,
Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Thanks. I'll work on updating it and see what happens.
~Jonathan
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 17 May 2015 at 02:39, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> > I see libqrencode still exists in the main openwrt repo, instead of being
> > moved over to the pac
the 15.05 branch will be available via git?
~Jonathan bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On May 28, 2015 12:14 PM, "John Crispin" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28/05/2015 19:11, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
> >> * Steven Barth [20.05.2015 19:43]:
> >>> http://downloads.openwrt.org/chaos_calm
Hey, Kevin, I know how much of a pain it is to get patches to send without
getting mangled. You ought to stick with this, though, and work out how you
can send patches that don't get mangled. I'm sure Steven doesn't mind
pinging you back to let you know what the patches look like. Honestly, it's
be
Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:24 PM Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just committed a change making musl the new default libc in OpenWrt
> trunk, replacing uclibc. We've been preparing this for quite a while.
> Some packages mi
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:37 PM Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 16 June 2015 at 01:31, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> > Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
>
> Read again: "in OpenWrt trunk"
>
Sometimes, even apparently obvious thing
A couple lines of thought collided today during a conversation with a
friend who is also an fwknop user. Sending a knock over http is a clever
feature, and the hidden service idea is really cool. For example, I have a
web server that also has a cacti service in order to monitor that service.
Howeve
Oh dear. Sent to the wrong mailing list. Please disregard.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:52 PM Jonathan Bennett
wrote:
> A couple lines of thought collided today during a conversation with a
> friend who is also an fwknop user. Sending a knock over http is a clever
> feature, and the hidde
Instead of using a premade .config, you'll want to use "make menuconfig."
Under Target profile, you'll find the netgear WNDR3800.
Also, you will probably want to first run "./scripts/feeds update" and
./scripts/feeds install -a" in order to get the extra packages and luci.
Then if you want luci in
I have had great success with the tp-link Archer c7. It fits the bid
nicely, if it is available.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015, 1:06 PM Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> In our community we are struggling now, what we can buy.
> TP-Link 4900 and 4300 are EOL now in Germany. What else is there?
>
> - 8mb+ flash
> -
Tested and seems to work as intended. However, I think the image too big
messages should be printed at the default verbosity.
Currently, if make fails to generate the final image, it doesn't give any
message to acknowledge, and appears to have succeeded, there are just
"mysteriously" missing files
some reason, my system is ignoring the
make error. This is unrelated to your patch. My thinking is that it was
intended behavior, and would make sense to change it in the same patch.
Sorry about the confusion.
--Jonathan
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:46 AM Stephan Maka wrote:
> Jonathan Bennett
I'm sure it's been noticed already, but the ssl cert for openwrt.org seems
to have expired, and due to hsts being enabled, the site is impossible to
access.
--Jonathan
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.o
Those sort of emails are always just a bit discouraging. Keep in mind that
they tend to come from people that are slightly autistic or have Aspergers.
>From the rest of us, though, thank you for your hard work.
--Jonathan Bennett
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:24 AM Piotr Dymacz wrote:
> 2
Nak on setting a default password. The blank password has served its
purpose well for years now. Any preset password is asking for users to
leave it default. The only problem with blank ssh logins is it removes one
of the ways openwrt encouraged the user to set a password.
A banner that warns abou
Yay! Congratulations and thank you for your hard work! =)
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:54 AM Steven Barth wrote:
> The OpenWrt developers are proud to announce the final release of OpenWrt
> Chaos Calmer.
>
>___ __
> | |.-.-.-.| | |
with an ugly fork is very much not
welcome.
--Jonathan Bennett
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM John Clark wrote:
> >>the sudden deletion of our widely published openwrt.org email
> addresses somewhat undermines this
>
> Just so I am not jumping to wrong conclusions, their *.op
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM Daniel Dickinson <
open...@daniel.thecshore.com> wrote:
> On 16-05-05 11:38 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> > There is plenty of blame to go around, I think. Seems like the Lede
> > guys should have had the decency to at least inform the O
rking as a LTS sort of release, with minor version updates, so a 15.05.1
might happen in a few months. You *might* get your patches included for
that maintenance release. That's certainly not for me to decide, though.
