, with it's huge inferiority complex, has yearned to be a
"world class" city for decades - well, we're finally known around the world
for ~something~!!
Well, Charlotte has a superiority complex in that it thinks it's better and
bigger than it really is :-)
Bill
And I choose tripod before USM. I never did figure out
how this is supposed to be so wonderful. The bigger the lens,
the harder to handhold. Jeeze, just how long do you want to
hold even a 300mm lens waiting for the moment?
In fact, most of my tripod shots are pre-framed, pre-focused,
and I sit
> -Original Message-
> From: T Rittenhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Says something for Norton. Another poster said his McAfee
> didn't catch it,
> and my AVG didn't catch it. However, I never open an
> unsolicited .exe file.
>
Yeah, Norton caught it for me.
tv
You have to do the calibrating.
For instance my old Graphex shutter on the Press Camera is consistent to
within 1/6 stop (checking 10-12 times for each speed) but is quite a bit off
the marked speeds, a modern electrically timed shutter should be much more
consistant. My incident meter reads to 1/
Cotty wrote:
> If you have a lead-lined bag, this is absolutely the way to do it. You
> backpack (or whatever) goes through the machine, they frown, it gets
> pulled aside, opened, out comes the bag, gets opened, out come the film
> cans - but do they get put through again?
>
Never in my experie
Seemed to me that he was implying that
he has the ability to expose every frame
he shoots within 1/3 stop of a TECHNICALLY
perfect exposure with a TLL meter reading.
He has no clue that his camera/lenses are not
that accurate or consistent across all the
settings.
JCO
> -Original Message-
Luckily it was in an attachment. I do hate they way MickyShit won't let me
delete an e-mail before I open it.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Outhouse express will open it for you at it's default inst
Joe Wilensky wrote:
>
> I've heard that in many cases, if they see a lead-lined bag, they
> just turn up the power of the (new and more powerful) x-ray scanner
> to see through it, which then subjects the film to more radiation
> than it would have seen if it had gone through without a bag. Is t
Pentax K1000 with 300mm zoom lens, wide angle lens,
flash, timer, 2 rolls of film, 2X extender and
everything else seen in the picture. Email me if you
need more details about any of the parts. This
completely manual camera is in good condition and
hasn't gotten much use.
http://www.me.mtu.edu/~s
Thank you.
Mike Ignatiev wrote:
>
> I wish my shots from Paris were half as good.
>
> Mishka
>
> > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: OT:Twelve Hours in Paris
> >
> >
> > On a recent business trip to Paris I decided to stay
> > over one day and shoot some film.
Good lead bags are impenetrable by any amount of x-ray.
Paul
mike wilson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Joe Wilensky wrote:
> >
> > I've heard that in many cases, if they see a lead-lined bag, they
> > just turn up the power of the (new and more powerful) x-ray scanner
> > to see through it, which then subj
that works well if your subject isn't moving rapidly from place to place. for certain
types of subjects, you have to wait a lot longer to get the shot you need if you
insist on using a tripod. i'm not saying it can't be done as obviously people have
done it.
Herb...
- Original Message -
Your mentioning large format shutters/apertures.
Those are not the same as 35mm shutters. For example, on
a large format shutter you could easily SCRIBE
a new aperture scale at the correct points, the
35mm SLR lenses arent built that way. They
cant be rescribed because the meter requires
a specific
I guess what I want to know about the two FAJ "sigma killers"
in the works is: are they _better_ than Sigma lenses?
Arnold Stark wrote:
Alexander,
When I invested into new and old Pentax equipment I did so because of
the compatibilty of the k-mount. Suddenly this compatibilty is reduced
for eff
I have some shots from Paris Las Vegas...it's not quite the same thing
though...
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I wish I ~had~ some shots from Paris...
>
> -frank
>
> Mike Ignatiev wrote:
>
> > I wish my shots from Paris were half as good.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> And I choose tripod before USM. I never did figure out
> how this is supposed to be so wonderful. The bigger the lens,
> the harder to handhold. Jeeze, just how long do you want to
> hold even a 300mm lens waitin
As do I. Fortunately, I don't own many Leica lenses, and I didn't have
much room in my luggage.
Paul
U+B Scheffler wrote:
>
> I think there is yet another thing Paul teaches us: One camera with one
> (prime) lens can be enough to get impressive photos.
> I admit I often forget that fact.
> Regar
Mr. Robb, I hope someone at Pentax Japan is reading this
recent spate of posts by you.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: To Pentax in Japan (does anybody have their email address?)
Mark wrote:
Backwards compatibility isn't just about being able to us
Pål Jensen wrote:
>John said that the PH-273 could not hold a Hasselblad with
a 150mm lens. However, my PH-273QL with the 645NII and the
heavy 120/4 Macro is rock steady. My guess is that the
PH-273 offer less optimal coupling between head and body as
it doesn't have quick release plates, only cork
>We cannot afford to let Cotty into the states.
>Folks might start thinking 1776 was a mistake
Trying to figure out whether that's a compliment or an insult...
I'll have another drink instead.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co
<< I've heard that in many cases, if they see a lead-lined bag, they
just turn up the power of the (new and more powerful) x-ray scanner
to see through it, which then subjects the film to more radiation
than it would have seen if it had gone through without a bag. Is this
true?
>>
Joe, I have
Hey, Cotty,
Screw the Yanks. C'mon to Canada for a visit. I wanna see you, Caveman
and Wheatfield sitting at the same table!!
cheers,
frank
Cotty wrote:
> >We cannot afford to let Cotty into the states.
> >Folks might start thinking 1776 was a mistake
>
> Trying to figure out whether that's
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Seemed to me that he was implying that
he has the ability to expose every frame
he shoots within 1/3 stop of a TECHNICALLY
perfect exposure with a TLL meter reading.
If it's about the technical definition. There's a way to prove such claim.
Hello, Paal ! Here is what you can
Any pentax 50mm and the K135f2.5, and I have _no_ idea why.
zoomshot wrote:
Ok, we haven't had a survey for a long time so, which one is it and why?
Still a working KX, but over the last 6 months I have begun
to appreciate the MXen.
Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
FM3a - perfect for my 105/2.5
And already we have a controversial answer :-)
Lukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
As Mark Twain is reputed to have said about being ridden out of town on a rail,
"if not for the singular honor I would rather forgo the experience."
At 05:23 PM 6/11/03 -0400, you wrote:
We don't joke about ~real~ viruses around these parts anymore!
ciao,
frank (from the SARS capital of the West
sorry, i don't see the point.
say, you have two lenses: A and B.
you mount A. at f/8 and meter shows 1/125. you experimentally find that
it overexposes 1/2 ev
you mount B. at f/8 and meter shows 1/100. you experimentally find that
it underexposes 1/2 ev
so put these two compensations for THESE ex
Now that would be a sight I'd like to see on Grandfather Mountain, a bloke
and 2 canucks !
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: Various and sundry
> Hey, Cotty,
>
> Screw the Yan
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
