Only yourself.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Brad Dobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 01. marraskuuta 2002 22:39
Aihe: Re: New Pentax SLR platform
2 years - it was introduced at Photokina 2000. But replacement depends on how well it
is selling. No accurate assessment available?
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Peter Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
V
Yes - there was one "Gregory" one time - and he appeared with several identities and
all got unsubscribed in the end. It is really bad to see worthy contributors fleeing
en masse.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti--
I've seen a lot of messages that seem to have started, as usual, in reaction
to a flow of rubbish from Canada. I only get part of the picture because I
have a filter on what seems to be the main stream. There have been many
insults exchanged. I find this distasteful and the rot has spread sideways
On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 04:37 PM, Pat White wrote:
Actually, Dave, it's a picture of my other figure model, the
'athletic' one,
rather than the 'glamorous' one. Now if only either or both would
move to
Victoria!
Pat White
Hmm?
Congratulations on your photo. Are these male, female
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 01:47 AM, Glen O'Neal wrote:
What I am asking from my brethren here at the PDML is what do you
think this
lens is worth. I would rather not broadcast what I paid for it. If I
paid
too much I may be embarrassed. If I got it for a song I might seem to
be
brag
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 12:16 AM, gfen wrote:
I just wrote a long winded, whiny, and decidedly OT post complaining
about
childish attitudes (which, of course, my post fit right into, hey hey,
hypocrits!) and I chose to delete it, figuring it was just going to
blow
over, and I was be
Hi.
I got the prints of my double exposure experiment (with my K-1000), and the
film has moved in all the shots. So Im pretty depressed, and feeling bit
silly that I didnt
follow your carefully given point-by-point advice. Of the 4 frames, one has
moved forward and another has moved back! So obviou
keep trying
i would use a 50mm lens and try 1/60 of a second
maybe then speed it up to 1/125
the blurryness is probably due to two things
you moved to fast and lens shake
- Original Message -
From: "Arathi-Sridhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Arathi-Sridhar
Subject: full moon; panning
> Hi.
> I got the prints of my double exposure experiment (with my
K-1000), and the
> film has moved in all the shots. So Im pretty depressed, and
feeling bit
> silly that I didnt
> follow your carefully given point-by
if i use the pentax 1.7x atufocus convertor with a k mount adaptor will
these two lenses autofocus
it would be a shame to get rid of these two
is this a good lens optically
how does it compare with a pentax m f4
Not only the chief test subject, but also a volunteer.
Cameron
> From: tom
> *Subject: RE: Brad the CEO's Assistant (Re: New Pentax SLR platform)
> *Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 14:31:30 -0800
>
>
> I pretty sure he's j
Dear sirs, I would like you to stop insulting me on-list or off-list. This
is not appropriate behaviour.
Brad Dobo
---
Not only the chief test subject, but also a volunteer.
Cameron
> From: tom
> *Subject: RE: Brad the CEO's Assistant (Re: New Pentax SLR pl
Texas, that's impressive.
Could it have been the radiation storm in -89 that knokced out communication
satellites and power supplies?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Debra Wilborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: AURORA
Yep I am doing the same here.I joined this list to learn about Pentax
cameras and photography in general.
Not how to hurl insults.
Time to go me thinks.
Alan
Those who do not learn from Dilbert are doomed to repeat it.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:knarf.theriault@;symp
He doesn't seem to take a hint that he's not wanted around here, and seems
to have unlimited hours to post useless piles of self serving crap to this
list.
Brad, the internet is huge, and you have only pissed off a couple of hundred
people here. Someone of your incomparable ignorance, idiocy, and
Bruce wrote:
> In fact, it
> seems that information about products reaches the Pentax US, through
> official channels, about the same time it hits the internet. The rep thought
> it was very funny that the same day his boss was in Japan being briefed, he
> got a call for a customer who gave the r
Peter wrote:
> All this doesn't make sense. Isn't the MZ-S a
> mid-level camera?
That depends on how you define mid-level. I think most put it in the semi-pro class
somewhat above mid-level. Personally, I define mid level as anything between the MZ-5n
and the Dynaxx 7.