--Jonathan Bennett
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:15 PM Drasko DRASKOVIC
w
plus.google.com/+JonathanBennett87/posts/bMPMjn7ZcJS
--Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Oct 9, 2015 2:21 PM, "Jo-Philipp Wich" wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> > Moving to Git seemed to have lots of traction at the summit, and I'll
> > add my voice that this sounds like a step in the right direction for
> > OpenWrt. I'm assuming that we would want to do a proper SVN to Git
> > conversion, and
g there as well, and retire trac altogether?
--Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Certain things are certainly broken. The body of kernel code that OpenWrt
maintains (allows to bitrot) outside the upstream kernel tree is broken.
Regarding downstream forks, would using Git also make it easier for people
like project turris to push appropriate changes back into OpenWrt proper?
t the revision. We could bake
the short hash into the image, but this would not be useful if any commits
were added locally, whereas the r number would still show some useful
information.
Would it be possible to track the revision number in an automated way even
in a git repo? So store the r number, and automatically increment on
commits. Not sure if that's an option, but it seems like it might address
the problem.
--Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Also worth noting is the 3rd party packages feed over at
https://github.com/openwrt/packages This could be a good place to get
started hacking on code for the OpenWrt project.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:47 PM Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 17 December 2015 at 01:28, Mohammed Billoo
> wrote:
> > I'm
gy for
> funding the 2 build servers that we used for the release.
>
>
> Whats next ?
> We aim at releasing Chaos Calmer (CC) before the end of the year. The
> CC release will use 3.14 or a newer LTS kernel as baseline.
>
>
> Have fun!
> The OpenWrt
Are you building with multiple processes (-j 2 or greater)? This reminds me
of an old bug that only popped up after a make distclean when building with
multiple build threads.
~Jonathan Bennett
On Sep 16, 2014 6:55 PM, "John Szakmeister" wrote:
> I'm finding that I'
In your tree, in the file tools/sed/Makefile, change HOST_BUILD_PARALLEL:=1
to HOST_BUILD_PARALLEL:=0 and see if that fixes the error.
On Sep 16, 2014 7:47 PM, "John Szakmeister" wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Jonathan Bennett
> wrote:
> > Are you building with
ot cleared up shortly, go ahead and open a ticket on
dev.openwrt.org
~Jonathan Bennett
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:43 PM, John Szakmeister
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Jonathan Bennett
> wrote:
> > In your tree, in the file tools/sed/Makefile, change
> HOST_BUILD_PARAL
The following patch updates fwknop to the newest release, v 2.5. I`m not
familiar with the standard procedures for package updates after the
official release. If possible, it would be great to update the package in
12.09 as well.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett
diff --git a/net/fwknop/Makefile
On Jul 24, 2013 1:19 AM, "Etienne Champetier"
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Le 24/07/2013 02:10, Jonathan Bennett a écrit :
>>
>> The following patch updates fwknop to the newest release, v 2.5. I`m not
familiar with the standard procedures for package updates after the
This is a minor update to fwknop that just released. This supersedes the
previously submitted patch.
Again, if this could be pushed into 12.09, it would be great.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett
diff --git a/net/fwknop/Makefile b/net/fwknop/Makefile
index 24d7385..a0d0454 100644
--- a/net/fwknop
Ping. This patch is on the tracker: http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/3861/
As I am the maintainer, but have no commit access, I would ask that someone
with commit access would commit this patch to trunk and 12.09.
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Jonathan Bennett
tch that sets the capture port to eth1
or drop the patch and let it default to eth0? Or is there a good way to
detect the wan port and write it to the config, but only on firstboot?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Jonathan Bennett [02.08.2013 15:22]:
> > &
files
installed by ncurses.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett
diff --git a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile
index 62ffdfb..26b7bf5 100644
--- a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile
+++ b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ ifneq ($(HOST_OS),FreeBSD)
mv dir
is causes a few unintended
problems, namely nano fails to launch.
