Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-11-01 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 01 November 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > David Brownell pisze: > > With "this" being the warning about "-irmask 1" ... since > > you have that particular hardware, you can test to see if > > the config files even need to include those two optional > > parameters for those TAPs. > > I th

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-11-01 Thread Freddie Chopin
David Brownell pisze: With "this" being the warning about "-irmask 1" ... since you have that particular hardware, you can test to see if the config files even need to include those two optional parameters for those TAPs. I thought it was more complicated than "trial & error" <: If the results

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-31 Thread David Brownell
On Saturday 31 October 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > David Brownell pisze: > > Looks like you can fix this for the LPC2103 and STM32 > > chips... > > How? With "this" being the warning about "-irmask 1" ... since you have that particular hardware, you can test to see if the config files even need

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-31 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > 5. Some time ago there was some talk about adding the > libusb-win32/libftdi driver file with some info to the repository. What > about it? libusb-win32/libftdi use is still complicated (nothing > changed) and the forums are full of questions

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-31 Thread David Brownell
On Saturday 31 October 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > > But unless some other maintainer is happier with > > merging untested stuff, I'll ask you to trim > > this down to just the stuff you tested, plus > > LPC and CFI changes. > > Sorry, working with your newest idea - git - is way over my pati

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-31 Thread Freddie Chopin
David Brownell pisze: > Hmmm ... we're at RC0, which means I've now got my > "avoid merging patches" hat. Tested patches are by > and large OK when they fix bugs, and getting rid of > these warnings passes my "ok to merge" filter. > > And in this case think it's clear the other LPC > files have t

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-31 Thread Freddie Chopin
David Brownell pisze: > Looks like you can fix this for the LPC2103 and STM32 > chips... How? 4\/3!! ___ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-29 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > 1. When using lpc2103.cfg or stm32.cfg (probably many other target > scripts) when started OpenOCD warns: > >  > Warn : use 'lpc2103.cpu' as target identifier, not '0' > > which is because lines like: > >  > flash bank stm32x 0 0 0 0 0 > > wh

Re: [Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-29 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote: > 2. When using stm32.cfg OpenOCD says (beside the above): > >  > Warn : stm32.bs: nonstandard IR mask > > which is because of > >  > jtag newtap $_CHIPNAME bs  -irlen 5 -ircapture 0x1 -irmask 0x1 >  > -expected-id $_BSTAPID1 -expected-id $_BSTA

[Openocd-development] rc0 bugs in target scripts

2009-10-29 Thread Freddie Chopin
OpenOCD 0.3.0-rc0 compiled on mingw with ftd2xx.dll 1. When using lpc2103.cfg or stm32.cfg (probably many other target scripts) when started OpenOCD warns: > Warn : use 'lpc2103.cpu' as target identifier, not '0' which is because lines like: > flash bank stm32x 0 0 0 0 0 which should be > fl