Any other opinions on this? Has BerliOS responded? Rick
On Dec 10, 2008, at 7:18 PM, Rick Altherr wrote:
On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Duane Ellis wrote:rick> That is going to get confusing for new users.No, it has not confused people in the past, and will not confuse people in the future.Adam Dunkels uses a vastly different configuration in Contiki - and that does not confuse people.And the guys @ ethernut do not use this technique - and people manage.Perhaps the entire "correct layout issue" is much ado about nothing? -Duane.The goal is to pick a layout that makes it clear where trunk, tags, and branches are for both openocd and zy1000. Simply having trunk, tags, branches at the top-level be openocd and zy1000 be at the top- level with a trunk, tags, branches underneath isn't clear. I personally don't like the:trunk/ openocd/ zy1000/ tags openocd/ zy1000/ branches/ openocd/ zy1000/ but it is at least clear. -- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."-- Unsigned _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
