Dne Ne 29. listopadu 2009 05:21:20 David Brownell napsal(a): > On Saturday 28 November 2009, Marek Vasut wrote: > > @@ -70,6 +70,13 @@ static int xscale_set_watchpoint(struct target *, > > struct watchpoint *); static int xscale_unset_breakpoint(struct target *, > > struct breakpoint *); static int xscale_read_trace(struct target *); > > > > +/* This variable determines which CPU we are connecting to. > > + * > > + * Possible values are: > > + * 0 - For PXA2xx and IXP4xx (default). > > + * 4 - For PXA3xx, which has JTAG Instructions shifted by four to > > left. + */ > > +static int xscale_version = XSCALE_IXP4XX_PXA2XX; > > Please put this in the instance-specific struct ... this approach > obviously breaks on a board with both a PXA2xx and a PXA3xx.
Have you ever seen such a mutant ? Come on ... btw. where should I look for that instance-specific struct ? > > > Other than that, it looks OK ... and I'll likely merge it after the > tree starts working well enough for me that I can re-test two other > XScale patches that are queued ahead of it. > > - Dave > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development