I agree with John's comments as not all projects related to Core should fall under a single umbrella but I think there could be some "projects" that could be beneficial.
An example could be a Customer/Contact service that expands the knowledge of a "tenant" without any Core system needing to know anything more. These types of things could then enhance things such as the dashboard by extending functionality. ________________________________________ From: Ryan Lane [rl...@wikimedia.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 5:11 PM To: John Dickinson Cc: Matt Colton; openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Satellite On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47 PM, John Dickinson <m...@not.mn> wrote: > What benefits does an openstack-satellite project bring? Other than all using > some openstack component, what do these projects have in common that > justifies grouping them? For example, I know of many open source projects > that use swift (swauth, slogging, cyberduck, all the rackspace language > bindings, several iOS apps, a few dashboards), and I can't seem to see why > they would benefit by being grouped into one umbrella. > Agreed. This seems like something that would likely be better as a page or pages in the wiki. - Ryan This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
