Thanks for the message Bill, Point out a couple things, if people do not want to see me posting, why post themselves looking for a reply or a bait? Yours is a prime example of this. Should have been off-list. Why did you choose on-list? You are right, I'm even better than an ok fellow. You'd be surprised. I bet I would be likewise surprised at you as well! I won't go over the facts again, but I did not one tiny thing wrong.
Anyhow, this is so late in the game now, what did you intend with a message on-list with this topic? You said you don't want it to carry on, but you post the same as I. I ask that you please refrain from using the language in your last sentence there. It offends me personally and religiously. Crude I don't mind, the other, I do. I'm sure there are others out there that feel the same. Thanks. Thanks and Regards, Brad Dobo (want to chat or say more, off-list is good) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: Re: Cameron and tv > Brad Dobo wrote: > > > No time to chat, sorry, gotta keep running, lynch > > mob is still in hot pursuit! > > Ya know, Brad - you're probably an OK sort of fellow. But this > insistence on posting a reply to every god damn post w/ your > small-minded rebuttals is just making the volume of the list > messages skyrocket and the %age of interesting posts drop to > near-none. Get a life fer christ's sake and don't let a bunch > of old Pentax farts get ya all bent out of shape. > > Bill > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast > > http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------- >
