he addresses I can provide the PI
> with and find the person that matches the voice / maybe even the
> picture. The PI then must document the outcome in a way that it can
> be used in court. I'm wanting to go the PI route because it will be
> the fastest way to possibly gather evidence
k of full-time staff.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
ctive_only=1&sort=Region&order=desc
…gets you exactly what you’re looking for.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
y of those rules need to be updated.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Jul 9, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Jul 09, 2014, at 16:03 , Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> it’s all automated with rulesets and a whole lot of exceptions (knowing that
>> AS 701, 702, 703 are the same organization, etc.).
>
> Is that a good idea?
>
&
eet), I and many other people would very much like
to know about it.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
ce: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
> Software Tool & Die| Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
Therein lies the fallacy of the “air-gap” … sometimes 3meters is not wide
enough.
/bill
whats not to love… its DKIM’d & everything
/bill
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet.
On 16July2014Wednesday, at 1:12, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> I love the From: field :-)
>
Also good for customer privacy. LE can still subpoena ISP logs, but e-commerce
sites can't track users quite as easily.
-Bill
On Aug 3, 2011, at 9:55, "William Allen Simpson"
wrote:
> On 8/3/11 4:13 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I agree that au
nti-DDoS features? I know there are scenarios it
> wouldn't begin to address, but are they worth spending time to fiddle with?
> Also, is anyone taking JFlow off of them? We're trying to figure out how
> much we could sample while doing about 900Mbps. I'm not sur
Friends of mine recently bought a large traditionally-designed house.
The former "servant's quarters" are now the server room.
t shut the hell up and/or let anyone else
talk.)
Would 10,000 other Internet engineers want to read this?
NO.
STOP.
-bill
ps. Those who chime in with a witty comment or yet another opinion just
when the thread seems to be slowing down are just as guilty as the ones
who keep it doing b
iated. We have a repository also which we can open up for new
code/patches etc, but it needs to also be given to the community.
As I have stated are working with Vyatta (and google, and others not
be mentioned), but more are always welcome.
We will be at Nanog in philly - come find me or one of my team members.
Thanks
Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> <http://www.arbornetworks.com/survey/ISR2011>
404
The page you requested cannot be found.
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1
important than how the packets get delivered.
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOnwB7AAoJEG+kcEsoi3+H4hEQAKecuMs/sXjXMqpuGaZ/I4+W
ZZze/q/pmQskfrJ8l2lWkiv+h0YUlcR9u
There are several models for where the MTA lives in an ISP environment
- MTA at customer, connects to destination via Port 25.
- MUA at customer, MTA at ISP, connects to destination via Port 25.
- MTA at customer, ISP transparently forces connection through ISP
MTA, then connects to destination via
service that has the responsibility not to let
spam escape, and your ISP has done its job of stopping point-source
pollution.
>Bill>I've got a strong preference for ISPs to run a
>Bill>Block-25-by-default/Enable-when-asked. [...]
> This is, of course, exactly why this blocking is do
124 or shorter (plus nibble-aligned or byte-aligned address
blocks make report generation less ugly.)
--
Thanks; Bill
Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still experimental so far.
And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it.
for the network
provider, 16 bits for subnet, 48 for MAC" that the earlier proposals
adapted from Netware IPX, but that would probably have gotten us in
trouble also.
I can't explain why EUI-64 picked its particular ugly way to convert
48-bit MACs to 64-bit, but I won't rant about tha
Another really useful skill is knowing what it looks like to be a
customer / end user of one of those networks. Sure, it's fun to crank
obscure BGP load-balancing techniques, but you also need to know where
the industry as a whole is going technically and business-wise. Tier
1s sell to Tier 2s, b
x27;m working.
>
> I could see how having a "home office" with a closed door could create
> this impression of "going to the office" and "coming home", but I don't
> find it either desirable nor (in Manhattan) practical.
>
> -Jan
>
--
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer
Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.
> >>
> >
> > As a Dr. Who fan -- DELETE, DELETE, DELETE...
> >
>
>
>
--
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer
Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.
that renumbering is important in the abstract, but is
> there
> really an overwhelming reason why renumbering the root servers is critical?
> Shouldn't
> they all be in PI space for starters?
Starters was a _long_ time ago, and the person who did it shouldn't be
disturbed.
-Bill
ad it for yourself.
-Bill
h 25 years.
Actually, I was just throwing some away yesterday, and it struck me how much
things _had_ changed.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps214/products_tech_note09186a00801f5d86.shtml
-Bill
t $11M/year from the ITU to Internet
governance organizations like the IETF.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:59 PM, wrote:
> its not that black/white. The ITU-R is actually -very- useful
I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say that, but we can't withdraw from it, which
is why it's called out as an exception in the petition.