>It's only a year ol
Henry wrote:
> Pentax would end up having 3 SLRs with 3 different chassis: the unique MZ-S,
> the new MZ-?, the old MZ for MZ-60. It would be a nightmare for the
> factories and maintenance centres to keep 3 different production lines and 3
> sets of spare parts I don't think that's realis
Tom wrote:
> Are you actually seeing a problem? I haven't noticed one, though I
> haven't really looked that closely.
Almost only in cold weather and whe it goes minutes (or more) between each exposure.
During shooting this summer I've only seen it in two images. It is, however, a real
problem
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Also tried my first attempt at panning - a bird in flight. And the whole
image is a blur.
I went by the book and used 1/30 second and 1/15 second exposure. I guess
it
needs much more practice... Any advice on this?<
much practice and luck. not mu
Hi Pål,
on 02 Nov 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
>But according to those who has been under the Pentax table and seen the
>thing, it is not an new version of the MR-52, but a brand new and very
>stylish camera of very different design.
Hm, Pål any idea what we have to imagine by a "stylish" design
Hi Pål,
>dropped the idea after the production line was installed. The MZ-S was
>basically introduced to recouperate developing and tooling cost for the MR-52
>project. I cannot imagine Pentax will continue with this platform when they
>have developed a brand new one customized for both digital a
Ken,
I'm sorry to say I am running thru AOL and have no email utilities.
I have to delete Brad's messages by hand.
On occasion, some slip thru and I read them by mistake.
If I was a new subscriber, I would be disappointed with this list.
21 non-sense messages from Brad this AM alone!
Brad,
Rolling On the Floor, Laughing Out Loud
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Stan (that is Dr. Stan to you Shaun.) >>
Brad, stop acting like a 6 year old (...he started it) and give it a rest.
We don't need to hear anybody's voice that often on this list.
Regards, Bob S.
Everything has settled down now...so you just keep bating him. Who's being
immature again?
__
A...
I've used Tmax developer on a few films..
Ilford HP5+
Delta 100
Plus X Pan
Tmax 100
Delta 400
Did I like it on any of them ?
Only on the Tmax
I'm going to play a bit (I've got a bunch of Xtol powder waiting) soon and
hopefully try out some new developers and see what happens on the "Fran
German Fotomagazin makes a FOMAG Liste with estimated price of most
photographic equipment.
The FA*2.8/200 is supposed to cost 610 Euros/USD, the A*4.0/300mm about 700
Euro/USD, the FA* 2.8/300 about 2500 Euro/USD (no listing for the A*
2.8/200mm). But shouldn't it be in the nieghbourhood of 600 Eu
Is this a troll?
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Robert Soames Wetmore [mailto:rswarchitect@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 5:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bogus rule about not posting ebay auction links
This supposed rule about not posting on active ebay auctions is
I am becoming increasingly interested in architectural photography and am
again seeking recommendations for wide angle and especially tilt-shift
lenses: Pentax lenses and various branded lenses for Pentax cameras, as well
as lenses for other-branded cameras. Can anyone advise?
I don't suppose
Someone recently posted a question on bokeh that interested me but to which
I didn't have a chance to respond - nor were there many responses. Now I
cannot find the post; would that person (or someone else) care to repost?
_
Pr
On 2 Nov 2002 at 8:22, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
> Most people here have a preference for buying and getting deals -
> what about the seller not getting full value? Try to think outside of your own
> tiny life and desires! It's wonderful for you when you get a bargain and
> unfortunate for so
On 2 Nov 2002 at 10:08, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
> I am becoming increasingly interested in architectural photography and am
> again seeking recommendations for wide angle and especially tilt-shift
> lenses: Pentax lenses and various branded lenses for Pentax cameras, as well as
> lenses for
On 2 Nov 2002 at 1:47, Glen O'Neal wrote:
> P.S. If you really want to know what I paid for it I would agree to tell you off
> list if you keep it to yourself.
Hi Glen,
Great lens. Over the last two years I have seen them close at the following
prices on eBay: US$685, US$598, US$569, US$516, US
No, NO, No! He wants the latest, greatest, most awesome camera made, dude. Canon guy
if I ever saw one.
