- Original Message -
From: "keithw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT Why the full size solid-state imaging sensor will be a pipe
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Steve Jolly"
Subject: Re: OT Why the full size solid-state imag
So basically he's Leica's version of Herbert Kepler? That explains much...
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 30 Jun 2005 at 0:53, keithw wrote:
Erwin's comments, in part:
"My personal testing (to be published soon) shows that a 5MP sensor with
dedicated optics can match the performance of a 35mm n
The equivalent to grain in the digital world for me is pixel noise, not
pixel edges. I too prefer the grain but probably for the same reasons I
prefer the crack noises of old LPs to MP3 compression distortion.
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:39, Bob Blakely wrote:
> Yes and no. Much of an image is the re
Yes and no. Much of an image is the result of image processing in our
retinas and brains. When we get to the edge where grain is barely
perceptible or where individual pixels are barely perceptible the brain
weighs in. At the edge, at the same resolution, same color rendering and
same contrast,
Because they are misleading, basically.
The technology making the recording isn't the dominant factor.
A more relevant comparison would be:
o A lens designed for use with a large sensor can be
relatively small compared to sensor area.
o A lens designed for use with a small sensor must b
Why do you find these points to be dubious and suspect?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis
> But the whole argument is based on some rather dubious assumptions.
> In particular, I found this premise extremely suspect:
>
> o A lens designed for silver halide recording can be
>
But the whole argument is based on some rather dubious assumptions.
In particular, I found this premise extremely suspect:
o A lens designed for silver halide recording can be
relatively small compared to sensor area.
o A lens designed for solid-state recording must be
bulky in relat
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Steve Jolly"
Subject: Re: OT Why the full size solid-state imaging sensor will be a pipe
I don't understand the importance of print size. If the two systems
capture the same amount of information about a scene,
On 30 Jun 2005 at 0:53, keithw wrote:
> Erwin's comments, in part:
>
> "My personal testing (to be published soon) shows that a 5MP sensor with
> dedicated optics can match the performance of a 35mm negative of superb
> quality coupled to a lens of equally superb quality."
>
> Now I'll have to
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Jolly"
Subject: Re: OT Why the full size solid-state imaging sensor will be a pipe
I don't understand the importance of print size. If the two systems
capture the same amount of information about a scene, then they will
produc
>
> From: Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/30 Thu PM 12:17:06 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT Why the full size solid-state imaging sensor will be a pipe
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> >> "My personal testing (to be publishe
mike wilson wrote:
"My personal testing (to be published soon) shows that a 5MP sensor
with dedicated optics can match the performance of a 35mm negative
of superb quality coupled to a lens of equally superb quality."
To do what, though? Produce prints up to a certain size, arguably.
You can d
Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This supports what many had begun to suspect, based on the release of
>lenses designed for the APS digital sensor size and the reluctance of
>most makers to go full frame. If this is correct, Pentax is on the
>right path.
>Paul
>On Jun 30, 2005, at 1:3
This supports what many had begun to suspect, based on the release of
lenses designed for the APS digital sensor size and the reluctance of
most makers to go full frame. If this is correct, Pentax is on the
right path.
Paul
On Jun 30, 2005, at 1:36 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
A commentary on the
>
> From: keithw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/30 Thu AM 07:53:15 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT Why the full size solid-state imaging sensor will be a pipe
> dream
>
> Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> > A commentary on the state of
Rob Studdert wrote:
A commentary on the state of things to come or pass from Erwin Puts:
http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c014.html
I'll reserve my comments for later :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Erwin's comments, in part:
"My personal testing (to be published soon) shows tha
Gleaned from one of the Canon lists I'm on:
Read an interesting side-story in the Dutch CameraMagazine (written
by Erwin Puts, Leica adepts might know him), about the chip used in
the new Mamiya ZD (36x48mm), from Dalsa (Canadian, (once?) owned by
Philips), being a full-time (FT) design, which
A commentary on the state of things to come or pass from Erwin Puts:
http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c014.html
I'll reserve my comments for later :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publicat
18 matches
Mail list logo
