duane> ================================== duane> Here is the *SIMPLE* thing that needs to happen. duane> (1) There needs to be a new target event. duane> This event should happen when all taps have duane> been "re-id" aka: when the chain is validated.
rick> I don't think the target is the right place for this. It is the right place, this gives the *TARGET* something that the *TARGET* can do after the jtag tap chains have been validated. If they choose to do *NOTHING* so be it. If they do something - ie: Like make sure "TARGET.foo" is *REALLY* the chip you think it is... then even better. Adding *ANOTHER* *ADDITIONAL* mechanism - for *TAP* events - yes, that is possible. But - that gets messy. Please recall our earlier discussion about "taps as objects" we came to the conclusion that "taps as objects" was not a good idea,m the problem was namespace issues. ============== Rick> The id is tied to a tap which may or may not be a target. If we tie it to a target event, how would you do an id check for a PLD? Via the list of "-expected-id" patch that you just posted to the list. --Duane. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