Personally, I think he needs a trip to the Bada-Bing Lounge.
BR
Just east of New Jersey
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Hood [mailto:hood1616@;shaw.ca]
Go be with the pros; buy a Ni
On 2 Nov 2002 at 8:33, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
> Mike Johnston, the noted former editor of Photo Techniques and Camera and
> Darkroom, the publisher of the delightful 37th Frame, the admired critic,
> the beloved and long standing PDML member,..., weighed in on this supposed
> gentleman's a
I'm sorry but that is an idiotic argument. eBay provides tools for the
seller to insure a minimum price is met. If the seller chooses to lay >bare
his auction items to market forces with no reserve then they can't blame
anyone >for it selling at a lower price than they may have foreseen.
Agreed
I haven't seen an A* 85 1.4 on KEH in a long time, Though they do have
several FA* 85 1.4's somewhere around the price you mention. An A* 85 1.4
can go for more than $900.
From: "Glen O'Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By the way, I remember Shel. Haven't seen him on here in a while. KEH
offers
> $48
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Dan Scott wrote:
> To that I could only add, "and so little money..." (you have to look at
> the item and then double or triple the cost to find the SO appeasement
> factor). ;-)
I went to B&H on Tuesday to buy only a set of lugs for my 645 (with strap,
$10!), however, there wa
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:b_rubenstein@;att.net]
Sent: November 1, 2002 5:51 PM
.. Kodak also makes note of it being a 6th generation
DSLR. Pentax has a lot of catching up to do.
Not necessarily! Pentax could step into the digital arena at this time with
a c
Thank you so much. This is just the type of advice I need: 1) I was trying
to recall that Schneider PC Super Angulon 2,8/28 in K mount which had been
mentioned before and 2) I somehow simply hadn't thought about the AOV
problem with the Zork - but it makes so much sense now.
Can anyone weigh i
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
> I am becoming increasingly interested in architectural photography and am
> again seeking recommendations for wide angle and especially tilt-shift
> lenses: Pentax lenses and various branded lenses for Pentax cameras, as well
> as lenses for other-
On 2 Nov 2002 at 10:47, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:
> Thank you so much. This is just the type of advice I need: 1) I was trying to
> recall that Schneider PC Super Angulon 2,8/28 in K mount which had been
> mentioned before
No problems :-) I believe that Gianfranco has one but not in K mount,
Why is the 57mm normal a thing of the past? Does anyone know? All fast
normals now seem to be 50mm on the nose, whereas once so many were 57mm. I
rather like the 57mm focal length, and it makes a nice compliment with a
40mm (also not so popular any more). I once recall someone (maybe Mike
J
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 09:45 AM, gfen wrote:
I went to B&H on Tuesday to buy only a set of lugs for my 645 (with
strap,
$10!), however, there was a nice, cheap, 4x5 field camera (it was
listed
as offbrand, but I think it was a Tachihara) for a mere $299.
I'd own it, now, except Sh
Hello,
I'm new in your mailing list and I just say : hello :)
thierry
sorry, my english was very bad :( I'm French boy ;)
Tom,
I'd rather have the A 2X-S converter for the compatibility with A lenses and
above. It will also let you A lenses do spot metering on the PZ-1 series
cameras. I have both, but can't comment on the quality comparison. If you
scrounge for a while on ebay, the T6-2X is available (mis-labele
Heiko wrote:
> BTW - why was it necessary to develop a new platform? Wouldn't it be
> possible to put the APS-sized CCD into the MR-52? Conversly will it by
> possible to put a full frame CCD into that new chassis? The last
> question is pure speculation, but maybe somebody can tell be a tec
Heiko wrote:
> Hm, Pål any idea what we have to imagine by a "stylish" design? Will it
> be a something comparable to the difference between a MZ-5 and the MZ-S
> or will it be a "revolutionary" attempt comparable to the difference
> between an Olympus OM-4 and those all-in-one Olympus IS-mo
Michael wrote:
> Personally I think digital is at a point that anyone introducing a digital
> SLR at a consumer price, as opposed to prosumer/pro level camera, has an
> excellent chance of capturing a major market share of digital. Pentax has
> some excellent P&S digital cameras and if they introd
Ok, you asked for it. Here's a roughly 1-1 macro shot with the A200/4 Macro.
