Could anyone extract this seemslike tar.gz?
-- --
??: "axishero";
: 2012??5??23??(??) 5:09
??: "openwrt-devel";
: [OpenWrt-Devel] Tp-link has released gpl source code of ar934x,which can
not be extracted.
http://www.tp-l
Changes in this patch:
* update to version 1.14.2
* merge 0004-Pulse-dialing-support-into-pjsip.patch into
0002-register-tapi.patch
* refresh patches
* remove dummy echo foo from Makefile
Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov
---
package/pjsip/Makefile | 10 +--
package
Citando Marek Lindner :
Hi,
I already wrote to http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/open-mesh/MailingList
(the mailing list of batman-adv routing protocol) but the developers
of the batman-adv said to me, after some chat and replies, that this
issue could be solved asking in the openwrt forum, becau
Citando Marek Lindner :
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 03:28:43 ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
Looks like the committer for the OpenWRT package is Marek:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/batman-adv
did you report this problem to him ?
Yes, he did and I told him that mixing trunk pac
Helmut Schaa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Tobias Diedrich
> wrote:
> > Helmut Schaa wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Tobias Diedrich
> >> wrote:
> >> > Helmut Schaa wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Tobias Diedrich
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > rt2800:
Hi,
> I already wrote to http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/open-mesh/MailingList
> (the mailing list of batman-adv routing protocol) but the developers
> of the batman-adv said to me, after some chat and replies, that this
> issue could be solved asking in the openwrt forum, because they didn't
> kno
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 03:28:43 ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
> Looks like the committer for the OpenWRT package is Marek:
> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/batman-adv
>
> did you report this problem to him ?
Yes, he did and I told him that mixing trunk packages with stable is n
Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Tobias Diedrich
wrote:
> Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Tobias Diedrich
>> wrote:
>> > Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Tobias Diedrich
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > rt2800: Initialize max_txpower to MAX_G_TXPOWER a
Looks like the committer for the OpenWRT package is Marek:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/batman-adv
did you report this problem to him ?
bye :)
Saverio
2012/5/23 Pedro Nuno Costa Rodrigues :
>
> Hello, my name is Pedro, and I'm writing from Portugal.
>
> I would like to ask some
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:26 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> On 23/05/12 20:07, John Crispin wrote:
> i think we should change this to not use xtu bits unless explicitly set
> can you try with this patch applied ?
>
I effectively did that for the longer trace. See previous email.
"dsl_cpe_con
On 23/05/12 20:07, John Crispin wrote:
>
>>
>> The firmware reports identical:
>> DSL_CPE#>vig
>> nReturn=0 DSL_DriverVersionApi=3.24.4.4 DSL_ChipSetFWVersion=2.4.4.0.0.1
>> DSL_ChipSetHWVersion=1.5 DSL_ChipSetType=Ifx-Danube
>> DSL_DriverVersionMeiBsp=5.0.0
>> nReturn=0 DSL_DriverVersionApi=3.2
Hello, my name is Pedro, and I'm writing from Portugal.
I would like to ask some questions about batman-adv in openwrt backfire
10.03.2.
I already wrote to http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/open-mesh/MailingList
(the mailing list of batman-adv routing protocol) but the developers
of the batman-
>
> The firmware reports identical:
> DSL_CPE#>vig
> nReturn=0 DSL_DriverVersionApi=3.24.4.4 DSL_ChipSetFWVersion=2.4.4.0.0.1
> DSL_ChipSetHWVersion=1.5 DSL_ChipSetType=Ifx-Danube
> DSL_DriverVersionMeiBsp=5.0.0
> nReturn=0 DSL_DriverVersionApi=3.24.4.4 DSL_ChipSetFWVersion=2.4.4.0.0.1
> DSL_C
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 18:25 +0100, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:01 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> > On 21/05/12 22:14, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
> > > On 21/05/2012 18:16, John Crispin wrote:
> > >> On 21/05/12 17:48, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> current
Al 23/05/12 19:23, En/na Luka Perkov ha escrit:
> Other long & hard nights how John said were spent trying to make wifi
> and lan working...
At least your hard night was taken into consideration, mines were sitting in
patchwork for ~1 year, then wrongly applied and not credited.
Bye
--
Luca
__
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Robert Vineyard wrote:
> On 5/21/2012 8:20 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>
>> Committed in r31836 /packages/net/daemonlogger/ (. Makefile):
>> [patchteam] - Daemonlogger is a packet logger and soft tap
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Now that this has been committed to trunk, is the
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:01 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> On 21/05/12 22:14, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
> > On 21/05/2012 18:16, John Crispin wrote:
> >> On 21/05/12 17:48, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> currently we test our last left-for-testing xDSL interface. The Danube
> >>> tri
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:53:32AM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> On 23/05/12 10:47, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:34 +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
> >> It's the most important change in this patch and reason for sending it.
> >> I dont see the need to comment every line in basic pat
On 5/21/2012 8:20 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
Committed in r31836 /packages/net/daemonlogger/ (. Makefile):
[patchteam] - Daemonlogger is a packet logger and soft tap
Thanks!
Now that this has been committed to trunk, is there any chance of
getting this package included in a current or future re
I am building openwrt revision 31839, but the compat-wireless version is
dated 04-07-12... is there a more updated version of compat-wireless for
openwrt?
Y-
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman
Helmut Schaa wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Tobias Diedrich
> wrote:
> > Helmut Schaa wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Tobias Diedrich
> >> wrote:
> >> > rt2800: Initialize max_txpower to MAX_G_TXPOWER and MAX_A_TXPOWER
> >> > respectively, similar to how it is already don
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Tobias Diedrich
wrote:
> Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Tobias Diedrich
>> wrote:
>> > rt2800: Initialize max_txpower to MAX_G_TXPOWER and MAX_A_TXPOWER
>> > respectively, similar to how it is already done in rt2[45]00pci.c
>> >
>> > rt28
Hi
I almost finish the code:
http://pastebin.com/0YRJ6QYb
But after I got the TOKEN, it always give me a 403 error.
Please help me check the code. give some advice.
Thanks
On 04/27/2012 07:45 PM, Mirko Vogt wrote:
As far as I know UVL is unmaintained and got obsoleted.
This still doesn't f
http://www.tp-link.com/resources/gpl/ap123_gpl.tar.gz
Like before??the suffix is intentionally not matching the archive, but this
time I tried altering to different suffixes result in no effect.___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwr
On 23/05/12 10:47, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:34 +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
>> It's the most important change in this patch and reason for sending it.
>> I dont see the need to comment every line in basic patch like this.
>
> Yes, you are right, it is a small change. I just th
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:34 +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
> It's the most important change in this patch and reason for sending it.
> I dont see the need to comment every line in basic patch like this.
Yes, you are right, it is a small change. I just think a title such as
"lantiq: p2601hnfx fix leds
Sure.
Thanks,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:52 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess asking 3 times is ok. If you get no response this time please
> move this to the forum.
>
> I would also like to point out that this sounds like NDA info that you
> are requesting, which we really do not want
27 matches
Mail list logo