-Bill
in S. Con. Res. 50 or H. Con. Res. 127. And if you
think that any of the Internet agrees with you, you should take a look at
Reddit sometime.
-Bill
are fighting for the Internet, and doing so
much more efficiently. This is as much about funding NANOG and the IETF as it
is about removing 7.7% of the ITU's budget. You really think the ITU can make
better use of that money than NANOG and the IETF?
-Bill
On Jan 13, 2013, at 7:54 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> Since it is possible to fund -by sector-, there is no good reason to tar the
> entire Union with the same brush.
Bill, please read the petition before attempting to comment on it.
Again, the petition specifically exclud
change-2-billion-users-and-its-done-on-a-handshake/
The ITU has $181M/year. It'll do just fine without our money. No sense in
throwing good money after bad.
-Bill
the registries and registrars
who use our DNS back-end have had both v6 and DNSSEC for a very long time, now.
-Bill
ave not been able to get in touch with anyone at yelp or
> retailmenot to isolate the problem.
For what it's worth, I've contacted Yelp about this issue a number of
times, and they're wholly uninterested in traffic from Linode. They're
also unwilling to discuss the issue with someone coming from Linode. So,
good luck on that front!
--
Bill Weiss
(possibly) interesting answers:
http://serverfault.com/questions/2382/server-room-survival-kit/ and
http://serverfault.com/questions/202680/what-tools-parts-accessories-do-you-keep-in-your-colo
--
Bill Weiss
There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum.
-- Arthur C. Clarke
ve with giving us space for use within their
regions, even in the cases when we had no business incorporated entity within
their region.
This experience is two or three years old, now, so interpretation and policy
changes may have had some effect since then.
-Bill
They do
it using anycast, which requires a certain amount of network build, or they do
it using source-address databases, which have a certain amount of ridiculous
FAIL. Are you actually asking why there's no way to do it perfectly at no cost?
-Bill
ks and a float. I don't see any mention of
welding equipment in the NYT or Guardian pieces, or in the Egyptian Navy's
statement or photos.
-Bill
On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> We need to find a clueful P.O.C at the Government of Canada NOC,
Introductions made off-list.
-Bill
27;re dimwits doesn't count.
Bill
RFC 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
>
--
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer
Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.
>>> to other places on the continent is another matter altogether.
There were INOC-DBA phones at several of the Antarctic stations, for quite a
few years. We could see connectivity to them go up and down as the satellites
rose above the horizon and set again.
your anycast
service would be wasteful.
Good luck!
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPWakoAAoJEG+kcEsoi3+HQp8P+gORNJ9KCQ4kd303Nuu5TSo2
yqxU7U14hRNRL
meserver is heavily loaded, and
adjust its BGP announcements accordingly?
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPWcigAAoJEG+kcEsoi3+HTy0QAJlt5Sy/uDKFL+JY8ebMR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 9, 2012, at 1:34 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> Re Bill,
>
> wo...@pch.net (Bill Woodcock) wrote:
>
>>> Well, let's say, using Quagga/BIRD might not really be best practice for
>>> everybody... (e.g., *we*
cTLDs in those two locations as well as Maputo,
Dar es Salaam, Johannesburg, and Nairobi.
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPW56jAAoJEG+kcEso
D 1,505
Nepal: USD 1,328
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPW6EsAAoJEG+kcEsoi3+HySgQAJ/td8kXhyxzMJ18J0Xrxpvj
36d6VJqfajgkeSJ9SFiWwam+Us7XBRnwKgz9ntX3wmavA0H4QTuWQyTl9T60Fac+
hvq
can find is using a tftp server but it's not working...
I'm using RANCID against a few 54xx PowerConnect switches, and it's
working well enough. I'm pretty sure my dlogin and drancid came from
http://web.rickyninja.net:81/rancid/drancid and
http://web.rickyninja.net:81/rancid/dlogin .
--
Bill Weiss
ons like : BW, Prices, contract or
> not, level of use, date of the contract S
>
> You have to give them information twice a year
For those anglophones following this from afar, Malcolm Hutty's excellent
submission is relevant to your interests:
https://publicaffairs.linx.net/news/wp
aucrats… Their reaction would be to fine you for not
submitting each letter in triplicate, and then charge you interest on the
fines. :-)
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQIc
un checks from a bunch of different places (40
servers, seemingly half in the US, right now). Pricing at the low scale
is $6/check/year, which is pretty compelling even against running some
VPSes if you aren't checking too many sites.
--
Bill Weiss
uld I be using 192.0.2.0/24 or 198.18.0.0/15 as
long as I'm careful not to leak them out to the real internet?)
- Is there any application that can actually set the RFC3514 Evil Bit?
--
Thanks; Bill
Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still expe
I see a few drops in ATLN
-b
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Scott Wolfe wrote:
> Anyone having BGP issues in and out of Level3 in the past 30 minutes?
