On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:59 -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> At the moment we have a page that lists some projects
> http://openstack.org/Projects/. That's probably becoming too long now,
> though and hard to use or update. What would be considered more
> useful?
I actually think this is fairly c
Ah yes - these are definitely different efforts, but I certainly
wouldn't mind working together in some way.
The focus of StackForge is development infrastructure hosting. We're
working with the guys at cloudsoft (Adrian Cole actually) to get the
jclouds plugin for jenkins finished so that we can
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 08:08 -0800, Monty Taylor wrote:
> We've been working on spinning up a second copy of the OpenStack CI
> infrastructure that is intended to be offered for the use of any
> Satellite project without curation or approval (but be completely
> optional - intended to be helpful, no
This sounds slightly different from what TryStack.org is offering,
perhaps efforts could be united? I'd love to have a one-stop place to
test against multiple releases of OpenStack (Diablo, Essex, trunk,
etc.).
Thanks,
Matt Ray
Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc.
m...@opscode.com | (512) 73
Funny story ... I JUST sent an email to the PPB about a thing I've been
working on to help out here - although I do want to build an ion powered
spacecraft.
We've been working on spinning up a second copy of the OpenStack CI
infrastructure that is intended to be offered for the use of any
Satellit
Really, the fog presentation was lovely in Boston. Huge +1
Márton
2012/2/28 Matt Ray :
> I'd add Fog, the Ruby cloud services library which has support for
> OpenStack http://fog.io/
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Ray
> Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc.
> m...@opscode.com | (512) 731-2218
> Twitter,
I'd add Fog, the Ruby cloud services library which has support for
OpenStack http://fog.io/
Thanks,
Matt Ray
Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc.
m...@opscode.com | (512) 731-2218
Twitter, IRC, GitHub: mattray
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Marton Kiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Essex Design
Hi,
At Essex Design Summit, there was a session about Openstack Satellite
Projects. Anybody knows something about that? I checked the archives,
but not found too much improvement in that topic.
The openness of core project API helps third party integrators or
application developers to deliver app
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 10:01 -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 08:58 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > However, after re-reading the OpenStack trademark policy, it seems
> > pretty clear to me that if we wish to use the term "OpenStack
> > Satellite" as the name of this umbrella, that
@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Stefano Maffulli
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 12:02 PM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] openstack-satellite
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 08:58 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
> However, after re-reading the OpenStack trademark policy, it seems
> pretty
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 08:58 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
> However, after re-reading the OpenStack trademark policy, it seems
> pretty clear to me that if we wish to use the term "OpenStack
> Satellite" as the name of this umbrella, that Satellite absolutely may
> not contain products primarily designat
site to begin with
24. Crowbar, devstack, etc. should go in there
-Original Message-
From: David Medberry [mailto:david.medbe...@canonical.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 2:10 PM
To: Chris Bohannon
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: RE: [Openstack] openstack-satellite
On Fri, 2011-10-14
On 10/15/2011 07:58 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
There is a well-defined trademark policy for OpenStack:
http://www.openstack.org/brand/openstack-trademark-policy/
What is being used for "OpenStack Satellite" is simply the Word Mark,
which is liberally applied to refer to the OpenStack project
ecosyste
@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Jay Pipes
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:52 PM
To: Bryan Taylor
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] openstack-satellite
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
> I don't know, but there are several obvious ne
Hey Bryan, comments inline...
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
> On 10/14/2011 04:52 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
>
> I don't know, but there are several obvious next steps:
> - Document publicly the criteria for a project to
On 10/14/2011 04:52 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
I don't know, but there are several obvious next steps:
- Document publicly the criteria for a project to fit
Not really sure there needs to be crite
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2011 10:54 p.m., "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>> I would advise NOT having any particular governance model for
>> Satellite projects. The projects themselves should self-govern by the
>> cultural norms of the programming language commun
On Oct 14, 2011 10:54 p.m., "Jay Pipes" wrote:
> I would advise NOT having any particular governance model for
> Satellite projects. The projects themselves should self-govern by the
> cultural norms of the programming language communities that are
> relevant to the project; since Satellite projec
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
> I don't know, but there are several obvious next steps:
> - Document publicly the criteria for a project to fit
Not really sure there needs to be criteria, really...
> - Identify resources available to participating projects
What do you m
Chris B and I have a chat with folks at SourceForge on Monday about
getting an OpenStack forge community site going... of course I will
keep everyone informed.
Cheers,
-jay
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:24 PM, David Medberry
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've not seen anything following the ODS about OpenStack
Let's not raise the bar too high for Satellite The points mentioned (CI,
QA, etc.) should be clearly documented with a y/n for the projects to aid
selection but I would much rather try out a non-CI tool in the directory than
have to write it all myself from scratch.
Ultimately, the aim of
I don't know, but there are several obvious next steps:
- Document publicly the criteria for a project to fit
- Identify resources available to participating projects
- Formalize it with the PPB and unleash it
- Build the Satellite community
A big question we didn't discuss is what the govern
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 18:01 +, Chris Bohannon wrote:
> Should we post them on the wiki?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
Just post them (wherever convenient) and drop a note on openstack@lists.
