On 03/ 5/13 12:16 PM, Ram Chander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am importing zfs snapshot to oracle solaris 11 from anther host
> running oracle soalris 11. When the import happens via "zfs recv" ,
> it locks the filesystem, "df" hangs and unable to use the filesystem.
> Once the import completes, the files
On 06/27/12 05:29 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey all,
We're hosting an Oracle Solaris engineering chat now for the next few hours:
http://www.bitpipe.com/detail/RES/1338394033_420.html?asrc=CL_PRM_wcsdc_OracleSolarisBlg
Join this exclusive live chat on June 27th, 11 AM -2 PM EST to explore Oracle
On 06/27/12 05:29 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey all,
We're hosting an Oracle Solaris engineering chat now for the next few hours:
http://www.bitpipe.com/detail/RES/1338394033_420.html?asrc=CL_PRM_wcsdc_OracleSolarisBlg
Join this exclusive live chat on June 27th, 11 AM -2 PM EST to explore Oracle
On 04/13/11 04:37 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
>> Exactly what I was thinking too when I saw those specifications.
>> So people already using Solaris variant can not see presentation at all.
>>
> Didn't you read Glynn's recent post?
>
Aha, I see it now in mail client.
It is S10+, FF3+, Flash10 great, the
On 03/24/11 01:53 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
>
>> On 03/24/11 10:06 AM, Gary Driggs wrote:
>>> FWIW, they list Linux and Mac clients as not supported as well...
>> From the test page:
>>
>> System Requirements
>>
>> Windows XP with IE 6+ or Firefox 3.x
>> Windows Vista with
On 03/21/11 02:59 PM, Octave Orgeron wrote:
Hi,
The two graphics card options you should look at are the XVR-300 and XVR-2500
for SPARC. All other graphics cards are EOL and don't have support in the Xorg
consolidation in OpenSolaris and Solaris 11. It would be nice if there were some
Nvidia car
I would like to know what modern Graphic cards are supported for SPARC
architecture servers, for OpenSolaris, Solaris 10u9, Solaris11Express
and OpenIndiana and so on.
I see there are drivers for Solaris x86 on Nvidia site, noting on AMD.
What options do one have if wants to put one ore severa
On 12/26/10 07:46 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> Now I think when it comes to opensource, Oracle only tries to
> exploit it, by finding ways where they can make money of it. with
> that in mind,
There is nothing wrong in fully exploiting open source to make money ,
that is great actually :)
>
On 12/13/10 11:36 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>> probably, after full solaris 11 is out and oracle
>> makes millions of it first
>> since they are develop it. it will be like when
>> oracle needs to wait for red hat to release the
>> enterprise sources to develop oracle linux.
>> so we need the w
Ian Collins wrote:
>> Alas, it isn't to be I'm afraid. My work environment precludes the
>> attachment to our network of any OS that could not be patched should
>> security vulnerabilities arise.
>
> So you wouldn't have been able to attach an OpenSolaris system either.
OpenSolaris /dev releases in
Ian Collins wrote:
> On 11/16/10 05:42 PM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
>>> Sean M. Brannon wrote:
>>>
What is the update/patch policy for Express? i.e.
>>> is an Oracle support contract required to gain access
>>> to Solaris 11 Express software/security updates?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> All rights not expressly granted above are hereby reserved. If you want to
> use the Programs for any purpose other than as permitted under this
> agreement, [...] you must obtain a valid license permitting such use.
>
I think that S11Express include more then enough p
Octave Orgeron wrote:
> OpenIndiana is another option like so many now for x86 such as Belinix,
> Schillix, Nextenta,
> etc.
>
> I just find it distasteful for anyone to shoot down someone's questions or to
> even suggest they switch to another OS. If you feel that way, you shouldn't
> be
Edward Martinez wrote:
> well... if it happens that updates won't be made available to
> end-users,devs, etc unless we are enrolled in the "Oracle Premier Support for
> Operating Systems offering" then that is one main feature we lost we had a
> new opensolaris /dev build; updated software.
