On 23/05/12 10:47, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:34 +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
>> It's the most important change in this patch and reason for sending it.
>> I dont see the need to comment every line in basic patch like this.
> 
> Yes, you are right, it is a small change. I just think a title such as 
> 
> "lantiq: p2601hnfx fix leds, partitions, buttons"
> 
> without even a description, would have been better. I guess the patch
> guideline 'one fix per patch' made me comment, and the better option was
> to mention each trivial fix, rather than suggest 3 trivial patches.
> 

i agree. and the next patch should try and follow those guidelines. The
thing is i know this patch was the result of 3 very long and hard nights
for a few people and i can imagine that they were happy to get it out
the door :-)

however i will use the subject proposed above when i push it and add a
small description text.

I think that would be the ideal route to resolve this and make every one
happy...


Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to