>
> --ScottW
--
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer
Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.
Any recommendations of such?
-Bill
On May 19, 2012, at 9:20, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
> On 5/19/12 3:48 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>>> Was wondering if there's anyone from S
) and there is almost no "short/local route" effect.
Correct. That's why you need to use the same transit providers at each
location.
http://www.pch.net/resources/papers//dns-service-architecture/dns-service-architecture-v11.pdf
Slides 20-29.
-Bill
ths, you'll realize that the simple peering agreement is
the one that covers 99.5% of interconnections, and is well enough understood
that it need not be committed to paper. :-)
http://www.pch.net/resources/papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pdf
the
last few ISPs appear to have departed at the end of 2008, after about two years
of activity.
https://prefix.pch.net/applications/ixpdir/detail.php?exchange_point_id=350
If anyone has any better information, please let us know.
-Bill
signature.asc
De
etail.php?exchange_point_id=331
Last known was seven participants and 5Mbps of traffic, but they reorganized
their web site and no longer have members or traffic graph pages at the
previous locations. I'll have our research staff start digging into it.
-Bill
providing value to their
customers, not to each other.
In 0.27% of cases, the parties aren’t able to see their way to following best
practices, and some fraction of those are disputes between content and eyeball
networks of the sort that you’re describing.
tion norms, not of hugeness.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
We look forward to your participation in the next one! :-)
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
trapolate to a whole, or any other part, with some minor assurance of
reasonability.
If someone has an easier methodology to suggest, that still produces usable
results, I’m all ears.
> it isn't really germane to the conversation we're having.
I thought I’d made that point?
We maintain one in spreadsheet form ONLY FOR FIXED CONFIGURATION SWITCHES with
price, performance, and ports, which we're happy to share. I can provide it by
email or post it to our wiki, depending how many people want it.
-Bill
> On Aug 7, 2014, at 12:44,
any persistent policies that I remember offhand. The tide may turn, as it
were, if problems get sufficiently bad, at which point these sorts of policies
might receive sufficient support to be passed, and stick.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Sprint used to proxy aggregate… I remember 128.0.0.0/3
the real question, imho, is if folks are going to look into their crystal balls
and roadmap where the default offered is a /32 (either v4 or v6)
and plan accordingly, or just slap another bandaid on the oozing wound...
/bill
PO Box
so Internet in the US is safe…
/bill
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet.
On 31August2014Sunday, at 22:35, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Cause it's a long weekend, and why shouldn't it be whackier than normal.
>
> - Forwarded Message -
>> From: "PRIVACY Forum m
We got a resume once where the guy listed "2-day workshop on personal grooming,
Karachi, Pakistan" under his "education" section. I think that trumps the
Kentrox certification. :-)
-Bill
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 0:58, "William Herrin" wrot
: http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes.htm
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 16September2014Tuesday, at 18:15, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 9/16/2014 18:57, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>> What will happen to ".uk" if En
Slight differences depending on platform. For my 5S, the OTA patch is 1.1GB,
and the clean install is 2.05GB. Both compressed, of course.
-Bill
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 19:15, "Alexander Neilson"
> wrote:
>
> According to devices I have seen num
yes! by ALL means, hand out /48s. There is huge benefit to announcing all
that dark space, esp. when
virtually no one practices BCP-38, esp in IPv6 land.
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 8October2014Wednesday, at 18:31, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Give them
take your point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Northridge_earthquake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Baja_California_earthquake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_South_Napa_earthquake
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Nothing that I recall. Sean might know better.
-Bill
> On Oct 19, 2014, at 6:19, "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
>
> How widespread were the effects on backbone communication circuits from those
> quakes?
>
>> On October 18, 2014 3:22:
FNC “reserved” .gov and .mil for the US.
And Postel was right… there was/is near zero reason to technically
extend/expand the number of TLDs.
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 20October2014Monday, at 12:19, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> By the time of RFC1591, March 1
On Oct 21, 2014, at 6:09 AM, manning bill wrote:
> there was/is near zero reason to technically extend/expand the number of TLDs.
Equally, no reason not to.
> On 20October2014Monday, at 12:19, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>
>> By the time of RFC1591, March 1994, authored by J
ing more TLDs… They’ve already been created. It’s an argument against
doing so in an uncoordinated manner, which is the source of the breakage.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
I'd like to talk to someone with clue about open NTPd on a router of
yours. Normal support channels are totally failing me.
--
Bill Weiss
Bill Weiss(houdini+na...@clanspum.net)@Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:10:45PM -0500:
> I'd like to talk to someone with clue about open NTPd on a router of
> yours. Normal support channels are totally failing me.
I found someone via the list. Thank you to those who reached out!