Attached patch adds xterm-256color to the files installed by ncurses.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett
diff --git a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile
index 62ffdfb..26b7bf5 100644
--- a/package/libs/n
Fwknopd is a firewall knock operator daemon written by Michael Rash.
It implements Single Packet Authentication to securely authorize
connections through a firewall.
I'm also volunteering to maintain the package in openwrt.
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
Index: net/fwknop/Mak
Fwknopd is a firewall knock operator daemon written by Michael Rash.
It implements Single Packet Authentication to securely authorize
connections through a firewall.
I'm also volunteering to maintain the package in openwrt.
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
Index: net/fwknop/Mak
Previous submission mangled a few lines. Fixed (hopefully ) here.
Signed off by Jonathan Bennett
Index: net/fwknop/Makefile
===
--- net/fwknop/Makefile (revision 0)
+++ net/fwknop/Makefile (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+include
That time was my fault. Should be fixed now.
Signed off by Jonathan Bennett
Index: net/fwknop/Makefile
===
--- net/fwknop/Makefile (revision 0)
+++ net/fwknop/Makefile (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
Ping
Any progress on getting this approved? Do I need to supply any
additional information?
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> That time was my fault. Should be fixed now.
> Signed off by Jonathan Bennett
>
>
> Index: net/
On Aug 2, 2011 3:13 PM, "Hartmut Knaack" wrote:
>
> TP-Link offers only one firmware version for the 940nd, so most likely
> it will work. But you might be the first one to test.
Tp-link uses the minor version to refer to firmware upgrades. The hardware
is identical to 1.0
>
> Krisztián Szabolcs E
e packages feed. Let me know if you need anything from me.
~Jonathan Bennett
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jonathan Bennett
wrote:
> Ping
>
> Any progress on getting this approved? Do I need to supply any
> additional information?
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan Bennett
>
Not sure why, but it's taking the openwrt folks a while to pull fwknop
into trunk. Until that happens, if any of you want to play around with
the binaries, let me know what target you're running on, and I'll be
happy to send you the .ipk file.
~J
s, IMHO. I don't expect the client to be of
much use in an embedded/router setting, but if there is interest, I can
package the client as well.
Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt
to wireless, so I
> thought I'd ask if anyone else is seeing similar issues.
>
> Jim
>
~Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
This patch updates fwknop to the newest version: 2.0.0rc4 and includes
a few tweaks suggested by swalker. It also adds the fwknop client to
openwrt and includes a patch that changes a few default fwknopd
configuration options to more sane values for Openwrt.
Signed off by: Jonathan Bennett
Peter, on your Linux machine, you can connect from the command line using
wpasupplicant and get much more detailed info about what is going on.
On Sep 16, 2011 1:26 PM, "Peter Naulls" wrote:
>
> Some of this is speculation. I wish I had more precise details. This is
true
> of all trunk versions in
to add new devices. Juhosg has added several
devices in the last few months, and I've used those as templates for
working on new devices.
It's also useful to start a thread on the forums and report your
progress there. Some will chip in with help and advice.
Jonathan Bennett
a bit of digging, I made a change to /lib/netifd/proto/dhcp.sh
Changing the function name from dhcp_setup() to proto_dhcp_setup().
I'm not sure if this is the correct fix, but dhcp is currently broken
in nefifd.
~Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel ma
This patch seems like a really good idea for the ar71xx family. What
sorts of problems are preventing this from being implemented? As small
as it sounds, an extra 192k would be really useful on quite a few
routers.
~Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel
Do we still have need for more buildbot machines? I have a Phenom II 4
core that is set up just for building openwrt. I'm willing to add it
to the build bot if it's still needed. Let me know.
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
Incom Systems
___
ope
Do you have a serial port, and access to the bootloader? First step,
generally, is to try a ramboot image. You transfer it and boot from
ram using the boot loader. Watch the serial output to get an idea of
what changes you need to support the board.