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Well...Solaris 11 express support for production use will be made
>> available under the Oracle Premier Support for Operating Systems
>> program, maybe those who are enrolled will have access to the source
>> code. maybe not.
>>
> Sol 11 Express is open source for e
Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> On Tuesday 14th September, we will be unveiling OpenIndiana – an
> exciting new distribution of OpenSolaris!
>
Great! Hope more people will join in to make it happen.
I suppose there will be some kind of webcast?
Few cameras to record event and also public access and p
Eric Andersen wrote:
> If you want to build the official Oracle ON, I don't know. I think you need
> access to closed bits of the OS.
>
> If you want to move to the Illumos ON, there are instructions here (at least
> to get you to 145, not sure about 146):
>
> http://illumos.org/projects/illumos
Hernan Saltiel wrote:
> Thanks to Rich Lowe, I know what I did in the wrong way.
> Here is what needs to be done in order to have a working onnv_142
> OpenSolaris:
>
> a) Install OpenSolaris snv_134 (this is my case only).
>
> b) Create a directory where to put the untar'ed, unbzip2'ed binaries:
>
On 08/14/10 03:41 PM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
All source code will be available after binary update of Solaris 11 Express
have been released. Then Illumos will have a chance to catch up and
synchronize. As FreeBSD.
I would like it to be that way, but..
..they clearly indicate that code release
Stephan Ferraro wrote:
> What scp should do is to do a full md5sum of the files on each side:
> 1. One time calculating the md5sum before sending the file
>
Could you make .torrent file for first file , publish it in Bit Torrent
client and then start download into the Dir on target machine with
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Why do anyone need to use something closed and proprietary when there
>> is
>> open product available ?
>> (Opensolaris and distributions)
>>
> I don't know. Why does anyone pay for redhat? Why does anyone pay for
> windows? Why does anyone pay for MS Office, or
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Who needs Closed source Solaris, when you have OpenSolaris, and other
>> Opensolaris distributions, anyway?
>>
> I do. Why do you ask?
>
Why do anyone need to use something closed and proprietary when there is
open product available ?
(Opensolaris and distributi
Gary wrote:
> If one purchases a Solaris 10 DVD set from Oracle, they have a valid license.
> Does that permit one to download patches?
>
Who needs Closed source Solaris, when you have OpenSolaris, and other
Opensolaris distributions, anyway?
___
op
I use Transmission bit Torrent client on both OpenSolaris snv_131 and Linux box.
It works quite well. Besides GUI, it have ability of adding torrents from
remote, from CLI commands, too and Web interface also. Transmission can also
run as daemon as user process, etc.
--
This message posted from
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Nikola M wrote:
>
>
>> I don't think I see that you ever explained, what exactly you have
>> against using GPL.
>>
> The GPL is OK as long as it is not part of the core OS.
>
Why? I see at least one project that that thr
Andrew Greimann wrote:
> It would be impossible to take out core components, but I believe avoiding
> using the GPL can be helped. I'm aware a total 100% is
>
I don't think I see that you ever explained, what exactly you have
against using GPL.
___
Andrew Greimann wrote:
> say, to the GPL, how can the same be done to respin GNOME from the GPL? We're
> talking possibly recompiling and rebuilding GNOME into
>
Why would anyone want _not_ to use GPL??
It is in nature of free software to have a license that assures its
existence, not allowin
Chris Pickett wrote:
> Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?
>
http://www.genunix.org/ when available.
135 Not released yet.
As topic on #opensolaris is saying:
"134 IS NOT 2010.03! | 2010.03 will be released when it's ready. If you
rush it, you get what you deserve."
__
Hernan Saltiel wrote:
> Hi!
> As far as I'm concerned, if Oracle decides not to support OpenSolaris,
> or to use a Red Hat like policy having Solaris as the "commercialy
> supported" operating system, and OpenSolaris as the "developers" one,
> we will fall into something not as bad as mentioned in
29 matches
Mail list logo