--
Bill Weiss
RR
records into a signed in-addr didn’t, and they had an answer in the
affirmative, but I can’t remember the details now, because I was jet-lagged and
it was in the middle of a conversation about something else. Russ, Wes, anyone
else with an interest, could you explain that again?
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
The IRTF is looking for data…
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Arjuna Sathiaseelan
> Subject: Survey on Smart Data Pricing for Affordable Internet access
> Date: November 3, 2014 at 1:56:30 PST
> To: irtf-disc...@irtf
e commonly found in DNS DoS Amplification attacks.
>>
>> This *breaks the Internet*. Don't do it.
>
> +1
actually, if you think this will help you, by all means drop any DNS packets
which are gt. 512bytes, not UDP, and not IPv4.
/bill
Why use IPv4 for OOB? Seems a little late in the day for that.
-Bill
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 15:02, "Christopher Morrow"
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. wrote:
>> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offerin
atively.
Doing everything the cheapest possible way, regardless of the fragility or
complexity, is very short-sighted, and is unlikely to be an economy in the long
run.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
iding it,
All the specific legal feedback I’ve heard is that this is a liability
nightmare, and that everyone wants ARIN to take on all the liability, but
nobody wants to pay for it. Are you hearing something more useful than that?
-Bill
signature.asc
Descr
an zero) on how the market values RPKI. So, asking
how much more risk ARIN is willing to take on seems a little premature.
> The problem with free services is that often you get what you pay for when
> it comes to support, warranty, etc.
Yep.
-Bill
signa
to make it
functional, versus mitigating the risk when it’s not.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:21 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:17:34 -0800, Bill Woodcock said:
>> the RPKI costs are many orders of magnitude higher
>
> Orders of magnitude? Seriously? I can buy it costs 2x or 3x.
> But an additional 2 or 3
any point in its painful history.
Please focus on what we can do about it, rather than on the timeframe. John is
doing his job.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
rs of magnitude higher. The problem is the overhead cost of
trying to force a poorly-architected system into a semblance of
production-quality. If you want something that anyone can _actually rely
upon_, that's a precursor to doing the incremental transactions.
-Bill
If you're looking at scaling passed the mx104, I would consider the mx480
chassis. The price delta between the 240 vs. 480 bare chassis is negligible
and you'll get more slots to grow into. Especially, if you have a need to
do sampling or anything else that may require a service pic.
On Dec 5, 2014
ou believe that this doesn't answer your question, please quote the Equinix
language that you're looking at, so we can help you better.
-Bill
> On Dec 18, 2014, at 9:53, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
>
> So I just found out that the IX we're lookin
ve run afoul of
one of the rotten armpits of the shub-Internet.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
, it contains textually-represented
key-value pairs that are programmatically generated from an actual database,
and can thus be re-imported into another database. Depends what’s on the back
end.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
ve 24 or
fewer participants. And the failure rate of chassis-based switches is _way_
higher than that of stand-alone switches. So we never recommend that an IXP
buy a switch larger than necessary to accommodate 18 months
reasonably-projectable growth.
-Bill
max rating.
-Bill
> On Jan 28, 2015, at 18:40, Robert Drake wrote:
>
> For larger DC devices with ~50amps per side, does anyone have a software
> accessible way to turn off power?
>
> I've looked into PDU's but the ones I find have a max of 10amps.
>
Just because a cat has kittens in the oven, you don't call them biscuits. A
firewall can route, but it is not a router. Both have specialized tasks. You
can fix a car with a swiss army knife, but why would you want to?
--
Bill Thompson
bi...@mahagonny.com
On February 5, 2015 7:19:43 P
address. Or you could set up a Hurricane Electric
6in4 tunnel.
So, with ATT residential, I think you get 3 half assed choices, 6rd,
6in4 and 6to4 (if they support it).
Bill
I include a "no intellectual property ownership is transferred between the
Parties" clause in just about everything we do. Doesn't demand that any of the
questions you raise be answered, but shuts the door to problems pretty firmly.
-Bill
> On Feb
him directly.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> We’ve been focusing on completing our already-started transition from SER to
> BE6K on the back-end
Sorry, prototyping in BE6K, production will be BE7K.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Messa
and then there are the loons who will locally push /64 or longer, some of which
may leak.
even if things were sane & nothing longer than a /32 were to be in the table,
are we not looking at the functional
equivalent of v4 host routes?
/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.
Did you suddenly start getting "AOL will not accept delivery of this
message" bounce backs?
On Feb 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "John Zettlemoyer" wrote:
> Could someone from AOL who deals with the email systems please contact me
> off-list.
> Thank you.
>
> John Zettlemoyer
> WCiT LLC
> 856.310.1375 x221
>
201 - 300 of 587 matches
Mail list logo