They do nice work.
I was trying to get this into the PUG for Nov., but looking at the quality of
what was submitted, I don't think it measures us. It is really a fantastic
gallery with contributions from around the
David Brooks wrote:
>
> http://212.187.14.19/index2.html
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spotmatic
> http://www.egroups/co.jp/group/m42
>
> Thes are 3 i use James
>
> Dave
The first one I already have bookmarked. Beautiful site of equipment photos.
The second I found this morning, and joined
On 2 Nov 2002 at 14:27, Pål Jensen wrote:
> This is pretty much what pentax reps tell me too; "you guys know it before we
> do". They often hear about stuff on the internet first.
I have notified the Australian Pentax distributors of new releases before they
have received their faxes from Japan
Believe it or not, there are people who already have advanced degrees and don't
feel it necessary to broadcast the fact in a forum having nothing to do with
their academic expertise. I found Shawn's post a little snotty and inconsiderate
of others. BTW, I have no interest in the subject at hand, a
No problems :-) I believe that Gianfranco has one
but not in K mount, he mentioned that it is a stellar performer (which is
borne out by the manufacturers MTF diagrams).
Yes, I think it was Gianfranco that posted about it.
The big advantage of the Zork adaptors is that some
models offer a
In a message dated 11/2/02 10:32:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Along these lines I have the older K200/2.5 which has been compared to the
A*200/2.8. Most feel the lenses are pretty much identical... I paid $400 Cdn
for this lens maybe six years ago. It's a nice lens sharp, fast ...
In one i
Welcome. And your English is probably better than my French. However,
there was a thread a while back about a Pentax list in French, which you
might enjoy in addition to the PDML. Anyone have the details?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 244
I don't believe that Mikes opinion on the issue is
that of the majority, if it did there should also have been posts
indicating
agreement. The majority agreement (for those who took the time to consider
and respond about the issue) was as was recently outlined.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
I honestly d
B&H has a A1.4/85mm for 750 USD. It doesn't say "Star", though...
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Bob Blakely [mailto:Bob@;Blakely.com]
Sendt: 2. november 2002 16:43
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Pentax-A* 85 f/1.4 & Pentax-A* 135 f/1.8
I haven't seen an A* 85 1.4 on KEH in a long t
Pål Jensen wrote:
>
> Peter wrote:
>
> > All this doesn't make sense. Isn't the MZ-S a
> > mid-level camera?
>
> That depends on how you define mid-level. I think most put it in the semi-pro class
>somewhat above mid-level. Personally, I define mid level as anything between the
>MZ-5n and th
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Dan Scott wrote:
> Alas, the Look. More than mortal man can bear...
I was lovingly cradling it, marveling at its light weight, and wondering
if I could figure out how to fold it up to stowe it away for the rest of
my day in the city, when I turned around and was greeted by the
Well, nice work Cameron. You are totally ignorant to the problem, in fact
you are a big part of it. Spew your stuff somewhere else, you assume to
speak for others, you do not. And your language shows your age.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pent
Hello
I'm sure I have seen Kiev shift lens that can be used for Pentax. They are
probably called Arsat. I think a Carl Ziess Jena was made for Exa M42 Exakta
Ihagee).
Theres an Arsat on ebay right now (Buy it now for 239.50 USD):
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1392801420
Otherw
Brad Dobo wrote:
> No time to chat, sorry, gotta keep running, lynch
> mob is still in hot pursuit!
