Hernan Saltiel wrote: > Hi! > As far as I'm concerned, if Oracle decides not to support OpenSolaris, > or to use a Red Hat like policy having Solaris as the "commercialy > supported" operating system, and OpenSolaris as the "developers" one, > we will fall into something not as bad as mentioned in several mailing > lists I'm reading. > What's the problem? We will have a "Stallman like" support schema, > where the customer will decide which support provider to contract, and > then evaluate which has more knowledge. > In the country I live, they are several GNU/Linux support providers, > and they work a lot. Normally, when I talk with IT managers of big > companies, and ask for the support provider, it's very often to > receive "XXXXX local provider" for answer. > Let's see this as a new opportunity to create, not to destroy. > Best regards, > > HeCSa. I think you are right and I very much like what you are saying.
It could mean both opportunity for further wide spreading of Opensolaris with wider support and offers of Opensolaris on local levels. Sounds like win/win situation for all to me, for both Oracle and users. After this, there is definitely more room for OpenSolaris growing. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