I was in part just trying to confirm that the topic/discussion hadn't
moved to another mailing list/channel.
m: openstack-bounces+chris.bohannon=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+chris.bohannon=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of David Medberry
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 11:25 AM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] openstack-satellite
Hi,
I&
Hi,
I've not seen anything following the ODS about OpenStack Satellite (or
whatever new name has been proposed).
Is discussion going on another list?
I also don't see an etherpad for it posted here:
http://wiki.openstack.org/EssexSummitEtherpads
Was the discussion captured somewhere else?
-da
Oracles?
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 28, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> To be clear (and I blame myself for using the term "shop" in my
> reply), the goal certainly is NOT to monetize or marketize in the
> ecosystem. I should have used the term "peruse the Bazaar" or "sit
> around the OpenSt
Dickinson
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 23:03 -0500, John Dickinson wrote:
> So you're looking for a place to point marketing? We already have
> http://openstack.org/projects/ (which has a long list on it) and the
Another possiblity here would be to support satellite contributors with
some kind of continuous integration against the development branches of
openstack components. We would uprev and deploy new codebases of
openstack and let registered satellite projects integrate against the
latest code base
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 23:03 -0500, John Dickinson wrote:
>> So you're looking for a place to point marketing? We already have
>> http://openstack.org/projects/ (which has a long list on it) and the
>> wiki has plenty of space to add new pa
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 23:03 -0500, John Dickinson wrote:
> So you're looking for a place to point marketing? We already have
> http://openstack.org/projects/ (which has a long list on it) and the
> wiki has plenty of space to add new pages, if necessary. However, the
> original proposal is not abou
To be clear (and I blame myself for using the term "shop" in my
reply), the goal certainly is NOT to monetize or marketize in the
ecosystem. I should have used the term "peruse the Bazaar" or "sit
around the OpenStack town square and talk to the soap-box oracles". I
don't know. Sometimes I wonder w
d.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+chris.bohannon=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Jay Pipes
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:39 PM
To: John Dickinson
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:47 PM, John Dickinson
It's way deeper than just "marketing". The idea is to encourage the
community that creates complementary functionality to OpenStack to be more
organized and to stay close to the main OpenStack community, and vice
versa. The lines blur between these communities because you just can't
deploy a cloud
Well, if the goal is to create a marketplace for openstack compatible
products... meaning a place to find solutions built on and around openstack
core (monetization is not my point)... then great... if the point is to
aggregate ephemera then that seems like simply a directory/repository of
indi
So you're looking for a place to point marketing? We already have
http://openstack.org/projects/ (which has a long list on it) and the wiki has
plenty of space to add new pages, if necessary. However, the original proposal
is not about a marketing landing page to promote an openstack ecosystem.
That's an impressive list. I haven't heard of half of them, which answers
your question.
On 9/27/11 5:47 PM, "John Dickinson" wrote:
>What benefits does an openstack-satellite project bring? Other than all
>using some openstack component, what do these projects have in common
>that justifies gro
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:47 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> What benefits does an openstack-satellite project bring? Other than all using
> some openstack component, what do these projects have in common that
> justifies grouping them? For example, I know of many open source projects
> that use sw
t: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
>
> I think one benefit would be a greater breadth of contributors to OpenStack.
> As far as I know, the core components are written in python and this could
> limit the number of contributors to OpenStack outside of Swift, Glance, and
> etc. This
n=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net[openstack-bounces+matt.colton=
rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Bryan Taylor [
btay...@rackspace.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:27 AM
>> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
>> Subject: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
>&g
space@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Jan Drake
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 5:31 PM
To: John Dickinson
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
Doesn't make sense to me... satellite projects are typically integration
projects around a core not sets of dependen
c: Matt Colton; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> What benefits does an openstack-satellite project bring? Other than all using
> some openstack component, what do these projects have in common that
> ju
n the Core mailing
>> list.
>>
>> From: openstack-bounces+matt.colton=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
>> [openstack-bounces+matt.colton=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf
>> of Bryan Taylor [btay...@rackspace.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:2
space@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Jan Drake
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 5:31 PM
To: John Dickinson
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
Doesn't make sense to me... satellite projects are typically integration
projects around a core not sets of dependen
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> What benefits does an openstack-satellite project bring? Other than all using
> some openstack component, what do these projects have in common that
> justifies grouping them? For example, I know of many open source projects
> that use sw
ailing
> list.
>
> From: openstack-bounces+matt.colton=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
> [openstack-bounces+matt.colton=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf
> of Bryan Taylor [btay...@rackspace.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:27 AM
> To: openstack@lists.
[btay...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:27 AM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite
I just saw Chris Bohannon's talk at the design conference regarding OpenStack
Satellite. This is an area for projects that are not part of the OpenStack
CORE, b
I just saw Chris Bohannon's talk at the design conference regarding OpenStack
Satellite. This is an area for projects that are not part of the OpenStack
CORE, but instead that simply support it:
http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/view/3
I think this is an important idea. There's a lot of stu
47 matches
Mail list logo