Ya know, Brad - you're probably an OK sort of fellow. But this
insistence on posting a reply to every god damn post w/ your
small-minded rebuttals is just making the volum
"Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> ... so I tried out a roll of Kodak T400CN ... It does indeed seem
>> to be much more scanner friendly than the traditional stuff. My
>> question is: Can anyone tell me how the Ilford chromogenic films
>> compare to the Ko
> I don't know why it wouldn't be held in great esteem - the
> mechanical construction, perhaps? It's optically the same at the
> A20/2.8 which is certainly held in great esteem. [snip] I have the
> "A" version and it's a real gem. Very sharp, nice color rendition
> and very free from distortion fo
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 10:02 AM, Robert Soames Wetmore
wrote:
To keep this on topic, I was thinking about doing a shoot out between
my Hexanon 57mm f/1.2 (for Konica Autoreflex) and the Pentax SMCP-A
50mm f/1.2. I have a feeling the Hexanon is superior but would be
interested to
Keith Whaley wrote:
> I just got two M-42 thread, coated lens Vivitar
> Custom Tele-Converters," models 2X-1 and 3X-1.
the trouble w/ m42 TC's is that they are all 4-element
designs (though there may be the rare 5-element unit).
consequently they have optical limitati
Thanks for the message Bill,
Point out a couple things, if people do not want to see me posting, why post
themselves looking for a reply or a bait? Yours is a prime example of this.
Should have been off-list. Why did you choose on-list? You are right, I'm
even better than an ok fellow. You'd b
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Thnaks Bill. That's just the kind of information I'm looking for.
> Since my Minolta Scan Multi sandwiches the neg between two glass
> plates (anti-newton-ring type), I expect resistance to physical
> damage should be something to which I give consideration.
Als
On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 10:03 PM, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)
wrote:
I just reported that the rep wouldn't comment.
BTW, Pentax US is aware of the PDML.
BR
Bruce,
Aware of us in the "Ahhh, that's where the icky smell is coming from"
sense or the "Ahhh, this is what concerns our cu
Wendy's gone too?
Sig.
What's the list coming to?
Do send me notification of new newsletters coming out. I always
appreciate them, even tho' the photo quality far surpasses my own
attempts... ;^)
Take care of yourself. I'll keep in touch,
keith whaley
Cotty wrote:
>
> Hi there folks,
>
> I
"Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, the Ilford doesn't (didn't when I used it, anyway) have
> anything like the C-41 mask as does the CN. I would suspect that
> this would complicate scanning, as it "appears" more like a
> regular B&W emulsion and I've
RSW,
Buy the DSLR next year and make the correction in PhotoShop.
Frits
> From: Robert Soames Wetmore
> I am becoming increasingly interested in architectural photography and am
> again seeking recommendations for wide angle and especially tilt-shift
> lenses: Pentax lenses and various branded l
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 10:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/200macro.jpg
I was trying to get this into the PUG for Nov., but looking at the
quality
of
what was submitted, I don't think it measures us.
Well, sure. It doesn't even have any t
Test.
eactivist aka Marnie Parker
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com]
I have no idea what it looks like just that it is different from Pentax
current slr offerings and that it is supposedly stunning looking. As pure
speculation, I would not be surprised if it takes design cues from the
sucessful Pentax Optio digital
Thanks David.(Feed me)
So far, in class, we/I have used only the school provided Tmax 1:4,
on one roll of Tmax 100,one sacrafical roll of Delta 100 and
latest,delta 3200 pushed to 6400.(best work so farIMHO)
As i have nothing to compare to,other than a dozen rolls of lab
developed neg's,my findi
Sounds to me you two need to swap your partners.
> On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 11:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Dan Scott wrote:
> >
> > Dan, any chance I can introduce you and the Mrs to my better half
> > before he
> > does his Christmas shopping? I'd love t
I can say that I find my Optio very stylish and sophisticated looking. I've
had comments made to me about that. How well that would work with a new
series, I don't know, but it works with the Optios at any rate!
> From: Pål Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com]
> I have no idea what it looks
Hi, newbie here, taking first photography class with Pentax K-1000. Times for the
Leonids can be found at NASA's web site.
I'll introduce myself more formally later. Was wondering -- since I've never tried
night photography -- what film should I use (and film ISO)? Preferrably negative film.
An
Keith.
My faukt .I have not visted that site for a while and when i saw
they had moved,just copied the addy.The Spotmatic group is very good.
See you there.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:18:28 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Welcome.
Just wait for this latest flame to douse and enjoy the
knowledge of a number of Pentax entusiasts.
