On Aug 10, 2014, at 1:28 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Paul S. wrote: >> It would appear you've done your part in trying to reach out (and >> subsequently failed), so the next step to go is dropping all traffic from it. >> >> Nothing wrong with trying to protect your own customer from people who >> cannot be bothered to do their own due diligence. > > It would be nice if allocations would be revoked due to invalid/fake contact > info.
That’s been debated many times, in most of the RIRs, and has not resulted in
any persistent policies that I remember offhand. The tide may turn, as it
were, if problems get sufficiently bad, at which point these sorts of policies
might receive sufficient support to be passed, and stick.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
