I'm probably way off here, but: Imagine an MX with a single RE, 1 MX-MPC2-3D-Q that can be populated with your choice of MICs in FPC-1 and 1 MIC-3D-4XGE-XFP in FPC-0. But, they run a little hot.
-b On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Brian Keefer <ch...@smtps.net> wrote: > On Aug 11, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Babak Pasdar wrote: > >> Hello NANOG Group, >> >> I am curious if anyone has any experiences positive or negative with Juniper >> MX-80s. Our recent experience with Juniper has not been great both in terms >> of new product offerings (SRX) and software bugs in the recent revs of Junos >> for the MX platform. I want to know if the MX-80 functions as advertised >> and in specific can properly handle two full IPv4 and IPv6 BGP feeds > > > I'm curious about these too. Specifically, does anyone have > experience/thoughts on the anti-DDoS features? I know there are scenarios it > wouldn't begin to address, but are they worth spending time to fiddle with? > Also, is anyone taking JFlow off of them? We're trying to figure out how > much we could sample while doing about 900Mbps. I'm not sure what our PPS > looks like off the top of my head. > > TIA. > > -- > chort > > > -- Bill Blackford Network Engineer Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....
