On Sunday 29 November 2009, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Ok, here's an updated patch
Merged both. Don't you need to update setting the BYPASS instruction
though? 0x7f isn't an 11-bit constant. :)
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@li
Dne Ne 29. listopadu 2009 06:10:57 David Brownell napsal(a):
> On Saturday 28 November 2009, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > +static int xscale_version = XSCALE_IXP4XX_PXA2XX;
> > >
> > > Please put this in the instance-specific struct ... this approach
> > > obviously breaks on a board with both a PXA2
Dne Ne 29. listopadu 2009 06:10:57 David Brownell napsal(a):
> On Saturday 28 November 2009, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > +static int xscale_version = XSCALE_IXP4XX_PXA2XX;
> > >
> > > Please put this in the instance-specific struct ... this approach
> > > obviously breaks on a board with both a PXA2
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > +static int xscale_version = XSCALE_IXP4XX_PXA2XX;
> >
> > Please put this in the instance-specific struct ... this approach
> > obviously breaks on a board with both a PXA2xx and a PXA3xx.
>
> Have you ever seen such a mutant ? Come on ...
Dne Ne 29. listopadu 2009 05:21:20 David Brownell napsal(a):
> On Saturday 28 November 2009, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > @@ -70,6 +70,13 @@ static int xscale_set_watchpoint(struct target *,
> > struct watchpoint *); static int xscale_unset_breakpoint(struct target *,
> > struct breakpoint *); static int
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Marek Vasut wrote:
> @@ -70,6 +70,13 @@ static int xscale_set_watchpoint(struct target *, struct
> watchpoint *); static int xscale_unset_breakpoint(struct target *, struct
> breakpoint *); static int xscale_read_trace(struct target *);
>
> +/* This variable determine
Hi,
attached (because of a buggy mailer not inline) is a patch that adds basic
support for XScale/PXA3xx. Tested on PXA320 CPU.
Please consider applying. Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
From f4653c4af3c5fc093f9df69b7d0d16843c221d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marek Vasut
Date: Sun, 29 No
