Wrong list.
Rick
On Dec 11, 2008, at 9:42 PM, shiyou yu wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to build the complete Openembedded development platform
along with the Angstrom Linux and the root filesystem for my Atmel
AT91SAM9263EK board on Ubuntu 8.04 using the instructions given in
linux4sam.
Hello all,
I am trying to build the complete Openembedded development platform along with
the Angstrom Linux and the root filesystem for my Atmel AT91SAM9263EK board
on Ubuntu 8.04 using the instructions given in linux4sam.org and Openembedde
website. But every time after giving the bitbake comma
rick> As my other patch shows, such a mechanism simplifies interacting
with a JTAG route controller, so the mechanism would already be in place.
duane> I missed that - where is this at?
rick> A different thread with subject "JTAG Events".
Thanks, looks good :-) Missed that in all the email that w
Rick> Any other opinions on this? Has BerliOS responded?
1) I do not believe berilos is going to change anything for this
project, or any project on its own. Why? Simple facts of $money$. For a
free system, we get free templates. Nothing more. Berlios points the
browsers at the top of the rep
On Dec 11, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Duane Ellis wrote:
rick> As my other patch shows, such a mechanism simplifies
interacting with a JTAG route controller, so the mechanism would
already be in place.
I missed that - where is this at?
A different thread with subject "JTAG Events".
duane> {tap
rick> As my other patch shows, such a mechanism simplifies interacting
with a JTAG route controller, so the mechanism would already be in place.
I missed that - where is this at?
duane> {taps as objects}
rick> [name space is the real issue]
Agreed.
As for the more general "taps - as objects"
Any other opinions on this? Has BerliOS responded?
Rick
On Dec 10, 2008, at 7:18 PM, Rick Altherr wrote:
On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Duane Ellis wrote:
rick> That is going to get confusing for new users.
No, it has not confused people in the past, and will not confuse
people in the fut
>
> Please ignore it!
>
> Find attached a patch to add axm0432 layout, this source code
> was developed by DSP team.
>
> Please let me know if it works to soundbite boards since it
> uses the same layout.
>
Thanks,
I will see what reply i get regarding the full source archive.
Purely intere
Does anyone know anything about Altera Nios and what it would
take to support it?
Do docs which are GPL friendly exist?
Any source code out there?
(I know the OpenOCD bits, but not Altera Nios).
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash p
On Dec 11, 2008, at 8:02 AM, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
Find attached a patch to add axm0432 layout, this source code was
developed by DSP team.
Please let me know if it works to soundbite boards since it uses the
same layout.
Cheers
Spen
Best Regards,
Alan
Committed.
--
Rick A
On Dec 11, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Duane Ellis wrote:
duane> ==
duane> Here is the *SIMPLE* thing that needs to happen.
duane> (1) There needs to be a new target event.
duane> This event should happen when all taps have
duane> been "re-id" aka: when the chain is valid
Hi Spencer,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Spencer Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, we can prove this source code to you.
s/prove/provide :-)
> Do you work for freescale?
>
Yes, just a newcomer ;-)
> They have also added a new target - target dsp56374
>
Hmm, I am not from DSP di
> Hi Spencer,
>
> This "soundbite" board uses same JTAG interface layout as
> Axiom AXM-0432, see:
>
> http://www.imxdev.org/wiki/index.php?title=IMX27_ADS_Board_Ins
> talling_OpenOCD_and_GDB
>
> Yes, we can prove this source code to you.
>
> Best Regards,
>
Do you work for freescale?
They
duane> ==
duane> Here is the *SIMPLE* thing that needs to happen.
duane> (1) There needs to be a new target event.
duane> This event should happen when all taps have
duane> been "re-id" aka: when the chain is validated.
rick> I don't think the target is the right
Rick Altherr wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Duane Ellis wrote:
>> I think the idea of supporting *MULTIPLE* "-expected-id" parameters
>> is a good thing.
>> (ie: an array of tap ids in the C code). It is a *SMALL* and
>> reasonable price to pay.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Patches
Hi Spencer,
This "soundbite" board uses same JTAG interface layout as Axiom AXM-0432, see:
http://www.imxdev.org/wiki/index.php?title=IMX27_ADS_Board_Installing_OpenOCD_and_GDB
Yes, we can prove this source code to you.
Best Regards,
Alan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Spencer Oliver <[EMAI
>trunk/
> openocd/
> zy1000/
>tags
> openocd/
> zy1000/
>branches/
> openocd/
> zy1000/
Again, OpenOCD is project, Zy100 is an other one and commercial.
Two projects with to repository.
- http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/openocd/
- http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/zy1000/
OpenOC
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Rick Altherr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect that there needs to be some work to handle SRST correctly. I
> believe we will need to store the initial state provided at tap creation so
> that it can be reset at SRST assert. Right now if you setup correct met
For a device with a JTAG route controller, enabling or disabling a tap
involves some set of operations to be done on the route controller
tap. Currently, jtag tapenable and jtag tapdisable only change
OpenOCD's internal state. The attached patch adds jtag tap event
hooks. Using the new '
19 matches
Mail list logo