Dave in Canada
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/C
I wrote:
> Personally I think digital is at a point that anyone introducing a digital
> SLR at a consumer price, as opposed to prosumer/pro level camera, has an
> excellent chance of capturing a major market share of digital. Pentax has
> some excellent P&S digital cameras and if they introduced s
> -Original Message-
> From: gfen [mailto:gfen@;infotainment.org]
>
> >
> I'd own it, now, except She was standing about 5 feet beind
> me giving me
> the Look.
I used to get that look alot. Then I bought a 645N, 45-85, 120 and 35
all on the same day.
I'm divorced now.
tv
I haven't tried the Ilford stuff in about 4 years. Didn't like it,
seemed relatively grainy, plus Wheaty warned us about the soft
emulsion.
I've been shotting gobs of T400CN lately. In fact today, was the first
wedding I ever shot without shooting any real b+w.
T400CN has more exposure latitude t
Yes I switch to Nikon for more reasons, and specially macro photo.
In Nikon, I 've the 70-180 macro and it was very good in practice, and
the macro system was very better than Pentax (and others system too)
I was compare, and one day, I see a AFD 200 macro Nikon (occasion), and
I buy it.
And othe
A.
Good Bye
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 15:54:46 -0500
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cameron and tv
Thanks for the message Bill,
Point out a couple things, if people do not wan
> -Original Message-
> From: Pål Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com]
>
>
>
> > If anyone has an FA 45 they want to get rid of, I'll take
> that too.
>
>
> I sold mine two months ago...
BTW, why did you sell it?
I broke my 45-85 again...last time it broke a bought the 75 to sort of
f
Keith wrote:
> On the other hand, if it ensues that the MZ-S has an increasing larger
> following, year by year, or even level sales figures (!) why not keep
> it on the market?
A possible answer to this is that they want everything made on the same "chassis" made
on the same production line. A
Sorry this is one day late.
Have now to many cameras and lenses.Need to help finance a recent
Kmount lens aquasition.
For sale:
-Pentax S3 c/w 55 m f 1.8 Auto Takumar
-Original lens cap
-Clip on Pentax meter
-Case for meter work with in 1/3 stop
Sorry no case for the S3,stolen at a show last fall
Tom wrote:
> BTW, why did you sell it?
I bought the 33-55 zoom.
> I broke my 45-85 again...last time it broke a bought the 75 to sort of
> fill in while it was being repaired, but the gap between it and the 35
> was too much. I'll buy a FA 45 tonight unless you tell me it sucks...
To be frank,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pål Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com]
>
>
>
> To be frank, the 33-55 zoom is sharper. My impression is
> that there are some sample to sample variations with the 45mm.
But it's slower and doesn't focus very close.
The 33-55 I tried didn't seem all that
To put in my 2cents befor leaving(i said -500 midnight:)
I have run 5-6 rolls of Kodak 400cn na d alththoug you can see in
the neg it is not 'true'b&W film, i hav ebeen very happy with the
results.However now that i have joined the "brotherhood of dark":)
i'll stick with Tmax 100 or Delta 100.:
Cotty>
Please add me to your "keep in touch list".I'm going too, B&W NEEDS
ME:)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 20:23:59 +
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hi Guys And Gals, Unsubscribing For A While...Request
Hi the
I found the T400CN to be a good all round film and it scans quite well,
although i like XP2 Super for portraits, it gives a really nice look to the
subjects skin. I also find the XP2 Super easier to print in a real dark
room. I noted what william said about the soft emulsion and have been extra
car
My God! Have we attracted the attention of folks in alt.syntax.tactical?
Len
---
_
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now!
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
On 2 Nov 2002 at 12:37, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> I've recently seen ads for Pentax digital binaoculars. I believe the model is
> called "Digibino DB 100." It is supposed to have a built-in digital camera a s
> well.
>
> Has anyone here seen this item, or does anyone know anything about it?
H
Tom wrote:
> The 33-55 I tried didn't seem all that sharp either, certainly not as
> sharp as the 120 or 45-85.
It certainly isn't as sharp as the 120mm but what is? It is on level with the FA 75mm;
at least at the wider setting.
> Than again, you're shooting at infinity, I'm at 3-10 feet, so
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