~Jonathan Bennett
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 6:58
Following patch updates fwknop to v2.0
Signed off by Jonathan Bennett
Index: net/fwknop/patches/002-fix_init.patch
===
--- net/fwknop/patches/002-fix_init.patch (revision 0)
+++ net/fwknop/patches/002-fix_init.patch
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alberich de megres
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> @Jonathan,
> how get access to the bootloader?
> do you send it to the router by streaming, or write it and then boot it?
Get a serial port and watch the output as you turn it on. Normally
there will be a message about how to in
w_feature.patch
Open that file with kwrite, and then copy the code. This seems to
preserve correct whitespace.
~Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ote:
> One more last question:
>
> which serial/jtag cable do you use? (if it is cheap, better)
>
> thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Jonathan Bennett
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alberich de megres
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>
On May 6, 2012 11:55 AM, "Alberich de megres" wrote:
>
> And for the Jtag?
Never had to use jtag, so no idea, honestly. Sorry.
>
>
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Jonathan Bennett
wrote:
> > https://www.adafruit.com/products/70 is a great serial cable. It'
0-4) to a
laptop. Sometime tomorrow I'll get these files online.
Any ideas on the lan port? I'm assuming it's a lack of the proper
driver. Any help or hints are appreciated.
Cheers,
Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-de
7;ve
added "CONFIG_FORCEDETH=Y" it to
trunk/target/linux/generic/config-2.6.32 and
trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.32. That driver isn't added to
the firmware, and the actual .config file in the build directory has
it unset. What am I missing to make this driver co
ietary driver? I'd try to investigate it further, but I
can't think of a way to transfer the file off the router.
Cheers,
Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
mages that makes
the wireless show up on one, but not the other. My understanding is
that Ath9k should autodetect the wireless chip ind configure wlan0 for
use. Any thoughts?
Cheers,
Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lis
is running on a wa901ndv2 and brings up the ethernet port
if it is. There may be a better way to reset that phy chip, but this
is the best I've found.
Cheers,
Signed off by: Jonathan Bennett
Index: target/linux/ar71x
mii-tool would semi-brick this board. It would require a
serial cable to recover.
To my knowledge, everything works as intended.
Cheers,
Signed off by Jonathan Bennett
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.36
===
--- target/l
Gabor, thanks for the feedback.
>> + ar71xx_eth0_data.phy_if_mode = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII;
>> + ar71xx_eth0_data.speed = SPEED_100;
>> + ar71xx_eth0_data.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
>
> You don't have to specify the speed and duplex values if you are using a
> phy_mask.
3rd time's the charm.
This patch fully supports the TP-Link tl-wa901nd v2. It removes the
mii-tool dependency, cleans up the mach file just a bit, and uses the
correct phy-mask.
Cheers,
Signed off by Jonathan Bennett
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/config-2
This patch is refreshed for the most recent changes to trunk. It does
work as intended. Please commit to trunk when possible.
Cheers,
Jonathan Bennett
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.37
===
--- target/linux/ar71xx/config
rstand why
>> am I getting this error.
>>
>> Any suggestions / hints would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks for your help, too.
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Madhavi M.
>
> Dear All,
>
> It was resolved. Thanks.
That's great! However, a
Juhos, is there any chance we could backport the 841nd v7 support for
10.03.1 rc5? Trunk seems to run great on it.
Thanks,
Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt
hould do exactly what you need.
~Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Try this one:
http://www.rowetel.com/blog/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
?
~Jonathan Bennett
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> On 6/17/11 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
>> Phillip,
>> What would be the advantage of ipsec over OpenVPN?
>>
>> In my experience, if you have Asterisk deployed, the call is
>> routed throug
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> On 6/17/11 1:12 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Philip Prindeville
>> wrote:
>>> As for Asterisk, it handles NAT fairly well *unless* Asterisk happens to be
>>> run
75 matches
Mail list logo
